Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/28/16 7:21 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/27/2016 9:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 19:00:35 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/27/16 4:19 PM, wrote: Did you actually read the post you are responding to? I certainly bet I know more about US history than a GW graduate who did not have to take a single US history course to get his BA. Where did he get all of this knowledge? Smoking dope and watching the History channel in his dorm room? He could have saved the fifty grand and just bought a basic cable package at home in his mom's basement. I doubt at 22 you knew as much about history as a college grad in history at the same age. And as for whether he/she studied U.S. history, well that would have depended upon the cycle and sequence taken for the major. If your major was medieval history of Europe, you wouldn't have spent a lot of time taking courses about the United States. Or maybe any time. Reading random books and papers, as you apparently did, ain't the same as following a course of study taught by professors and discussed by students discussing similar material in a classroom setting and producing college-level papers. You may think it is the same, and results in the same, but...it doesn't. Dance Mr Bojangles. You don't seem to give me any credit for 50 years of life experience so the bet stands as is. If this kid does not take American history at GW, I will sit for the test and he can sit for the same one. Give me $100 a point and I will make at least five grand. Make it easy, just use two of those 50 question Face book quizzes. If you want proof watch some of the YouTube videos of college students being asked questions about history, geography and historical figures. Many can't identify Carter, Reagan or even Joe Biden when shown pictures of them, but virtually *all* of them know who Kim Kardashian is. Yeah, and you Republicans thought Trump was an educated, knowledgeable, decent guy. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 07:21:47 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 12/27/2016 9:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 19:00:35 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/27/16 4:19 PM, wrote: Did you actually read the post you are responding to? I certainly bet I know more about US history than a GW graduate who did not have to take a single US history course to get his BA. Where did he get all of this knowledge? Smoking dope and watching the History channel in his dorm room? He could have saved the fifty grand and just bought a basic cable package at home in his mom's basement. I doubt at 22 you knew as much about history as a college grad in history at the same age. And as for whether he/she studied U.S. history, well that would have depended upon the cycle and sequence taken for the major. If your major was medieval history of Europe, you wouldn't have spent a lot of time taking courses about the United States. Or maybe any time. Reading random books and papers, as you apparently did, ain't the same as following a course of study taught by professors and discussed by students discussing similar material in a classroom setting and producing college-level papers. You may think it is the same, and results in the same, but...it doesn't. Dance Mr Bojangles. You don't seem to give me any credit for 50 years of life experience so the bet stands as is. If this kid does not take American history at GW, I will sit for the test and he can sit for the same one. Give me $100 a point and I will make at least five grand. Make it easy, just use two of those 50 question Face book quizzes. If you want proof watch some of the YouTube videos of college students being asked questions about history, geography and historical figures. Many can't identify Carter, Reagan or even Joe Biden when shown pictures of them, but virtually *all* of them know who Kim Kardashian is. I saw that and they were GW students. It is shameful considering the school is less than a half mile from the white house. When I applied, GW was considered a good school. I guess it went down hill but I think they all did. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
9:40 AMKeyser Soze
- show quoted text - You mean, become a right-wing racist? No thanks. ...,, Wow Harry, I think you dove off the hi-dive into the shallow end of the pool. You're replies are getting worse as you go... |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:06:13 -0500, wrote:
On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 07:21:47 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 12/27/2016 9:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 19:00:35 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/27/16 4:19 PM, wrote: Did you actually read the post you are responding to? I certainly bet I know more about US history than a GW graduate who did not have to take a single US history course to get his BA. Where did he get all of this knowledge? Smoking dope and watching the History channel in his dorm room? He could have saved the fifty grand and just bought a basic cable package at home in his mom's basement. I doubt at 22 you knew as much about history as a college grad in history at the same age. And as for whether he/she studied U.S. history, well that would have depended upon the cycle and sequence taken for the major. If your major was medieval history of Europe, you wouldn't have spent a lot of time taking courses about the United States. Or maybe any time. Reading random books and papers, as you apparently did, ain't the same as following a course of study taught by professors and discussed by students discussing similar material in a classroom setting and producing college-level papers. You may think it is the same, and results in the same, but...it doesn't. Dance Mr Bojangles. You don't seem to give me any credit for 50 years of life experience so the bet stands as is. If this kid does not take American history at GW, I will sit for the test and he can sit for the same one. Give me $100 a point and I will make at least five grand. Make it easy, just use two of those 50 question Face book quizzes. If you want proof watch some of the YouTube videos of college students being asked questions about history, geography and historical figures. Many can't identify Carter, Reagan or even Joe Biden when shown pictures of them, but virtually *all* of them know who Kim Kardashian is. I saw that and they were GW students. It is shameful considering the school is less than a half mile from the white house. When I applied, GW was considered a good school. I guess it went down hill but I think they all did. It wasn't bad when I went. But, I majored in Math Education. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Washington Post - Liberal Arts majors | General | |||
Future Liberal Arts Majors | General | |||
The intersection of technology and liberal arts. | General | |||
Not a liberal arts major or social worker in the bunch....... | General | |||
Liberal arts major working for Fox | General |