|
This is really making sense
I'm beginning to understand after this last election cycle how corrupt the DNC really is. Anything is fair game to get ahead...
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...mocrats-want-/ |
This is really making sense
On 1/25/18 1:18 AM, Tim wrote:
I'm beginning to understand after this last election cycle how corrupt the DNC really is. Anything is fair game to get ahead... https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...mocrats-want-/ No, you have no understanding. The entire GOP effort in this issue is aimed only at reducing the ranks of voters. There's no widespread voter fraud. |
This is really making sense
5:44 AMKeyser Soze On 1/25/18 1:18 AM, Tim wrote: I'm beginning to understand after this last election cycle how corrupt the DNC really is. Anything is fair game to get ahead... https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...mocrats-want-/ No, you have no understanding. The entire GOP effort in this issue is aimed only at reducing the ranks of voters. There's no widespread voter fraud. ..... Looks like the GOP Is trying to tighten voter security where Ellison gable or not, the DNC will grab anyone to pull the lever. |
This is really making sense
On 1/25/18 8:29 AM, Tim wrote:
5:44 AMKeyser Soze On 1/25/18 1:18 AM, Tim wrote: I'm beginning to understand after this last election cycle how corrupt the DNC really is. Anything is fair game to get ahead... https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...mocrats-want-/ No, you have no understanding. The entire GOP effort in this issue is aimed only at reducing the ranks of voters. There's no widespread voter fraud. .... Looks like the GOP Is trying to tighten voter security where Ellison gable or not, the DNC will grab anyone to pull the lever. I am sure it looks that way to you. Your political acumen ranks somewhat lower than my understanding of particle accelerators. |
This is really making sense
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 1/25/18 8:29 AM, Tim wrote: 5:44 AMKeyser Soze On 1/25/18 1:18 AM, Tim wrote: I'm beginning to understand after this last election cycle how corrupt the DNC really is. Anything is fair game to get ahead... https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...mocrats-want-/ No, you have no understanding. The entire GOP effort in this issue is aimed only at reducing the ranks of voters. There's no widespread voter fraud. .... Looks like the GOP Is trying to tighten voter security where Ellison gable or not, the DNC will grab anyone to pull the lever. I am sure it looks that way to you. Your political acumen ranks somewhat lower than my understanding of particle accelerators. Your handlers are treating you like a mushroom. They keep you in the dark and pile manure onto you. Your educators did everything but teach you to think. Did you sleep through the 60s? -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
This is really making sense
On 1/25/18 8:53 AM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 1/25/18 8:29 AM, Tim wrote: 5:44 AMKeyser Soze On 1/25/18 1:18 AM, Tim wrote: I'm beginning to understand after this last election cycle how corrupt the DNC really is. Anything is fair game to get ahead... https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...mocrats-want-/ No, you have no understanding. The entire GOP effort in this issue is aimed only at reducing the ranks of voters. There's no widespread voter fraud. .... Looks like the GOP Is trying to tighten voter security where Ellison gable or not, the DNC will grab anyone to pull the lever. I am sure it looks that way to you. Your political acumen ranks somewhat lower than my understanding of particle accelerators. Your handlers are treating you like a mushroom. They keep you in the dark and pile manure onto you. Your educators did everything but teach you to think. Did you sleep through the 60s? Actually, I was studying and learning in the 1960s, while you were asleep at your naveeee sinecure, preparing for your lifelong intellectual stupor. |
This is really making sense
7:39 AMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - I am sure it looks that way to you. Your political acumen ranks somewhat lower than my understanding of particle accelerators. .... That’s ok. It ranks high enough to know the DNC has little integrity and to me, at this venture that’s all that matters |
This is really making sense
On 1/25/18 9:08 AM, Tim wrote:
7:39 AMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - I am sure it looks that way to you. Your political acumen ranks somewhat lower than my understanding of particle accelerators. ... That’s ok. It ranks high enough to know the DNC has little integrity and to me, at this venture that’s all that matters The party in power, the GOP, has no integrity. That's less than little integrity. |
This is really making sense
On Thursday, January 25, 2018 at 8:39:32 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/25/18 8:29 AM, Tim wrote: 5:44 AMKeyser Soze On 1/25/18 1:18 AM, Tim wrote: I'm beginning to understand after this last election cycle how corrupt the DNC really is. Anything is fair game to get ahead... https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...mocrats-want-/ No, you have no understanding. The entire GOP effort in this issue is aimed only at reducing the ranks of voters. There's no widespread voter fraud. .... Looks like the GOP Is trying to tighten voter security where Ellison gable or not, the DNC will grab anyone to pull the lever. I am sure it looks that way to you. Your political acumen ranks somewhat lower than my understanding of particle accelerators. It looks that way to the college professor who conducted the study. "Republicans respond to even small reports of voter fraud, seeing them as a reason to back stricter voting access, according to the research by John V.. Kane, a professor at New York University, whose study was published in the latest Public Opinion Quarterly. Democrats, meanwhile, generally support voter-ID but their support is less firm. If told the GOP would suffer from stricter voter-ID laws, Democrats become more supportive, Mr. Kane found. “There’s different concerns in both camps. Republicans really do appear to be super-concerned about fraud and Democrats not so much. Democrats really appear to be concerned about the electoral implications, not so much fraud,” Mr. Kane told The Washington Times. “Voter ID is yesterday’s fight, and it’s a fight proponents won because it is supported overwhelmingly,” Mr. Adams said. “The bottom line is the vast majority of Americans support voter ID. That some academic study found that Democrats are less concerned about election crimes is hardly news.” |
This is really making sense
On 1/25/2018 8:08 AM, Tim wrote:
7:39 AMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - I am sure it looks that way to you. Your political acumen ranks somewhat lower than my understanding of particle accelerators. ... That’s ok. It ranks high enough to know the DNC has little integrity and to me, at this venture that’s all that matters I can't figure out why anyone would want someone that can't figure out how to get an ID should be able to vote. If you can't process the information required to get an ID, you can't process information for an inform opinion. Please don't tell me about the hardship poor people having getting an ID. It's bull****. Mikek |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com