Carrier Strike Force 1 ...
 

On 4/10/17 12:26 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 9 Apr 2017 20:05:48 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald
Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker,
instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade
President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North
Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy,
ignorant, short-termed idiot as president.

I am not convinced that Trump is not going to work a deal with Putin
and Xi. I just fear the rest of the world might not like it.
They might end up saying China will step on N Korea if we let them
have the islands in the South China Sea, maybe Tibet and a bigger
stake in Taiwan.




China has "had" Tibet for decades. It is in China's interest to act in
ways that promote its world trade.

Carrier Strike Force 1 ...
 

On 4/9/2017 8:53 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 8:05:50 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided
missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off
the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but
were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported
but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub.

The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit.

I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL



The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald
Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker,
instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade
President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North
Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy,
ignorant, short-termed idiot as president.

The last president drone-bombed 7 countries. Now one precise strike is going to start WWIII with what you liberals call his buddy?

You are delusional.



It's because the term "drone" is not offensive to progressive liberals.

They are already complaining and protesting that "Tomahawk" is offensive
to native Americans.

Carrier Strike Force 1 ...
 

On 4/9/2017 10:47 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 10:23 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/9/2017 8:05 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided
missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station
off
the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but
were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported
but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke
sub.

The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit.

I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what
else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more
than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL



The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald
Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker,
instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade
President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North
Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy,
ignorant, short-termed idiot as president.


If your concern is a confrontation with one of our adversaries that
could lead to WWIII and given Hillary's recent comments regarding what
she would do in Syria, you should feel safer with Trump so far.





What matters is that Hillary is not ignorant, intellectually lazy, a
loudmouth, inexperienced in diplomacy, and the laughing stock of our
allies, and your boy Trump is all of these.


I agree that Hillary is not ignorant. She's arrogant.

She not intellectually lazy. She considers herself an intellectual
elitist and one of the "enlightened".

She *is* a loudmouth but nobody can differentiate her lies from her truths.

She *is* well experienced in ill formed and poorly executed diplomacy.

She was the laughing stock of the nation at about 11pm last Nov 8th.

Carrier Strike Force 1 ...
 

On 4/10/2017 6:47 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/10/17 12:26 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 9 Apr 2017 20:05:48 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald
Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker,
instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade
President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North
Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy,
ignorant, short-termed idiot as president.

I am not convinced that Trump is not going to work a deal with Putin
and Xi. I just fear the rest of the world might not like it.
They might end up saying China will step on N Korea if we let them
have the islands in the South China Sea, maybe Tibet and a bigger
stake in Taiwan.




China has "had" Tibet for decades. It is in China's interest to act in
ways that promote its world trade.


I think there is a good chance that China will eventually agree to clamp
down on North Korea.

China has made a major transition since the late 1970's when economic
reforms were initiated and experiments in capitalism with foreign trade
in mind began. Before then about 700 million Chinese survived on the
equivalent of $1 a day. The experiment in economic reforms from 1980 to
the late 1990's allowed limited privatization of businesses, competition
and encouraged foreign trade. I visited China in 1986 as a direct
result of these reforms although it was still "experimental" in nature.
Certain provinces that were somewhat remote from major population areas
were set aside as the experiment locations.
Western and European companies were invited to visit under the pretense
of developing joint ventures. The mistake many western companies made
was in assuming that the joint ventures with China would open markets
for their products to the billion plus Chinese population which was not
the case. The Chinese were interested in procuring Western
manufacturing technologies to produce and export products to the rest of
the world.

They have succeeded in doing exactly that as we can see today. Although
technically still a communist country China has transformed itself
economically into a major capitalist nation. The poverty level in China
has dropped enormously as it's population benefits from business
privatization. The Chinese government can never go back to the way it
was before 1980 and they need us as customers more than we really need them.

Carrier Strike Force 1 ...
 

On 4/10/17 6:48 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/9/2017 8:53 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 8:05:50 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided
missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a
station off
the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but
were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported
but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke
sub.

The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit.

I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and
what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know
more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL



The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald
Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker,
instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade
President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North
Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy,
ignorant, short-termed idiot as president.

The last president drone-bombed 7 countries. Now one precise strike
is going to start WWIII with what you liberals call his buddy?

You are delusional.



It's because the term "drone" is not offensive to progressive liberals.

They are already complaining and protesting that "Tomahawk" is offensive
to native Americans.




Jackoff didn't realize I was discussing the two nutcases, the POTUS and
the leader of North Korea, I suppose. I wasn't talking about Trump's
attack on Syria. You obviously pay a lot more attention to "progressive
liberals" than I do. I haven't read a peep of complaint about the
Tomahawk descriptor.

By the way, all liberals are progressive.

Carrier Strike Force 1 ...
 

On 4/10/17 6:55 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/9/2017 10:47 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 10:23 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/9/2017 8:05 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided
missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station
off
the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call
but
were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported
but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke
sub.

The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit.

I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what
else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more
than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL



The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than
Donald
Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker,
instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade
President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North
Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy,
ignorant, short-termed idiot as president.


If your concern is a confrontation with one of our adversaries that
could lead to WWIII and given Hillary's recent comments regarding what
she would do in Syria, you should feel safer with Trump so far.





What matters is that Hillary is not ignorant, intellectually lazy, a
loudmouth, inexperienced in diplomacy, and the laughing stock of our
allies, and your boy Trump is all of these.


I agree that Hillary is not ignorant. She's arrogant.

She not intellectually lazy. She considers herself an intellectual
elitist and one of the "enlightened".

She *is* a loudmouth but nobody can differentiate her lies from her truths.

She *is* well experienced in ill formed and poorly executed diplomacy.

She was the laughing stock of the nation at about 11pm last Nov 8th.





No head of state or politician is more arrogant than Trump, and he is
far more of a liar than Mrs. Clinton.

Carrier Strike Force 1 ...
 

On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 10:47:20 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 10:23 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/9/2017 8:05 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided
missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station
off
the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but
were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported
but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub.

The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit.

I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what
else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more
than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL



The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald
Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker,
instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade
President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North
Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy,
ignorant, short-termed idiot as president.


If your concern is a confrontation with one of our adversaries that
could lead to WWIII and given Hillary's recent comments regarding what
she would do in Syria, you should feel safer with Trump so far.





What matters is that Hillary is a liberal, and Trump is not.

There, I fixed it for you.

Carrier Strike Force 1 ...
 

On 4/10/17 9:32 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 10:47:20 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 10:23 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/9/2017 8:05 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided
missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station
off
the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but
were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported
but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub.

The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit.

I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what
else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more
than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL



The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald
Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker,
instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade
President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North
Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy,
ignorant, short-termed idiot as president.


If your concern is a confrontation with one of our adversaries that
could lead to WWIII and given Hillary's recent comments regarding what
she would do in Syria, you should feel safer with Trump so far.





What matters is that Hillary is a liberal, and Trump is not.

There, I fixed it for you.


No, you fixed it for you and the rest of the right-wing jackoffs.

Carrier Strike Force 1 ...
 

On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 10:48:06 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 8:53 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 8:05:50 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided
missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off
the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but
were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported
but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub.

The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit.

I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL



The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald
Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker,
instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade
President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North
Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy,
ignorant, short-termed idiot as president.

The last president drone-bombed 7 countries. Now one precise strike is going to start WWIII with what you liberals call his buddy?

You are delusional.



We're talking about two lunatics, Kim and Trump, dummy.

WWIII will not be between Kim and the US, dummy. It would involve Russia, and it's not going to happen, ****head. You got it, dipwad?

Carrier Strike Force 1 ...
 

On 4/10/17 9:36 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 10:48:06 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 8:53 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 8:05:50 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided
missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off
the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but
were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported
but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub.

The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit.

I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL



The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald
Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker,
instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade
President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North
Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy,
ignorant, short-termed idiot as president.

The last president drone-bombed 7 countries. Now one precise strike is going to start WWIII with what you liberals call his buddy?

You are delusional.



We're talking about two lunatics, Kim and Trump, dummy.

WWIII will not be between Kim and the US, dummy. It would involve Russia, and it's not going to happen, ****head. You got it, dipwad?



Do you even know what the term "World War" means, ****-for-brains? It
means a war involving a great number of big nations in all different
parts of the world. A world war would not be between just the U.S. and
North Korea, as you implied I meant, or just between the U.S., Korea,
and Russia.