What next?
 

On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:46:38 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 12/1/16 9:43 AM, True North wrote:
Watching Boston news on NBC this morning and I'm sure the announcer said Trump was going to appoint Sarah Palin as Secretary for Veterans Affairs.
Does he really think that little of vets? I'll have to keep up with 'merican news to see this play out.

Here for just a moment or two for a few giggles, and of course Sarah
Palin is always high on the giggle list. I would have said it was hard
to believe anyone would appoint a corrupt nincompoop incompetent like
Palin to any high federal post, but we're talking about Donald Trump,
and most of his appointments and plans so far have been and will prove
to be horrific for those who are not wealthy. And corrupt.

Did you see the deal he cooked to keep some of the jobs Carrier Air
Conditioning wanted to move to Mexico in Indiana? That's the usual
bull**** politicians in states play...they bribe a company to stay where
they are instead of deserting a city in search of lower wages and less
environmental controls.


Trump, as Luddite said, couldn't bribe anyone. He's not President yet. Is bribing 'a company to stay
where they are instead of deserting a city in search of lower wages and less environmental controls
worse than penalizing said company if they do so?

Guess what...you weren't missed. Maybe you should stick to your 'not going to be around' comment. Or
was that just another lie?

What next?
 

On 12/1/2016 12:46 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/1/16 9:43 AM, True North wrote:
Watching Boston news on NBC this morning and I'm sure the announcer
said Trump was going to appoint Sarah Palin as Secretary for Veterans
Affairs.
Does he really think that little of vets? I'll have to keep up with
'merican news to see this play out.

Here for just a moment or two for a few giggles, and of course Sarah
Palin is always high on the giggle list. I would have said it was hard
to believe anyone would appoint a corrupt nincompoop incompetent like
Palin to any high federal post, but we're talking about Donald Trump,
and most of his appointments and plans so far have been and will prove
to be horrific for those who are not wealthy. And corrupt.

Did you see the deal he cooked to keep some of the jobs Carrier Air
Conditioning wanted to move to Mexico in Indiana? That's the usual
bull**** politicians in states play...they bribe a company to stay where
they are instead of deserting a city in search of lower wages and less
environmental controls.

Saw an old movie last weekend with a scene that reminded me of Trump's
upcoming cabinet meetings and, of course, of the right-wing gaseous
emitters in rec.boats. Same noises, same smells.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6dm9rN6oTs




I see you've been drinking the Rachel Maddow Kool-Aid too.
State tax incentives for companies are fairly routine.

What next?
 

On 12/1/2016 2:19 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:46:38 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 12/1/16 9:43 AM, True North wrote:
Watching Boston news on NBC this morning and I'm sure the announcer said Trump was going to appoint Sarah Palin as Secretary for Veterans Affairs.
Does he really think that little of vets? I'll have to keep up with 'merican news to see this play out.

Here for just a moment or two for a few giggles, and of course Sarah
Palin is always high on the giggle list. I would have said it was hard
to believe anyone would appoint a corrupt nincompoop incompetent like
Palin to any high federal post, but we're talking about Donald Trump,
and most of his appointments and plans so far have been and will prove
to be horrific for those who are not wealthy. And corrupt.

Did you see the deal he cooked to keep some of the jobs Carrier Air
Conditioning wanted to move to Mexico in Indiana? That's the usual
bull**** politicians in states play...they bribe a company to stay where
they are instead of deserting a city in search of lower wages and less
environmental controls.


Trump, as Luddite said, couldn't bribe anyone. He's not President yet. Is bribing 'a company to stay
where they are instead of deserting a city in search of lower wages and less environmental controls
worse than penalizing said company if they do so?

Guess what...you weren't missed. Maybe you should stick to your 'not going to be around' comment. Or
was that just another lie?



As for the Sarah Palin "thing":

Unless something new has happened in the past 24 hours, the "Boston"
reporter I heard said that Palin had contacted the Trump transition
team, not the other way around. They did not solicit her for anything.
The media picked up on it and began speculating as to what role she
could play. The media is responsible for the Secretary of Veteran
Affairs position rumor, not any formal announcement of consideration by
the Trump team. Basically, she's looking for a job.

What next?
 

On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 14:37:46 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 12/1/2016 2:19 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:46:38 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 12/1/16 9:43 AM, True North wrote:
Watching Boston news on NBC this morning and I'm sure the announcer said Trump was going to appoint Sarah Palin as Secretary for Veterans Affairs.
Does he really think that little of vets? I'll have to keep up with 'merican news to see this play out.

Here for just a moment or two for a few giggles, and of course Sarah
Palin is always high on the giggle list. I would have said it was hard
to believe anyone would appoint a corrupt nincompoop incompetent like
Palin to any high federal post, but we're talking about Donald Trump,
and most of his appointments and plans so far have been and will prove
to be horrific for those who are not wealthy. And corrupt.

Did you see the deal he cooked to keep some of the jobs Carrier Air
Conditioning wanted to move to Mexico in Indiana? That's the usual
bull**** politicians in states play...they bribe a company to stay where
they are instead of deserting a city in search of lower wages and less
environmental controls.


Trump, as Luddite said, couldn't bribe anyone. He's not President yet. Is bribing 'a company to stay
where they are instead of deserting a city in search of lower wages and less environmental controls
worse than penalizing said company if they do so?

Guess what...you weren't missed. Maybe you should stick to your 'not going to be around' comment. Or
was that just another lie?



As for the Sarah Palin "thing":

Unless something new has happened in the past 24 hours, the "Boston"
reporter I heard said that Palin had contacted the Trump transition
team, not the other way around. They did not solicit her for anything.
The media picked up on it and began speculating as to what role she
could play. The media is responsible for the Secretary of Veteran
Affairs position rumor, not any formal announcement of consideration by
the Trump team. Basically, she's looking for a job.

Trust Donnie to screw it up.

What next?
 

Poco Loco Wrote in message:
On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:46:38 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 12/1/16 9:43 AM, True North wrote:
Watching Boston news on NBC this morning and I'm sure the announcer said Trump was going to appoint Sarah Palin as Secretary for Veterans Affairs.
Does he really think that little of vets? I'll have to keep up with 'merican news to see this play out.

Here for just a moment or two for a few giggles, and of course Sarah
Palin is always high on the giggle list. I would have said it was hard
to believe anyone would appoint a corrupt nincompoop incompetent like
Palin to any high federal post, but we're talking about Donald Trump,
and most of his appointments and plans so far have been and will prove
to be horrific for those who are not wealthy. And corrupt.

Did you see the deal he cooked to keep some of the jobs Carrier Air
Conditioning wanted to move to Mexico in Indiana? That's the usual
bull**** politicians in states play...they bribe a company to stay where
they are instead of deserting a city in search of lower wages and less
environmental controls.


Trump, as Luddite said, couldn't bribe anyone. He's not President yet. Is bribing 'a company to stay
where they are instead of deserting a city in search of lower wages and less environmental controls
worse than penalizing said company if they do so?

Guess what...you weren't missed. Maybe you should stick to your 'not going to be around' comment. Or
was that just another lie?


I missed him. There's really no one to poop on when Harry isn't
here making a fool of himself.
--
x

What next?
 

On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:46:38 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

Did you see the deal he cooked to keep some of the jobs Carrier Air
Conditioning wanted to move to Mexico in Indiana? That's the usual
bull**** politicians in states play...they bribe a company to stay where
they are instead of deserting a city in search of lower wages and less

It sounds like the same deal Cuomo and Jerry Brown are using to stop
flight from their unionized, high tax states.
If Pence was from Tennessee, the deal would have just been to move
there.

What next?
 

On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 14:37:46 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

As for the Sarah Palin "thing":

Unless something new has happened in the past 24 hours, the "Boston"
reporter I heard said that Palin had contacted the Trump transition
team, not the other way around. They did not solicit her for anything.
The media picked up on it and began speculating as to what role she
could play. The media is responsible for the Secretary of Veteran
Affairs position rumor, not any formal announcement of consideration by
the Trump team. Basically, she's looking for a job.

The left seems to be obsessed with Palin.

What next?
 

On Thursday, 1 December 2016 12:07:53 UTC-4, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 06:43:45 -0800 (PST), True North wrote:

Watching Boston news on NBC this morning and I'm sure the announcer said Trump was going to appoint Sarah Palin as Secretary for Veterans Affairs.
Does he really think that little of vets? I'll have to keep up with 'merican news to see this play out.

As a vet, which you sure as **** aren't, I think he made a great choice! We need more racist,
mysoginistic, homophobic, xenophobic (especially) Repugnants in high level positions.

Now STFU.


Say what? JohnnyMop...y'all seem to get more obnoxious the closer we get to your saviour's birthday. An independent outside observer might find that to be very anti-Christian like behaviour.
What's up with that?

What next?
 

On Thursday, 1 December 2016 11:42:46 UTC-4, Tim wrote:
8:43 AMTrue North
Watching Boston news on NBC this morning and I'm sure the announcer said Trump was going to appoint Sarah Palin as Secretary for Veterans Affairs.
Does he really think that little of vets? I'll have to keep up with 'merican news to see this play out.
....

Actually Don, she might do a good job. As a governor she was well liked and fairly efficient on Alaskas focal matters. The least she can do is bumble things and get fired like what Bill Clinton was forced to do with mrs. Elders after she was appointed surgeon general.

Speakers nog of surgeon general I'd think that would have been better suited for Ben Carson.

Anyhow. That whole team has 4 years to prove itself, or maybe less...


In our last Conservative government, the very unpopular Minister if Veterans Affairs started closing many of the Veteran service offices in smaller communities. Bad move...the Legion in Sydney Cape Breton got all fired up and started organizing national protests ...even traveling to Ottawa. During our federal election last year they launched an 'Anything but Conservative' campaign. All 30 seats in the Atlantic region went Liberal and nationally the Conservatives were trounced. Sarah better be careful down there.

What next?
 

3:03 PMTrue North
- show quoted text -
In our last Conservative government, the very unpopular Minister if Veterans Affairs started closing many of the Veteran service offices in smaller communities. Bad move...the Legion in Sydney Cape Breton got all fired up and started organizing national protests ...even traveling to Ottawa. During our federal election last year they launched an 'Anything but Conservative' campaign. All 30 seats in the Atlantic region went Liberal and nationally the Conservatives were trounced. Sarah better be careful down there.
.....

Don, look at who all were trounced in our election and why did it happen?

These next years will be "interesting" to say the least.