wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:24:23 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

No, you are projecting what you think I think or believe. Your powers of
deduction are limited. I've never said I wanted to nationalize
education, airport security, energy, or provision of health care. I
don't have secret wishes to do it, either.

Bull**** You have criticized the privatization of any government
function. Government schools are the only schools you support. I have
never heard you say a good thing about privatized airplane screeners
opposed to TSA and you certainly seem to want a government health care
system. If not, stop pimping them.



I have no problems with private k12 schools so long as public funds are
not diverted to support them.

So you want people to pay for their kid's school TWICE?
If you are taking your kid out of the public system and relieving that
pressure on the classroom, they should, at least, get the paltry 40%
of their school taxes that actually trickle down to the classroom,
back.
I would even agree to a means test on that.

I support a single payer system for health
care payment, but that is not a government health care system. You are
too binary to understand.

If the medical professionals are getting paid by the government, they
work for the government. At that point you have a two tier medical
system like the UK. Private health care for rich people who don't need
the subsidy will be first rate with all the advancements possible.
Government health care will be 3d world doctors, rationing care and
using the cheapest technology if it is even available to them.




I remember back in the 1970's there was one MRI in all of British Columbia.
While there were 5 in the San Francisco Bay Area alone. So, MRI time had
to be severely rationed in BC. Government health care?