| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Dear EpiPen Customers . . .
On 8/28/16 7:40 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 11:13:32 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 8/28/16 10:29 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 09:21:40 -0400 (EDT), Keyser Soze wrote: Tim Wrote in message: On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 7:33:15 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 8/27/16 9:52 PM, Tim wrote: Actually I hope this inspires competition. Ahhh...that old American dream...the "free market" and "competition." Exactly. the more the "competition" the better the pricing. Yes "free market" is part of the "American dream" Ahhh. Sorta like that GOP b.s. about trickle down economics... Only a democrat would believe a government imposed monopoly is the way to go. I bet you think Comcast is good too. There's no monopoly in the insulin drugs I previously mentioned, yet both competitors charge the same outrageous price for their products...and there have been numerous news articles discussing collusion in the pharma industry to avoid "competitiveness." In many market segments, even though there are competitors, there is no competition. I have never supported monopolies or market collusion. That is not a free market. In the case of insulin, why are there only 2 sources. You mean, a free market doesn't mean those doing the marketing have the freedom to do anything they wish?  |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dear EpiPen Customers . . .
On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 7:19:26 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 8/28/16 7:40 PM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 11:13:32 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 8/28/16 10:29 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 09:21:40 -0400 (EDT), Keyser Soze wrote: Tim Wrote in message: On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 7:33:15 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 8/27/16 9:52 PM, Tim wrote: Actually I hope this inspires competition. Ahhh...that old American dream...the "free market" and "competition." Exactly. the more the "competition" the better the pricing. Yes "free market" is part of the "American dream" Ahhh. Sorta like that GOP b.s. about trickle down economics... Only a democrat would believe a government imposed monopoly is the way to go. I bet you think Comcast is good too. There's no monopoly in the insulin drugs I previously mentioned, yet both competitors charge the same outrageous price for their products...and there have been numerous news articles discussing collusion in the pharma industry to avoid "competitiveness." In many market segments, even though there are competitors, there is no competition. I have never supported monopolies or market collusion. That is not a free market. In the case of insulin, why are there only 2 sources. You mean, a free market doesn't mean those doing the marketing have the freedom to do anything they wish? Perhaps that is the meaning to a socialist like you, Herr Krause. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dear EpiPen Customers . . .
On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 20:19:23 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 8/28/16 7:40 PM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 11:13:32 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 8/28/16 10:29 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 09:21:40 -0400 (EDT), Keyser Soze wrote: Tim Wrote in message: On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 7:33:15 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 8/27/16 9:52 PM, Tim wrote: Actually I hope this inspires competition. Ahhh...that old American dream...the "free market" and "competition." Exactly. the more the "competition" the better the pricing. Yes "free market" is part of the "American dream" Ahhh. Sorta like that GOP b.s. about trickle down economics... Only a democrat would believe a government imposed monopoly is the way to go. I bet you think Comcast is good too. There's no monopoly in the insulin drugs I previously mentioned, yet both competitors charge the same outrageous price for their products...and there have been numerous news articles discussing collusion in the pharma industry to avoid "competitiveness." In many market segments, even though there are competitors, there is no competition. I have never supported monopolies or market collusion. That is not a free market. In the case of insulin, why are there only 2 sources. You mean, a free market doesn't mean those doing the marketing have the freedom to do anything they wish? What does that have to do with what we are talking about? It is the FDA that says the competition can't enter new delivery devices into the market ... or even old designs until they get specifically accepted and that takes years. Why are there only 2 companies selling that insulin device you talked about? Insulin itself is a commodity item. pretty much selling for the cost of production so it must be a proprietary delivery device. The same is true of the Epi pen. The drug itself is generically available dirt cheap. You are just paying for the syringe. Who is holding up the approval of the 50 cent one? |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dear EpiPen Customers . . .
On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 9:58:43 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 20:19:23 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 8/28/16 7:40 PM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 11:13:32 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 8/28/16 10:29 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 09:21:40 -0400 (EDT), Keyser Soze wrote: Tim Wrote in message: On Sunday, August 28, 2016 at 7:33:15 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 8/27/16 9:52 PM, Tim wrote: Actually I hope this inspires competition. Ahhh...that old American dream...the "free market" and "competition." Exactly. the more the "competition" the better the pricing. Yes "free market" is part of the "American dream" Ahhh. Sorta like that GOP b.s. about trickle down economics... Only a democrat would believe a government imposed monopoly is the way to go. I bet you think Comcast is good too. There's no monopoly in the insulin drugs I previously mentioned, yet both competitors charge the same outrageous price for their products...and there have been numerous news articles discussing collusion in the pharma industry to avoid "competitiveness." In many market segments, even though there are competitors, there is no competition. I have never supported monopolies or market collusion. That is not a free market. In the case of insulin, why are there only 2 sources. You mean, a free market doesn't mean those doing the marketing have the freedom to do anything they wish? What does that have to do with what we are talking about? It is the FDA that says the competition can't enter new delivery devices into the market ... or even old designs until they get specifically accepted and that takes years. Why are there only 2 companies selling that insulin device you talked about? Insulin itself is a commodity item. pretty much selling for the cost of production so it must be a proprietary delivery device. The same is true of the Epi pen. The drug itself is generically available dirt cheap. You are just paying for the syringe. Who is holding up the approval of the 50 cent one? Krause can't hold the talking point. He must attempt to derail the conversation at his convenience. He is a desperate thinker, that is, if you can call his MO as truly thinking. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| How to attract customers | General | |||
| Get more customers for your business - wherever you are... | ASA | |||
| Safety gear, kayak,open ocean, Hawaii, ACR 406 EPIRB, Katadyn Survivor 35, epipen | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
