![]() |
|
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
Transgender activists are upset that the women’s march over the weekend was not inclusive to
biological men who identify as women, as the protest presented an “oppressive message” that having a “vagina is essential to womanhood.” http://freebeacon.com/culture/white-cis-women-march/ I wonder if there were 'Her', 'His', and 'Both' porta potties. |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On 1/24/2017 8:09 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
Transgender activists are upset that the women’s march over the weekend was not inclusive to biological men who identify as women, as the protest presented an “oppressive message” that having a “vagina is essential to womanhood.” http://freebeacon.com/culture/white-cis-women-march/ I wonder if there were 'Her', 'His', and 'Both' porta potties. I think they had signs on the doors that said, "Shems" |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On 1/24/17 9:48 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/24/2017 8:09 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: Transgender activists are upset that the women’s march over the weekend was not inclusive to biological men who identify as women, as the protest presented an “oppressive message” that having a “vagina is essential to womanhood.” http://freebeacon.com/culture/white-cis-women-march/ I wonder if there were 'Her', 'His', and 'Both' porta potties. I think they had signs on the doors that said, "Shems" You mooks must be nervous about your alleged masculinity. |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
8:52 AMKeyser Soze
- show quoted text - You mooks must be nervous about your alleged masculinity. ..... Well I don't think you'll find them wearing a pink pussy hat like you claim you did. |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On 1/24/17 9:58 AM, Tim wrote:
8:52 AMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - You mooks must be nervous about your alleged masculinity. .... Well I don't think you'll find them wearing a pink pussy hat like you claim you did. I'm sure you assholes say cruel things about gays, women, minorities, to make yourselves feel better...about yourselves. It's not as if gender, race, country of origin, et cetera, are aspects one can change...they're not like, say, religion, an aspect one can change more simply than asking for four quarters for a dollar. |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
9:05 AMKeyser Soze
- hide quoted text - On 1/24/17 9:58 AM, Tim wrote: 8:52 AMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - You mooks must be nervous about your alleged masculinity. .... Well I don't think you'll find them wearing a pink pussy hat like you claim you did. I'm sure you assholes say cruel things about gays, women, minorities, to make yourselves feel better...about yourselves. It's not as if gender, race, country of origin, et cetera, are aspects one can change...they're not like, say, religion, an aspect one can change more simply than asking for four quarters for a dollar. .... I dont, but it seems like assholes and reach arounds are some of your favorite subjects so that must be on your mind a lot. |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On 1/24/2017 9:52 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/24/17 9:48 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 8:09 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: Transgender activists are upset that the women’s march over the weekend was not inclusive to biological men who identify as women, as the protest presented an “oppressive message” that having a “vagina is essential to womanhood.” http://freebeacon.com/culture/white-cis-women-march/ I wonder if there were 'Her', 'His', and 'Both' porta potties. I think they had signs on the doors that said, "Shems" You mooks must be nervous about your alleged masculinity. Sure Harry. I don't discriminate anyone regarding their race or sexual orientation. If people born as males want to be females and visa-versa, that's their business however I am not obligated to embrace every progressive liberal idea or rule that comes along. I mind my own business and am just "me". One of the funniest open mic nights I hosted at the music shop involved a guy who had decided to become a "her". He/she dressed as a female, sporting a pink ball cap and was well known to the open mic group. Physically he was still a guy ... he just dressed and acted like a female. There's another guy .. very macho ... who attended the open mics on a regular basis. He was divorced, considered himself quite the lady's man and was always on the prowl. He also drank a lot of beer and was usually half **** faced. Anyway, he noticed "her" going outside to have a butt and followed to make his move. I was near the door and noticed his advances. When he struck out and came back in I approached him and told him in case he wasn't aware that "she" used to be a "he". Never saw anyone sober up so fast in my life. His face got red as a beet, was bull ****, and said, "God dammit, they should be required to wear a damnn sign". |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/24/17 9:58 AM, Tim wrote: 8:52 AMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - You mooks must be nervous about your alleged masculinity. .... Well I don't think you'll find them wearing a pink pussy hat like you claim you did. I'm sure you assholes say cruel things about gays, women, minorities, to make yourselves feel better...about yourselves. It's not as if gender, race, country of origin, et cetera, are aspects one can change...they're not like, say, religion, an aspect one can change more simply than asking for four quarters for a dollar. I'm sure you do not really have a clue about most of the posters. You lump anyone, except Don, without a Liberal Arts degree as a racist, homophobic, uneducated buffoon. |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
9:33 AMMr. Luddite - show quoted text - Sure Harry. I don't discriminate anyone regarding their race or sexual orientation. If people born as males want to be females and visa-versa, that's their business however I am not obligated to embrace every progressive liberal idea or rule that comes along. I mind my own business and am just "me". One of the funniest open mic nights I hosted at the music shop involved a guy who had decided to become a "her". He/she dressed as a female, sporting a pink ball cap and was well known to the open mic group. Physically he was still a guy ... he just dressed and acted like a female. There's another guy .. very macho ... who attended the open mics on a regular basis. He was divorced, considered himself quite the lady's man and was always on the prowl. He also drank a lot of beer and was usually half **** faced. Anyway, he noticed "her" going outside to have a butt and followed to make his move. I was near the door and noticed his advances. When he struck out and came back in I approached him and told him in case he wasn't aware that "she" used to be a "he". Never saw anyone sober up so fast in my life. His face got red as a beet, was bull ****, and said, "God dammit, they should be required to wear a damnn sign". ..... Harry's probably appreciate this... https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=p2WCbbyChJ4 |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:33:34 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 1/24/2017 9:52 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 9:48 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 8:09 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: Transgender activists are upset that the women’s march over the weekend was not inclusive to biological men who identify as women, as the protest presented an “oppressive message” that having a “vagina is essential to womanhood.” http://freebeacon.com/culture/white-cis-women-march/ I wonder if there were 'Her', 'His', and 'Both' porta potties. I think they had signs on the doors that said, "Shems" You mooks must be nervous about your alleged masculinity. Sure Harry. I don't discriminate anyone regarding their race or sexual orientation. If people born as males want to be females and visa-versa, that's their business however I am not obligated to embrace every progressive liberal idea or rule that comes along. I mind my own business and am just "me". One of the funniest open mic nights I hosted at the music shop involved a guy who had decided to become a "her". He/she dressed as a female, sporting a pink ball cap and was well known to the open mic group. Physically he was still a guy ... he just dressed and acted like a female. There's another guy .. very macho ... who attended the open mics on a regular basis. He was divorced, considered himself quite the lady's man and was always on the prowl. He also drank a lot of beer and was usually half **** faced. Anyway, he noticed "her" going outside to have a butt and followed to make his move. I was near the door and noticed his advances. When he struck out and came back in I approached him and told him in case he wasn't aware that "she" used to be a "he". Never saw anyone sober up so fast in my life. His face got red as a beet, was bull ****, and said, "God dammit, they should be required to wear a damnn sign". === Way ahead of there time: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LaecsIUETYA |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:09:59 -0500, Poco Deplorevole
wrote: Transgender activists are upset that the women’s march over the weekend was not inclusive to biological men who identify as women, as the protest presented an “oppressive message” that having a “vagina is essential to womanhood.” http://freebeacon.com/culture/white-cis-women-march/ I wonder if there were 'Her', 'His', and 'Both' porta potties. Some of these folks are now getting a government funded "ada****omy". They are even talking about paying for that traitor Manning's surgery. They should have made that "pussy" in his forehead with a 45. |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:33:34 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: Anyway, he noticed "her" going outside to have a butt and followed to make his move. I was near the door and noticed his advances. When he struck out and came back in I approached him and told him in case he wasn't aware that "she" used to be a "he". Never saw anyone sober up so fast in my life. His face got red as a beet, was bull ****, and said, "God dammit, they should be required to wear a damnn sign". Didn't he notice the adam's apple? |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
10:53
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:33:34 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: - show quoted text - === Way ahead of there time: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LaecsIUETYA ..... I'd thought if that one as well. Hilarious! |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
11:32
- show quoted text - Some of these folks are now getting a government funded "ada****omy". They are even talking about paying for that traitor Manning's surgery. They should have made that "pussy" in his forehead with a 45. ..... I wonder what "it" will do when "it" is released into the public? |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
|
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
|
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:40:13 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: 11:32 - show quoted text - Some of these folks are now getting a government funded "ada****omy". They are even talking about paying for that traitor Manning's surgery. They should have made that "pussy" in his forehead with a 45. .... I wonder what "it" will do when "it" is released into the public? === It seems unlikely to me that he/she will ever be accepted by either gender. My guess is that there is a successful suicide attempt somewhere in the future. |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On 1/24/2017 1:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/24/17 12:34 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:55:33 -0500 (EST), justan wrote: I wonder if there were 'Her', 'His', and 'Both' porta potties. And which one's did Harry use. -- He probably walked across the bridge to Arlington and ****ed on the graves of the people who died for his freedom. I have nothing but respect for those in our military who, along with my uncle, died for our freedoms in World War II. Cute. So you only have respect for those who served but didn't come home alive. Doesn't make any sense Harry. To die in military service, one has to be alive in military service first. |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
|
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On 1/24/17 1:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/24/2017 1:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 12:34 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:55:33 -0500 (EST), justan wrote: I wonder if there were 'Her', 'His', and 'Both' porta potties. And which one's did Harry use. -- He probably walked across the bridge to Arlington and ****ed on the graves of the people who died for his freedom. I have nothing but respect for those in our military who, along with my uncle, died for our freedoms in World War II. Cute. So you only have respect for those who served but didn't come home alive. Doesn't make any sense Harry. To die in military service, one has to be alive in military service first. The reference was to Arlington Cemetery and "...the graves of those who died." Didn't the good teachers at Amity Regional teach you how to read? |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On 1/24/2017 1:46 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/24/17 1:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 1:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 12:34 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:55:33 -0500 (EST), justan wrote: I wonder if there were 'Her', 'His', and 'Both' porta potties. And which one's did Harry use. -- He probably walked across the bridge to Arlington and ****ed on the graves of the people who died for his freedom. I have nothing but respect for those in our military who, along with my uncle, died for our freedoms in World War II. Cute. So you only have respect for those who served but didn't come home alive. Doesn't make any sense Harry. To die in military service, one has to be alive in military service first. The reference was to Arlington Cemetery and "...the graves of those who died." Didn't the good teachers at Amity Regional teach you how to read? Sure did but they didn't have a course in Harry Krause interpretations. |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On 1/24/2017 1:56 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/24/17 1:53 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 1:46 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 1:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 1:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 12:34 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:55:33 -0500 (EST), justan wrote: I wonder if there were 'Her', 'His', and 'Both' porta potties. And which one's did Harry use. -- He probably walked across the bridge to Arlington and ****ed on the graves of the people who died for his freedom. I have nothing but respect for those in our military who, along with my uncle, died for our freedoms in World War II. Cute. So you only have respect for those who served but didn't come home alive. Doesn't make any sense Harry. To die in military service, one has to be alive in military service first. The reference was to Arlington Cemetery and "...the graves of those who died." Didn't the good teachers at Amity Regional teach you how to read? Sure did but they didn't have a course in Harry Krause interpretations. Immediately above my post was the reference to Arlington. So what? |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On 1/24/17 1:59 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/24/2017 1:56 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 1:53 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 1:46 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 1:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 1:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 12:34 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:55:33 -0500 (EST), justan wrote: I wonder if there were 'Her', 'His', and 'Both' porta potties. And which one's did Harry use. -- He probably walked across the bridge to Arlington and ****ed on the graves of the people who died for his freedom. I have nothing but respect for those in our military who, along with my uncle, died for our freedoms in World War II. Cute. So you only have respect for those who served but didn't come home alive. Doesn't make any sense Harry. To die in military service, one has to be alive in military service first. The reference was to Arlington Cemetery and "...the graves of those who died." Didn't the good teachers at Amity Regional teach you how to read? Sure did but they didn't have a course in Harry Krause interpretations. Immediately above my post was the reference to Arlington. So what? My response was predicated, as I explained, on the reference to Arlington. Sheesh. |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On 1/24/2017 2:06 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/24/17 1:59 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 1:56 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 1:53 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 1:46 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 1:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 1:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 12:34 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:55:33 -0500 (EST), justan wrote: I wonder if there were 'Her', 'His', and 'Both' porta potties. And which one's did Harry use. -- He probably walked across the bridge to Arlington and ****ed on the graves of the people who died for his freedom. I have nothing but respect for those in our military who, along with my uncle, died for our freedoms in World War II. Cute. So you only have respect for those who served but didn't come home alive. Doesn't make any sense Harry. To die in military service, one has to be alive in military service first. The reference was to Arlington Cemetery and "...the graves of those who died." Didn't the good teachers at Amity Regional teach you how to read? Sure did but they didn't have a course in Harry Krause interpretations. Immediately above my post was the reference to Arlington. So what? My response was predicated, as I explained, on the reference to Arlington. Sheesh. And my response was predicated on your long standing record of disdain, ridicule and mockery of those who have served in the armed services. Seems you only have respect for the dead ones. |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On 1/24/17 2:13 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/24/2017 2:06 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 1:59 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 1:56 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 1:53 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 1:46 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 1:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 1:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 12:34 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:55:33 -0500 (EST), justan wrote: I wonder if there were 'Her', 'His', and 'Both' porta potties. And which one's did Harry use. -- He probably walked across the bridge to Arlington and ****ed on the graves of the people who died for his freedom. I have nothing but respect for those in our military who, along with my uncle, died for our freedoms in World War II. Cute. So you only have respect for those who served but didn't come home alive. Doesn't make any sense Harry. To die in military service, one has to be alive in military service first. The reference was to Arlington Cemetery and "...the graves of those who died." Didn't the good teachers at Amity Regional teach you how to read? Sure did but they didn't have a course in Harry Krause interpretations. Immediately above my post was the reference to Arlington. So what? My response was predicated, as I explained, on the reference to Arlington. Sheesh. And my response was predicated on your long standing record of disdain, ridicule and mockery of those who have served in the armed services. Seems you only have respect for the dead ones. My respect for those who served in WWII extends to those who died and those who came back alive and are or were alive after the war. I don't have issues with those who actually risked their lives facing enemy fire since and who died or came back alive. I'm not impressed with those who had military sinecures and who did not face enemy fire and think their service is some sort of a big deal. I have an acquaintance who spent a few years with the Army in Germany and then Korea and was little more than an apparatchik. He thinks his service is some sort of big deal. Many nurses, inner city school teachers and social workers face more risks on a daily basis. |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 14:22:56 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/24/17 2:13 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 2:06 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 1:59 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 1:56 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 1:53 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 1:46 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 1:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 1:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 12:34 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:55:33 -0500 (EST), justan wrote: I wonder if there were 'Her', 'His', and 'Both' porta potties. And which one's did Harry use. -- He probably walked across the bridge to Arlington and ****ed on the graves of the people who died for his freedom. I have nothing but respect for those in our military who, along with my uncle, died for our freedoms in World War II. Cute. So you only have respect for those who served but didn't come home alive. Doesn't make any sense Harry. To die in military service, one has to be alive in military service first. The reference was to Arlington Cemetery and "...the graves of those who died." Didn't the good teachers at Amity Regional teach you how to read? Sure did but they didn't have a course in Harry Krause interpretations. Immediately above my post was the reference to Arlington. So what? My response was predicated, as I explained, on the reference to Arlington. Sheesh. And my response was predicated on your long standing record of disdain, ridicule and mockery of those who have served in the armed services. Seems you only have respect for the dead ones. My respect for those who served in WWII extends to those who died and those who came back alive and are or were alive after the war. I don't have issues with those who actually risked their lives facing enemy fire since and who died or came back alive. I'm not impressed with those who had military sinecures and who did not face enemy fire and think their service is some sort of a big deal. I have an acquaintance who spent a few years with the Army in Germany and then Korea and was little more than an apparatchik. He thinks his service is some sort of big deal. Many nurses, inner city school teachers and social workers face more risks on a daily basis. Obviously you never took any walks through the countryside in Vietnam. You wouldn't know what a mine or booby-trap is, would you? |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On 1/24/2017 2:22 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/24/17 2:13 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 2:06 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 1:59 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 1:56 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 1:53 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 1:46 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 1:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 1:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 12:34 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:55:33 -0500 (EST), justan wrote: I wonder if there were 'Her', 'His', and 'Both' porta potties. And which one's did Harry use. -- He probably walked across the bridge to Arlington and ****ed on the graves of the people who died for his freedom. I have nothing but respect for those in our military who, along with my uncle, died for our freedoms in World War II. Cute. So you only have respect for those who served but didn't come home alive. Doesn't make any sense Harry. To die in military service, one has to be alive in military service first. The reference was to Arlington Cemetery and "...the graves of those who died." Didn't the good teachers at Amity Regional teach you how to read? Sure did but they didn't have a course in Harry Krause interpretations. Immediately above my post was the reference to Arlington. So what? My response was predicated, as I explained, on the reference to Arlington. Sheesh. And my response was predicated on your long standing record of disdain, ridicule and mockery of those who have served in the armed services. Seems you only have respect for the dead ones. My respect for those who served in WWII extends to those who died and those who came back alive and are or were alive after the war. I don't have issues with those who actually risked their lives facing enemy fire since and who died or came back alive. I'm not impressed with those who had military sinecures and who did not face enemy fire and think their service is some sort of a big deal. I have an acquaintance who spent a few years with the Army in Germany and then Korea and was little more than an apparatchik. He thinks his service is some sort of big deal. Many nurses, inner city school teachers and social workers face more risks on a daily basis. So, being "not impressed" doesn't mean lack of respect? Have to be careful with you and your words, you know. |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On 1/24/17 2:35 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/24/2017 2:22 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 2:13 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 2:06 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 1:59 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 1:56 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 1:53 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 1:46 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 1:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 1:16 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 12:34 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:55:33 -0500 (EST), justan wrote: I wonder if there were 'Her', 'His', and 'Both' porta potties. And which one's did Harry use. -- He probably walked across the bridge to Arlington and ****ed on the graves of the people who died for his freedom. I have nothing but respect for those in our military who, along with my uncle, died for our freedoms in World War II. Cute. So you only have respect for those who served but didn't come home alive. Doesn't make any sense Harry. To die in military service, one has to be alive in military service first. The reference was to Arlington Cemetery and "...the graves of those who died." Didn't the good teachers at Amity Regional teach you how to read? Sure did but they didn't have a course in Harry Krause interpretations. Immediately above my post was the reference to Arlington. So what? My response was predicated, as I explained, on the reference to Arlington. Sheesh. And my response was predicated on your long standing record of disdain, ridicule and mockery of those who have served in the armed services. Seems you only have respect for the dead ones. My respect for those who served in WWII extends to those who died and those who came back alive and are or were alive after the war. I don't have issues with those who actually risked their lives facing enemy fire since and who died or came back alive. I'm not impressed with those who had military sinecures and who did not face enemy fire and think their service is some sort of a big deal. I have an acquaintance who spent a few years with the Army in Germany and then Korea and was little more than an apparatchik. He thinks his service is some sort of big deal. Many nurses, inner city school teachers and social workers face more risks on a daily basis. So, being "not impressed" doesn't mean lack of respect? Have to be careful with you and your words, you know. This is rec.boats, a spot in etherspace populated mostly by Trump supporters. Words don't matter. |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:16:03 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 1/24/17 12:34 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:55:33 -0500 (EST), justan wrote: I wonder if there were 'Her', 'His', and 'Both' porta potties. And which one's did Harry use. -- He probably walked across the bridge to Arlington and ****ed on the graves of the people who died for his freedom. I have nothing but respect for those in our military who, along with my uncle, died for our freedoms in World War II. You have been consistent in ridiculing them since then tho. |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:53:43 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 1/24/2017 1:46 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: The reference was to Arlington Cemetery and "...the graves of those who died." Didn't the good teachers at Amity Regional teach you how to read? Sure did but they didn't have a course in Harry Krause interpretations. It seems clear to me, in Harry world, the only good soldier is a dead soldier. |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
|
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 14:12:59 -0500, Poco Deplorevole
wrote: Manning is a traitor. He could have received the death sentence instead of 35 years. He's sentence ... excuse me ... "her" sentence included the possibility of parole after 8 years. "She" served 7. This whole gender change thing is just an attempt to put the cost of the surgery on the taxpayers. He's not a she yet, is it? Or, are you just being UPC (ultra-politically correct)? We should have sent "her" to Afghanistan and let her be a woman there. |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On 1/24/2017 2:58 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/24/17 2:57 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:53:43 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 1/24/2017 1:46 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: The reference was to Arlington Cemetery and "...the graves of those who died." Didn't the good teachers at Amity Regional teach you how to read? Sure did but they didn't have a course in Harry Krause interpretations. It seems clear to me, in Harry world, the only good soldier is a dead soldier. It seems clear to me that, as usual, you are clueless. The obligation to clearly communicate is a two-way street Harry. Didn't they teach that at Kansas U or wherever you went? |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On 1/24/17 4:03 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/24/2017 2:58 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 2:57 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:53:43 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 1/24/2017 1:46 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: The reference was to Arlington Cemetery and "...the graves of those who died." Didn't the good teachers at Amity Regional teach you how to read? Sure did but they didn't have a course in Harry Krause interpretations. It seems clear to me, in Harry world, the only good soldier is a dead soldier. It seems clear to me that, as usual, you are clueless. The obligation to clearly communicate is a two-way street Harry. Didn't they teach that at Kansas U or wherever you went? The statements I made in this thread were perfectly clear and simply stated. You can't read. |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
5:55 PMKeyser Soze
- show quoted text - I'm opposed to the military-industrial complex wasting trillions and trillions of dollars in order to keep officers in uniform and armament corporations in the money. Manning's surgery isn't even a drop in the bucket. There's no bigger waste of money than the military. Eisenhower was right: Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities. It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some fifty miles of concrete pavement. We pay for a single fighter plane with a half million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people. This is, I repeat, the best way of life to be found on the road the world has been taking. This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron. Is there no other way the world may live? –Dwight David Eisenhower, “The Chance for Peace,” speech given to the American Society of Newspaper Editors, Apr. 16, 1953. ...... Easy to say that in peacetime. Of course he didnt say that in 1941 |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:55:54 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote: I'm opposed to the military-industrial complex wasting trillions and trillions of dollars in order to keep officers in uniform and armament corporations in the money. Manning's surgery isn't even a drop in the bucket. There's no bigger waste of money than the military I agree you are right about military waste but this is a worse disgrace. Manning is a convicted traitor and he should have been shot. We should not be spending $50,000 to fulfill his sexual fantasy. |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 19:36:02 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: Eisenhower was talking a world view, not just that of the USA. If our adversaries, particularly the USSR, agreed and shared the same view the Cold War would have come to a screaming halt. Unfortunately, that was not to be, and still isn't. If there was ever anyone who could deal with a crook like Putin, it would be a crook like Trump and his hatchet man Tillerson may be a good tip on the spear. It is certainly time we rolled back the cold war to at least GHWB levels again. We (the US and the russians) know we can destroy the world so why argue about who can do it the most number times? If the US, China and the russians actually started working together, the rest of the world better watch out. I think it is those tertiary powers who want to keep stoking the cold war. How much money do you think the US pumps into the Eurozone, just propping up NATO? The russians also spend a lot to counter that threat on their borders. Without a russian threat, the russians and the US could spend that money in our own countries. |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On 1/24/17 7:57 PM, Tim wrote:
5:55 PMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - I'm opposed to the military-industrial complex wasting trillions and trillions of dollars in order to keep officers in uniform and armament corporations in the money. Manning's surgery isn't even a drop in the bucket. There's no bigger waste of money than the military. Eisenhower was right: Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities. It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some fifty miles of concrete pavement. We pay for a single fighter plane with a half million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people. This is, I repeat, the best way of life to be found on the road the world has been taking. This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron. Is there no other way the world may live? –Dwight David Eisenhower, “The Chance for Peace,” speech given to the American Society of Newspaper Editors, Apr. 16, 1953. ..... Easy to say that in peacetime. Of course he didnt say that in 1941 He didn't say it in peacetime. I do understand, though, that you righties are big fans of the ever-expanding military-industrial complex and its cancerous growth. |
Oh shit...Now the Transgenders are pissed
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:57:20 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: Easy to say that in peacetime. Of course he didnt say that in 1941 I think we ended world wars forever in 1945. We just have silly little proxy wars in 3d world countries because that is all the planet can deal with. There is an old saying that if we fight WWIII with nukes (and it will end up that way), the next war will be fought with stick and rocks. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:28 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com