On 5/7/17 7:11 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2017 at 4:02:58 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 5/5/17 3:46 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 05 May 2017 12:27:40 -0400, Poco Deplorevole
wrote:

Finally got the Ruger Mini-14 Ranch Rifle that I've been lusting for. Love it. Also love the Burris
prism sight. Of course, without the sight I was shooting dime size groupings at 100yds unsupported.
(Just kidding! I'm not nearly the shot our southern Maryland boy is!)

Here's a couple photos. Hope they're viewable:

http://s98.photobucket.com/user/jher...uger%20Mini-14



===

Looks nice John. It's so unusual to see a rifle with a wooden stock
these days. Does it have an internal box magazine?

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com



Man, that "scope" is mounted high. No, it uses magazines.

Here, Harry. Even chubby cheeks can get a decent weld. I suppose you'd cut the handle off to mount the sight lower, eh?

http://www.hwsportsman.net/AR332-1.jpg

In case you think that is the 'exceptional' way of mounting the sight--

http://tinyurl.com/mv7dvbc

Learn something.


On the more modern versions of that "AR" rifle, there is no carry
handle. What there is is a rail mounted on the upper receiver right
above the action and the barrel. If there is a carry handle, it is
removable so a sight can be mounted on a rail. None of the photos in
what you posted show a Mini-14, anyway. I tried out the sight you bought
at a Bass Pro Shop. It is a decent sight for the price. Interestingly,
the firearms sales counters at that store are almost 100 yards away from
the other side of the store, so you can easily see how the sight would
perform at that fairly typical distance. I ended up buying a Vortex
sight instead. You pays your money and you makes your choice.

On Sun, 7 May 2017 08:30:44 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/7/17 7:11 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2017 at 4:02:58 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 5/5/17 3:46 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 05 May 2017 12:27:40 -0400, Poco Deplorevole
wrote:

Finally got the Ruger Mini-14 Ranch Rifle that I've been lusting for. Love it. Also love the Burris
prism sight. Of course, without the sight I was shooting dime size groupings at 100yds unsupported.
(Just kidding! I'm not nearly the shot our southern Maryland boy is!)

Here's a couple photos. Hope they're viewable:

http://s98.photobucket.com/user/jher...uger%20Mini-14



===

Looks nice John. It's so unusual to see a rifle with a wooden stock
these days. Does it have an internal box magazine?

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com



Man, that "scope" is mounted high. No, it uses magazines.

Here, Harry. Even chubby cheeks can get a decent weld. I suppose you'd cut the handle off to mount the sight lower, eh?

http://www.hwsportsman.net/AR332-1.jpg

In case you think that is the 'exceptional' way of mounting the sight--

http://tinyurl.com/mv7dvbc

Learn something.


On the more modern versions of that "AR" rifle, there is no carry
handle. What there is is a rail mounted on the upper receiver right
above the action and the barrel. If there is a carry handle, it is
removable so a sight can be mounted on a rail. None of the photos in
what you posted show a Mini-14, anyway. I tried out the sight you bought
at a Bass Pro Shop. It is a decent sight for the price. Interestingly,
the firearms sales counters at that store are almost 100 yards away from
the other side of the store, so you can easily see how the sight would
perform at that fairly typical distance. I ended up buying a Vortex
sight instead. You pays your money and you makes your choice.

Your comment had to do with the height of the sight, if you'll recall.

On 5/7/17 8:47 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Sun, 7 May 2017 08:30:44 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/7/17 7:11 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2017 at 4:02:58 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 5/5/17 3:46 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 05 May 2017 12:27:40 -0400, Poco Deplorevole
wrote:

Finally got the Ruger Mini-14 Ranch Rifle that I've been lusting for. Love it. Also love the Burris
prism sight. Of course, without the sight I was shooting dime size groupings at 100yds unsupported.
(Just kidding! I'm not nearly the shot our southern Maryland boy is!)

Here's a couple photos. Hope they're viewable:

http://s98.photobucket.com/user/jher...uger%20Mini-14



===

Looks nice John. It's so unusual to see a rifle with a wooden stock
these days. Does it have an internal box magazine?

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com



Man, that "scope" is mounted high. No, it uses magazines.

Here, Harry. Even chubby cheeks can get a decent weld. I suppose you'd cut the handle off to mount the sight lower, eh?

http://www.hwsportsman.net/AR332-1.jpg

In case you think that is the 'exceptional' way of mounting the sight--

http://tinyurl.com/mv7dvbc

Learn something.


On the more modern versions of that "AR" rifle, there is no carry
handle. What there is is a rail mounted on the upper receiver right
above the action and the barrel. If there is a carry handle, it is
removable so a sight can be mounted on a rail. None of the photos in
what you posted show a Mini-14, anyway. I tried out the sight you bought
at a Bass Pro Shop. It is a decent sight for the price. Interestingly,
the firearms sales counters at that store are almost 100 yards away from
the other side of the store, so you can easily see how the sight would
perform at that fairly typical distance. I ended up buying a Vortex
sight instead. You pays your money and you makes your choice.

Your comment had to do with the height of the sight, if you'll recall.


You showed examples of sights being mounted on top of an AR carry
handle, mounted way up high. On the current versions of that rifle, the
sights are mounted much lower, and for reasons that matter.

On Sun, 7 May 2017 09:31:01 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/7/17 8:47 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Sun, 7 May 2017 08:30:44 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/7/17 7:11 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2017 at 4:02:58 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 5/5/17 3:46 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 05 May 2017 12:27:40 -0400, Poco Deplorevole
wrote:

Finally got the Ruger Mini-14 Ranch Rifle that I've been lusting for. Love it. Also love the Burris
prism sight. Of course, without the sight I was shooting dime size groupings at 100yds unsupported.
(Just kidding! I'm not nearly the shot our southern Maryland boy is!)

Here's a couple photos. Hope they're viewable:

http://s98.photobucket.com/user/jher...uger%20Mini-14



===

Looks nice John. It's so unusual to see a rifle with a wooden stock
these days. Does it have an internal box magazine?

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com



Man, that "scope" is mounted high. No, it uses magazines.

Here, Harry. Even chubby cheeks can get a decent weld. I suppose you'd cut the handle off to mount the sight lower, eh?

http://www.hwsportsman.net/AR332-1.jpg

In case you think that is the 'exceptional' way of mounting the sight--

http://tinyurl.com/mv7dvbc

Learn something.


On the more modern versions of that "AR" rifle, there is no carry
handle. What there is is a rail mounted on the upper receiver right
above the action and the barrel. If there is a carry handle, it is
removable so a sight can be mounted on a rail. None of the photos in
what you posted show a Mini-14, anyway. I tried out the sight you bought
at a Bass Pro Shop. It is a decent sight for the price. Interestingly,
the firearms sales counters at that store are almost 100 yards away from
the other side of the store, so you can easily see how the sight would
perform at that fairly typical distance. I ended up buying a Vortex
sight instead. You pays your money and you makes your choice.

Your comment had to do with the height of the sight, if you'll recall.


You showed examples of sights being mounted on top of an AR carry
handle, mounted way up high. On the current versions of that rifle, the
sights are mounted much lower, and for reasons that matter.

Krause, your pretense of omniscience is just that.

On 5/7/17 9:36 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Sun, 7 May 2017 09:31:01 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/7/17 8:47 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Sun, 7 May 2017 08:30:44 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/7/17 7:11 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2017 at 4:02:58 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 5/5/17 3:46 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 05 May 2017 12:27:40 -0400, Poco Deplorevole
wrote:

Finally got the Ruger Mini-14 Ranch Rifle that I've been lusting for. Love it. Also love the Burris
prism sight. Of course, without the sight I was shooting dime size groupings at 100yds unsupported.
(Just kidding! I'm not nearly the shot our southern Maryland boy is!)

Here's a couple photos. Hope they're viewable:

http://s98.photobucket.com/user/jher...uger%20Mini-14



===

Looks nice John. It's so unusual to see a rifle with a wooden stock
these days. Does it have an internal box magazine?

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com



Man, that "scope" is mounted high. No, it uses magazines.

Here, Harry. Even chubby cheeks can get a decent weld. I suppose you'd cut the handle off to mount the sight lower, eh?

http://www.hwsportsman.net/AR332-1.jpg

In case you think that is the 'exceptional' way of mounting the sight--

http://tinyurl.com/mv7dvbc

Learn something.


On the more modern versions of that "AR" rifle, there is no carry
handle. What there is is a rail mounted on the upper receiver right
above the action and the barrel. If there is a carry handle, it is
removable so a sight can be mounted on a rail. None of the photos in
what you posted show a Mini-14, anyway. I tried out the sight you bought
at a Bass Pro Shop. It is a decent sight for the price. Interestingly,
the firearms sales counters at that store are almost 100 yards away from
the other side of the store, so you can easily see how the sight would
perform at that fairly typical distance. I ended up buying a Vortex
sight instead. You pays your money and you makes your choice.

Your comment had to do with the height of the sight, if you'll recall.


You showed examples of sights being mounted on top of an AR carry
handle, mounted way up high. On the current versions of that rifle, the
sights are mounted much lower, and for reasons that matter.

Krause, your pretense of omniscience is just that.


Uh, I owned a Colt AR rifle, a fairly good "duplicate" aside from select
fire of what is issued to the military. No carry handle, and if you
wanted additional sights, you mounted them on the rail forward of the
folding rear sight. The photos you posted here of the AR rifle showed
the old style AR with the carry handle.

As I stated originally, you've got that sight on your new rifle mounted
too high. I doubt it matters much for a guy like you, though, since it
is unlikely you could hit a 2' "gong" target at 100 yards.

On Sun, 7 May 2017 09:44:27 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/7/17 9:36 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Sun, 7 May 2017 09:31:01 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/7/17 8:47 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Sun, 7 May 2017 08:30:44 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/7/17 7:11 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2017 at 4:02:58 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 5/5/17 3:46 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 05 May 2017 12:27:40 -0400, Poco Deplorevole
wrote:

Finally got the Ruger Mini-14 Ranch Rifle that I've been lusting for. Love it. Also love the Burris
prism sight. Of course, without the sight I was shooting dime size groupings at 100yds unsupported.
(Just kidding! I'm not nearly the shot our southern Maryland boy is!)

Here's a couple photos. Hope they're viewable:

http://s98.photobucket.com/user/jher...uger%20Mini-14



===

Looks nice John. It's so unusual to see a rifle with a wooden stock
these days. Does it have an internal box magazine?

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com



Man, that "scope" is mounted high. No, it uses magazines.

Here, Harry. Even chubby cheeks can get a decent weld. I suppose you'd cut the handle off to mount the sight lower, eh?

http://www.hwsportsman.net/AR332-1.jpg

In case you think that is the 'exceptional' way of mounting the sight--

http://tinyurl.com/mv7dvbc

Learn something.


On the more modern versions of that "AR" rifle, there is no carry
handle. What there is is a rail mounted on the upper receiver right
above the action and the barrel. If there is a carry handle, it is
removable so a sight can be mounted on a rail. None of the photos in
what you posted show a Mini-14, anyway. I tried out the sight you bought
at a Bass Pro Shop. It is a decent sight for the price. Interestingly,
the firearms sales counters at that store are almost 100 yards away from
the other side of the store, so you can easily see how the sight would
perform at that fairly typical distance. I ended up buying a Vortex
sight instead. You pays your money and you makes your choice.

Your comment had to do with the height of the sight, if you'll recall.


You showed examples of sights being mounted on top of an AR carry
handle, mounted way up high. On the current versions of that rifle, the
sights are mounted much lower, and for reasons that matter.

Krause, your pretense of omniscience is just that.


Uh, I owned a Colt AR rifle, a fairly good "duplicate" aside from select
fire of what is issued to the military. No carry handle, and if you
wanted additional sights, you mounted them on the rail forward of the
folding rear sight. The photos you posted here of the AR rifle showed
the old style AR with the carry handle.

As I stated originally, you've got that sight on your new rifle mounted
too high. I doubt it matters much for a guy like you, though, since it
is unlikely you could hit a 2' "gong" target at 100 yards.

Krause, your pretense of omniscience is just that.

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 5/7/17 9:36 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Sun, 7 May 2017 09:31:01 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/7/17 8:47 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Sun, 7 May 2017 08:30:44 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/7/17 7:11 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2017 at 4:02:58 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 5/5/17 3:46 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 05 May 2017 12:27:40 -0400, Poco Deplorevole
wrote:

Finally got the Ruger Mini-14 Ranch Rifle that I've been
lusting for. Love it. Also love the Burris
prism sight. Of course, without the sight I was shooting dime
size groupings at 100yds unsupported.
(Just kidding! I'm not nearly the shot our southern Maryland
boy is!)

Here's a couple photos. Hope they're viewable:

http://s98.photobucket.com/user/jher...uger%20Mini-14




===

Looks nice John. It's so unusual to see a rifle with a wooden
stock
these days. Does it have an internal box magazine?

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com



Man, that "scope" is mounted high. No, it uses magazines.

Here, Harry. Even chubby cheeks can get a decent weld. I suppose
you'd cut the handle off to mount the sight lower, eh?

http://www.hwsportsman.net/AR332-1.jpg

In case you think that is the 'exceptional' way of mounting the
sight--

http://tinyurl.com/mv7dvbc

Learn something.


On the more modern versions of that "AR" rifle, there is no carry
handle. What there is is a rail mounted on the upper receiver right
above the action and the barrel. If there is a carry handle, it is
removable so a sight can be mounted on a rail. None of the photos in
what you posted show a Mini-14, anyway. I tried out the sight you
bought
at a Bass Pro Shop. It is a decent sight for the price.
Interestingly,
the firearms sales counters at that store are almost 100 yards
away from
the other side of the store, so you can easily see how the sight
would
perform at that fairly typical distance. I ended up buying a Vortex
sight instead. You pays your money and you makes your choice.

Your comment had to do with the height of the sight, if you'll recall.


You showed examples of sights being mounted on top of an AR carry
handle, mounted way up high. On the current versions of that rifle, the
sights are mounted much lower, and for reasons that matter.

Krause, your pretense of omniscience is just that.


Uh, I owned a Colt AR rifle, a fairly good "duplicate" aside from
select fire of what is issued to the military. No carry handle, and if
you wanted additional sights, you mounted them on the rail forward of
the folding rear sight. The photos you posted here of the AR rifle
showed the old style AR with the carry handle.

As I stated originally, you've got that sight on your new rifle
mounted too high. I doubt it matters much for a guy like you, though,
since it is unlikely you could hit a 2' "gong" target at 100 yards.


It's not too high if it's accurate, expert. I have a red-dot scope on
my real Colt AR15 and it's very accurate.

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 5/7/17 8:47 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Sun, 7 May 2017 08:30:44 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/7/17 7:11 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2017 at 4:02:58 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 5/5/17 3:46 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 05 May 2017 12:27:40 -0400, Poco Deplorevole
wrote:

Finally got the Ruger Mini-14 Ranch Rifle that I've been lusting
for. Love it. Also love the Burris
prism sight. Of course, without the sight I was shooting dime
size groupings at 100yds unsupported.
(Just kidding! I'm not nearly the shot our southern Maryland boy
is!)

Here's a couple photos. Hope they're viewable:

http://s98.photobucket.com/user/jher...uger%20Mini-14



===

Looks nice John. It's so unusual to see a rifle with a wooden stock
these days. Does it have an internal box magazine?

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com



Man, that "scope" is mounted high. No, it uses magazines.

Here, Harry. Even chubby cheeks can get a decent weld. I suppose
you'd cut the handle off to mount the sight lower, eh?

http://www.hwsportsman.net/AR332-1.jpg

In case you think that is the 'exceptional' way of mounting the
sight--

http://tinyurl.com/mv7dvbc

Learn something.


On the more modern versions of that "AR" rifle, there is no carry
handle. What there is is a rail mounted on the upper receiver right
above the action and the barrel. If there is a carry handle, it is
removable so a sight can be mounted on a rail. None of the photos in
what you posted show a Mini-14, anyway. I tried out the sight you
bought
at a Bass Pro Shop. It is a decent sight for the price. Interestingly,
the firearms sales counters at that store are almost 100 yards away
from
the other side of the store, so you can easily see how the sight would
perform at that fairly typical distance. I ended up buying a Vortex
sight instead. You pays your money and you makes your choice.

Your comment had to do with the height of the sight, if you'll recall.


You showed examples of sights being mounted on top of an AR carry
handle, mounted way up high. On the current versions of that rifle,
the sights are mounted much lower, and for reasons that matter.


Your comment had to do with the height of the sight, if you'll recall.

On Sun, 7 May 2017 10:07:09 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:

Poco Deplorevole Wrote in message:
On Sun, 7 May 2017 08:30:44 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/7/17 7:11 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2017 at 4:02:58 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 5/5/17 3:46 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 05 May 2017 12:27:40 -0400, Poco Deplorevole
wrote:

Finally got the Ruger Mini-14 Ranch Rifle that I've been lusting for. Love it. Also love the Burris
prism sight. Of course, without the sight I was shooting dime size groupings at 100yds unsupported.
(Just kidding! I'm not nearly the shot our southern Maryland boy is!)

Here's a couple photos. Hope they're viewable:

http://s98.photobucket.com/user/jher...uger%20Mini-14



===

Looks nice John. It's so unusual to see a rifle with a wooden stock
these days. Does it have an internal box magazine?

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com



Man, that "scope" is mounted high. No, it uses magazines.

Here, Harry. Even chubby cheeks can get a decent weld. I suppose you'd cut the handle off to mount the sight lower, eh?

http://www.hwsportsman.net/AR332-1.jpg

In case you think that is the 'exceptional' way of mounting the sight--

http://tinyurl.com/mv7dvbc

Learn something.


On the more modern versions of that "AR" rifle, there is no carry
handle. What there is is a rail mounted on the upper receiver right
above the action and the barrel. If there is a carry handle, it is
removable so a sight can be mounted on a rail. None of the photos in
what you posted show a Mini-14, anyway. I tried out the sight you bought
at a Bass Pro Shop. It is a decent sight for the price. Interestingly,
the firearms sales counters at that store are almost 100 yards away from
the other side of the store, so you can easily see how the sight would
perform at that fairly typical distance. I ended up buying a Vortex
sight instead. You pays your money and you makes your choice.

Your comment had to do with the height of the sight, if you'll recall.


Moving on. Aren't you impressed by his neverending anecdotal
personal insights?

If true, they'd be thrilling.

Is my scope mounted too high?


http://tractioncontrol.well-regulate...3/IMG_0437.jpg