![]() |
Everyday cap
|
Everyday cap
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 13:38:40 -0500, Poco Deplorevole
wrote: https://photos.google.com/photo/AF1Q...VOVUE1nLkAhEfj Hope link works. Harry will love it. === 404. That’s an error. The requested URL was not found on this server. That’s all we know. Do you have sharing permissions set correctly? |
Everyday cap
5:37
- show quoted text - === 404. That’s an error. The requested URL was not found on this server. That’s all we know. ----- Same here |
Everyday cap
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:36:11 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: 5:37 - show quoted text - === 404. That’s an error. The requested URL was not found on this server. That’s all we know. ----- Same here I got a Google sign on screen. I don't do Google |
Everyday cap
|
Everyday cap
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 18:37:30 -0500, wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 13:38:40 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: https://photos.google.com/photo/AF1Q...VOVUE1nLkAhEfj Hope link works. Harry will love it. === 404. That’s an error. The requested URL was not found on this server. That’s all we know. Do you have sharing permissions set correctly? Don't know. Not sure how to set them when I click on share a window pops up with a bunch of individual names. Any suggestions? |
Everyday cap
|
Everyday cap
On Wed, 01 Feb 2017 01:01:17 -0500,
wrote: On Wed, 01 Feb 2017 00:47:37 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:36:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: 5:37 - show quoted text - === 404. That’s an error. The requested URL was not found on this server. That’s all we know. ----- Same here I got a Google sign on screen. I don't do Google === Really! How do you avoid using the best search engine and the most secure EMAIL system ever invented? I'm sure Google already knows who you are... :-) Between them and Amazon they have the most advanced cloud computing systems and artificial intelligence. They will end up making corporate data centers totally obsolete. I use an anonymous search engine that is powered by google and bing. I am also not sure why you think Gmail is so secure when they are reading and analyzing every byte you send. I feel the same way about cloud computing. All of your data is out of your control. Google (or whoever) may not be looking at it all but you are open to hackers who can. Also how well is that cloud stuff working when your internet connection breaks? My wife's place got tricked into a cloud solution for their point of sale and it is a nightmare because there is no way to run "no host". If Comcast takes a **** they are running a whole country club with a pencil and this is a cashless place. When the net finally comes back online they are trying to reconstruct thousands of transactions from scraps of paper written by kids who can't add. To make matters worse they run off of I-pads that are incapable of interfacing directly with the windows based accounting package but that is another deal. |
Everyday cap
On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 07:03:10 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 2/1/2017 1:01 AM, wrote: On Wed, 01 Feb 2017 00:47:37 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:36:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: 5:37 - show quoted text - === 404. That’s an error. The requested URL was not found on this server. That’s all we know. ----- Same here I got a Google sign on screen. I don't do Google === Really! How do you avoid using the best search engine and the most secure EMAIL system ever invented? I'm sure Google already knows who you are... :-) Between them and Amazon they have the most advanced cloud computing systems and artificial intelligence. They will end up making corporate data centers totally obsolete. I agree with that. Google knows more about you than you know about yourself. The Google "Home" thing that my daughter gave me for Christmas is sitting on a table in the living room .... unplugged. It's for show purposes only when my daughter visits. Don't want her to feel bad that I don't use it. I have an echo sitting here in the shrink wrap too. The only thing my wife thought it might work for, running a smart TV, is not available. If there is any doubt that it is listening to you all the time, look at how hard google worked to squash the subpoena in that murder case. Even if google isn't I wonder how susceptible it is to a hacker who would. |
Everyday cap
|
Everyday cap
On Wed, 01 Feb 2017 11:30:45 -0500, wrote:
On Wed, 01 Feb 2017 01:01:17 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 01 Feb 2017 00:47:37 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:36:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: 5:37 - show quoted text - === 404. That’s an error. The requested URL was not found on this server. That’s all we know. ----- Same here I got a Google sign on screen. I don't do Google === Really! How do you avoid using the best search engine and the most secure EMAIL system ever invented? I'm sure Google already knows who you are... :-) Between them and Amazon they have the most advanced cloud computing systems and artificial intelligence. They will end up making corporate data centers totally obsolete. I use an anonymous search engine that is powered by google and bing. I am also not sure why you think Gmail is so secure when they are reading and analyzing every byte you send. I feel the same way about cloud computing. All of your data is out of your control. Google (or whoever) may not be looking at it all but you are open to hackers who can. Also how well is that cloud stuff working when your internet connection breaks? My wife's place got tricked into a cloud solution for their point of sale and it is a nightmare because there is no way to run "no host". If Comcast takes a **** they are running a whole country club with a pencil and this is a cashless place. When the net finally comes back online they are trying to reconstruct thousands of transactions from scraps of paper written by kids who can't add. To make matters worse they run off of I-pads that are incapable of interfacing directly with the windows based accounting package but that is another deal. Don't do clouds. All I want to do is post a link to a photo I took and loaded into photos.google.com. Let's try this one: https://goo.gl/photos/M1AL9bNk2KSxGSiM9 |
Everyday cap
On Wed, 01 Feb 2017 13:26:53 -0500, wrote:
On Wed, 01 Feb 2017 11:30:45 -0500, wrote: Also how well is that cloud stuff working when your internet connection breaks? My wife's place got tricked into a cloud solution for their point of sale and it is a nightmare because there is no way to run "no host". If Comcast takes a **** they are running a whole country club with a pencil and this is a cashless place. === They need a backup network connection. Probably the most economic would be something like one of Verizon's "hot spot" devices. That's what I use on the boat to set up a Local Area Network. It creates a very crisp 4G connection for a flat rate of $50/month. https://www.verizonwireless.com/internet-devices/jetpack-mifi-6620l/ Wayne, try this link, please: https://goo.gl/photos/M1AL9bNk2KSxGSiM9 |
Everyday cap
On Wed, 01 Feb 2017 13:26:53 -0500,
wrote: On Wed, 01 Feb 2017 11:30:45 -0500, wrote: Also how well is that cloud stuff working when your internet connection breaks? My wife's place got tricked into a cloud solution for their point of sale and it is a nightmare because there is no way to run "no host". If Comcast takes a **** they are running a whole country club with a pencil and this is a cashless place. === They need a backup network connection. Probably the most economic would be something like one of Verizon's "hot spot" devices. That's what I use on the boat to set up a Local Area Network. It creates a very crisp 4G connection for a flat rate of $50/month. https://www.verizonwireless.com/internet-devices/jetpack-mifi-6620l/ I suggested they just get a DSL modem but these folks are pretty computer dumb. They contract out most of the actual IT design. It is still a single point failure when you are depending on a remote server. |
Everyday cap
On Wed, 01 Feb 2017 14:45:15 -0500, Poco Deplorevole
wrote: Don't do clouds. All I want to do is post a link to a photo I took and loaded into photos.google.com. Let's try this one: https://goo.gl/photos/M1AL9bNk2KSxGSiM9 Me either, I have a web page |
Everyday cap
1:45 PMPoco Deplorevole
- show quoted text - Wayne, try this link, please: https://goo.gl/photos/M1AL9bNk2KSxGSiM9 ..... That worked! |
Everyday cap
On 2/1/17 5:33 PM, Tim wrote:
1:45 PMPoco Deplorevole - show quoted text - Wayne, try this link, please: https://goo.gl/photos/M1AL9bNk2KSxGSiM9 .... That worked! Did someone put a cap into Herring****? |
Everyday cap
On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 17:37:29 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 2/1/17 5:33 PM, Tim wrote: 1:45 PMPoco Deplorevole - show quoted text - Wayne, try this link, please: https://goo.gl/photos/M1AL9bNk2KSxGSiM9 .... That worked! Did someone put a cap into Herring****? What cap? |
Everyday cap
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 2/1/17 5:33 PM, Tim wrote: 1:45 PMPoco Deplorevole - show quoted text - Wayne, try this link, please: https://goo.gl/photos/M1AL9bNk2KSxGSiM9 .... That worked! Did someone put a cap into Herring****? WTF? |
Everyday cap
On Wed, 01 Feb 2017 14:45:58 -0500, Poco Deplorevole
wrote: Wayne, try this link, please: https://goo.gl/photos/M1AL9bNk2KSxGSiM9 === That works. |
Everyday cap
|
Everyday cap
On Wed, 01 Feb 2017 22:44:57 -0500,
wrote: On Wed, 01 Feb 2017 15:31:27 -0500, wrote: They need a backup network connection. Probably the most economic would be something like one of Verizon's "hot spot" devices. That's what I use on the boat to set up a Local Area Network. It creates a very crisp 4G connection for a flat rate of $50/month. https://www.verizonwireless.com/internet-devices/jetpack-mifi-6620l/ I suggested they just get a DSL modem but these folks are pretty computer dumb. They contract out most of the actual IT design. It is still a single point failure when you are depending on a remote server. === That would work also. We use Century Link PRISM service which combines, TV, phone and internet on a fiber optic back bone. It works well and is more reliable than cable. Their LAN could be designed so it is connected to both at the same time with automatic fail over, or so that it could be easily switched from one provider to the other by plugging into the other box. You can just plug both into the LAN and your PCs will pick the best path for each packet. I was sharing internet connections with my Comcast neighbor until he died. His machine would get out on my DSL when Comcast was down. I got his extra speed when it was up. Century Link only gets me 10mb here but it is solid as a rock. Comcast is real fast when it works but it is down a lot. |
Everyday cap
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com