| 
		
		 
			
posted to rec.boats
	
		 
	 | 
	
		
		
		
			
			| 
				
				 external usenet poster 
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
					First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2016 
					
					
					
						Posts: 2,215
					 
					
					
					
					
					     
				 
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
	
	
		
	
		
		
			
			
				 
				 One thing about Harry
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 2:15:02 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:  
 On 11/22/16 2:04 PM, Its Me wrote: 
  On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 1:51:57 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: 
  On 11/22/16 1:22 PM, justan wrote: 
  Keyser Soze  Wrote in message: 
  On 11/22/16 11:10 AM, justan wrote: 
  Keyser Soze  Wrote in message: 
  On 11/22/16 9:48 AM, justan wrote: 
  Keyser Soze  Wrote in message: 
  On 11/22/16 9:08 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: 
  On 11/22/2016 7:35 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: 
  On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 21:49:28 -0500,  wrote: 
  
  On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 20:10:18 -0500, Alex  wrote: 
  
  He is a man of his word when it comes to a gentleman's wager .  I was 
  out of town for a few days and returned to find his postal money order 
  for our election bet. 
  
  I wasn't convinced that it would happen so I sent John the money I 
  "owed" him in advance.  It will go to a great cause that might bring a 
  tear to Harry's eye.  I'll leave it to John if he wants to fill in the 
  blanks. 
  
  I know it is fun to play with him but I always thought he was a good 
  guy. I am a little disappointed we could not get together when I was 
  in his "hood". 
  
  I'd love to add a 'great minds think alike' comment, but here's proof 
  they don't. 
  
  
  
  I used to have respect for Harry's liberal views even though I didn't 
  necessarily agree with many of them. I often enjoyed friendly debate but 
  he's gone off the deep end it seems.  He makes false claims about people 
  that he doesn't really know, repeating them over and over until he is 
  convinced in his obsessed mind that they are true.  I can't deal with 
  that kind of warped and dishonest mentality.  It's straight out of the 
  progressive liberal playbook. 
  
  
  
  But it is perfectly ok when your buddy Justan makes "false claims about 
  people he doesn't know," right? 
  Of course, right, because as you have told me, you think those claims 
  are "funny." 
  
  
  
  
  Perhaps a bit of satire based mostly on truth. Don't like it? 
   Don't read it. Prove me wrong on any of the truths I've told 
   about you. 
  
  
  Prove a moron like you wrong? What's the point? 
  
  
  Then stop whining. You are such a baby. 
  
  
  
  Your behavior doesn't bother me, **** for brains...it just gives me the 
  opportunity to point out your buddy's hypocrisy. 
  
  
  If you knew him, even casually,  you wouldn't say that. Your 
   problem is that you look in the mirror too often and see whay you 
   acuse others of. 
  
  
  
  I call 'em as I see 'em, ****-for-brains. Most of your posts here are 
  nothing more than junior high school level insults. 
  
  The term "**** for brains" was a popular one back in junior high.  You do realize you're the most prolific tosser of JHSLI's, don't you? 
  
  You should quit whining. 
  
  
 The popularity of phrases in junior high pretty much depends on when and  
 where you attended junior high. Back in the day when I was at Susan  
 Sheridan Junior High, jerks like Justan were referred to as "flamers,"  
 which was "short" for flaming assholes. Typically, one of the junior  
 high tough guys, and we had a few, would beat the **** out of the  
 Justans once a week and send them home with a bloody nose and a torn  
 shirt. Those of us who were smarter tutored some of the tough guys who  
 wanted to get through junior high and high school and therefore we were  
 considered untouchable.
Ah, so you "paid" for protection.  We called those guys "pusses", short for..., well, you know.
 
So that allowed you to be a flamer with no repercussions.  Explains a lot.
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |