| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
What an ass Comey is...
On 11/8/16, 5:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/7/2016 9:39 PM, wrote: On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 20:17:36 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: Comey never said HRC lied to Congress. That makes you a a low-down liar. He never said she "lied" but he did say some of her testimony was not true. Semantics. She testified under oath. Comey said that some of her testimony was not true. How can you make specific statements under oath that are not true and not be lying? The above has been brought to you by the Save the Lemmings Foundation. Wow...an argument about semantics from posters who do not believe in the value of those danged "liberal arts." Language and its usage are, of course, part of the liberal arts. "How can you make specific statements under oath that are not true and not be lying?", you ask. Easy. Facts may be interpreted differently. I'd give examples but, heck, this is rec.boats. What difference does it make?  |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
What an ass Comey is...
On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 at 6:44:16 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/8/16, 5:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/7/2016 9:39 PM, wrote: On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 20:17:36 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: Comey never said HRC lied to Congress. That makes you a a low-down liar. He never said she "lied" but he did say some of her testimony was not true. Semantics. She testified under oath. Comey said that some of her testimony was not true. How can you make specific statements under oath that are not true and not be lying? The above has been brought to you by the Save the Lemmings Foundation. Wow...an argument about semantics from posters who do not believe in the value of those danged "liberal arts." Language and its usage are, of course, part of the liberal arts. "How can you make specific statements under oath that are not true and not be lying?", you ask. Easy. Facts may be interpreted differently. I'd give examples but, heck, this is rec.boats. What difference does it make? Like one server or two. Like one device or thirteen. Or, "I did not have sex with that woman". Not telling the truth "is" lying, depending on the meaning of "is". |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
What an ass Comey is...
On 11/8/2016 6:44 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/8/16, 5:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/7/2016 9:39 PM, wrote: On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 20:17:36 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: Comey never said HRC lied to Congress. That makes you a a low-down liar. He never said she "lied" but he did say some of her testimony was not true. Semantics. She testified under oath. Comey said that some of her testimony was not true. How can you make specific statements under oath that are not true and not be lying? The above has been brought to you by the Save the Lemmings Foundation. Wow...an argument about semantics from posters who do not believe in the value of those danged "liberal arts." Language and its usage are, of course, part of the liberal arts. "How can you make specific statements under oath that are not true and not be lying?", you ask. Easy. Facts may be interpreted differently. I'd give examples but, heck, this is rec.boats. What difference does it make? Oh, please Harry ... hold the lectures. I am well aware and educated in the values of the liberal arts as well as more specific educational endeavors. Yours are not the only points of view that have merit. In fact, examples of binary thinking that take place in rec.boats are put forth in far greater numbers by you and those of your political persuasions than by most others. Try reading my statement again ... and take note of the word "specific". |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
What an ass Comey is...
On Tue, 08 Nov 2016 06:44:13 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/8/16, 5:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/7/2016 9:39 PM, wrote: On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 20:17:36 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: Comey never said HRC lied to Congress. That makes you a a low-down liar. He never said she "lied" but he did say some of her testimony was not true. Semantics. She testified under oath. Comey said that some of her testimony was not true. How can you make specific statements under oath that are not true and not be lying? The above has been brought to you by the Save the Lemmings Foundation. Wow...an argument about semantics from posters who do not believe in the value of those danged "liberal arts." Language and its usage are, of course, part of the liberal arts. "How can you make specific statements under oath that are not true and not be lying?", you ask. Easy. Facts may be interpreted differently. I'd give examples but, heck, this is rec.boats. What difference does it make? Just more proof that all that money you spent on a 'liberal arts' education was a waste. Here people with and without 'real' degrees are making you the fool. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
What an ass Comey is...
On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 at 8:49:43 AM UTC-5, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... On 11/8/16, 5:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/7/2016 9:39 PM, wrote: On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 20:17:36 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: Comey never said HRC lied to Congress. That makes you a a low-down liar. He never said she "lied" but he did say some of her testimony was not true. Semantics. She testified under oath. Comey said that some of her testimony was not true. How can you make specific statements under oath that are not true and not be lying? The above has been brought to you by the Save the Lemmings Foundation. Wow...an argument about semantics from posters who do not believe in the value of those danged "liberal arts." Language and its usage are, of course, part of the liberal arts. "How can you make specific statements under oath that are not true and not be lying?", you ask. Easy. Facts may be interpreted differently. I'd give examples but, heck, this is rec.boats. What difference does it make? You're talking to a known liar. He specifically said that Comey said HRC lied to Congress. That's a damned lie. You're a hoot. Keep thrashing around. Call it what you like. Synonyms of "lying": deceitful deceptive false fraudulent misleading untrustworthy bluffing cheating corrupt crooked deceiving disreputable double-crossing double-dealing lying shady shifty sneaking sneaky tricky two-face two-timing underhanded Hillary Clinton That sums it up pretty well. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
What an ass Comey is...
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 06:58:36 -0800 (PST), Its Me wrote:
On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 at 8:49:43 AM UTC-5, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 11/8/16, 5:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/7/2016 9:39 PM, wrote: On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 20:17:36 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: Comey never said HRC lied to Congress. That makes you a a low-down liar. He never said she "lied" but he did say some of her testimony was not true. Semantics. She testified under oath. Comey said that some of her testimony was not true. How can you make specific statements under oath that are not true and not be lying? The above has been brought to you by the Save the Lemmings Foundation. Wow...an argument about semantics from posters who do not believe in the value of those danged "liberal arts." Language and its usage are, of course, part of the liberal arts. "How can you make specific statements under oath that are not true and not be lying?", you ask. Easy. Facts may be interpreted differently. I'd give examples but, heck, this is rec.boats. What difference does it make? You're talking to a known liar. He specifically said that Comey said HRC lied to Congress. That's a damned lie. You're a hoot. Keep thrashing around. Call it what you like. Synonyms of "lying": deceitful deceptive false fraudulent misleading untrustworthy bluffing cheating corrupt crooked deceiving disreputable double-crossing double-dealing lying shady shifty sneaking sneaky tricky two-face two-timing underhanded Hillary Clinton Harry Krause That sums it up pretty well. There, I fixed it for you. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
What an ass Comey is...
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 07:49:41 -0600, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... On 11/8/16, 5:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/7/2016 9:39 PM, wrote: On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 20:17:36 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: Comey never said HRC lied to Congress. That makes you a a low-down liar. He never said she "lied" but he did say some of her testimony was not true. Semantics. She testified under oath. Comey said that some of her testimony was not true. How can you make specific statements under oath that are not true and not be lying? The above has been brought to you by the Save the Lemmings Foundation. Wow...an argument about semantics from posters who do not believe in the value of those danged "liberal arts." Language and its usage are, of course, part of the liberal arts. "How can you make specific statements under oath that are not true and not be lying?", you ask. Easy. Facts may be interpreted differently. I'd give examples but, heck, this is rec.boats. What difference does it make? You're talking to a known liar. He specifically said that Comey said HRC lied to Congress. That's a damned lie. Specifically. Besides, if Congress if affronted they can have the DOJ file charges under 18 U.S.C. §1621 ? perjury and 18 U.S.C. §1001 ? false representations before Congress. I ****ing dare them to do it. You need to get your head out of Krause's (a known liar) butt. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
What an ass Comey is...
Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... On 11/8/16, 5:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/7/2016 9:39 PM, wrote: On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 20:17:36 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: Comey never said HRC lied to Congress. That makes you a a low-down liar. He never said she "lied" but he did say some of her testimony was not true. Semantics. She testified under oath. Comey said that some of her testimony was not true. How can you make specific statements under oath that are not true and not be lying? The above has been brought to you by the Save the Lemmings Foundation. Wow...an argument about semantics from posters who do not believe in the value of those danged "liberal arts." Language and its usage are, of course, part of the liberal arts. "How can you make specific statements under oath that are not true and not be lying?", you ask. Easy. Facts may be interpreted differently. I'd give examples but, heck, this is rec.boats. What difference does it make? You're talking to a known liar. He specifically said that Comey said HRC lied to Congress. That's a damned lie. Specifically. Besides, if Congress if affronted they can have the DOJ file charges under 18 U.S.C. §1621 ? perjury and 18 U.S.C. §1001 ? false representations before Congress. I ****ing dare them to do it. The FBI can not have DOJ file charges. They can recommend, but you have a DOJ who does not want to thwart Hillary as POTUS. |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
What an ass Comey is...
On 11/8/16, 1:07 PM, Califbill wrote:
Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 11/8/16, 5:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/7/2016 9:39 PM, wrote: On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 20:17:36 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: Comey never said HRC lied to Congress. That makes you a a low-down liar. He never said she "lied" but he did say some of her testimony was not true. Semantics. She testified under oath. Comey said that some of her testimony was not true. How can you make specific statements under oath that are not true and not be lying? The above has been brought to you by the Save the Lemmings Foundation. Wow...an argument about semantics from posters who do not believe in the value of those danged "liberal arts." Language and its usage are, of course, part of the liberal arts. "How can you make specific statements under oath that are not true and not be lying?", you ask. Easy. Facts may be interpreted differently. I'd give examples but, heck, this is rec.boats. What difference does it make? You're talking to a known liar. He specifically said that Comey said HRC lied to Congress. That's a damned lie. Specifically. Besides, if Congress if affronted they can have the DOJ file charges under 18 U.S.C. §1621 ? perjury and 18 U.S.C. §1001 ? false representations before Congress. I ****ing dare them to do it. The FBI can not have DOJ file charges. They can recommend, but you have a DOJ who does not want to thwart Hillary as POTUS. Doubtful but on the other hand, we have an FBI director who is in the bag for Trump. |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| House Questions Comey | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
