Remember Me?
Menu
Home
Search
Today's Posts
Home
Search
Today's Posts
BoatBanter.com
»
rec.boats
»
General
>
Back Channel = Deep State
LinkBack
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes
Prev
Next
#
9
posted to rec.boats
Keyser Soze
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,424
Back Channel = Deep State
On 5/27/17 10:40 AM,
wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2017 08:28:56 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:
On 5/27/2017 7:46 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 5/26/17 8:58 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2017 13:18:58 -1100, Boating All Out
wrote:
So who's complaining about the "Deep State?"
What could be more "Deep State" than back channel communications to
our enemies?
The Kushner kid should have learned from his convict dad that crime
doesn't pay.
What a bunch of reprobates we have in charge here.
Thugs, bullies and criminals.
Long live the Free Press! Go get 'em.
Nothing requires the Free Press to be the Biased Free Press. Perhaps
if it simply reported the news,
as in 'news' papers, or 'evening news', more people would keep their
subscriptions. Since 2009, the
Washington Post circulation has dropped by some 37%.
"Biased" to Herring means legitimate news outlets are telling the truth.
Circulation of paper copy newspapers is down for many reasons, but the
better papers are working hard with other ways of getting their product
to those who want depth to their news. Republicans like JohnnyMop prefer
an ignorant population because such people are easy to manipulate.
I agree with BAO. I am all for a Free Press. It's a cornerstone of our
checks and balances system incorporated in our Constitution.
However, a "Free Press" to me doesn't mean an overtly and politically
biased press that relies on sensationalism and scantily researched
articles full of "undisclosed sources" and sinister innuendo. The
left-leaning cable news networks are notorious for quoting these
articles and putting their own spin on them, creating an entirely
different interpretation of what the article suggests. For example, the
recent articles by the NY Times and the WashPost regarding the
activities of Jared Kushner ended up being reported as Kushner being
under investigation by the FBI as a "person of interest"... a
meaningless legal term, but dripping with intrigue and innuendo.
The Times and Post were honest enough to acknowledge that proposed
"secret channels" were never set up but the cable media never mentions
that. I'll give MSNBC a bit of credit by acknowledging in a short
sentence before going to a station break after delivering their
"Breaking News" about Kushner that MSNBC had not independently
confirmed that Kushner was under any kind of criminal investigation.
It took MSNBC and CNN a while to even admit that Kushner has volunteered
to testify to the Senate Intelligence committee regarding any knowledge
he has. So far, the SIC hasn't accepted his offer. Also, the FBI
hasn't even contacted Kushner or his attorney to provide any information.
Unfortunately and because of the decline of print circulation, more
people get their news input from the cable news ... and the network news
stations. They also get input from social media, a factor that has
never before had so much of an influence and distribution of bull**** or
twisted interpretations of events.
I watched a few minutes of the Mad Cow show on MSNBC but the cow was
off last night. They do seem to be giddy about the chance of bringing
down the White House (like that has ever been a good thing)
Everyone wants to break another Watergate.
I don't think it will happen but getting Trump and the Trump family of
relatives and retainers out of the White House would be a good thing,
even if a politically crippled Mike Pence assumed the office.
There are photos extant of Trump removing his headphones (for the
simultaneous translations) at the G7 meeting because, apparently, he was
bored. Trump is so ****ing lazy, he can't even fake it. And why was
Trump, who during the campaign bragged about how vigorous he was,
driving a golf cart while following the other world leaders walking to a
meeting?
Reply With Quote
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Show Printable Version
Search this Thread
:
Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode
Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode
Posting Rules
Smilies
are
On
[IMG]
code is
Off
HTML code is
Off
Trackbacks
are
On
Pingbacks
are
On
Refbacks
are
On
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Depth at Cut at Intersection between Clear Lake Channel and Houston Ship Channel
Ronald Hugh Roberts
ASA
6
March 17th 08
04:20 PM
for Elisabeth the can's healthy, about me it's wide, whereas in back of you it's pouring deep
Mean Redneck
ASA
0
April 22nd 05
11:59 AM
for Kristen the plate's blank, with me it's deep, whereas in back of you it's attacking long
P. X. Lucarelli, DDS
ASA
0
April 22nd 05
11:53 AM
Florida Keys - Rocky Channel vs Big Spanish Channel (ICW)
Wayne.B
General
3
December 30th 04
06:14 PM
Florida Keys - Rocky Channel vs Big Spanish Channel (ICW)
Wayne.B
Cruising
3
December 30th 04
06:14 PM
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
04:06 AM
.
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
Contact Us
BoatBanter Home
Privacy Statement
Copyright © 2017
LinkBack
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks