Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
CA travel funding...last line says it all
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
CA travel funding...last line says it all
On 1/31/17 7:58 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
http://www.dailywire.com/news/12952/...ngconservative or: http://tinyurl.com/jbgaf3d "Official" religious groups should have no place on a publicly funded university. |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
CA travel funding...last line says it all
On Tuesday, January 31, 2017 at 9:45:26 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/31/17 7:58 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: http://www.dailywire.com/news/12952/...ngconservative or: http://tinyurl.com/jbgaf3d "Official" religious groups should have no place on a publicly funded university. Tell that to the Muslim's Student Organization. |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
CA travel funding...last line says it all
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:45:23 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 1/31/17 7:58 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: http://www.dailywire.com/news/12952/...ngconservative or: http://tinyurl.com/jbgaf3d "Official" religious groups should have no place on a publicly funded university. Neither should political groups, |
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
CA travel funding...last line says it all
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:01:58 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 1/31/17 11:50 AM, wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:45:23 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/31/17 7:58 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: http://www.dailywire.com/news/12952/...ngconservative or: http://tinyurl.com/jbgaf3d "Official" religious groups should have no place on a publicly funded university. Neither should political groups, There's nothing in the Constitution that precludes the mixing of politics and higher education. There is also nothing in the constitution that prevents a publicly funded college from promoting religion as long as it was not required in a law passed by the US congress. The 1st amendment is what it says, not what you think it should say. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" In fact congress could not pass a law banning a college from exercising a religious program. If I want to push that envelope to the ridiculous extreme you project, it would be a violation of the hatch act for a college to promote a political position because they are getting funding from the executive branch, via the Department of Education that goes toward their salary so they are federal employees. |
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
CA travel funding...last line says it all
On 1/31/17 12:41 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:01:58 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/31/17 11:50 AM, wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:45:23 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/31/17 7:58 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: http://www.dailywire.com/news/12952/...ngconservative or: http://tinyurl.com/jbgaf3d "Official" religious groups should have no place on a publicly funded university. Neither should political groups, There's nothing in the Constitution that precludes the mixing of politics and higher education. There is also nothing in the constitution that prevents a publicly funded college from promoting religion as long as it was not required in a law passed by the US congress. The 1st amendment is what it says, not what you think it should say. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" In fact congress could not pass a law banning a college from exercising a religious program. If I want to push that envelope to the ridiculous extreme you project, it would be a violation of the hatch act for a college to promote a political position because they are getting funding from the executive branch, via the Department of Education that goes toward their salary so they are federal employees. Allowing "official" religious organizations is establishing religion. Not interfering with an individual's right to practice a religion is not prohibiting the free exercise thereof. It's the same as school prayer. No formal group prayers, no prayers led by teachers, for example, but if a kid wants to pray, no one is to stop him. We're talking about public schools here. |
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
CA travel funding...last line says it all
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 07:04:41 -0800 (PST), Its Me wrote:
On Tuesday, January 31, 2017 at 9:45:26 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/31/17 7:58 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: http://www.dailywire.com/news/12952/...ngconservative or: http://tinyurl.com/jbgaf3d "Official" religious groups should have no place on a publicly funded university. Tell that to the Muslim's Student Organization. No ****. |
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
CA travel funding...last line says it all
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:45:23 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/31/17 7:58 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: http://www.dailywire.com/news/12952/...ngconservative or: http://tinyurl.com/jbgaf3d "Official" religious groups should have no place on a publicly funded university. What is an 'official' religious group? Is that something the California liberals have dreamed up? |
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
CA travel funding...last line says it all
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/31/17 7:58 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: http://www.dailywire.com/news/12952/...ngconservative or: http://tinyurl.com/jbgaf3d "Official" religious groups should have no place on a publicly funded university. Why not? You seem to forget freedom of religion. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Funding the Deniers | General | |||
When you control the funding... | General | |||
Funding a marina purchase | General | |||
Line by line debunking of latest BuSh attack ad..... | General | |||
ICW dredge funding | Cruising |