On 4/10/2017 9:27 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/10/17 6:48 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/9/2017 8:53 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 8:05:50 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided
missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a
station off
the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call
but
were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported
but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke
sub.

The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit.

I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and
what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know
more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL



The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than
Donald
Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker,
instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade
President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North
Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy,
ignorant, short-termed idiot as president.

The last president drone-bombed 7 countries. Now one precise strike
is going to start WWIII with what you liberals call his buddy?

You are delusional.



It's because the term "drone" is not offensive to progressive liberals.

They are already complaining and protesting that "Tomahawk" is offensive
to native Americans.




Jackoff didn't realize I was discussing the two nutcases, the POTUS and
the leader of North Korea, I suppose. I wasn't talking about Trump's
attack on Syria. You obviously pay a lot more attention to "progressive
liberals" than I do. I haven't read a peep of complaint about the
Tomahawk descriptor.

By the way, all liberals are progressive.


I don't think so but it's my personal view. There are some moderate
liberals that I wouldn't label as "progressive". To me, progressives
are liberals who are intolerant of other views and have an elitist,
"enlightened" attitude. It starts with most college professors who
indoctrinate/brainwash their students with their politics.

The complaints about "Tomahawk" being used as the name for our cruise
missiles was on the news last night and this morning.

You were probably cleaning your guns.

On 4/10/2017 9:28 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/10/17 6:55 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/9/2017 10:47 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 10:23 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/9/2017 8:05 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided
missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station
off
the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call
but
were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not
reported
but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke
sub.

The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit.

I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and
what
else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more
than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL



The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than
Donald
Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker,
instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade
President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North
Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy,
ignorant, short-termed idiot as president.


If your concern is a confrontation with one of our adversaries that
could lead to WWIII and given Hillary's recent comments regarding what
she would do in Syria, you should feel safer with Trump so far.





What matters is that Hillary is not ignorant, intellectually lazy, a
loudmouth, inexperienced in diplomacy, and the laughing stock of our
allies, and your boy Trump is all of these.


I agree that Hillary is not ignorant. She's arrogant.

She not intellectually lazy. She considers herself an intellectual
elitist and one of the "enlightened".

She *is* a loudmouth but nobody can differentiate her lies from her
truths.

She *is* well experienced in ill formed and poorly executed diplomacy.

She was the laughing stock of the nation at about 11pm last Nov 8th.





No head of state or politician is more arrogant than Trump, and he is
far more of a liar than Mrs. Clinton.

Right. Trump exaggerates his wealth. Hillary imagines snipers firing on
her airplane as it circles in to land.

On 4/10/17 10:00 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/10/2017 9:27 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/10/17 6:48 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/9/2017 8:53 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 8:05:50 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided
missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a
station off
the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call
but
were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not
reported
but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke
sub.

The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit.

I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and
what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know
more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL



The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than
Donald
Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker,
instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade
President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North
Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy,
ignorant, short-termed idiot as president.

The last president drone-bombed 7 countries. Now one precise strike
is going to start WWIII with what you liberals call his buddy?

You are delusional.



It's because the term "drone" is not offensive to progressive liberals.

They are already complaining and protesting that "Tomahawk" is offensive
to native Americans.




Jackoff didn't realize I was discussing the two nutcases, the POTUS and
the leader of North Korea, I suppose. I wasn't talking about Trump's
attack on Syria. You obviously pay a lot more attention to "progressive
liberals" than I do. I haven't read a peep of complaint about the
Tomahawk descriptor.

By the way, all liberals are progressive.


I don't think so but it's my personal view. There are some moderate
liberals that I wouldn't label as "progressive". To me, progressives
are liberals who are intolerant of other views and have an elitist,
"enlightened" attitude. It starts with most college professors who
indoctrinate/brainwash their students with their politics.

The complaints about "Tomahawk" being used as the name for our cruise
missiles was on the news last night and this morning.

You were probably cleaning your guns.



No, I was at the gym. The only thing on the TVs there are awful videos
telling you about the horrific diseases you'll get if you eat
good-tasting food, date pretty girls, and fail to exercise.

On 4/10/17 10:02 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/10/2017 9:28 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/10/17 6:55 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/9/2017 10:47 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 10:23 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/9/2017 8:05 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided
missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a
station
off
the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call
but
were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not
reported
but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke
sub.

The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit.

I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and
what
else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more
than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL



The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than
Donald
Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker,
instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade
President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North
Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy,
ignorant, short-termed idiot as president.


If your concern is a confrontation with one of our adversaries that
could lead to WWIII and given Hillary's recent comments regarding what
she would do in Syria, you should feel safer with Trump so far.





What matters is that Hillary is not ignorant, intellectually lazy, a
loudmouth, inexperienced in diplomacy, and the laughing stock of our
allies, and your boy Trump is all of these.


I agree that Hillary is not ignorant. She's arrogant.

She not intellectually lazy. She considers herself an intellectual
elitist and one of the "enlightened".

She *is* a loudmouth but nobody can differentiate her lies from her
truths.

She *is* well experienced in ill formed and poorly executed diplomacy.

She was the laughing stock of the nation at about 11pm last Nov 8th.





No head of state or politician is more arrogant than Trump, and he is
far more of a liar than Mrs. Clinton.

Right. Trump exaggerates his wealth. Hillary imagines snipers firing on
her airplane as it circles in to land.



There are several sites that keep track of lying politicians. Trump
easily leads the pack.

On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:28:18 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No head of state or politician is more arrogant than Trump, and he is
far more of a liar than Mrs. Clinton.

===

What a sad state of affairs for this country when we have to argue
which candidate is the most arrogant or the biggest liar. It was a
close race in more ways than one.

On Monday, April 10, 2017 at 9:44:38 AM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/10/17 9:36 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 10:48:06 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 8:53 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 8:05:50 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided
missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off
the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but
were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported
but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub.

The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit.

I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL



The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald
Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker,
instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade
President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North
Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy,
ignorant, short-termed idiot as president.

The last president drone-bombed 7 countries. Now one precise strike is going to start WWIII with what you liberals call his buddy?

You are delusional.



We're talking about two lunatics, Kim and Trump, dummy.

WWIII will not be between Kim and the US, dummy. It would involve Russia, and it's not going to happen, ****head. You got it, dipwad?



Do you even know what the term "World War" means, ****-for-brains? It
means a war involving a great number of big nations in all different
parts of the world. A world war would not be between just the U.S. and
North Korea, as you implied I meant, or just between the U.S., Korea,
and Russia.

Read for content, asshole. I never said or implied it would be *just* the US, Russia and NK.

8:28 AMKeyser Soze
- show quoted text -
No head of state or politician is more arrogant than Trump, and he is
far more of a liar than Mrs. Clinton.
.....

So you finally admit that Mrs. Clinton is a liar.

Wonders never cease

Tim wrote:
8:28 AMKeyser Soze
- show quoted text -
No head of state or politician is more arrogant than Trump, and he is
far more of a liar than Mrs. Clinton.
....

So you finally admit that Mrs. Clinton is a liar.

Wonders never cease


All politicians liie

--
Posted with my iPhone 7+.

On 4/10/17 11:24 AM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 4/10/17 9:36 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 10:48:06 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 8:53 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 8:05:50 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided
missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off
the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but
were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported
but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub.

The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit.

I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL



The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald
Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker,
instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade
President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North
Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy,
ignorant, short-termed idiot as president.

The last president drone-bombed 7 countries. Now one precise strike is going to start WWIII with what you liberals call his buddy?

You are delusional.



We're talking about two lunatics, Kim and Trump, dummy.

WWIII will not be between Kim and the US, dummy. It would involve Russia, and it's not going to happen, ****head. You got it, dipwad?



Do you even know what the term "World War" means, ****-for-brains? It
means a war involving a great number of big nations in all different
parts of the world. A world war would not be between just the U.S. and
North Korea, as you implied I meant, or just between the U.S., Korea,
and Russia.


He called you dummy, ****head, and dipwad. I tend to agree with
him. Dont get hung up on semantics.




Ooooh...someone opened your casket and let you out in daylight.

On 4/10/17 11:27 AM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 4/10/17 6:48 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/9/2017 8:53 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 8:05:50 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided
missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a
station off
the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but
were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported
but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke
sub.

The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit.

I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and
what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know
more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL



The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald
Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker,
instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade
President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North
Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy,
ignorant, short-termed idiot as president.

The last president drone-bombed 7 countries. Now one precise strike
is going to start WWIII with what you liberals call his buddy?

You are delusional.



It's because the term "drone" is not offensive to progressive liberals.

They are already complaining and protesting that "Tomahawk" is offensive
to native Americans.




Jackoff didn't realize I was discussing the two nutcases, the POTUS and
the leader of North Korea, I suppose. I wasn't talking about Trump's
attack on Syria. You obviously pay a lot more attention to "progressive
liberals" than I do. I haven't read a peep of complaint about the
Tomahawk descriptor.

By the way, all liberals are progressive.


What you don't realize is it doesn't matter what you are talking
about, you will be put down.


Put down? By the rec.boats right-wing dipsticks? Please.