| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Take the idiot out~
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 15:52:47 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/24/17 2:32 PM, wrote: On 24 Nov 2017 18:05:13 GMT, Keyser Soze wrote: wrote: On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 11:56:06 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/24/17 11:12 AM, wrote: On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:32:20 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: I appreciate that guys like you appreciate ignorant, incompetent, racist, sexist, pedophiles for POTUS. I don't. We lived through Bill Clinton and the murdering, raping Kennedys. Neither Clinton nor Jack, Bobby, or Teddy Kennedy were ignorant, incompetent, racist, sexist pedophiles. Jack and Bobby were arrogant, incompetent war mongers who damned near caused WWIII over bull**** and Teddy murdered a girl, was implicated in a rape and lied about it. They also had a total disregard of the constitution with their various crusades. JFK should have been impeached and Bobby should have gone to jail, taking J.E. Hoover with him. Heheheheh. You are a trip. Again, what part is not true? For a myriad of reasons, I just don't buy into your view of the world, your right-wing politics, your uninformed opinions on psychology and sociology, et cetera. I'm not your mindless buddy, John Herring. Further, you sort of put the cover on that pot when you posited several times here that the black slaves would have been better off without being emancipated for a few more generations. Unlike you, I don't expect historical figures to be perfect in every way or to meet some set of standards that you find acceptable. Hell, man, you provide cover to Donald Trump, unquestionably the worst POTUS in the history of the nation, and we've had some serious losers. Again, what part is not true? |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Take the idiot out~
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 15:52:47 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 11/24/17 2:32 PM, wrote: On 24 Nov 2017 18:05:13 GMT, Keyser Soze wrote: wrote: On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 11:56:06 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/24/17 11:12 AM, wrote: On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:32:20 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: I appreciate that guys like you appreciate ignorant, incompetent, racist, sexist, pedophiles for POTUS. I don't. We lived through Bill Clinton and the murdering, raping Kennedys. Neither Clinton nor Jack, Bobby, or Teddy Kennedy were ignorant, incompetent, racist, sexist pedophiles. Jack and Bobby were arrogant, incompetent war mongers who damned near caused WWIII over bull**** and Teddy murdered a girl, was implicated in a rape and lied about it. They also had a total disregard of the constitution with their various crusades. JFK should have been impeached and Bobby should have gone to jail, taking J.E. Hoover with him. Heheheheh. You are a trip. Again, what part is not true? For a myriad of reasons, I just don't buy into your view of the world, your right-wing politics, your uninformed opinions on psychology and sociology, et cetera. So you can't debate my facts so you attack me. .. Further, you sort of put the cover on that pot when you posited several times here that the black slaves would have been better off without being emancipated for a few more generations. Unlike you, I don't expect historical figures to be perfect in every way or to meet some set of standards that you find acceptable. That is not what I said at all. I said economic sanctions may have been able to stop slavery without killing 3% of the population, destroying the economy and creating a social divide born of war that still exists today. Do you really think the life a black man in Mississippi improved all that much in "a few more generations"? Hell there are people who say it is still not all that great. It is hard to integrate when you are walking over a quarter of a million dead relatives of the people you want to accept you. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Take the idiot out~
On 11/25/17 12:54 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 15:52:47 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/24/17 2:32 PM, wrote: On 24 Nov 2017 18:05:13 GMT, Keyser Soze wrote: wrote: On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 11:56:06 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/24/17 11:12 AM, wrote: On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:32:20 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: I appreciate that guys like you appreciate ignorant, incompetent, racist, sexist, pedophiles for POTUS. I don't. We lived through Bill Clinton and the murdering, raping Kennedys. Neither Clinton nor Jack, Bobby, or Teddy Kennedy were ignorant, incompetent, racist, sexist pedophiles. Jack and Bobby were arrogant, incompetent war mongers who damned near caused WWIII over bull**** and Teddy murdered a girl, was implicated in a rape and lied about it. They also had a total disregard of the constitution with their various crusades. JFK should have been impeached and Bobby should have gone to jail, taking J.E. Hoover with him. Heheheheh. You are a trip. Again, what part is not true? For a myriad of reasons, I just don't buy into your view of the world, your right-wing politics, your uninformed opinions on psychology and sociology, et cetera. So you can't debate my facts so you attack me. . Further, you sort of put the cover on that pot when you posited several times here that the black slaves would have been better off without being emancipated for a few more generations. Unlike you, I don't expect historical figures to be perfect in every way or to meet some set of standards that you find acceptable. That is not what I said at all. I said economic sanctions may have been able to stop slavery without killing 3% of the population, destroying the economy and creating a social divide born of war that still exists today. Do you really think the life a black man in Mississippi improved all that much in "a few more generations"? Hell there are people who say it is still not all that great. It is hard to integrate when you are walking over a quarter of a million dead relatives of the people you want to accept you. I don't accept your rationalizations for the continuance of slavery. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Take the idiot out~
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 07:32:46 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 11/25/17 12:54 AM, wrote: Further, you sort of put the cover on that pot when you posited several times here that the black slaves would have been better off without being emancipated for a few more generations. Unlike you, I don't expect historical figures to be perfect in every way or to meet some set of standards that you find acceptable. That is not what I said at all. I said economic sanctions may have been able to stop slavery without killing 3% of the population, destroying the economy and creating a social divide born of war that still exists today. Do you really think the life a black man in Mississippi improved all that much in "a few more generations"? Hell there are people who say it is still not all that great. It is hard to integrate when you are walking over a quarter of a million dead relatives of the people you want to accept you. I don't accept your rationalizations for the continuance of slavery. No, you are a democrat, war is always the answer for you. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Take the idiot out~
On 11/25/17 10:52 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 07:32:46 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/25/17 12:54 AM, wrote: Further, you sort of put the cover on that pot when you posited several times here that the black slaves would have been better off without being emancipated for a few more generations. Unlike you, I don't expect historical figures to be perfect in every way or to meet some set of standards that you find acceptable. That is not what I said at all. I said economic sanctions may have been able to stop slavery without killing 3% of the population, destroying the economy and creating a social divide born of war that still exists today. Do you really think the life a black man in Mississippi improved all that much in "a few more generations"? Hell there are people who say it is still not all that great. It is hard to integrate when you are walking over a quarter of a million dead relatives of the people you want to accept you. I don't accept your rationalizations for the continuance of slavery. No, you are a democrat, war is always the answer for you. Oh, please. Every time you post on this subject, your posts get a little more bizarre. The cause of the Civil War was slavery and its possible expansion to the western territories, and preservation of the union. The southern slave states seceded after Lincoln, a Republican, was elected. Your southern slave-owning buddies fired the first shots. I don't know what the answer is for you libertarians, but as long as you keep nominating the sort of really strange candidates you do, you're not going to elect a POTUS. "What's an Aleppo, anyway?" |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Take the idiot out~
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 11:05:35 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 11/25/17 10:52 AM, wrote: On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 07:32:46 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/25/17 12:54 AM, wrote: Further, you sort of put the cover on that pot when you posited several times here that the black slaves would have been better off without being emancipated for a few more generations. Unlike you, I don't expect historical figures to be perfect in every way or to meet some set of standards that you find acceptable. That is not what I said at all. I said economic sanctions may have been able to stop slavery without killing 3% of the population, destroying the economy and creating a social divide born of war that still exists today. Do you really think the life a black man in Mississippi improved all that much in "a few more generations"? Hell there are people who say it is still not all that great. It is hard to integrate when you are walking over a quarter of a million dead relatives of the people you want to accept you. I don't accept your rationalizations for the continuance of slavery. No, you are a democrat, war is always the answer for you. Oh, please. Every time you post on this subject, your posts get a little more bizarre. The cause of the Civil War was slavery and its possible expansion to the western territories, and preservation of the union. The southern slave states seceded after Lincoln, a Republican, was elected. Your southern slave-owning buddies fired the first shots. The basis of slavery was based on an economic advantage and if the market had removed that economic advantage, slavery would have collapsed of it's own weight. The only question is whether your northern ancestors and european heroes would have actually boycotted slave produced cotton and other products. They were profiting from the slaves too. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| According to the idiot's... | General | |||
| idiot! | General | |||
| Oh my, I'm such an idiot! | ASA | |||
| Idiot #2 | ASA | |||
| Idiot #3 | ASA | |||
Hybrid Mode
