Michael Moore stoops to Harry's level.
 

On 12/19/16 12:57 PM, Tim wrote:
11:28 AMKeyser Soze
- hide quoted text -
On 12/19/16 12:17 PM, Tim wrote:
a guy said on Facebook concerning this link:

"Its B.S. Tim. Only a few states fine the Electors. The fines are $100. So here is a multi-millionaire, pretending he's one of us.

Offering to pay roughly $2000 dollars. to try to throw an election. For all the threats he made. He should be in jail."


I find it hilarious you Trump enablers are ****ed off at everyone except
Trump himself, easily the scummiest incoming POTUS in the history of the
last 116 years.
....

No Harry I think that you're about to start bawling...


There's no evidence here that you think.

Michael Moore stoops to Harry's level.
 

On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 12:40:09 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/16 12:32 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:23:22 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/16 11:21 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 02:13:47 -0800 (PST), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

Except for Krause, Moore has money and is looking for a Judas when actually by offering blood money he's only selling his own soul.

I never thought much of him before hand. I think less of him now.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/micha...ry?id=44276931

Hey if this goes to the house, my guy Gary has another chance at it
Certainly a better chance than Hillary ;-)




'Mericans deserve Trump and all the horrors he'll visit upon them. Can
hardly wait for his first series of colossal ****ups.

I have never seen anyone so happy to see his country fail.
It would not break my heart if the first thing he did was to burn down
K street (the lobbyist/bribery business) but that would be tough on
you.


If Trump "burns down" the bribery business, he and his family will go
broke or be in jail or both. Did you forget that Trump bribed the
attorneys general of Florida and Texas to "forget" about the cases
against the Trumps for their fraudlent university?

He did not go through K street to do it and that is chump change
compared to the bribes that prop up the DoD budget, among other
things.

Michael Moore stoops to Harry's level.
 

11:59 AMKeyser Soze
- hide quoted text -
On 12/19/16 12:57 PM, Tim wrote:
11:28 AMKeyser Soze
- hide quoted text -
On 12/19/16 12:17 PM, Tim wrote:
a guy said on Facebook concerning this link:

"Its B.S. Tim. Only a few states fine the Electors. The fines are $100. So here is a multi-millionaire, pretending he's one of us.

Offering to pay roughly $2000 dollars. to try to throw an election. For all the threats he made. He should be in jail."


I find it hilarious you Trump enablers are ****ed off at everyone except
Trump himself, easily the scummiest incoming POTUS in the history of the
last 116 years.
....

No Harry I think that you're about to start bawling...


There's no evidence here that you think.
.....

There's no evidence here that you aren't bawling about now. Curl up with a cup of hot chocolate and one of your cats. The pizza guy ought to be there shortly..,

Michael Moore stoops to Harry's level.
 

On 12/19/16 12:58 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 12:28:06 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

I find it hilarious you Trump enablers are ****ed off at everyone except
Trump himself, easily the scummiest incoming POTUS in the history of the
last 116 years.

1900? are you suggesting someone should shoot Trump now?
Mike Pence is no Teddy Roosevelt.
Be careful what you wish for. Trump is far more like you in things you
seem to care about than Pence (gays, abortion and the subjugation of
the Palestinians).

BTW I still have it at about 50:50 that Trump resigns when the full
impact of the divestiture of "Trump inc" he needs to do becomes
apparent to him.


Where do you get the idea that because I think Trump is scummiest
incoming POTUS in 116 years, I think he should be shot? What is the
matter with you?

Michael Moore stoops to Harry's level.
 

On 12/19/16 1:00 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 12:40:09 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/16 12:32 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:23:22 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/16 11:21 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 02:13:47 -0800 (PST), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

Except for Krause, Moore has money and is looking for a Judas when actually by offering blood money he's only selling his own soul.

I never thought much of him before hand. I think less of him now.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/micha...ry?id=44276931

Hey if this goes to the house, my guy Gary has another chance at it
Certainly a better chance than Hillary ;-)




'Mericans deserve Trump and all the horrors he'll visit upon them. Can
hardly wait for his first series of colossal ****ups.

I have never seen anyone so happy to see his country fail.
It would not break my heart if the first thing he did was to burn down
K street (the lobbyist/bribery business) but that would be tough on
you.


If Trump "burns down" the bribery business, he and his family will go
broke or be in jail or both. Did you forget that Trump bribed the
attorneys general of Florida and Texas to "forget" about the cases
against the Trumps for their fraudlent university?

He did not go through K street to do it and that is chump change
compared to the bribes that prop up the DoD budget, among other
things.

Your point is not relevant; Trump's sleazy businesses are built on shady
deals and bribes.

Michael Moore stoops to Harry's level.
 

On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:49:41 -0600, Califbill
wrote:

Keyser Soze wrote:


If Trump "burns down" the bribery business, he and his family will go
broke or be in jail or both. Did you forget that Trump bribed the
attorneys general of Florida and Texas to "forget" about the cases
against the Trumps for their fraudlent university?



So what is Bill Clinton going to do about his fraudulent univ?

Clinton was smart enough to figure out how to get the money without
actually putting his name on the door although I bet it is in the
literature to donors.

Michael Moore stoops to Harry's level.
 

wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:49:41 -0600, Califbill
wrote:

Keyser Soze wrote:


If Trump "burns down" the bribery business, he and his family will go
broke or be in jail or both. Did you forget that Trump bribed the
attorneys general of Florida and Texas to "forget" about the cases
against the Trumps for their fraudlent university?



So what is Bill Clinton going to do about his fraudulent univ?

Clinton was smart enough to figure out how to get the money without
actually putting his name on the door although I bet it is in the
literature to donors.


But may not save him during a civil suit. $17 million a year to be a
figurehead may not fly.

Michael Moore stoops to Harry's level.
 

On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:03:44 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/16 12:58 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 12:28:06 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

I find it hilarious you Trump enablers are ****ed off at everyone except
Trump himself, easily the scummiest incoming POTUS in the history of the
last 116 years.

1900? are you suggesting someone should shoot Trump now?
Mike Pence is no Teddy Roosevelt.
Be careful what you wish for. Trump is far more like you in things you
seem to care about than Pence (gays, abortion and the subjugation of
the Palestinians).

BTW I still have it at about 50:50 that Trump resigns when the full
impact of the divestiture of "Trump inc" he needs to do becomes
apparent to him.


Where do you get the idea that because I think Trump is scummiest
incoming POTUS in 116 years, I think he should be shot? What is the
matter with you?

You referenced McKinley and that was just about the only thing most
people know about him. He was shot 115 years and 3 months ago.
I suppose you might be talking about his desire for the government to
be on "real money" (the gold standard) but that still has little to do
with Trump. In 1900 you are talking about his second term.

Michael Moore stoops to Harry's level.
 

On 12/19/16 4:04 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:03:44 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/16 12:58 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 12:28:06 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

I find it hilarious you Trump enablers are ****ed off at everyone except
Trump himself, easily the scummiest incoming POTUS in the history of the
last 116 years.

1900? are you suggesting someone should shoot Trump now?
Mike Pence is no Teddy Roosevelt.
Be careful what you wish for. Trump is far more like you in things you
seem to care about than Pence (gays, abortion and the subjugation of
the Palestinians).

BTW I still have it at about 50:50 that Trump resigns when the full
impact of the divestiture of "Trump inc" he needs to do becomes
apparent to him.


Where do you get the idea that because I think Trump is scummiest
incoming POTUS in 116 years, I think he should be shot? What is the
matter with you?

You referenced McKinley and that was just about the only thing most
people know about him. He was shot 115 years and 3 months ago.
I suppose you might be talking about his desire for the government to
be on "real money" (the gold standard) but that still has little to do
with Trump. In 1900 you are talking about his second term.



No, I did not reference McKinley. I simply used 1900 as a starting
point. You really work extra hard trying to find hidden meanings. Makes
you look...foolish.

Michael Moore stoops to Harry's level.
 

On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 16:49:57 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/16 4:04 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:03:44 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/16 12:58 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 12:28:06 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

I find it hilarious you Trump enablers are ****ed off at everyone except
Trump himself, easily the scummiest incoming POTUS in the history of the
last 116 years.

1900? are you suggesting someone should shoot Trump now?
Mike Pence is no Teddy Roosevelt.
Be careful what you wish for. Trump is far more like you in things you
seem to care about than Pence (gays, abortion and the subjugation of
the Palestinians).

BTW I still have it at about 50:50 that Trump resigns when the full
impact of the divestiture of "Trump inc" he needs to do becomes
apparent to him.


Where do you get the idea that because I think Trump is scummiest
incoming POTUS in 116 years, I think he should be shot? What is the
matter with you?

You referenced McKinley and that was just about the only thing most
people know about him. He was shot 115 years and 3 months ago.
I suppose you might be talking about his desire for the government to
be on "real money" (the gold standard) but that still has little to do
with Trump. In 1900 you are talking about his second term.



No, I did not reference McKinley. I simply used 1900 as a starting
point. You really work extra hard trying to find hidden meanings. Makes
you look...foolish.

Really? "116 years" seemed pretty specific to me but I did know who
the president was then, simply because of the Spanish American war and
TR. That is middle school history. I also knew it was his second term.
That is why I was curious why you picked that date.
McKinley might have easily been repugnant to you tho. He was in favor
of fiscal responsibility, he got us into a war over a lie from the
media and he was a republican.