On 4/9/17 8:53 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 8:05:50 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided
missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off
the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but
were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported
but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub.

The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit.

I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL



The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald
Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker,
instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade
President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North
Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy,
ignorant, short-termed idiot as president.

The last president drone-bombed 7 countries. Now one precise strike is going to start WWIII with what you liberals call his buddy?

You are delusional.



We're talking about two lunatics, Kim and Trump, dummy.

On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 10:48:06 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 8:53 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 8:05:50 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided
missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off
the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but
were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported
but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub.

The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit.

I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL



The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald
Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker,
instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade
President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North
Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy,
ignorant, short-termed idiot as president.

The last president drone-bombed 7 countries. Now one precise strike is going to start WWIII with what you liberals call his buddy?

You are delusional.



We're talking about two lunatics, Kim and Trump, dummy.

WWIII will not be between Kim and the US, dummy. It would involve Russia, and it's not going to happen, ****head. You got it, dipwad?

On 4/10/17 9:36 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 10:48:06 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 8:53 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 8:05:50 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided
missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off
the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but
were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported
but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub.

The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit.

I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL



The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald
Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker,
instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade
President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North
Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy,
ignorant, short-termed idiot as president.

The last president drone-bombed 7 countries. Now one precise strike is going to start WWIII with what you liberals call his buddy?

You are delusional.



We're talking about two lunatics, Kim and Trump, dummy.

WWIII will not be between Kim and the US, dummy. It would involve Russia, and it's not going to happen, ****head. You got it, dipwad?



Do you even know what the term "World War" means, ****-for-brains? It
means a war involving a great number of big nations in all different
parts of the world. A world war would not be between just the U.S. and
North Korea, as you implied I meant, or just between the U.S., Korea,
and Russia.

On Monday, April 10, 2017 at 9:44:38 AM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/10/17 9:36 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 10:48:06 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 8:53 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 8:05:50 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided
missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off
the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but
were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported
but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub.

The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit.

I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL



The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald
Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker,
instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade
President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North
Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy,
ignorant, short-termed idiot as president.

The last president drone-bombed 7 countries. Now one precise strike is going to start WWIII with what you liberals call his buddy?

You are delusional.



We're talking about two lunatics, Kim and Trump, dummy.

WWIII will not be between Kim and the US, dummy. It would involve Russia, and it's not going to happen, ****head. You got it, dipwad?



Do you even know what the term "World War" means, ****-for-brains? It
means a war involving a great number of big nations in all different
parts of the world. A world war would not be between just the U.S. and
North Korea, as you implied I meant, or just between the U.S., Korea,
and Russia.

Read for content, asshole. I never said or implied it would be *just* the US, Russia and NK.

On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:44:36 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:


Do you even know what the term "World War" means, ****-for-brains? It
means a war involving a great number of big nations in all different
parts of the world. A world war would not be between just the U.S. and
North Korea, as you implied I meant, or just between the U.S., Korea,
and Russia.

I doubt we will actually have another "world war" in the classical war
of attrition sense. It will not be long before it degrades into a
nuclear holocaust and that may only last a few hours.
The only question with N Korea is whether that exchange will be
limited or planet killing.
If Kim decides to hit Hawaii or Alaska I doubt there will be many
people left alive in North Korea but if it is just S Korea or Japan
there may be a little wiggle room.
The real issue is how we manage to attack N Korea without too much
collateral damage in China and South Korea.
I imagine we might go for the enhanced radiation weapons. (Aka Neutron
bombs)

On 4/10/17 12:54 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:44:36 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:


Do you even know what the term "World War" means, ****-for-brains? It
means a war involving a great number of big nations in all different
parts of the world. A world war would not be between just the U.S. and
North Korea, as you implied I meant, or just between the U.S., Korea,
and Russia.

I doubt we will actually have another "world war" in the classical war
of attrition sense. It will not be long before it degrades into a
nuclear holocaust and that may only last a few hours.
The only question with N Korea is whether that exchange will be
limited or planet killing.
If Kim decides to hit Hawaii or Alaska I doubt there will be many
people left alive in North Korea but if it is just S Korea or Japan
there may be a little wiggle room.
The real issue is how we manage to attack N Korea without too much
collateral damage in China and South Korea.
I imagine we might go for the enhanced radiation weapons. (Aka Neutron
bombs)


Or we could airdrop in Jared Kushner in a blazer and bullet-resistant
vest to negotiate...

On 4/10/17 11:24 AM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 4/10/17 9:36 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 10:48:06 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 8:53 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 8:05:50 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided
missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off
the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but
were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported
but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub.

The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit.

I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL



The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald
Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker,
instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade
President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North
Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy,
ignorant, short-termed idiot as president.

The last president drone-bombed 7 countries. Now one precise strike is going to start WWIII with what you liberals call his buddy?

You are delusional.



We're talking about two lunatics, Kim and Trump, dummy.

WWIII will not be between Kim and the US, dummy. It would involve Russia, and it's not going to happen, ****head. You got it, dipwad?



Do you even know what the term "World War" means, ****-for-brains? It
means a war involving a great number of big nations in all different
parts of the world. A world war would not be between just the U.S. and
North Korea, as you implied I meant, or just between the U.S., Korea,
and Russia.


He called you dummy, ****head, and dipwad. I tend to agree with
him. Dont get hung up on semantics.




Ooooh...someone opened your casket and let you out in daylight.