Tim wrote:
11:46 AMKeyser Soze
On 12/1/16 9:43 AM, True North wrote:
Watching Boston news on NBC this morning and I'm sure the announcer said
Trump was going to appoint Sarah Palin as Secretary for Veterans Affairs.
Does he really think that little of vets? I'll have to keep up with
'merican news to see this play out.

Here for just a moment or two for a few giggles, and of course Sarah
Palin is always high on the giggle list. I would have said it was hard
to believe anyone would appoint a corrupt nincompoop incompetent like
Palin to any....


....
An "incompetent and corrupt nincompoop?"
I thought one of those was just defeated in the election.


You mean, like President Clintons appointment and the DOJ payoff of Raines?
He and his cohort fudge the books at FannieMae and get $100 million in
bonus, and have to give back $10 million and no prosecution.

On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:46:38 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 12/1/16 9:43 AM, True North wrote:
Watching Boston news on NBC this morning and I'm sure the announcer said Trump was going to appoint Sarah Palin as Secretary for Veterans Affairs.
Does he really think that little of vets? I'll have to keep up with 'merican news to see this play out.

Here for just a moment or two for a few giggles, and of course Sarah
Palin is always high on the giggle list. I would have said it was hard
to believe anyone would appoint a corrupt nincompoop incompetent like
Palin to any high federal post, but we're talking about Donald Trump,
and most of his appointments and plans so far have been and will prove
to be horrific for those who are not wealthy. And corrupt.

Did you see the deal he cooked to keep some of the jobs Carrier Air
Conditioning wanted to move to Mexico in Indiana? That's the usual
bull**** politicians in states play...they bribe a company to stay where
they are instead of deserting a city in search of lower wages and less
environmental controls.


Trump, as Luddite said, couldn't bribe anyone. He's not President yet. Is bribing 'a company to stay
where they are instead of deserting a city in search of lower wages and less environmental controls
worse than penalizing said company if they do so?

Guess what...you weren't missed. Maybe you should stick to your 'not going to be around' comment. Or
was that just another lie?

On 12/1/2016 2:19 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:46:38 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 12/1/16 9:43 AM, True North wrote:
Watching Boston news on NBC this morning and I'm sure the announcer said Trump was going to appoint Sarah Palin as Secretary for Veterans Affairs.
Does he really think that little of vets? I'll have to keep up with 'merican news to see this play out.

Here for just a moment or two for a few giggles, and of course Sarah
Palin is always high on the giggle list. I would have said it was hard
to believe anyone would appoint a corrupt nincompoop incompetent like
Palin to any high federal post, but we're talking about Donald Trump,
and most of his appointments and plans so far have been and will prove
to be horrific for those who are not wealthy. And corrupt.

Did you see the deal he cooked to keep some of the jobs Carrier Air
Conditioning wanted to move to Mexico in Indiana? That's the usual
bull**** politicians in states play...they bribe a company to stay where
they are instead of deserting a city in search of lower wages and less
environmental controls.


Trump, as Luddite said, couldn't bribe anyone. He's not President yet. Is bribing 'a company to stay
where they are instead of deserting a city in search of lower wages and less environmental controls
worse than penalizing said company if they do so?

Guess what...you weren't missed. Maybe you should stick to your 'not going to be around' comment. Or
was that just another lie?



As for the Sarah Palin "thing":

Unless something new has happened in the past 24 hours, the "Boston"
reporter I heard said that Palin had contacted the Trump transition
team, not the other way around. They did not solicit her for anything.
The media picked up on it and began speculating as to what role she
could play. The media is responsible for the Secretary of Veteran
Affairs position rumor, not any formal announcement of consideration by
the Trump team. Basically, she's looking for a job.

On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 14:37:46 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 12/1/2016 2:19 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:46:38 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 12/1/16 9:43 AM, True North wrote:
Watching Boston news on NBC this morning and I'm sure the announcer said Trump was going to appoint Sarah Palin as Secretary for Veterans Affairs.
Does he really think that little of vets? I'll have to keep up with 'merican news to see this play out.

Here for just a moment or two for a few giggles, and of course Sarah
Palin is always high on the giggle list. I would have said it was hard
to believe anyone would appoint a corrupt nincompoop incompetent like
Palin to any high federal post, but we're talking about Donald Trump,
and most of his appointments and plans so far have been and will prove
to be horrific for those who are not wealthy. And corrupt.

Did you see the deal he cooked to keep some of the jobs Carrier Air
Conditioning wanted to move to Mexico in Indiana? That's the usual
bull**** politicians in states play...they bribe a company to stay where
they are instead of deserting a city in search of lower wages and less
environmental controls.


Trump, as Luddite said, couldn't bribe anyone. He's not President yet. Is bribing 'a company to stay
where they are instead of deserting a city in search of lower wages and less environmental controls
worse than penalizing said company if they do so?

Guess what...you weren't missed. Maybe you should stick to your 'not going to be around' comment. Or
was that just another lie?



As for the Sarah Palin "thing":

Unless something new has happened in the past 24 hours, the "Boston"
reporter I heard said that Palin had contacted the Trump transition
team, not the other way around. They did not solicit her for anything.
The media picked up on it and began speculating as to what role she
could play. The media is responsible for the Secretary of Veteran
Affairs position rumor, not any formal announcement of consideration by
the Trump team. Basically, she's looking for a job.

Trust Donnie to screw it up.

On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 14:37:46 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

As for the Sarah Palin "thing":

Unless something new has happened in the past 24 hours, the "Boston"
reporter I heard said that Palin had contacted the Trump transition
team, not the other way around. They did not solicit her for anything.
The media picked up on it and began speculating as to what role she
could play. The media is responsible for the Secretary of Veteran
Affairs position rumor, not any formal announcement of consideration by
the Trump team. Basically, she's looking for a job.

The left seems to be obsessed with Palin.

Poco Loco Wrote in message:
On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:46:38 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 12/1/16 9:43 AM, True North wrote:
Watching Boston news on NBC this morning and I'm sure the announcer said Trump was going to appoint Sarah Palin as Secretary for Veterans Affairs.
Does he really think that little of vets? I'll have to keep up with 'merican news to see this play out.

Here for just a moment or two for a few giggles, and of course Sarah
Palin is always high on the giggle list. I would have said it was hard
to believe anyone would appoint a corrupt nincompoop incompetent like
Palin to any high federal post, but we're talking about Donald Trump,
and most of his appointments and plans so far have been and will prove
to be horrific for those who are not wealthy. And corrupt.

Did you see the deal he cooked to keep some of the jobs Carrier Air
Conditioning wanted to move to Mexico in Indiana? That's the usual
bull**** politicians in states play...they bribe a company to stay where
they are instead of deserting a city in search of lower wages and less
environmental controls.


Trump, as Luddite said, couldn't bribe anyone. He's not President yet. Is bribing 'a company to stay
where they are instead of deserting a city in search of lower wages and less environmental controls
worse than penalizing said company if they do so?

Guess what...you weren't missed. Maybe you should stick to your 'not going to be around' comment. Or
was that just another lie?


I missed him. There's really no one to poop on when Harry isn't
here making a fool of himself.
--
x

On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 15:32:17 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:

Poco Loco Wrote in message:
On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:46:38 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 12/1/16 9:43 AM, True North wrote:
Watching Boston news on NBC this morning and I'm sure the announcer said Trump was going to appoint Sarah Palin as Secretary for Veterans Affairs.
Does he really think that little of vets? I'll have to keep up with 'merican news to see this play out.

Here for just a moment or two for a few giggles, and of course Sarah
Palin is always high on the giggle list. I would have said it was hard
to believe anyone would appoint a corrupt nincompoop incompetent like
Palin to any high federal post, but we're talking about Donald Trump,
and most of his appointments and plans so far have been and will prove
to be horrific for those who are not wealthy. And corrupt.

Did you see the deal he cooked to keep some of the jobs Carrier Air
Conditioning wanted to move to Mexico in Indiana? That's the usual
bull**** politicians in states play...they bribe a company to stay where
they are instead of deserting a city in search of lower wages and less
environmental controls.


Trump, as Luddite said, couldn't bribe anyone. He's not President yet. Is bribing 'a company to stay
where they are instead of deserting a city in search of lower wages and less environmental controls
worse than penalizing said company if they do so?

Guess what...you weren't missed. Maybe you should stick to your 'not going to be around' comment. Or
was that just another lie?


I missed him. There's really no one to poop on when Harry isn't
here making a fool of himself.

Donnie's *trying* to get pooped on.

On 12/1/2016 12:46 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/1/16 9:43 AM, True North wrote:
Watching Boston news on NBC this morning and I'm sure the announcer
said Trump was going to appoint Sarah Palin as Secretary for Veterans
Affairs.
Does he really think that little of vets? I'll have to keep up with
'merican news to see this play out.

Here for just a moment or two for a few giggles, and of course Sarah
Palin is always high on the giggle list. I would have said it was hard
to believe anyone would appoint a corrupt nincompoop incompetent like
Palin to any high federal post, but we're talking about Donald Trump,
and most of his appointments and plans so far have been and will prove
to be horrific for those who are not wealthy. And corrupt.

Did you see the deal he cooked to keep some of the jobs Carrier Air
Conditioning wanted to move to Mexico in Indiana? That's the usual
bull**** politicians in states play...they bribe a company to stay where
they are instead of deserting a city in search of lower wages and less
environmental controls.

Saw an old movie last weekend with a scene that reminded me of Trump's
upcoming cabinet meetings and, of course, of the right-wing gaseous
emitters in rec.boats. Same noises, same smells.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6dm9rN6oTs




I see you've been drinking the Rachel Maddow Kool-Aid too.
State tax incentives for companies are fairly routine.

Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/1/2016 12:46 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/1/16 9:43 AM, True North wrote:
Watching Boston news on NBC this morning and I'm sure the announcer
said Trump was going to appoint Sarah Palin as Secretary for Veterans
Affairs.
Does he really think that little of vets? I'll have to keep up with
'merican news to see this play out.

Here for just a moment or two for a few giggles, and of course Sarah
Palin is always high on the giggle list. I would have said it was hard
to believe anyone would appoint a corrupt nincompoop incompetent like
Palin to any high federal post, but we're talking about Donald Trump,
and most of his appointments and plans so far have been and will prove
to be horrific for those who are not wealthy. And corrupt.

Did you see the deal he cooked to keep some of the jobs Carrier Air
Conditioning wanted to move to Mexico in Indiana? That's the usual
bull**** politicians in states play...they bribe a company to stay where
they are instead of deserting a city in search of lower wages and less
environmental controls.

Saw an old movie last weekend with a scene that reminded me of Trump's
upcoming cabinet meetings and, of course, of the right-wing gaseous
emitters in rec.boats. Same noises, same smells.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6dm9rN6oTs




I see you've been drinking the Rachel Maddow Kool-Aid too.
State tax incentives for companies are fairly routine.




Yup. Tesla and Elon Musk, everything he seems to be involved in is
subsidized by taxpayers. $1.3 billion in tax incentives in Nevada for a
battery plant. Trump?

On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:46:38 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

Did you see the deal he cooked to keep some of the jobs Carrier Air
Conditioning wanted to move to Mexico in Indiana? That's the usual
bull**** politicians in states play...they bribe a company to stay where
they are instead of deserting a city in search of lower wages and less

It sounds like the same deal Cuomo and Jerry Brown are using to stop
flight from their unionized, high tax states.
If Pence was from Tennessee, the deal would have just been to move
there.