|
Back in the news ....
Ol' Hillary is back again, this time in an Australian interview claiming that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was a tool for the Russians and blames him for publishing hacked emails that hurt her presidential campaign. Assange (for what it's worth) has repeatedly denied that the Russians were the source of the leaked emails. Regardless of how they were hacked or who was responsible, Hillary just doesn't "get it" that it wasn't the fact that they were hacked that hurt her. It was the content contained in the emails that hurt her, along with her many lies about them. |
Back in the news ....
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:16:14 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
Ol' Hillary is back again, this time in an Australian interview claiming that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was a tool for the Russians and blames him for publishing hacked emails that hurt her presidential campaign. Assange (for what it's worth) has repeatedly denied that the Russians were the source of the leaked emails. Regardless of how they were hacked or who was responsible, Hillary just doesn't "get it" that it wasn't the fact that they were hacked that hurt her. It was the content contained in the emails that hurt her, along with her many lies about them. In today's news: "During her talk, she blamed her loss to Donald Trump on sexism and the “maddening” double standards women are held to in public life. “The only way we’ll get sexism out of politics is to get many more women into politics,” she said." I don't think I'd heard that one before. I suppose all the women who voted for Trump were sexist also, not to mention racist, etc. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...hour-interview |
Back in the news ....
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:54:11 -0400, John H
wrote: On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:16:14 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Ol' Hillary is back again, this time in an Australian interview claiming that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was a tool for the Russians and blames him for publishing hacked emails that hurt her presidential campaign. Assange (for what it's worth) has repeatedly denied that the Russians were the source of the leaked emails. Regardless of how they were hacked or who was responsible, Hillary just doesn't "get it" that it wasn't the fact that they were hacked that hurt her. It was the content contained in the emails that hurt her, along with her many lies about them. In today's news: "During her talk, she blamed her loss to Donald Trump on sexism and the “maddening” double standards women are held to in public life. “The only way we’ll get sexism out of politics is to get many more women into politics,” she said." I don't think I'd heard that one before. I suppose all the women who voted for Trump were sexist also, not to mention racist, etc. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...hour-interview The election of Trump probably did more to advance the fight against sexual abuse than anything else in history. Suddenly the left started thinking this was a bad thing after years of other democrats doing it with impunity from them. (Trump was even a democrat when most of these allegations came up), Now that we have decided pussy grabbing is a crime, they could not ignore Weinstein and Afflack transgressions. I suspect more will come up now that women feel comfortable coming forward. |
Back in the news ....
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 14:06:21 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 10/16/2017 12:35 PM, wrote: On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:54:11 -0400, John H wrote: On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:16:14 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Ol' Hillary is back again, this time in an Australian interview claiming that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was a tool for the Russians and blames him for publishing hacked emails that hurt her presidential campaign. Assange (for what it's worth) has repeatedly denied that the Russians were the source of the leaked emails. Regardless of how they were hacked or who was responsible, Hillary just doesn't "get it" that it wasn't the fact that they were hacked that hurt her. It was the content contained in the emails that hurt her, along with her many lies about them. In today's news: "During her talk, she blamed her loss to Donald Trump on sexism and the “maddening” double standards women are held to in public life. “The only way we’ll get sexism out of politics is to get many more women into politics,” she said." I don't think I'd heard that one before. I suppose all the women who voted for Trump were sexist also, not to mention racist, etc. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...hour-interview The election of Trump probably did more to advance the fight against sexual abuse than anything else in history. Suddenly the left started thinking this was a bad thing after years of other democrats doing it with impunity from them. (Trump was even a democrat when most of these allegations came up), Now that we have decided pussy grabbing is a crime, they could not ignore Weinstein and Afflack transgressions. I suspect more will come up now that women feel comfortable coming forward. Trump "talked" about it with a buddy on a bus thinking the conversation was private. He has never publicly admitted "doing it". The Weinstein guy has admitted his transgressions but wants sympathy and forgiveness because he's "sick". Hillary says she'll return some of his contributions in the form of her standard, 10 percent charitable contributions. So, that means she'll return 10 percent of what he donated to charity. How 'bout the other 90 percent and how about his contributions to the Clinton Foundation? Hasn't mentioned any of that. Despicable lawyer speak. Already spent. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...Weinstein.html |
Back in the news ....
On 10/16/17 2:06 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/16/2017 12:35 PM, wrote: On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:54:11 -0400, John H wrote: On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:16:14 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Ol' Hillary is back again, this time in an Australian interview claiming that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was a tool for the Russians and blames him for publishing hacked emails that hurt her presidential campaign. Assange (for what it's worth) has repeatedly denied that the Russians were the source of the leaked emails. Regardless of how they were hacked or who was responsible, Hillary just doesn't "get it" that it wasn't the fact that they were hacked that hurt her.Â* It was the content contained in the emails that hurt her, along with her many lies about them. In today's news: "During her talk, she blamed her loss to Donald Trump on sexism and the “maddening” double standards women are held to in public life. “The only way we’ll get sexism out of politics is to get many more women into politics,” she said." I don't think I'd heard that one before. I suppose all the women who voted for Trump were sexist also, not to mention racist, etc. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...hour-interview The election of Trump probably did more to advance the fight against sexual abuse than anything else in history. Suddenly the left started thinking this was a bad thing after years of other democrats doing it with impunity from them. (Trump was even a democrat when most of these allegations came up), Now that we have decided pussy grabbing is a crime, they could not ignore Weinstein and Afflack transgressions. I suspect more will come up now that women feel comfortable coming forward. Trump "talked" about it with a buddy on a bus thinking the conversation was private.Â* He has never publicly admitted "doing it". The Weinstein guy has admitted his transgressions but wants sympathy and forgiveness because he's "sick". Hillary says she'll return some of his contributions in the form of her standard, 10 percent charitable contributions.Â* So, that means she'll return 10 percent of what he donated to charity.Â* How 'bout the other 90 percent and how about his contributions to the Clinton Foundation? Hasn't mentioned any of that.Â* Despicable lawyer speak. I find it hilarious that you mook who directly or indirectly support Trump, who will go down as the worst president in U.S. history and the worst human being, too, are still trying to put salt on Hillary Clinton's tail. The worst of all the supporters here, sadly, is Richard the Luddite, who, despite his denials of being a Trump supporter, is almost always the first in line to rationalize or justify Trump's behavior. That sort of behavior from JustAnAsshole, Herring, Bilious, et cetera, would be understandable because they're just mindless right-wingers, but I always thought Richard was above that sort of lemming-like behavior. |
Back in the news ....
On 10/16/2017 4:14 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/16/17 2:06 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/16/2017 12:35 PM, wrote: On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:54:11 -0400, John H wrote: On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:16:14 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Ol' Hillary is back again, this time in an Australian interview claiming that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was a tool for the Russians and blames him for publishing hacked emails that hurt her presidential campaign. Assange (for what it's worth) has repeatedly denied that the Russians were the source of the leaked emails. Regardless of how they were hacked or who was responsible, Hillary just doesn't "get it" that it wasn't the fact that they were hacked that hurt her.Â* It was the content contained in the emails that hurt her, along with her many lies about them. In today's news: "During her talk, she blamed her loss to Donald Trump on sexism and the “maddening” double standards women are held to in public life. “The only way we’ll get sexism out of politics is to get many more women into politics,” she said." I don't think I'd heard that one before. I suppose all the women who voted for Trump were sexist also, not to mention racist, etc. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...hour-interview The election of Trump probably did more to advance the fight against sexual abuse than anything else in history. Suddenly the left started thinking this was a bad thing after years of other democrats doing it with impunity from them. (Trump was even a democrat when most of these allegations came up), Now that we have decided pussy grabbing is a crime, they could not ignore Weinstein and Afflack transgressions. I suspect more will come up now that women feel comfortable coming forward. Trump "talked" about it with a buddy on a bus thinking the conversation was private.Â* He has never publicly admitted "doing it". The Weinstein guy has admitted his transgressions but wants sympathy and forgiveness because he's "sick". Hillary says she'll return some of his contributions in the form of her standard, 10 percent charitable contributions.Â* So, that means she'll return 10 percent of what he donated to charity.Â* How 'bout the other 90 percent and how about his contributions to the Clinton Foundation? Hasn't mentioned any of that.Â* Despicable lawyer speak. I find it hilarious that you mook who directly or indirectly support Trump, who will go down as the worst president in U.S. history and the worst human being, too, are still trying to put salt on Hillary Clinton's tail. The worst of all the supporters here, sadly, is Richard the Luddite, who, despite his denials of being a Trump supporter, is almost always the first in line to rationalize or justify Trump's behavior. That sort of behavior from JustAnAsshole, Herring, Bilious, et cetera, would be understandable because they're just mindless right-wingers, but I always thought Richard was above that sort of lemming-like behavior. That's rich. You are calling *me* a lemming? BTW ... the reason I keep pouring salt on Hillary's wounds is because she keeps popping up with blame claims. If she just STFU and went away I wouldn't have any interest in her. She sorta reminds me of that "Wack-A-Mole" arcade game where the moles keep popping up out of their holes and the player is supposed to wack them back down. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7nPhk-fYFg |
Back in the news ....
Keyser Soze
- show quoted text - I find it hilarious that you mook(s) who directly or indirectly support Trump, who will go down as the worst president in U.S. history and the worst human being, too, are still trying to put salt on Hillary Clinton's tail. .... I you say he's the worst human being. You say he's the worst president ever. You said Hillary was a shoe in. You Said Donald was electable. Your a real "jimmy the Greek" Harry. Remember? "Go, DONALD GO!" |
Back in the news ....
On 10/16/17 4:30 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/16/2017 4:14 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/16/17 2:06 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/16/2017 12:35 PM, wrote: On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:54:11 -0400, John H wrote: On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:16:14 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Ol' Hillary is back again, this time in an Australian interview claiming that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was a tool for the Russians and blames him for publishing hacked emails that hurt her presidential campaign. Assange (for what it's worth) has repeatedly denied that the Russians were the source of the leaked emails. Regardless of how they were hacked or who was responsible, Hillary just doesn't "get it" that it wasn't the fact that they were hacked that hurt her.Â* It was the content contained in the emails that hurt her, along with her many lies about them. In today's news: "During her talk, she blamed her loss to Donald Trump on sexism and the “maddening” double standards women are held to in public life. “The only way we’ll get sexism out of politics is to get many more women into politics,” she said." I don't think I'd heard that one before. I suppose all the women who voted for Trump were sexist also, not to mention racist, etc. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...hour-interview The election of Trump probably did more to advance the fight against sexual abuse than anything else in history. Suddenly the left started thinking this was a bad thing after years of other democrats doing it with impunity from them. (Trump was even a democrat when most of these allegations came up), Now that we have decided pussy grabbing is a crime, they could not ignore Weinstein and Afflack transgressions. I suspect more will come up now that women feel comfortable coming forward. Trump "talked" about it with a buddy on a bus thinking the conversation was private.Â* He has never publicly admitted "doing it". The Weinstein guy has admitted his transgressions but wants sympathy and forgiveness because he's "sick". Hillary says she'll return some of his contributions in the form of her standard, 10 percent charitable contributions.Â* So, that means she'll return 10 percent of what he donated to charity.Â* How 'bout the other 90 percent and how about his contributions to the Clinton Foundation? Hasn't mentioned any of that.Â* Despicable lawyer speak. I find it hilarious that you mook who directly or indirectly support Trump, who will go down as the worst president in U.S. history and the worst human being, too, are still trying to put salt on Hillary Clinton's tail. The worst of all the supporters here, sadly, is Richard the Luddite, who, despite his denials of being a Trump supporter, is almost always the first in line to rationalize or justify Trump's behavior. That sort of behavior from JustAnAsshole, Herring, Bilious, et cetera, would be understandable because they're just mindless right-wingers, but I always thought Richard was above that sort of lemming-like behavior. That's rich.Â* You are calling *me* a lemming? BTW ... the reason I keep pouring salt on Hillary's wounds is because she keeps popping up with blame claims.Â* If she just STFU and went away I wouldn't have any interest in her.Â* She sorta reminds me of that "Wack-A-Mole" arcade game where the moles keep popping up out of their holes and the player is supposed to wack them back down. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7nPhk-fYFg You seem a hell of a lot more interested in Hillary than I am, Mr. Luddite-Lemming. |
Back in the news ....
On Monday, October 16, 2017 at 4:04:15 PM UTC-5, Tim wrote:
Keyser Soze - show quoted text - I find it hilarious that you mook(s) who directly or indirectly support Trump, who will go down as the worst president in U.S. history and the worst human being, too, are still trying to put salt on Hillary Clinton's tail. ... I you say he's the worst human being. You say he's the worst president ever. You said Hillary was a shoe-in. You Said Donald wasn't electable. Your a real "Jimmy the Greek," Harry. Remember? "Go, DONALD GO!" BTW she salted herself a plenty. |
Back in the news ....
On 10/16/17 6:09 PM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, October 16, 2017 at 4:04:15 PM UTC-5, Tim wrote: Keyser Soze - show quoted text - I find it hilarious that you mook(s) who directly or indirectly support Trump, who will go down as the worst president in U.S. history and the worst human being, too, are still trying to put salt on Hillary Clinton's tail. ... I you say he's the worst human being. You say he's the worst president ever. You said Hillary was a shoe-in. You Said Donald wasn't electable. Your a real "Jimmy the Greek," Harry. Remember? "Go, DONALD GO!" BTW she salted herself a plenty. These political posts of yours, Tim, are too stupid for a comment. Have a nice day. |
Back in the news ....
John H wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 14:06:21 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 10/16/2017 12:35 PM, wrote: On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:54:11 -0400, John H wrote: On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:16:14 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Ol' Hillary is back again, this time in an Australian interview claiming that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was a tool for the Russians and blames him for publishing hacked emails that hurt her presidential campaign. Assange (for what it's worth) has repeatedly denied that the Russians were the source of the leaked emails. Regardless of how they were hacked or who was responsible, Hillary just doesn't "get it" that it wasn't the fact that they were hacked that hurt her. It was the content contained in the emails that hurt her, along with her many lies about them. In today's news: "During her talk, she blamed her loss to Donald Trump on sexism and the “maddening” double standards women are held to in public life. “The only way we’ll get sexism out of politics is to get many more women into politics,” she said." I don't think I'd heard that one before. I suppose all the women who voted for Trump were sexist also, not to mention racist, etc. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...hour-interview The election of Trump probably did more to advance the fight against sexual abuse than anything else in history. Suddenly the left started thinking this was a bad thing after years of other democrats doing it with impunity from them. (Trump was even a democrat when most of these allegations came up), Now that we have decided pussy grabbing is a crime, they could not ignore Weinstein and Afflack transgressions. I suspect more will come up now that women feel comfortable coming forward. Trump "talked" about it with a buddy on a bus thinking the conversation was private. He has never publicly admitted "doing it". The Weinstein guy has admitted his transgressions but wants sympathy and forgiveness because he's "sick". Hillary says she'll return some of his contributions in the form of her standard, 10 percent charitable contributions. So, that means she'll return 10 percent of what he donated to charity. How 'bout the other 90 percent and how about his contributions to the Clinton Foundation? Hasn't mentioned any of that. Despicable lawyer speak. Already spent. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...Weinstein.html Why give the scum bag back anything? The university gave back $5 million. Would be better helping students than going in the rapists legal fund. |
Back in the news ....
On Monday, October 16, 2017 at 5:15:00 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/16/17 6:09 PM, Tim wrote: On Monday, October 16, 2017 at 4:04:15 PM UTC-5, Tim wrote: Keyser Soze - show quoted text - I find it hilarious that you mook(s) who directly or indirectly support Trump, who will go down as the worst president in U.S. history and the worst human being, too, are still trying to put salt on Hillary Clinton's tail. ... I you say he's the worst human being. You say he's the worst president ever. You said Hillary was a shoe-in. You Said Donald wasn't electable. Your a real "Jimmy the Greek," Harry. Remember? "Go, DONALD GO!" BTW she salted herself a plenty. These political posts of yours, Tim, are too stupid for a comment. Have a nice day. But you just did. Have a great evening... |
Back in the news ....
On 10/16/2017 6:14 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/16/17 6:09 PM, Tim wrote: On Monday, October 16, 2017 at 4:04:15 PM UTC-5, Tim wrote: Keyser Soze - show quoted text - I find it hilarious that you mook(s) who directly or indirectly support Trump, who will go down as the worst president in U.S. history and the worst human being, too, are still trying to put salt on Hillary Clinton's tail. ... I you say he's the worst human being. You say he's the worst president ever. You said Hillary was a shoe-in. You Said Donald wasn't electable. Your a real "Jimmy the Greek," Harry. Remember? "Go, DONALD GO!" BTW she salted herself a plenty. These political posts of yours, Tim, are too stupid for a comment. Have a nice day. You are too funny. You post daily cut and pastes of the latest progressive liberal bull****, most of it turning out to be fake news, and you think Tim's contributions are "stupid"? |
Back in the news ....
On 10/16/17 7:46 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/16/2017 6:14 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/16/17 6:09 PM, Tim wrote: On Monday, October 16, 2017 at 4:04:15 PM UTC-5, Tim wrote: Keyser Soze - show quoted text - I find it hilarious that you mook(s) who directly or indirectly support Trump, who will go down as the worst president in U.S. history and the worst human being, too, are still trying to put salt on Hillary Clinton's tail. ... I you say he's the worst human being. You say he's the worst president ever. You said Hillary was a shoe-in. You Said Donald wasn't electable. Your a real "Jimmy the Greek," Harry. Remember? "Go, DONALD GO!" BTW she salted herself a plenty. These political posts of yours, Tim, are too stupid for a comment. Have a nice day. You are too funny.Â* You post daily cut and pastes of the latest progressive liberal bull****, most of it turning out to be fake news, and you think Tim's contributions are "stupid"? I do and they are. If it isn't satire, then the political stuff I post is not fake news, except of course to Trumpsters. |
Back in the news ....
On 10/16/2017 7:49 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/16/17 7:46 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/16/2017 6:14 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/16/17 6:09 PM, Tim wrote: On Monday, October 16, 2017 at 4:04:15 PM UTC-5, Tim wrote: Keyser Soze - show quoted text - I find it hilarious that you mook(s) who directly or indirectly support Trump, who will go down as the worst president in U.S. history and the worst human being, too, are still trying to put salt on Hillary Clinton's tail. ... I you say he's the worst human being. You say he's the worst president ever. You said Hillary was a shoe-in. You Said Donald wasn't electable. Your a real "Jimmy the Greek," Harry. Remember? "Go, DONALD GO!" BTW she salted herself a plenty. These political posts of yours, Tim, are too stupid for a comment. Have a nice day. You are too funny.Â* You post daily cut and pastes of the latest progressive liberal bull****, most of it turning out to be fake news, and you think Tim's contributions are "stupid"? I do and they are. If it isn't satire, then the political stuff I post is not fake news, except of course to Trumpsters. I'll repeat. *Most* of the bull**** circulated by progressive liberals turns out to be fake news. You, being the progressive liberal lemming that you are simply repeats it here in your daily cut and pastes. |
Back in the news ....
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 14:06:21 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: Hillary says she'll return some of his contributions in the form of her standard, 10 percent charitable contributions. So, that means she'll return 10 percent of what he donated to charity. How 'bout the other 90 percent and how about his contributions to the Clinton Foundation? Hasn't mentioned any of that. Despicable lawyer speak. She is basically saying that she will still only be giving away the same amount of money that her accountant says is best for her and she will say that is the Weinstein money. In other words she is not doing squat. |
Back in the news ....
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:14:43 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote: I find it hilarious that you mook who directly or indirectly support Trump, who will go down as the worst president in U.S. history and the worst human being, too, are still trying to put salt on Hillary Clinton's tail. The worst of all the supporters here, sadly, is Richard the Luddite, who, despite his denials of being a Trump supporter, is almost always the first in line to rationalize or justify Trump's behavior. That sort of behavior from JustAnAsshole, Herring, Bilious, et cetera, would be understandable because they're just mindless right-wingers, but I always thought Richard was above that sort of lemming-like behavior. I think we are just wondering where the outrage is from this so called feminist. I can understand her going after Trump during the campaign, even if she was oblivious when they were pals 10 years ago, at the time all of the alleged incidents were happening. The real question is why is she so passive now. Is it just the Harvey money she is enamored with or does she really believe "boys will be boys" no matter how egregious the behavior is. She certainly gave her woman abusing husband a pass. She didn't want to derail that gravy train either, I suppose. They do have a name for a woman who trades morals for money, a whore. |
Back in the news ....
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 18:05:33 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/16/17 4:30 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/16/2017 4:14 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/16/17 2:06 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/16/2017 12:35 PM, wrote: On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:54:11 -0400, John H wrote: On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:16:14 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Ol' Hillary is back again, this time in an Australian interview claiming that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was a tool for the Russians and blames him for publishing hacked emails that hurt her presidential campaign. Assange (for what it's worth) has repeatedly denied that the Russians were the source of the leaked emails. Regardless of how they were hacked or who was responsible, Hillary just doesn't "get it" that it wasn't the fact that they were hacked that hurt her.* It was the content contained in the emails that hurt her, along with her many lies about them. In today's news: "During her talk, she blamed her loss to Donald Trump on sexism and the “maddening” double standards women are held to in public life. “The only way we’ll get sexism out of politics is to get many more women into politics,” she said." I don't think I'd heard that one before. I suppose all the women who voted for Trump were sexist also, not to mention racist, etc. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...hour-interview The election of Trump probably did more to advance the fight against sexual abuse than anything else in history. Suddenly the left started thinking this was a bad thing after years of other democrats doing it with impunity from them. (Trump was even a democrat when most of these allegations came up), Now that we have decided pussy grabbing is a crime, they could not ignore Weinstein and Afflack transgressions. I suspect more will come up now that women feel comfortable coming forward. Trump "talked" about it with a buddy on a bus thinking the conversation was private.* He has never publicly admitted "doing it". The Weinstein guy has admitted his transgressions but wants sympathy and forgiveness because he's "sick". Hillary says she'll return some of his contributions in the form of her standard, 10 percent charitable contributions.* So, that means she'll return 10 percent of what he donated to charity.* How 'bout the other 90 percent and how about his contributions to the Clinton Foundation? Hasn't mentioned any of that.* Despicable lawyer speak. I find it hilarious that you mook who directly or indirectly support Trump, who will go down as the worst president in U.S. history and the worst human being, too, are still trying to put salt on Hillary Clinton's tail. The worst of all the supporters here, sadly, is Richard the Luddite, who, despite his denials of being a Trump supporter, is almost always the first in line to rationalize or justify Trump's behavior. That sort of behavior from JustAnAsshole, Herring, Bilious, et cetera, would be understandable because they're just mindless right-wingers, but I always thought Richard was above that sort of lemming-like behavior. That's rich.* You are calling *me* a lemming? BTW ... the reason I keep pouring salt on Hillary's wounds is because she keeps popping up with blame claims.* If she just STFU and went away I wouldn't have any interest in her.* She sorta reminds me of that "Wack-A-Mole" arcade game where the moles keep popping up out of their holes and the player is supposed to wack them back down. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7nPhk-fYFg You seem a hell of a lot more interested in Hillary than I am, Mr. Luddite-Lemming. Showing that ol' maturity level again, eh Krause? I'm sure your buddy Don White approves and applauds. You, of all the folks here, have no business calling anyone but Don White a lemming. Good gracious, go read some of your posts! It's like you tape MSNBC just to regurgitate the tripe here. You and Hillary...both in pathological denial. Cry a river, build a bridge, and get over it. |
Back in the news ....
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 23:27:34 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote:
John H wrote: On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 14:06:21 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 10/16/2017 12:35 PM, wrote: On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:54:11 -0400, John H wrote: On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:16:14 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Ol' Hillary is back again, this time in an Australian interview claiming that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was a tool for the Russians and blames him for publishing hacked emails that hurt her presidential campaign. Assange (for what it's worth) has repeatedly denied that the Russians were the source of the leaked emails. Regardless of how they were hacked or who was responsible, Hillary just doesn't "get it" that it wasn't the fact that they were hacked that hurt her. It was the content contained in the emails that hurt her, along with her many lies about them. In today's news: "During her talk, she blamed her loss to Donald Trump on sexism and the ?maddening? double standards women are held to in public life. ?The only way we?ll get sexism out of politics is to get many more women into politics,? she said." I don't think I'd heard that one before. I suppose all the women who voted for Trump were sexist also, not to mention racist, etc. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...hour-interview The election of Trump probably did more to advance the fight against sexual abuse than anything else in history. Suddenly the left started thinking this was a bad thing after years of other democrats doing it with impunity from them. (Trump was even a democrat when most of these allegations came up), Now that we have decided pussy grabbing is a crime, they could not ignore Weinstein and Afflack transgressions. I suspect more will come up now that women feel comfortable coming forward. Trump "talked" about it with a buddy on a bus thinking the conversation was private. He has never publicly admitted "doing it". The Weinstein guy has admitted his transgressions but wants sympathy and forgiveness because he's "sick". Hillary says she'll return some of his contributions in the form of her standard, 10 percent charitable contributions. So, that means she'll return 10 percent of what he donated to charity. How 'bout the other 90 percent and how about his contributions to the Clinton Foundation? Hasn't mentioned any of that. Despicable lawyer speak. Already spent. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...Weinstein.html Why give the scum bag back anything? The university gave back $5 million. Would be better helping students than going in the rapists legal fund. Good point. There are much better things to do with the money than give it back. Toys for Tots could use it. Which reminds me, if anyone has a couple extra bucks lying around, Toys for Tots is a pretty good charity, especially as we approach Christmas. https://www.charitynavigator.org/ind...ary&orgid=4047 |
Back in the news ....
|
Back in the news ....
|
Back in the news ....
Hillary Clinton is one of those classic don't do as I do, do as I say persons.
|
Back in the news ....
On 10/17/17 4:39 PM, RGrew176 wrote:
Hillary Clinton is one of those classic don't do as I do, do as I say persons. If that were the case, she'd be very popular in .wrecked.bloats, because this joint is filled with conservatrash who want posters to behave as they say, but not as they do. |
Back in the news ....
On 10/17/2017 4:49 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/17/17 4:39 PM, RGrew176 wrote: Hillary Clinton is one of those classic don't do as I do, do as I say persons. If that were the case, she'd be very popular in .wrecked.bloats, because this joint is filled with conservatrash who want posters to behave as they say, but not as they do. Really? Perhaps you could provide an example or two? |
Back in the news ....
On 10/17/17 6:06 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/17/2017 4:49 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/17/17 4:39 PM, RGrew176 wrote: Hillary Clinton is one of those classic don't do as I do, do as I say persons. If that were the case, she'd be very popular in .wrecked.bloats, because this joint is filled with conservatrash who want posters to behave as they say, but not as they do. Really?Â* Perhaps you could provide an example or two? Sure. Your buddies Herring, W'hine, and a couple of others constantly castigate and insult other posters here, and also call them out for not behaving in a gentlemanly fashion. If you haven't noticed, you have your Trump Blinders on. As for me, I don't really give a **** how the conservatrash here behaves...I just find it a giggle when they call out others for behaving as they do. |
Back in the news ....
O0/17/2017 6:42 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/17/17 6:06 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/17/2017 4:49 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/17/17 4:39 PM, RGrew176 wrote: Hillary Clinton is one of those classic don't do as I do, do as I say persons. If that were the case, she'd be very popular in .wrecked.bloats, because this joint is filled with conservatrash who want posters to behave as they say, but not as they do. Really?Â* Perhaps you could provide an example or two? Sure. Your buddies Herring, W'hine, and a couple of others constantly castigate and insult other posters here, and also call them out for not behaving in a gentlemanly fashion. If you haven't noticed, you have your Trump Blinders on. As for me, I don't really give a **** how the conservatrash here behaves...I just find it a giggle when they call out others for behaving as they do. There are only two people in this newsgroup who receive insults from the people you named. You are one of them and the insults are richly deserved in response to your never ending litany of insults, insinuations, fake news and more that you cast upon them, me and others. The other person is obviously Don. Personally, I have no beef with him and neither of us have ever directed "insults" at each other. Other people's mileage may vary. |
Back in the news ....
Mr. Luddite wrote:
O0/17/2017 6:42 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/17/17 6:06 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/17/2017 4:49 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/17/17 4:39 PM, RGrew176 wrote: Hillary Clinton is one of those classic don't do as I do, do as I say persons. If that were the case, she'd be very popular in .wrecked.bloats, because this joint is filled with conservatrash who want posters to behave as they say, but not as they do. Really?Â* Perhaps you could provide an example or two? Sure. Your buddies Herring, W'hine, and a couple of others constantly castigate and insult other posters here, and also call them out for not behaving in a gentlemanly fashion. If you haven't noticed, you have your Trump Blinders on. As for me, I don't really give a **** how the conservatrash here behaves...I just find it a giggle when they call out others for behaving as they do. There are only two people in this newsgroup who receive insults from the people you named. You are one of them and the insults are richly deserved in response to your never ending litany of insults, insinuations, fake news and more that you cast upon them, me and others. The other person is obviously Don. Personally, I have no beef with him and neither of us have ever directed "insults" at each other. Other people's mileage may vary. Just as I stated. Oh and Don and I are the only two non conservatives who bother with this dung heap. No coincidence. -- Posted with my iPhone 8+. |
Back in the news ....
On 10/17/2017 7:22 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
O0/17/2017 6:42 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/17/17 6:06 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/17/2017 4:49 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/17/17 4:39 PM, RGrew176 wrote: Hillary Clinton is one of those classic don't do as I do, do as I say persons. If that were the case, she'd be very popular in .wrecked.bloats, because this joint is filled with conservatrash who want posters to behave as they say, but not as they do. Really?Â* Perhaps you could provide an example or two? Sure. Your buddies Herring, W'hine, and a couple of others constantly castigate and insult other posters here, and also call them out for not behaving in a gentlemanly fashion. If you haven't noticed, you have your Trump Blinders on. As for me, I don't really give a **** how the conservatrash here behaves...I just find it a giggle when they call out others for behaving as they do. There are only two people in this newsgroup who receive insults from the people you named.Â* You are one of them and the insults are richly deserved in response to your never ending litany of insults, insinuations, fake news and more that you cast upon them, me and others. The other person is obviously Don.Â* Personally, I have no beef with him and neither of us have ever directed "insults" at each other.Â* Other people's mileage may vary. BTW ... at some point you may finally realize that I offer positive comments about your president, the Donald, mainly because I know it gets under your skin sometimes. You will of course deny this but all you have to do is follow a thread long enough and at some point you'll lash out at something I wrote. It's really sorta funny ... and entertaining. The truth is, I probably agree more with Steve Bannon's thoughts as they relate to the political "establishment" and it's transformation into a "ruling class" over the years. It desperately needs to be corrected and returned back to when politicians were representatives of the people and not of their own pocketbooks. |
Back in the news ....
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/17/2017 7:22 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: O0/17/2017 6:42 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/17/17 6:06 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/17/2017 4:49 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/17/17 4:39 PM, RGrew176 wrote: Hillary Clinton is one of those classic don't do as I do, do as I say persons. If that were the case, she'd be very popular in .wrecked.bloats, because this joint is filled with conservatrash who want posters to behave as they say, but not as they do. Really?Â* Perhaps you could provide an example or two? Sure. Your buddies Herring, W'hine, and a couple of others constantly castigate and insult other posters here, and also call them out for not behaving in a gentlemanly fashion. If you haven't noticed, you have your Trump Blinders on. As for me, I don't really give a **** how the conservatrash here behaves...I just find it a giggle when they call out others for behaving as they do. There are only two people in this newsgroup who receive insults from the people you named.Â* You are one of them and the insults are richly deserved in response to your never ending litany of insults, insinuations, fake news and more that you cast upon them, me and others. The other person is obviously Don.Â* Personally, I have no beef with him and neither of us have ever directed "insults" at each other.Â* Other people's mileage may vary. BTW ... at some point you may finally realize that I offer positive comments about your president, the Donald, mainly because I know it gets under your skin sometimes. You will of course deny this but all you have to do is follow a thread long enough and at some point you'll lash out at something I wrote. It's really sorta funny ... and entertaining. The truth is, I probably agree more with Steve Bannon's thoughts as they relate to the political "establishment" and it's transformation into a "ruling class" over the years. It desperately needs to be corrected and returned back to when politicians were representatives of the people and not of their own pocketbooks. All politicians should serve 2 terms. One in office, one in jail. |
Back in the news ....
On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 13:39:22 -0700 (PDT), RGrew176 wrote:
Hillary Clinton is one of those classic don't do as I do, do as I say persons. I think Hillary Clinton is almost as mentally sick as Harry Krause. |
Back in the news ....
Bill Wrote in message:
Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/17/2017 7:22 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: O0/17/2017 6:42 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/17/17 6:06 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/17/2017 4:49 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/17/17 4:39 PM, RGrew176 wrote: Hillary Clinton is one of those classic don't do as I do, do as I say persons. If that were the case, she'd be very popular in .wrecked.bloats, because this joint is filled with conservatrash who want posters to behave as they say, but not as they do. Really? Perhaps you could provide an example or two? Sure. Your buddies Herring, W'hine, and a couple of others constantly castigate and insult other posters here, and also call them out for not behaving in a gentlemanly fashion. If you haven't noticed, you have your Trump Blinders on. As for me, I don't really give a **** how the conservatrash here behaves...I just find it a giggle when they call out others for behaving as they do. There are only two people in this newsgroup who receive insults from the people you named. You are one of them and the insults are richly deserved in response to your never ending litany of insults, insinuations, fake news and more that you cast upon them, me and others. The other person is obviously Don. Personally, I have no beef with him and neither of us have ever directed "insults" at each other. Other people's mileage may vary. BTW ... at some point you may finally realize that I offer positive comments about your president, the Donald, mainly because I know it gets under your skin sometimes. You will of course deny this but all you have to do is follow a thread long enough and at some point you'll lash out at something I wrote. It's really sorta funny ... and entertaining. The truth is, I probably agree more with Steve Bannon's thoughts as they relate to the political "establishment" and it's transformation into a "ruling class" over the years. It desperately needs to be corrected and returned back to when politicians were representatives of the people and not of their own pocketbooks. All politicians should serve 2 terms. One in office, one in jail. I'm an optimist. I can't believe that all politicians succumb to the corruption and scumminess of most of the career politicians. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Back in the news ....
John H Wrote in message:
On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 13:39:22 -0700 (PDT), RGrew176 wrote: Hillary Clinton is one of those classic don't do as I do, do as I say persons. I think Hillary Clinton is almost as mentally sick as Harry Krause. Two peas in a pod. But Clinton got rich. Harry missed that boat despite the fact that his daddy left him a boatload of money to feather his nest. (Boating reference) -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Back in the news ....
On 10/18/17 9:39 AM, justan wrote:
John H Wrote in message: On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 13:39:22 -0700 (PDT), RGrew176 wrote: Hillary Clinton is one of those classic don't do as I do, do as I say persons. I think Hillary Clinton is almost as mentally sick as Harry Krause. Two peas in a pod. But Clinton got rich. Harry missed that boat despite the fact that his daddy left him a boatload of money to feather his nest. (Boating reference) Most of my dad's estate was left to my mother. I know that because I was present at our family lawyer's office when my dad, a year before his death, worked out the changes the family wanted in his will. I inherited all the hand and small electric tools from his boat shop, and a new 14' dory, outboard, and trailer, which I gave to our family accountant for his help "above and beyond" in selling off the store's merchandise and working with our family lawyer in redeveloping the real property into a mini-mall while I returned to D.C. to continue my career in advertising and marketing. I also inherited my dad's totally rebuilt and restored 1949 Jeepster, which I gave to my dad's long-time shop foreman. I was pleased that he maintained it properly and passed it on to his son. The funds generated enabled my mom to move to south Florida, buy a nice condo, and live another 25 years in comfort. |
Back in the news ....
On 10/18/2017 9:36 AM, justan wrote:
Bill Wrote in message: Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/17/2017 7:22 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: O0/17/2017 6:42 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/17/17 6:06 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/17/2017 4:49 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/17/17 4:39 PM, RGrew176 wrote: Hillary Clinton is one of those classic don't do as I do, do as I say persons. If that were the case, she'd be very popular in .wrecked.bloats, because this joint is filled with conservatrash who want posters to behave as they say, but not as they do. Really? Perhaps you could provide an example or two? Sure. Your buddies Herring, W'hine, and a couple of others constantly castigate and insult other posters here, and also call them out for not behaving in a gentlemanly fashion. If you haven't noticed, you have your Trump Blinders on. As for me, I don't really give a **** how the conservatrash here behaves...I just find it a giggle when they call out others for behaving as they do. There are only two people in this newsgroup who receive insults from the people you named. You are one of them and the insults are richly deserved in response to your never ending litany of insults, insinuations, fake news and more that you cast upon them, me and others. The other person is obviously Don. Personally, I have no beef with him and neither of us have ever directed "insults" at each other. Other people's mileage may vary. BTW ... at some point you may finally realize that I offer positive comments about your president, the Donald, mainly because I know it gets under your skin sometimes. You will of course deny this but all you have to do is follow a thread long enough and at some point you'll lash out at something I wrote. It's really sorta funny ... and entertaining. The truth is, I probably agree more with Steve Bannon's thoughts as they relate to the political "establishment" and it's transformation into a "ruling class" over the years. It desperately needs to be corrected and returned back to when politicians were representatives of the people and not of their own pocketbooks. All politicians should serve 2 terms. One in office, one in jail. I'm an optimist. I can't believe that all politicians succumb to the corruption and scumminess of most of the career politicians. Those are the ones who get elected, find out how Wash DC operates and voluntarily decide not to run for re-election after one term. |
Back in the news ....
On 10/18/2017 10:22 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/18/17 9:39 AM, justan wrote: John H Wrote in message: On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 13:39:22 -0700 (PDT), RGrew176 wrote: Hillary Clinton is one of those classic don't do as I do, do as I say persons. I think Hillary Clinton is almost as mentally sick as Harry Krause. Two peas in a pod. But Clinton got rich. Harry missed that boat * despite the fact that his daddy left him a boatload of money to * feather his nest. (Boating reference) Most of my dad's estate was left to my mother. I know that because I was present at our family lawyer's office when my dad, a year before his death, worked out the changes the family wanted in his will. I inherited all the hand and small electric tools from his boat shop, and a new 14' dory, outboard, and trailer, which I gave to our family accountant for his help "above and beyond" in selling off the store's merchandise and working with our family lawyer in redeveloping the real property into a mini-mall while I returned to D.C. to continue my career in advertising and marketing. I also inherited my dad's totally rebuilt and restored 1949 Jeepster, which I gave to my dad's long-time shop foreman. I was pleased that he maintained it properly and passed it on to his son. The funds generated enabled my mom to move to south Florida, buy a nice condo, and live another 25 years in comfort. Fair enough. Advertising and marketing, huh? |
Back in the news ....
On 10/18/17 11:22 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2017 10:22 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/18/17 9:39 AM, justan wrote: John H Wrote in message: On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 13:39:22 -0700 (PDT), RGrew176 wrote: Hillary Clinton is one of those classic don't do as I do, do as I say persons. I think Hillary Clinton is almost as mentally sick as Harry Krause. Two peas in a pod. But Clinton got rich. Harry missed that boat * despite the fact that his daddy left him a boatload of money to * feather his nest. (Boating reference) Most of my dad's estate was left to my mother. I know that because I was present at our family lawyer's office when my dad, a year before his death, worked out the changes the family wanted in his will. I inherited all the hand and small electric tools from his boat shop, and a new 14' dory, outboard, and trailer, which I gave to our family accountant for his help "above and beyond" in selling off the store's merchandise and working with our family lawyer in redeveloping the real property into a mini-mall while I returned to D.C. to continue my career in advertising and marketing. I also inherited my dad's totally rebuilt and restored 1949 Jeepster, which I gave to my dad's long-time shop foreman. I was pleased that he maintained it properly and passed it on to his son. The funds generated enabled my mom to move to south Florida, buy a nice condo, and live another 25 years in comfort. Fair enough. Advertising and marketing, huh? Yup, I quit working for the teachers' union because I was tired of being on call 24-7 and the endless travel, and I was successfully recruited by at that time the largest AAAA ad, marketing, and pr agency in the D.C. market. I actually made a trip down to D.C. for a final interview (first one was in NYC) and for an separate interview with Jacob Javits, then a Republican U.S. Senator from New York State, who was looking for a new press secretary. I was recommended for that post by a Republican former state legislator in New York who was the registered lobbyist for the teachers union in New York and with who I worked on a few legislative issues and fundraisers. I took the ad agency job: it paid a lot better, my office in Georgetown overlooked the beautiful canal, and my assistant was to be a stunningly gorgeous young woman who looked like a Playboy model. Sadly, when I actually came down to D.C. to start, it was after a huge storm...the canal had collapsed and the dish had left the agency for greener pastures. :( But it all worked out. Three months later, I was researching and writing a script in preparation for a trip to Bangladesh to direct a film on Louis Kahn's National Parliamentary Building in Dhaka. :) |
Back in the news ....
Keyser Söze wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote: O0/17/2017 6:42 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/17/17 6:06 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/17/2017 4:49 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 10/17/17 4:39 PM, RGrew176 wrote: Hillary Clinton is one of those classic don't do as I do, do as I say persons. If that were the case, she'd be very popular in .wrecked.bloats, because this joint is filled with conservatrash who want posters to behave as they say, but not as they do. Really? Perhaps you could provide an example or two? Sure. Your buddies Herring, W'hine, and a couple of others constantly castigate and insult other posters here, and also call them out for not behaving in a gentlemanly fashion. If you haven't noticed, you have your Trump Blinders on. As for me, I don't really give a **** how the conservatrash here behaves...I just find it a giggle when they call out others for behaving as they do. There are only two people in this newsgroup who receive insults from the people you named. You are one of them and the insults are richly deserved in response to your never ending litany of insults, insinuations, fake news and more that you cast upon them, me and others. The other person is obviously Don. Personally, I have no beef with him and neither of us have ever directed "insults" at each other. Other people's mileage may vary. Just as I stated. Oh and Don and I are the only two non conservatives who bother with this dung heap. No coincidence. Kevin shows up from time to time. You used to attack him until you kissed and made up. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com