Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/22/16 6:29 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/22/2016 2:14 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/22/16 2:04 PM, Its Me wrote: On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 1:51:57 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/22/16 1:22 PM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 11:10 AM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 9:48 AM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 9:08 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/22/2016 7:35 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 21:49:28 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 20:10:18 -0500, Alex wrote: He is a man of his word when it comes to a gentleman's wager . I was out of town for a few days and returned to find his postal money order for our election bet. I wasn't convinced that it would happen so I sent John the money I "owed" him in advance. It will go to a great cause that might bring a tear to Harry's eye. I'll leave it to John if he wants to fill in the blanks. I know it is fun to play with him but I always thought he was a good guy. I am a little disappointed we could not get together when I was in his "hood". I'd love to add a 'great minds think alike' comment, but here's proof they don't. I used to have respect for Harry's liberal views even though I didn't necessarily agree with many of them. I often enjoyed friendly debate but he's gone off the deep end it seems. He makes false claims about people that he doesn't really know, repeating them over and over until he is convinced in his obsessed mind that they are true. I can't deal with that kind of warped and dishonest mentality. It's straight out of the progressive liberal playbook. But it is perfectly ok when your buddy Justan makes "false claims about people he doesn't know," right? Of course, right, because as you have told me, you think those claims are "funny." Perhaps a bit of satire based mostly on truth. Don't like it? Don't read it. Prove me wrong on any of the truths I've told about you. Prove a moron like you wrong? What's the point? Then stop whining. You are such a baby. Your behavior doesn't bother me, **** for brains...it just gives me the opportunity to point out your buddy's hypocrisy. If you knew him, even casually, you wouldn't say that. Your problem is that you look in the mirror too often and see whay you acuse others of. I call 'em as I see 'em, ****-for-brains. Most of your posts here are nothing more than junior high school level insults. The term "**** for brains" was a popular one back in junior high. You do realize you're the most prolific tosser of JHSLI's, don't you? You should quit whining. The popularity of phrases in junior high pretty much depends on when and where you attended junior high. Back in the day when I was at Susan Sheridan Junior High, jerks like Justan were referred to as "flamers," which was "short" for flaming assholes. Typically, one of the junior high tough guys, and we had a few, would beat the **** out of the Justans once a week and send them home with a bloody nose and a torn shirt. Those of us who were smarter tutored some of the tough guys who wanted to get through junior high and high school and therefore we were considered untouchable. We didn't have "anonymous" loudmouths back then. Justan would have had to have behaved or been one of the class punching bags. Ha ha ha. So, you were a "brain" (popular phrase back then) and therefore of immense value to the mere mortals trying to get through. Meanwhile, you claim to be a regular Don Juan of the school, chasing every skirt that walked by. What a freakin' joke. I was one of many bright kids at Sheridan, and I helped out some of the boys who had trouble with their classes in English and American History. I also had a couple of girl friends in 7th, 8th, and 9th grade in junior high, as did almost every other guy. That's a tad different than being a "regular Don Juan," right? |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/22/2016 6:39 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/22/16 6:29 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/22/2016 2:14 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/22/16 2:04 PM, Its Me wrote: On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 1:51:57 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/22/16 1:22 PM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 11:10 AM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 9:48 AM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 9:08 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/22/2016 7:35 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 21:49:28 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 20:10:18 -0500, Alex wrote: He is a man of his word when it comes to a gentleman's wager . I was out of town for a few days and returned to find his postal money order for our election bet. I wasn't convinced that it would happen so I sent John the money I "owed" him in advance. It will go to a great cause that might bring a tear to Harry's eye. I'll leave it to John if he wants to fill in the blanks. I know it is fun to play with him but I always thought he was a good guy. I am a little disappointed we could not get together when I was in his "hood". I'd love to add a 'great minds think alike' comment, but here's proof they don't. I used to have respect for Harry's liberal views even though I didn't necessarily agree with many of them. I often enjoyed friendly debate but he's gone off the deep end it seems. He makes false claims about people that he doesn't really know, repeating them over and over until he is convinced in his obsessed mind that they are true. I can't deal with that kind of warped and dishonest mentality. It's straight out of the progressive liberal playbook. But it is perfectly ok when your buddy Justan makes "false claims about people he doesn't know," right? Of course, right, because as you have told me, you think those claims are "funny." Perhaps a bit of satire based mostly on truth. Don't like it? Don't read it. Prove me wrong on any of the truths I've told about you. Prove a moron like you wrong? What's the point? Then stop whining. You are such a baby. Your behavior doesn't bother me, **** for brains...it just gives me the opportunity to point out your buddy's hypocrisy. If you knew him, even casually, you wouldn't say that. Your problem is that you look in the mirror too often and see whay you acuse others of. I call 'em as I see 'em, ****-for-brains. Most of your posts here are nothing more than junior high school level insults. The term "**** for brains" was a popular one back in junior high. You do realize you're the most prolific tosser of JHSLI's, don't you? You should quit whining. The popularity of phrases in junior high pretty much depends on when and where you attended junior high. Back in the day when I was at Susan Sheridan Junior High, jerks like Justan were referred to as "flamers," which was "short" for flaming assholes. Typically, one of the junior high tough guys, and we had a few, would beat the **** out of the Justans once a week and send them home with a bloody nose and a torn shirt. Those of us who were smarter tutored some of the tough guys who wanted to get through junior high and high school and therefore we were considered untouchable. We didn't have "anonymous" loudmouths back then. Justan would have had to have behaved or been one of the class punching bags. Ha ha ha. So, you were a "brain" (popular phrase back then) and therefore of immense value to the mere mortals trying to get through. Meanwhile, you claim to be a regular Don Juan of the school, chasing every skirt that walked by. What a freakin' joke. I was one of many bright kids at Sheridan, and I helped out some of the boys who had trouble with their classes in English and American History. I also had a couple of girl friends in 7th, 8th, and 9th grade in junior high, as did almost every other guy. That's a tad different than being a "regular Don Juan," right? Not according to your claims. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/22/16 6:48 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/22/2016 6:39 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/22/16 6:29 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/22/2016 2:14 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/22/16 2:04 PM, Its Me wrote: On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 1:51:57 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/22/16 1:22 PM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 11:10 AM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 9:48 AM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 9:08 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/22/2016 7:35 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 21:49:28 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 20:10:18 -0500, Alex wrote: He is a man of his word when it comes to a gentleman's wager . I was out of town for a few days and returned to find his postal money order for our election bet. I wasn't convinced that it would happen so I sent John the money I "owed" him in advance. It will go to a great cause that might bring a tear to Harry's eye. I'll leave it to John if he wants to fill in the blanks. I know it is fun to play with him but I always thought he was a good guy. I am a little disappointed we could not get together when I was in his "hood". I'd love to add a 'great minds think alike' comment, but here's proof they don't. I used to have respect for Harry's liberal views even though I didn't necessarily agree with many of them. I often enjoyed friendly debate but he's gone off the deep end it seems. He makes false claims about people that he doesn't really know, repeating them over and over until he is convinced in his obsessed mind that they are true. I can't deal with that kind of warped and dishonest mentality. It's straight out of the progressive liberal playbook. But it is perfectly ok when your buddy Justan makes "false claims about people he doesn't know," right? Of course, right, because as you have told me, you think those claims are "funny." Perhaps a bit of satire based mostly on truth. Don't like it? Don't read it. Prove me wrong on any of the truths I've told about you. Prove a moron like you wrong? What's the point? Then stop whining. You are such a baby. Your behavior doesn't bother me, **** for brains...it just gives me the opportunity to point out your buddy's hypocrisy. If you knew him, even casually, you wouldn't say that. Your problem is that you look in the mirror too often and see whay you acuse others of. I call 'em as I see 'em, ****-for-brains. Most of your posts here are nothing more than junior high school level insults. The term "**** for brains" was a popular one back in junior high. You do realize you're the most prolific tosser of JHSLI's, don't you? You should quit whining. The popularity of phrases in junior high pretty much depends on when and where you attended junior high. Back in the day when I was at Susan Sheridan Junior High, jerks like Justan were referred to as "flamers," which was "short" for flaming assholes. Typically, one of the junior high tough guys, and we had a few, would beat the **** out of the Justans once a week and send them home with a bloody nose and a torn shirt. Those of us who were smarter tutored some of the tough guys who wanted to get through junior high and high school and therefore we were considered untouchable. We didn't have "anonymous" loudmouths back then. Justan would have had to have behaved or been one of the class punching bags. Ha ha ha. So, you were a "brain" (popular phrase back then) and therefore of immense value to the mere mortals trying to get through. Meanwhile, you claim to be a regular Don Juan of the school, chasing every skirt that walked by. What a freakin' joke. I was one of many bright kids at Sheridan, and I helped out some of the boys who had trouble with their classes in English and American History. I also had a couple of girl friends in 7th, 8th, and 9th grade in junior high, as did almost every other guy. That's a tad different than being a "regular Don Juan," right? Not according to your claims. You're either imaging or listening to your intellectually challenged buddy, "JustHopeless." I had a *couple* of girlfriends, two or three, in junior high. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/22/16 6:48 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/22/2016 6:39 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/22/16 6:29 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/22/2016 2:14 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/22/16 2:04 PM, Its Me wrote: On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 1:51:57 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/22/16 1:22 PM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 11:10 AM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 9:48 AM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 9:08 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/22/2016 7:35 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 21:49:28 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 20:10:18 -0500, Alex wrote: He is a man of his word when it comes to a gentleman's wager . I was out of town for a few days and returned to find his postal money order for our election bet. I wasn't convinced that it would happen so I sent John the money I "owed" him in advance. It will go to a great cause that might bring a tear to Harry's eye. I'll leave it to John if he wants to fill in the blanks. I know it is fun to play with him but I always thought he was a good guy. I am a little disappointed we could not get together when I was in his "hood". I'd love to add a 'great minds think alike' comment, but here's proof they don't. I used to have respect for Harry's liberal views even though I didn't necessarily agree with many of them. I often enjoyed friendly debate but he's gone off the deep end it seems. He makes false claims about people that he doesn't really know, repeating them over and over until he is convinced in his obsessed mind that they are true. I can't deal with that kind of warped and dishonest mentality. It's straight out of the progressive liberal playbook. But it is perfectly ok when your buddy Justan makes "false claims about people he doesn't know," right? Of course, right, because as you have told me, you think those claims are "funny." Perhaps a bit of satire based mostly on truth. Don't like it? Don't read it. Prove me wrong on any of the truths I've told about you. Prove a moron like you wrong? What's the point? Then stop whining. You are such a baby. Your behavior doesn't bother me, **** for brains...it just gives me the opportunity to point out your buddy's hypocrisy. If you knew him, even casually, you wouldn't say that. Your problem is that you look in the mirror too often and see whay you acuse others of. I call 'em as I see 'em, ****-for-brains. Most of your posts here are nothing more than junior high school level insults. The term "**** for brains" was a popular one back in junior high. You do realize you're the most prolific tosser of JHSLI's, don't you? You should quit whining. The popularity of phrases in junior high pretty much depends on when and where you attended junior high. Back in the day when I was at Susan Sheridan Junior High, jerks like Justan were referred to as "flamers," which was "short" for flaming assholes. Typically, one of the junior high tough guys, and we had a few, would beat the **** out of the Justans once a week and send them home with a bloody nose and a torn shirt. Those of us who were smarter tutored some of the tough guys who wanted to get through junior high and high school and therefore we were considered untouchable. We didn't have "anonymous" loudmouths back then. Justan would have had to have behaved or been one of the class punching bags. Ha ha ha. So, you were a "brain" (popular phrase back then) and therefore of immense value to the mere mortals trying to get through. Meanwhile, you claim to be a regular Don Juan of the school, chasing every skirt that walked by. What a freakin' joke. I was one of many bright kids at Sheridan, and I helped out some of the boys who had trouble with their classes in English and American History. I also had a couple of girl friends in 7th, 8th, and 9th grade in junior high, as did almost every other guy. That's a tad different than being a "regular Don Juan," right? Not according to your claims. You're either imaging or listening to your intellectually challenged buddy, "JustHopeless." I had a *couple* of girlfriends, two or three, in junior high. "imaging"? Really? |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 6:29:11 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/22/2016 2:14 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/22/16 2:04 PM, Its Me wrote: On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 1:51:57 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 11/22/16 1:22 PM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 11:10 AM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 9:48 AM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 11/22/16 9:08 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/22/2016 7:35 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 21:49:28 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 20:10:18 -0500, Alex wrote: He is a man of his word when it comes to a gentleman's wager . I was out of town for a few days and returned to find his postal money order for our election bet. I wasn't convinced that it would happen so I sent John the money I "owed" him in advance. It will go to a great cause that might bring a tear to Harry's eye. I'll leave it to John if he wants to fill in the blanks. I know it is fun to play with him but I always thought he was a good guy. I am a little disappointed we could not get together when I was in his "hood". I'd love to add a 'great minds think alike' comment, but here's proof they don't. I used to have respect for Harry's liberal views even though I didn't necessarily agree with many of them. I often enjoyed friendly debate but he's gone off the deep end it seems. He makes false claims about people that he doesn't really know, repeating them over and over until he is convinced in his obsessed mind that they are true. I can't deal with that kind of warped and dishonest mentality. It's straight out of the progressive liberal playbook. But it is perfectly ok when your buddy Justan makes "false claims about people he doesn't know," right? Of course, right, because as you have told me, you think those claims are "funny." Perhaps a bit of satire based mostly on truth. Don't like it? Don't read it. Prove me wrong on any of the truths I've told about you. Prove a moron like you wrong? What's the point? Then stop whining. You are such a baby. Your behavior doesn't bother me, **** for brains...it just gives me the opportunity to point out your buddy's hypocrisy. If you knew him, even casually, you wouldn't say that. Your problem is that you look in the mirror too often and see whay you acuse others of. I call 'em as I see 'em, ****-for-brains. Most of your posts here are nothing more than junior high school level insults. The term "**** for brains" was a popular one back in junior high. You do realize you're the most prolific tosser of JHSLI's, don't you? You should quit whining. The popularity of phrases in junior high pretty much depends on when and where you attended junior high. Back in the day when I was at Susan Sheridan Junior High, jerks like Justan were referred to as "flamers," which was "short" for flaming assholes. Typically, one of the junior high tough guys, and we had a few, would beat the **** out of the Justans once a week and send them home with a bloody nose and a torn shirt. Those of us who were smarter tutored some of the tough guys who wanted to get through junior high and high school and therefore we were considered untouchable. We didn't have "anonymous" loudmouths back then. Justan would have had to have behaved or been one of the class punching bags. Ha ha ha. So, you were a "brain" (popular phrase back then) and therefore of immense value to the mere mortals trying to get through. Meanwhile, you claim to be a regular Don Juan of the school, chasing every skirt that walked by. What a freakin' joke. Ha, ha! I noticed that too. The pretty girls went for the tough, athletic guys, not the bookworm "goody two shoes". He's exposing himself again. There are a lot of issues here we haven't even scratched the surface on. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
1 THING IS CERTAIN...... | General | |||
1 THING IS CERTAIN...... | General | |||
Hey... is this thing ON? | General | |||
Doing the Right Thing | ASA | |||
Next big thing | ASA |