justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
justan Wrote in message:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 6/16/17 7:38 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 7:26 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/16/17 6:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 6:24 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/15/17 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for political
unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war path
again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general,
FoxNews and others.

Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com


Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning violence
on the part of his supporters.


Bull****.

Oh? You missed Trump at his pre-election rallies urging his
supporters to "knock the crap" out of protestors, and promising to
pay their legal fees if they did? Where were you, on another planet?
Trump did this many times, and it was covered by print, on-line and
cable news media.

I recall Trump saying things like, "Get them out" when protesters
tried interrupting some of his campaign rallies, some with violence
that the protesters initiated. Hardly inciting violence, IMO. And
sure, it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media, just
like the same cover him now with their progressive liberal slants.

Get over it. He's the POTUS. You'll have your opportunity again in
2020.



Trump said a lot more than "get them out," but,of course, you've
turned a blind eye and ear to Trump's transgressions. The best we can
hope for is Trump tied up in knots politically, unless, of course, he
resigns.

"Progressive liberal" Love it.

Eventually the combination of the term "progressive liberal" will
separate and become two, distinct political ideologies. We'll have
"progressives", "liberals" and "conservatives".

Many aspects of liberal ideology I can agree with as can I with many
aspects of conservative ideology. "Progressives" like yourself, can't
even consider the ideology of either traditional liberals or
conservatives. You refuse to read anything that has a conservative
slant or watch any media known for having a conservative bias. It's
"below" you, as a progressive and, of course, it *must* be bull**** to
you (without even giving it any consideration).

That's why I can't embrace progressive ideology, even though (unlike
you) I am willing to at least listen and read before I draw a conclusion.

Progressive ideology to me is too close to European style socialism.
I don't think the USA is designed for or made for European style
socialism and that is the most significant difference in how we view
things.


I don't separate "progressive liberal" into two distinct words for the
purposes you describe here. Liberals *are* per se progressive.
Naturally, there is a range of belief within liberalism. My socialist
buddies are more liberal than I am in certain areas, and less liberal in
other areas. But we'd all describe ourselves as progressive liberals.

I do read pieces that have a conservative slant. I do not watch Fox
News, but I do see an occasional bit from that network in other places.
I will admit that much of what is supposedly news and commentary from
"the right" gives me the giggles.

I'm not sure what economic system would be best for the future of this
country. I do believe that "capitalism" has taken us down a road that is
leading to the destruction of the lower and middle income classes. Too
much wealth in concentrated in the hands of the truly wealthy, more than
ever before, and even the crumbs are being swept that way.




If you had been willing to work, you might have accumilated a
little wealth. This idea that everything is to be handed to you
on a silver platter should have gone away after you stopped
suckling on you mamas teat.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/


i doubt there has been a year in your life when your earned income
exceeded mine

--


Whetever. I have some leftover, where's yours?

Carefully invested. And I still have earned income.

--
Posted with my iPhone 7+.

On 6/16/2017 10:01 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
justan Wrote in message:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 6/16/17 7:38 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 7:26 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/16/17 6:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 6:24 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/15/17 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for political
unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war path
again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general,
FoxNews and others.

Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com


Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning violence
on the part of his supporters.


Bull****.

Oh? You missed Trump at his pre-election rallies urging his
supporters to "knock the crap" out of protestors, and promising to
pay their legal fees if they did? Where were you, on another planet?
Trump did this many times, and it was covered by print, on-line and
cable news media.

I recall Trump saying things like, "Get them out" when protesters
tried interrupting some of his campaign rallies, some with violence
that the protesters initiated. Hardly inciting violence, IMO. And
sure, it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media, just
like the same cover him now with their progressive liberal slants.

Get over it. He's the POTUS. You'll have your opportunity again in
2020.



Trump said a lot more than "get them out," but,of course, you've
turned a blind eye and ear to Trump's transgressions. The best we can
hope for is Trump tied up in knots politically, unless, of course, he
resigns.

"Progressive liberal" Love it.

Eventually the combination of the term "progressive liberal" will
separate and become two, distinct political ideologies. We'll have
"progressives", "liberals" and "conservatives".

Many aspects of liberal ideology I can agree with as can I with many
aspects of conservative ideology. "Progressives" like yourself, can't
even consider the ideology of either traditional liberals or
conservatives. You refuse to read anything that has a conservative
slant or watch any media known for having a conservative bias. It's
"below" you, as a progressive and, of course, it *must* be bull**** to
you (without even giving it any consideration).

That's why I can't embrace progressive ideology, even though (unlike
you) I am willing to at least listen and read before I draw a conclusion.

Progressive ideology to me is too close to European style socialism.
I don't think the USA is designed for or made for European style
socialism and that is the most significant difference in how we view
things.


I don't separate "progressive liberal" into two distinct words for the
purposes you describe here. Liberals *are* per se progressive.
Naturally, there is a range of belief within liberalism. My socialist
buddies are more liberal than I am in certain areas, and less liberal in
other areas. But we'd all describe ourselves as progressive liberals.

I do read pieces that have a conservative slant. I do not watch Fox
News, but I do see an occasional bit from that network in other places.
I will admit that much of what is supposedly news and commentary from
"the right" gives me the giggles.

I'm not sure what economic system would be best for the future of this
country. I do believe that "capitalism" has taken us down a road that is
leading to the destruction of the lower and middle income classes. Too
much wealth in concentrated in the hands of the truly wealthy, more than
ever before, and even the crumbs are being swept that way.




If you had been willing to work, you might have accumilated a
little wealth. This idea that everything is to be handed to you
on a silver platter should have gone away after you stopped
suckling on you mamas teat.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/


i doubt there has been a year in your life when your earned income
exceeded mine


So what if it didn't? Not everyone makes the same amount of income in
their lives but it's no reflection on their willingness to work.
I'll betcha I've paid more in federal income taxes in my life than you
have every earned as income since you were a youngster. Does that make
me "better" than you? No.

On 6/16/17 10:39 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 10:01 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
justan Wrote in message:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 6/16/17 7:38 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 7:26 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/16/17 6:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 6:24 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/15/17 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for
political
unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war path
again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general,
FoxNews and others.

Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com


Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning violence
on the part of his supporters.


Bull****.

Oh? You missed Trump at his pre-election rallies urging his
supporters to "knock the crap" out of protestors, and promising to
pay their legal fees if they did? Where were you, on another
planet?
Trump did this many times, and it was covered by print, on-line and
cable news media.

I recall Trump saying things like, "Get them out" when protesters
tried interrupting some of his campaign rallies, some with violence
that the protesters initiated. Hardly inciting violence, IMO. And
sure, it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media, just
like the same cover him now with their progressive liberal slants.

Get over it. He's the POTUS. You'll have your opportunity again in
2020.



Trump said a lot more than "get them out," but,of course, you've
turned a blind eye and ear to Trump's transgressions. The best we can
hope for is Trump tied up in knots politically, unless, of course, he
resigns.

"Progressive liberal" Love it.

Eventually the combination of the term "progressive liberal" will
separate and become two, distinct political ideologies. We'll have
"progressives", "liberals" and "conservatives".

Many aspects of liberal ideology I can agree with as can I with many
aspects of conservative ideology. "Progressives" like yourself, can't
even consider the ideology of either traditional liberals or
conservatives. You refuse to read anything that has a conservative
slant or watch any media known for having a conservative bias. It's
"below" you, as a progressive and, of course, it *must* be bull**** to
you (without even giving it any consideration).

That's why I can't embrace progressive ideology, even though (unlike
you) I am willing to at least listen and read before I draw a
conclusion.

Progressive ideology to me is too close to European style socialism.
I don't think the USA is designed for or made for European style
socialism and that is the most significant difference in how we view
things.


I don't separate "progressive liberal" into two distinct words for the
purposes you describe here. Liberals *are* per se progressive.
Naturally, there is a range of belief within liberalism. My socialist
buddies are more liberal than I am in certain areas, and less
liberal in
other areas. But we'd all describe ourselves as progressive liberals.

I do read pieces that have a conservative slant. I do not watch Fox
News, but I do see an occasional bit from that network in other places.
I will admit that much of what is supposedly news and commentary from
"the right" gives me the giggles.

I'm not sure what economic system would be best for the future of this
country. I do believe that "capitalism" has taken us down a road
that is
leading to the destruction of the lower and middle income classes. Too
much wealth in concentrated in the hands of the truly wealthy, more
than
ever before, and even the crumbs are being swept that way.




If you had been willing to work, you might have accumilated a
little wealth. This idea that everything is to be handed to you
on a silver platter should have gone away after you stopped
suckling on you mamas teat.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/


i doubt there has been a year in your life when your earned income
exceeded mine


So what if it didn't? Not everyone makes the same amount of income in
their lives but it's no reflection on their willingness to work.
I'll betcha I've paid more in federal income taxes in my life than you
have every earned as income since you were a youngster. Does that make
me "better" than you? No.



Your moronic buddy implied I have not been willing to work. That's just
another of his absurdities, yet no comment from you? You're just
enabling a moron, the same way you enable Trump.

On 6/16/2017 10:48 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/16/17 10:39 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 10:01 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
justan Wrote in message:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 6/16/17 7:38 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 7:26 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/16/17 6:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 6:24 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/15/17 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for
political
unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war
path
again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general,
FoxNews and others.

Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com


Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning
violence
on the part of his supporters.


Bull****.

Oh? You missed Trump at his pre-election rallies urging his
supporters to "knock the crap" out of protestors, and promising to
pay their legal fees if they did? Where were you, on another
planet?
Trump did this many times, and it was covered by print, on-line
and
cable news media.

I recall Trump saying things like, "Get them out" when protesters
tried interrupting some of his campaign rallies, some with violence
that the protesters initiated. Hardly inciting violence, IMO.
And
sure, it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media, just
like the same cover him now with their progressive liberal slants.

Get over it. He's the POTUS. You'll have your opportunity
again in
2020.



Trump said a lot more than "get them out," but,of course, you've
turned a blind eye and ear to Trump's transgressions. The best we
can
hope for is Trump tied up in knots politically, unless, of
course, he
resigns.

"Progressive liberal" Love it.

Eventually the combination of the term "progressive liberal" will
separate and become two, distinct political ideologies. We'll have
"progressives", "liberals" and "conservatives".

Many aspects of liberal ideology I can agree with as can I with many
aspects of conservative ideology. "Progressives" like yourself,
can't
even consider the ideology of either traditional liberals or
conservatives. You refuse to read anything that has a conservative
slant or watch any media known for having a conservative bias. It's
"below" you, as a progressive and, of course, it *must* be
bull**** to
you (without even giving it any consideration).

That's why I can't embrace progressive ideology, even though (unlike
you) I am willing to at least listen and read before I draw a
conclusion.

Progressive ideology to me is too close to European style socialism.
I don't think the USA is designed for or made for European style
socialism and that is the most significant difference in how we view
things.


I don't separate "progressive liberal" into two distinct words for the
purposes you describe here. Liberals *are* per se progressive.
Naturally, there is a range of belief within liberalism. My socialist
buddies are more liberal than I am in certain areas, and less
liberal in
other areas. But we'd all describe ourselves as progressive liberals.

I do read pieces that have a conservative slant. I do not watch Fox
News, but I do see an occasional bit from that network in other
places.
I will admit that much of what is supposedly news and commentary from
"the right" gives me the giggles.

I'm not sure what economic system would be best for the future of this
country. I do believe that "capitalism" has taken us down a road
that is
leading to the destruction of the lower and middle income classes. Too
much wealth in concentrated in the hands of the truly wealthy, more
than
ever before, and even the crumbs are being swept that way.




If you had been willing to work, you might have accumilated a
little wealth. This idea that everything is to be handed to you
on a silver platter should have gone away after you stopped
suckling on you mamas teat.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/


i doubt there has been a year in your life when your earned income
exceeded mine


So what if it didn't? Not everyone makes the same amount of income in
their lives but it's no reflection on their willingness to work.
I'll betcha I've paid more in federal income taxes in my life than you
have every earned as income since you were a youngster. Does that
make me "better" than you? No.



Your moronic buddy implied I have not been willing to work. That's just
another of his absurdities, yet no comment from you? You're just
enabling a moron, the same way you enable Trump.


He is referencing your constant expectation that the government has an
obligation for your welfare than most of us expect. It's your socialist
leanings in play.

On 6/16/17 10:59 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 10:48 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/16/17 10:39 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 10:01 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
justan Wrote in message:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 6/16/17 7:38 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 7:26 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/16/17 6:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 6:24 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/15/17 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for
political
unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war
path
again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general,
FoxNews and others.

Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com


Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning
violence
on the part of his supporters.


Bull****.

Oh? You missed Trump at his pre-election rallies urging his
supporters to "knock the crap" out of protestors, and
promising to
pay their legal fees if they did? Where were you, on another
planet?
Trump did this many times, and it was covered by print,
on-line and
cable news media.

I recall Trump saying things like, "Get them out" when protesters
tried interrupting some of his campaign rallies, some with
violence
that the protesters initiated. Hardly inciting violence, IMO. And
sure, it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media, just
like the same cover him now with their progressive liberal slants.

Get over it. He's the POTUS. You'll have your opportunity
again in
2020.



Trump said a lot more than "get them out," but,of course, you've
turned a blind eye and ear to Trump's transgressions. The best
we can
hope for is Trump tied up in knots politically, unless, of
course, he
resigns.

"Progressive liberal" Love it.

Eventually the combination of the term "progressive liberal" will
separate and become two, distinct political ideologies. We'll have
"progressives", "liberals" and "conservatives".

Many aspects of liberal ideology I can agree with as can I with many
aspects of conservative ideology. "Progressives" like yourself,
can't
even consider the ideology of either traditional liberals or
conservatives. You refuse to read anything that has a conservative
slant or watch any media known for having a conservative bias. It's
"below" you, as a progressive and, of course, it *must* be
bull**** to
you (without even giving it any consideration).

That's why I can't embrace progressive ideology, even though (unlike
you) I am willing to at least listen and read before I draw a
conclusion.

Progressive ideology to me is too close to European style socialism.
I don't think the USA is designed for or made for European style
socialism and that is the most significant difference in how we view
things.


I don't separate "progressive liberal" into two distinct words for
the
purposes you describe here. Liberals *are* per se progressive.
Naturally, there is a range of belief within liberalism. My socialist
buddies are more liberal than I am in certain areas, and less
liberal in
other areas. But we'd all describe ourselves as progressive liberals.

I do read pieces that have a conservative slant. I do not watch Fox
News, but I do see an occasional bit from that network in other
places.
I will admit that much of what is supposedly news and commentary from
"the right" gives me the giggles.

I'm not sure what economic system would be best for the future of
this
country. I do believe that "capitalism" has taken us down a road
that is
leading to the destruction of the lower and middle income classes.
Too
much wealth in concentrated in the hands of the truly wealthy,
more than
ever before, and even the crumbs are being swept that way.




If you had been willing to work, you might have accumilated a
little wealth. This idea that everything is to be handed to you
on a silver platter should have gone away after you stopped
suckling on you mamas teat.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/


i doubt there has been a year in your life when your earned income
exceeded mine


So what if it didn't? Not everyone makes the same amount of income
in their lives but it's no reflection on their willingness to work.
I'll betcha I've paid more in federal income taxes in my life than
you have every earned as income since you were a youngster. Does
that make me "better" than you? No.



Your moronic buddy implied I have not been willing to work. That's
just another of his absurdities, yet no comment from you? You're just
enabling a moron, the same way you enable Trump.


He is referencing your constant expectation that the government has an
obligation for your welfare than most of us expect. It's your socialist
leanings in play.

That's too abstract for your moronic buddyboy.

On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 06:49:47 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 6/16/2017 6:24 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/15/17 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for political
unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the war path
again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general,
FoxNews and others.

Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com


Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning violence on
the part of his supporters.


Bull****.

Oh? You missed Trump at his pre-election rallies urging his supporters
to "knock the crap" out of protestors, and promising to pay their legal
fees if they did? Where were you, on another planet? Trump did this many
times, and it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media.

I recall Trump saying things like, "Get them out" when protesters tried
interrupting some of his campaign rallies, some with violence that the
protesters initiated. Hardly inciting violence, IMO. And sure, it was
covered by print, on-line and cable news media, just like the same cover
him now with their progressive liberal slants.

Harry is right on that one. Trump even to pay the legal fees if his
goons beat someone up.

On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 07:52:27 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

I'm not sure what economic system would be best for the future of this
country. I do believe that "capitalism" has taken us down a road that is
leading to the destruction of the lower and middle income classes. Too
much wealth in concentrated in the hands of the truly wealthy, more than
ever before, and even the crumbs are being swept that way.

I suppose "national socialism" sounds good to you but that didn't work
out so well in the 20th century.
You actually embrace communism but that didn't work out so well
either. Without the capitalist incentive to work the proletariat gets
lazy and needs an oppressive government to make the system work.

On 6/16/2017 11:19 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/16/17 10:59 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 10:48 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/16/17 10:39 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 10:01 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
justan Wrote in message:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 6/16/17 7:38 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 7:26 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/16/17 6:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 6:24 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/15/17 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for
political
unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the
war path
again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general,
FoxNews and others.

Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com


Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning
violence
on the part of his supporters.


Bull****.

Oh? You missed Trump at his pre-election rallies urging his
supporters to "knock the crap" out of protestors, and
promising to
pay their legal fees if they did? Where were you, on another
planet?
Trump did this many times, and it was covered by print,
on-line and
cable news media.

I recall Trump saying things like, "Get them out" when
protesters
tried interrupting some of his campaign rallies, some with
violence
that the protesters initiated. Hardly inciting violence, IMO.
And
sure, it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media, just
like the same cover him now with their progressive liberal
slants.

Get over it. He's the POTUS. You'll have your opportunity
again in
2020.



Trump said a lot more than "get them out," but,of course, you've
turned a blind eye and ear to Trump's transgressions. The best
we can
hope for is Trump tied up in knots politically, unless, of
course, he
resigns.

"Progressive liberal" Love it.

Eventually the combination of the term "progressive liberal" will
separate and become two, distinct political ideologies. We'll have
"progressives", "liberals" and "conservatives".

Many aspects of liberal ideology I can agree with as can I with
many
aspects of conservative ideology. "Progressives" like yourself,
can't
even consider the ideology of either traditional liberals or
conservatives. You refuse to read anything that has a conservative
slant or watch any media known for having a conservative bias.
It's
"below" you, as a progressive and, of course, it *must* be
bull**** to
you (without even giving it any consideration).

That's why I can't embrace progressive ideology, even though
(unlike
you) I am willing to at least listen and read before I draw a
conclusion.

Progressive ideology to me is too close to European style
socialism.
I don't think the USA is designed for or made for European style
socialism and that is the most significant difference in how we
view
things.


I don't separate "progressive liberal" into two distinct words
for the
purposes you describe here. Liberals *are* per se progressive.
Naturally, there is a range of belief within liberalism. My
socialist
buddies are more liberal than I am in certain areas, and less
liberal in
other areas. But we'd all describe ourselves as progressive
liberals.

I do read pieces that have a conservative slant. I do not watch Fox
News, but I do see an occasional bit from that network in other
places.
I will admit that much of what is supposedly news and commentary
from
"the right" gives me the giggles.

I'm not sure what economic system would be best for the future of
this
country. I do believe that "capitalism" has taken us down a road
that is
leading to the destruction of the lower and middle income
classes. Too
much wealth in concentrated in the hands of the truly wealthy,
more than
ever before, and even the crumbs are being swept that way.




If you had been willing to work, you might have accumilated a
little wealth. This idea that everything is to be handed to you
on a silver platter should have gone away after you stopped
suckling on you mamas teat.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/


i doubt there has been a year in your life when your earned income
exceeded mine


So what if it didn't? Not everyone makes the same amount of income
in their lives but it's no reflection on their willingness to work.
I'll betcha I've paid more in federal income taxes in my life than
you have every earned as income since you were a youngster. Does
that make me "better" than you? No.



Your moronic buddy implied I have not been willing to work. That's
just another of his absurdities, yet no comment from you? You're just
enabling a moron, the same way you enable Trump.


He is referencing your constant expectation that the government has an
obligation for your welfare than most of us expect. It's your
socialist leanings in play.


That's too abstract for your moronic buddyboy.

Heh. This is the dramatic irony of rec.boats. Those of us who know him
personally get a big kick out of how he makes you look so foolish in
many of your posts. Other than the various "handles" he has used here
you know little about him or his past, despite your attempts to garner
information about him. It makes for some comical reading sometimes.

Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 11:19 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/16/17 10:59 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 10:48 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/16/17 10:39 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 10:01 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
justan Wrote in message:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 6/16/17 7:38 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 7:26 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/16/17 6:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/16/2017 6:24 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/15/17 7:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/15/2017 6:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/15/17 5:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

The day after Nancy Pelosi joined others in calling for
political
unity following the Virginia shootings, she went on the
war path
again blaming the shootings on Trump, Republicans in general,
FoxNews and others.

Must be taking blame lessons from Hillary.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com


Trump spent a lot of time last year urging and condoning
violence
on the part of his supporters.


Bull****.

Oh? You missed Trump at his pre-election rallies urging his
supporters to "knock the crap" out of protestors, and
promising to
pay their legal fees if they did? Where were you, on another
planet?
Trump did this many times, and it was covered by print,
on-line and
cable news media.

I recall Trump saying things like, "Get them out" when
protesters
tried interrupting some of his campaign rallies, some with
violence
that the protesters initiated. Hardly inciting violence, IMO.
And
sure, it was covered by print, on-line and cable news media, just
like the same cover him now with their progressive liberal
slants.

Get over it. He's the POTUS. You'll have your opportunity
again in
2020.



Trump said a lot more than "get them out," but,of course, you've
turned a blind eye and ear to Trump's transgressions. The best
we can
hope for is Trump tied up in knots politically, unless, of
course, he
resigns.

"Progressive liberal" Love it.

Eventually the combination of the term "progressive liberal" will
separate and become two, distinct political ideologies. We'll have
"progressives", "liberals" and "conservatives".

Many aspects of liberal ideology I can agree with as can I with
many
aspects of conservative ideology. "Progressives" like yourself,
can't
even consider the ideology of either traditional liberals or
conservatives. You refuse to read anything that has a conservative
slant or watch any media known for having a conservative bias.
It's
"below" you, as a progressive and, of course, it *must* be
bull**** to
you (without even giving it any consideration).

That's why I can't embrace progressive ideology, even though
(unlike
you) I am willing to at least listen and read before I draw a
conclusion.

Progressive ideology to me is too close to European style
socialism.
I don't think the USA is designed for or made for European style
socialism and that is the most significant difference in how we
view
things.


I don't separate "progressive liberal" into two distinct words
for the
purposes you describe here. Liberals *are* per se progressive.
Naturally, there is a range of belief within liberalism. My
socialist
buddies are more liberal than I am in certain areas, and less
liberal in
other areas. But we'd all describe ourselves as progressive
liberals.

I do read pieces that have a conservative slant. I do not watch Fox
News, but I do see an occasional bit from that network in other
places.
I will admit that much of what is supposedly news and commentary
from
"the right" gives me the giggles.

I'm not sure what economic system would be best for the future of
this
country. I do believe that "capitalism" has taken us down a road
that is
leading to the destruction of the lower and middle income
classes. Too
much wealth in concentrated in the hands of the truly wealthy,
more than
ever before, and even the crumbs are being swept that way.




If you had been willing to work, you might have accumilated a
little wealth. This idea that everything is to be handed to you
on a silver platter should have gone away after you stopped
suckling on you mamas teat.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/


i doubt there has been a year in your life when your earned income
exceeded mine


So what if it didn't? Not everyone makes the same amount of income
in their lives but it's no reflection on their willingness to work.
I'll betcha I've paid more in federal income taxes in my life than
you have every earned as income since you were a youngster. Does
that make me "better" than you? No.



Your moronic buddy implied I have not been willing to work. That's
just another of his absurdities, yet no comment from you? You're just
enabling a moron, the same way you enable Trump.


He is referencing your constant expectation that the government has an
obligation for your welfare than most of us expect. It's your
socialist leanings in play.


That's too abstract for your moronic buddyboy.

Heh. This is the dramatic irony of rec.boats. Those of us who know him
personally get a big kick out of how he makes you look so foolish in
many of your posts. Other than the various "handles" he has used here
you know little about him or his past, despite your attempts to garner
information about him. It makes for some comical reading sometimes.


He works hard at being a moron... 🤔

--
Posted with my iPhone 7+.

On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:31:41 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Carefully invested. And I still have earned income.

I bet it is invested in American Capitalism too.
If you are 100% in federal paper your returns barely beat inflation if
at all.