Question for Progressives
 

On 4/4/17 9:49 AM, Tim wrote:
8:43 AMKeyser Soze
- show quoted text -
No, Lil' Tim, I said "someone," I didn't say "me." Did you graduate from
high school?
.....

Yes I graduated from high school. Why didn't you? And if you did, you should at least act like it.


I was referring to your apparent inability to "decode" a simple
statement. Back in the day, if you couldn't do that on an exam, you
couldn't graduate.

Question for Progressives
 

- hide quoted text -
On 4/4/17 9:49 AM, Tim wrote:
8:43 AMKeyser Soze
- show quoted text -
No, Lil' Tim, I said "someone," I didn't say "me." Did you graduate from
high school?
.....

Yes I graduated from high school. Why didn't you? And if you did, you should at least act like it.


I was referring to your apparent inability to "decode" a simple
statement. Back in the day, if you couldn't do that on an exam, you
couldn't graduate.
-----

Oh, so you needed a decoder ring? Or was it the enigma machine?

I left mine at home. Didn't need them. Graduated with a 3.8 and goofed off most of my senior year too!

Question for Progressives
 

8:36 AMKeyser Soze
On 4/4/17 9:22 AM, justan wrote:
Tim Wrote in message:
6:55 AMKeyser Soze

Ahh, rec.boats, where simple minds go for their daily dose of superficiality.

Well Harry, seeing you're on here and also post more in here than anyone else, maybe you should know that you have included yourself in that statement. But I know, you probably can't see nor understand that...


What could be more superficial than a bunch of gay guys standing
around a tree stump firing bullets into it. What in the world are
they trying to prove?



Actually, poor "Stumpy" was simply a tree stump "stand" 2' tall on which
we placed empty soda cans and plastic bottles, and rested paper targets.
Stumpy was exactly 25 yards from our shooting table, and 50 yards in
front of the berm on the range we had in those days. Alas, Stumpy was
tractored out when we had the septic field installed, and we moved the
shooting range to a spot where we had room to build a 100 yard range. No
stumps.
......

That's nice. Now, what about your wives and their women you go out with?

Question for Progressives
 

On 4/4/2017 9:44 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 08:31:56 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:

Yup. She wore the grey version last night. First time I've ever seen
anything other than black. Maybe she reads rec.boats ?



Madcow-Maddow. Could it be a typo. At any rate, the woman hater
Krause drove her out of here years ago. Can't have a mere woman
upstaging the great Harry Krause now, can we?

===

Same with Karen from Oz, and Peggie Hall.



I now understand why he didn't introduce himself to Peggie at the trade
show years ago. She would have thought a walrus was approaching.

Question for Progressives
 

On 4/4/2017 8:48 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/4/17 8:14 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/4/2017 8:09 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/4/17 8:00 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/4/2017 7:55 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/4/17 5:19 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/3/2017 7:21 PM, Alex wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote:

Does Rachel Maddow ever change her clothes?

It occurred to me the other day that for as long as I can
remember seeing her on MSNBC she is always wearing the same,
black, gender neutral "suit".

Is there some liberal symbolism here?

She apparently has a gray version, too:

https://www.google.com/search?q=rach...1536&bih=6 58









Yup. She wore the grey version last night. First time I've ever
seen
anything other than black. Maybe she reads rec.boats ?




Ahh, rec.boats, where simple minds go for their daily dose of
superficiality. But what color are her shoes? And does johnny the
racist
cut off the crusts of the bread he uses to make PB&J sandwiches?


Sorta the same as the left criticizing Pence because he doesn't think a
private dinner with another woman is appropriate. It's not up to them
to judge.

Sure it is. It indicates Pence is driven by weird religious beliefs or,
like Trump, he can't control himself in the presence of women but,
unlike Trump, realizes his addiction and stays away. Personally, I think
it is related to his weird fundamentalist religious bull**** beliefs.

Weird religious beliefs? Inability to control himself?
I think not.

I'd probably refrain from private dinners with other women myself
(unless I knew them well) and I don't have any weird religious beliefs
or history of lack of control. There's another practical reason for me:

Maybe Pence's wife is also Italian. :-)


I've been to lunches and dinners with women other than my wives my
entire adult life, all business-related, and never a thought of
hanky-panky. That includes some Italian women.


You're not married to one. :-)

Question for Progressives
 

On 4/4/2017 9:26 AM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 4/4/17 9:09 AM, Tim wrote:
8:01 AMKeyser Soze
- hide quoted text -
On 4/4/17 8:53 AM, Tim wrote:
7:48 AMKeyser Soze
- show quoted text -
I've been to lunches and dinners with women other than my wives my
entire adult life, all business-related, and never a thought of
hanky-panky.

.....

So your wives have other women? Wow!


Have you been sleeping with FlaJim?
....

You ought to know the way you mention hand jobs and reach arounds.You like peaking into guys bedrooms and showers, evidently.


So, are you saying that someone peaking into FlaJim's bedroom would find
you and FlaJim in flagrante delicto?


Get your hand off your dick, moron.



Short, concise and to the point.

Question for Progressives
 

On 4/4/17 10:14 AM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 4/4/17 9:22 AM, justan wrote:
Tim Wrote in message:
6:55 AMKeyser Soze

Ahh, rec.boats, where simple minds go for their daily dose of superficiality.

Well Harry, seeing you're on here and also post more in here than anyone else, maybe you should know that you have included yourself in that statement. But I know, you probably can't see nor understand that...


What could be more superficial than a bunch of gay guys standing
around a tree stump firing bullets into it. What in the world are
they trying to prove?



Actually, poor "Stumpy" was simply a tree stump "stand" 2' tall on which
we placed empty soda cans and plastic bottles, and rested paper targets.
Stumpy was exactly 25 yards from our shooting table, and 50 yards in
front of the berm on the range we had in those days. Alas, Stumpy was
tractored out when we had the septic field installed, and we moved the
shooting range to a spot where we had room to build a 100 yard range. No
stumps.


Do you ever allow your wives at your kingdom in the woods? Or
would it cramp your style.


Now that there is running hot and cold water, an indoor shower, and,
most important, a toilet, they usually accompany us.

Question for Progressives
 

On 4/4/17 11:15 AM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 4/4/17 10:14 AM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 4/4/17 9:22 AM, justan wrote:
Tim Wrote in message:
6:55 AMKeyser Soze

Ahh, rec.boats, where simple minds go for their daily dose of superficiality.

Well Harry, seeing you're on here and also post more in here than anyone else, maybe you should know that you have included yourself in that statement. But I know, you probably can't see nor understand that...


What could be more superficial than a bunch of gay guys standing
around a tree stump firing bullets into it. What in the world are
they trying to prove?



Actually, poor "Stumpy" was simply a tree stump "stand" 2' tall on which
we placed empty soda cans and plastic bottles, and rested paper targets.
Stumpy was exactly 25 yards from our shooting table, and 50 yards in
front of the berm on the range we had in those days. Alas, Stumpy was
tractored out when we had the septic field installed, and we moved the
shooting range to a spot where we had room to build a 100 yard range. No
stumps.


Do you ever allow your wives at your kingdom in the woods? Or
would it cramp your style.


Now that there is running hot and cold water, an indoor shower, and,
most important, a toilet, they usually accompany us.


Bummer, eh?


Actually. it's quite nice. We don't have Stepford Wives, like so many of
you mindless righties.

Question for Progressives
 

On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 09:46:42 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

Madcow-Maddow. Could it be a typo. At any rate, the woman hater
Krause drove her out of here years ago. Can't have a mere woman
upstaging the great Harry Krause now, can we?

===

Same with Karen from Oz, and Peggie Hall.


Bull**** upon bull**** upon bull****, reaching the status of urban myth.

===

It's well documented. The bull**** is yours.

Question for Progressives
 

On 4/4/17 11:40 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 09:46:42 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

Madcow-Maddow. Could it be a typo. At any rate, the woman hater
Krause drove her out of here years ago. Can't have a mere woman
upstaging the great Harry Krause now, can we?

===

Same with Karen from Oz, and Peggie Hall.


Bull**** upon bull**** upon bull****, reaching the status of urban myth.

===

It's well documented. The bull**** is yours.


Sorry, Mr. STD, it isn't, except with you righties repeating it enough
to try to make it so.