True North wrote:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/soon-ad...izza-1.3848121


And why would you state I use pot? You seem to forget the laws against
hate speech in Canada. Been probably 50+ years since I went to SF State
Univ. and tried pot. Did not seem to do anything then, and since I do not
smoke, why try it again? What is sad, is they legalize pot, and then to
prevent smoking, add an extra $2 a pack tax on tobacco cigarettes. Liberal
think I guess.

On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 17:33:32 -0600, Califbill
wrote:

Been probably 50+ years since I went to SF State
Univ. and tried pot. Did not seem to do anything then, and since I do not
smoke, why try it again?

I hear the pot got better.

wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 17:33:32 -0600, Califbill
wrote:

Been probably 50+ years since I went to SF State
Univ. and tried pot. Did not seem to do anything then, and since I do not
smoke, why try it again?

I hear the pot got better.


I heard that also. But was told the smoking stuff is not much stronger.
They use the nuclear power ones for brownies, cookies, etc.

On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 22:40:02 -0600, Califbill
wrote:

wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 17:33:32 -0600, Califbill
wrote:

Been probably 50+ years since I went to SF State
Univ. and tried pot. Did not seem to do anything then, and since I do not
smoke, why try it again?

I hear the pot got better.


I heard that also. But was told the smoking stuff is not much stronger.

You have been misinformed. I have a buddy in Colorado.

They use the nuclear power ones for brownies, cookies, etc.

I think all of it is nuke now. That was his complaint. He says it is
hard to get a little buzz. You get whacked but I suppose he had not
smoked for a while. This was a while ago, right after they changed the
law.

Wrote in message:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 22:40:02 -0600, Califbill
wrote:

wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 17:33:32 -0600, Califbill
wrote:

Been probably 50+ years since I went to SF State
Univ. and tried pot. Did not seem to do anything then, and since I do not
smoke, why try it again?

I hear the pot got better.


I heard that also. But was told the smoking stuff is not much stronger.

You have been misinformed. I have a buddy in Colorado.

They use the nuclear power ones for brownies, cookies, etc.

I think all of it is nuke now. That was his complaint. He says it is
hard to get a little buzz. You get whacked but I suppose he had not
smoked for a while. This was a while ago, right after they changed the
law.


Thanks for the warning. Ill be sure to give Colorado a wide berth
next time I'm out west. Do the cops have brethalizer tests or
other means to determine when a driver has been pulled over for
being " whacked" ie impaired?
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 07:07:29 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:

Wrote in message:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 22:40:02 -0600, Califbill
wrote:

wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 17:33:32 -0600, Califbill
wrote:

Been probably 50+ years since I went to SF State
Univ. and tried pot. Did not seem to do anything then, and since I do not
smoke, why try it again?

I hear the pot got better.


I heard that also. But was told the smoking stuff is not much stronger.

You have been misinformed. I have a buddy in Colorado.

They use the nuclear power ones for brownies, cookies, etc.

I think all of it is nuke now. That was his complaint. He says it is
hard to get a little buzz. You get whacked but I suppose he had not
smoked for a while. This was a while ago, right after they changed the
law.


Thanks for the warning. Ill be sure to give Colorado a wide berth
next time I'm out west. Do the cops have brethalizer tests or
other means to determine when a driver has been pulled over for
being " whacked" ie impaired?

I assume they just look for signs of impairment but they are working
on quantitative tests.
I am not any more concerned than I am about the 10% of Americans who
use prescribed opiates legally and maybe 10-15% more who use them
illegally. They don't test for that either.

Wrote in message:
On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 07:07:29 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:

Wrote in message:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 22:40:02 -0600, Califbill
wrote:

wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 17:33:32 -0600, Califbill
wrote:

Been probably 50+ years since I went to SF State
Univ. and tried pot. Did not seem to do anything then, and since I do not
smoke, why try it again?

I hear the pot got better.


I heard that also. But was told the smoking stuff is not much stronger.

You have been misinformed. I have a buddy in Colorado.

They use the nuclear power ones for brownies, cookies, etc.

I think all of it is nuke now. That was his complaint. He says it is
hard to get a little buzz. You get whacked but I suppose he had not
smoked for a while. This was a while ago, right after they changed the
law.


Thanks for the warning. Ill be sure to give Colorado a wide berth
next time I'm out west. Do the cops have brethalizer tests or
other means to determine when a driver has been pulled over for
being " whacked" ie impaired?

I assume they just look for signs of impairment but they are working
on quantitative tests.
I am not any more concerned than I am about the 10% of Americans who
use prescribed opiates legally and maybe 10-15% more who use them
illegally. They don't test for that either.


They need to get on the stick and target Americans drugs of
choice. Going after alcahol abusers from out northern and
southern borders isn't enough anymore.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

justan wrote:
Wrote in message:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 22:40:02 -0600, Califbill
wrote:

wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 17:33:32 -0600, Califbill
wrote:

Been probably 50+ years since I went to SF State
Univ. and tried pot. Did not seem to do anything then, and since I do not
smoke, why try it again?

I hear the pot got better.


I heard that also. But was told the smoking stuff is not much stronger.

You have been misinformed. I have a buddy in Colorado.

They use the nuclear power ones for brownies, cookies, etc.

I think all of it is nuke now. That was his complaint. He says it is
hard to get a little buzz. You get whacked but I suppose he had not
smoked for a while. This was a while ago, right after they changed the
law.


Thanks for the warning. Ill be sure to give Colorado a wide berth
next time I'm out west. Do the cops have brethalizer tests or
other means to determine when a driver has been pulled over for
being " whacked" ie impaired?

I think they do now.