This article can't be right.
 

Sex scandals are only for republicans, right Harry?

http://www.dailywire.com/news/23910/...ign=position1#

This article can't be right.
 

Tim Wrote in message:
Sex scandals are only for republicans, right Harry?

http://www.dailywire.com/news/23910/...ign=position1#


Harry doesn't talk about gender fluidity. What do you suppose he's
hiding?
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

This article can't be right.
 

Tim wrote:
Sex scandals are only for republicans, right Harry?

http://www.dailywire.com/news/23910/...ign=position1#

It must be right. Harry Krause didn't respond.

This article can't be right.
 

Alex
Tim wrote:
Sex scandals are only for republicans, right Harry?

http://www.dailywire.com/news/23910/...ign=position1#

It must be right. Harry Krause didn't respond.

....

That’s a good possibility

This article can't be right.
 

On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 20:11:14 -0500, Alex wrote:

Tim wrote:
Sex scandals are only for republicans, right Harry?

http://www.dailywire.com/news/23910/...ign=position1#

It must be right. Harry Krause didn't respond.

And *that* my friend is the correct conclusion! Both he and lil' donnie have the same MO. When the
questions get hard, just pretend not to see them. Or, complain that someone is 'ordering' an answer!

This article can't be right.
 

On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 19:25:29 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

Alex
Tim wrote:
Sex scandals are only for republicans, right Harry?

http://www.dailywire.com/news/23910/...ign=position1#

It must be right. Harry Krause didn't respond.

...

That’s a good possibility

So good it's a certainty!

This article can't be right.
 

John H wrote:
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 20:11:14 -0500, Alex wrote:

Tim wrote:
Sex scandals are only for republicans, right Harry?

http://www.dailywire.com/news/23910/...ign=position1#
It must be right. Harry Krause didn't respond.
And *that* my friend is the correct conclusion! Both he and lil' donnie have the same MO. When the
questions get hard, just pretend not to see them. Or, complain that someone is 'ordering' an answer!

Cut and run, eh?

This article can't be right.
 

On Tuesday, 28 November 2017 21:23:10 UTC-4, Alex wrote:
John H wrote:
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 20:11:14 -0500, Alex wrote:

Tim wrote:
Sex scandals are only for republicans, right Harry?

http://www.dailywire.com/news/23910/...ign=position1#
It must be right. Harry Krause didn't respond.
And *that* my friend is the correct conclusion! Both he and lil' donnie have the same MO. When the
questions get hard, just pretend not to see them. Or, complain that someone is 'ordering' an answer!

Cut and run, eh?

No Ditzy...we've never been or will be members of the US Army.

This article can't be right.
 

True North Wrote in message:
On Tuesday, 28 November 2017 21:23:10 UTC-4, Alex wrote:
John H wrote:
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 20:11:14 -0500, Alex wrote:

Tim wrote:
Sex scandals are only for republicans, right Harry?

http://www.dailywire.com/news/23910/...ign=position1#
It must be right. Harry Krause didn't respond.
And *that* my friend is the correct conclusion! Both he and lil' donnie have the same MO. When the
questions get hard, just pretend not to see them. Or, complain that someone is 'ordering' an answer!

Cut and run, eh?

No Ditzy...we've never been or will be members of the US Army.


Fer sure. The US Army wouldn't take drunken ex broom jockeys from
her majesty's crown corporation.


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

This article can't be right.
 

On 11/29/17 9:18 AM, justan wrote:
True North Wrote in message:
On Tuesday, 28 November 2017 21:23:10 UTC-4, Alex wrote:
John H wrote:
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 20:11:14 -0500, Alex wrote:

Tim wrote:
Sex scandals are only for republicans, right Harry?

http://www.dailywire.com/news/23910/...ign=position1#
It must be right. Harry Krause didn't respond.
And *that* my friend is the correct conclusion! Both he and lil' donnie have the same MO. When the
questions get hard, just pretend not to see them. Or, complain that someone is 'ordering' an answer!

Cut and run, eh?

No Ditzy...we've never been or will be members of the US Army.


Fer sure. The US Army wouldn't take drunken ex broom jockeys from
her majesty's crown corporation.


Dumb as you are, you probably were the perfect military recruitment
specimen. Oh, and just for you and your fellow right-wing stupidos, I
read on the average one out of five of your posts here (the original
post), fewer for Alex the Asshole, none of John Herring the Racist, and
fewer and fewer of Tim's. I do see the occasional post of you morons
when someone requotes your original post, but that doesn't happen much.