Wow...an argument about semantics from posters who do not believe in the
value of those danged "liberal arts." Language and its usage are, of
course, part of the liberal arts.
"How can you make specific statements under oath
that are not true and not be lying?", you ask.
Easy. Facts may be interpreted differently. I'd give examples but, heck,
this is rec.boats. What difference does it make?
You're talking to a known liar. He specifically said that Comey said HRC
lied to Congress. That's a damned lie. Specifically.
Besides, if Congress if affronted they can have the DOJ file charges
under 18 U.S.C. §1621 ? perjury and 18 U.S.C. §1001 ? false
representations before Congress.
I ****ing dare them to do it.
Similar Threads
What an ass Comey is...
Threaded Mode
