| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
The NRA is...
The NRA is full of ****.
The Dallas shooter was a good guy with a gun until he wasn’t. The guns and ammo were legally purchased. There were at least 20 “open carry” guys present when the shooting started, and they all ran from the scene. The victims were heavily armed and highly trained. So much for the concept that there’s a benefit to “carrying” in an open venue. Oh, and did I miss the NRA’s comment on the death of the guy in Minnesota who apparently was legally carrying and shot to death by the cops? Or does the NRA only care about white folks who carry? |
The NRA is...
Keyser Söze wrote:
The NRA is full of ****. The Dallas shooter was a good guy with a gun until he wasn’t. The guns and ammo were legally purchased. There were at least 20 “open carry” guys present when the shooting started, and they all ran from the scene. The victims were heavily armed and highly trained. So much for the concept that there’s a benefit to “carrying” in an open venue. Oh, and did I miss the NRA’s comment on the death of the guy in Minnesota who apparently was legally carrying and shot to death by the cops? Or does the NRA only care about white folks who carry? Another dumb post by a racist and loser. |
The NRA is...
On 7/10/16 11:32 AM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: The NRA is full of ****. The Dallas shooter was a good guy with a gun until he wasn’t. The guns and ammo were legally purchased. There were at least 20 “open carry” guys present when the shooting started, and they all ran from the scene. The victims were heavily armed and highly trained. So much for the concept that there’s a benefit to “carrying” in an open venue. Oh, and did I miss the NRA’s comment on the death of the guy in Minnesota who apparently was legally carrying and shot to death by the cops? Or does the NRA only care about white folks who carry? Another dumb post by a racist and loser. Bilious, it is fashionable these days for white guys to accuse others of "racism" when the latter point out the racism or possible racism of whites or white-dominated groups. But that doesn't make the charge true. It is simply a way for white guys to try to "transfer" their racism onto those who accuse them of it. The NRA and other nutcase groups frequently state that "if only more people carried firearms...blah blah blah." Well, in Dallas there were plenty of "civilians" open carrying firearms, and they all ran when the shooting started. And where is the comment from the NRA on the guy who apparently was legally carrying and was shot by a cop? If the 2nd Amendment is suppose to allow you to arm yourself so you can protect yourself from an "overreaching" government, well, it doesn't seem to work, does it? |
The NRA is...
On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 11:19:04 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: There were at least 20 “open carry” guys present when the shooting started, and they all ran from the scene. Are you suggesting that they should have just started firing blindly at anything that they thought looked threatening? Perhaps we should be demanding that your CCW be revoked if you have such a poor understanding about the legal use of force. At least one of those guys actually turned his gun over to the first cop he saw because he did not want to be shot by the cops. |
The NRA is...
|
The NRA is...
On 7/10/16 1:47 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 13:40:46 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/10/16 1:05 PM, wrote: On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 11:19:04 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: There were at least 20 “open carry” guys present when the shooting started, and they all ran from the scene. Are you suggesting that they should have just started firing blindly at anything that they thought looked threatening? Perhaps we should be demanding that your CCW be revoked if you have such a poor understanding about the legal use of force. At least one of those guys actually turned his gun over to the first cop he saw because he did not want to be shot by the cops. Just about everytime there is a mass shooting at a school, a church, a movie theater, a shopping center, a parking lot or any other place where folks gather, the NRA or some gun nut says, "If only there was someone there carrying a firearm, he/she could have shot the shooter and saved X number of people." That's nonsense. Maybe an armed citizen might "save the day" in a tiny number of cases, but it doesn't seem very likely. The open carry guys in Dallas ran for their lives. Apparently down there, open carry works well to intimidate shoppers at Target or fast food venues, but not when there is a bad guy shooting, eh? There are cases of CCW people shooting the bad guy but they are generally not hyped up like the cases where they don't. In Dallas, the "open carry" people had more fear of being shot by the cops than the shooter. The guy I talked about was arrested and held for several hours, He still had not got his gun back the last time CNN had him on. That is plenty of reason to get away. Well, then, perhaps the lesson is that "open carry" is great for intimidating shoppers but not so much for taking care of bad guys, especially when there are cops present. |
The NRA is...
On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 14:01:43 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: Well, then, perhaps the lesson is that "open carry" is great for intimidating shoppers but not so much for taking care of bad guys, especially when there are cops present. I do not disagree. If this guy is shooting at heavily armed cops, I doubt a few untrained yahoos are going to scare him much. Of course if one of them was a trained shootist like you with a rifle that shoots well within a MOA, he might guess wrong. ;-) |
The NRA is...
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 14:01:43 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Well, then, perhaps the lesson is that "open carry" is great for intimidating shoppers but not so much for taking care of bad guys, especially when there are cops present. I do not disagree. If this guy is shooting at heavily armed cops, I doubt a few untrained yahoos are going to scare him much. Of course if one of them was a trained shootist like you with a rifle that shoots well within a MOA, he might guess wrong. ;-) Right, except I am not dumb enough to open carry downtown anywhere. Besides the only MOA rifle I have is a mere .22. 😀 -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ |
The NRA is...
Califbill Wrote in message:
Keyser Sze wrote: The NRA is full of ****. The Dallas shooter was a good guy with a gun until he wasn?t. The guns and ammo were legally purchased. There were at least 20 ?open carry? guys present when the shooting started, and they all ran from the scene. The victims were heavily armed and highly trained. So much for the concept that there?s a benefit to ?carrying? in an open venue. Oh, and did I miss the NRA?s comment on the death of the guy in Minnesota who apparently was legally carrying and shot to death by the cops? Or does the NRA only care about white folks who carry? Another dumb post by a racist and loser. Harry is kind of a unique racist. He hates his own race. That's assuming he's a purebred. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
The NRA is...
Keyser Sze Wrote in message:
On 7/10/16 11:32 AM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Sze wrote: The NRA is full of ****. The Dallas shooter was a good guy with a gun until he wasn?t. The guns and ammo were legally purchased. There were at least 20 ?open carry? guys present when the shooting started, and they all ran from the scene. The victims were heavily armed and highly trained. So much for the concept that there?s a benefit to ?carrying? in an open venue. Oh, and did I miss the NRA?s comment on the death of the guy in Minnesota who apparently was legally carrying and shot to death by the cops? Or does the NRA only care about white folks who carry? Another dumb post by a racist and loser. Bilious, it is fashionable these days for white guys to accuse others of "racism" when the latter point out the racism or possible racism of whites or white-dominated groups. But that doesn't make the charge true. It is simply a way for white guys to try to "transfer" their racism onto those who accuse them of it. That's an excellent description of one of your afflictions. You're not bright enough to come up with it on your own. Did Dr Dr feed it to you during a therapy session? -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
The NRA is...
Wrote in message:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 11:19:04 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: There were at least 20 ?open carry? guys present when the shooting started, and they all ran from the scene. Are you suggesting that they should have just started firing blindly at anything that they thought looked threatening? Perhaps we should be demanding that your CCW be revoked if you have such a poor understanding about the legal use of force. At least one of those guys actually turned his gun over to the first cop he saw because he did not want to be shot by the cops. You don't want to be anywhere near cops when bullets start flying. Especially when they have been ambushed and they don't know where the shooter is. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
The NRA is...
Keyser Sze Wrote in message:
On 7/10/16 1:05 PM, wrote: On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 11:19:04 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: There were at least 20 ?open carry? guys present when the shooting started, and they all ran from the scene. Are you suggesting that they should have just started firing blindly at anything that they thought looked threatening? Perhaps we should be demanding that your CCW be revoked if you have such a poor understanding about the legal use of force. At least one of those guys actually turned his gun over to the first cop he saw because he did not want to be shot by the cops. Just about everytime there is a mass shooting at a school, a church, a movie theater, a shopping center, a parking lot or any other place where folks gather, the NRA or some gun nut says, "If only there was someone there carrying a firearm, he/she could have shot the shooter and saved X number of people." That's nonsense. Maybe an armed citizen might "save the day" in a tiny number of cases, but it doesn't seem very likely. The open carry guys in Dallas ran for their lives. Apparently down there, open carry works well to intimidate shoppers at Target or fast food venues, but not when there is a bad guy shooting, eh? Better to limit your open carry to the Shenandoahwoods where your only enemy are puppy dogs and squirrels. Eh sweet cheeks? -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
The NRA is...
Keyser Sze Wrote in message:
On 7/10/16 1:47 PM, wrote: On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 13:40:46 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 7/10/16 1:05 PM, wrote: On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 11:19:04 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: There were at least 20 ?open carry? guys present when the shooting started, and they all ran from the scene. Are you suggesting that they should have just started firing blindly at anything that they thought looked threatening? Perhaps we should be demanding that your CCW be revoked if you have such a poor understanding about the legal use of force. At least one of those guys actually turned his gun over to the first cop he saw because he did not want to be shot by the cops. Just about everytime there is a mass shooting at a school, a church, a movie theater, a shopping center, a parking lot or any other place where folks gather, the NRA or some gun nut says, "If only there was someone there carrying a firearm, he/she could have shot the shooter and saved X number of people." That's nonsense. Maybe an armed citizen might "save the day" in a tiny number of cases, but it doesn't seem very likely. The open carry guys in Dallas ran for their lives. Apparently down there, open carry works well to intimidate shoppers at Target or fast food venues, but not when there is a bad guy shooting, eh? There are cases of CCW people shooting the bad guy but they are generally not hyped up like the cases where they don't. In Dallas, the "open carry" people had more fear of being shot by the cops than the shooter. The guy I talked about was arrested and held for several hours, He still had not got his gun back the last time CNN had him on. That is plenty of reason to get away. Well, then, perhaps the lesson is that "open carry" is great for intimidating shoppers but not so much for taking care of bad guys, especially when there are cops present. Is that your take away. It's no wonder so many think you are a sick ****. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
The NRA is...
Keyser Sze Wrote in message:
wrote: On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 14:01:43 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: Well, then, perhaps the lesson is that "open carry" is great for intimidating shoppers but not so much for taking care of bad guys, especially when there are cops present. I do not disagree. If this guy is shooting at heavily armed cops, I doubt a few untrained yahoos are going to scare him much. Of course if one of them was a trained shootist like you with a rifle that shoots well within a MOA, he might guess wrong. ;-) Right, except I am not dumb enough to open carry downtown anywhere. Besides the only MOA rifle I have is a mere .22. ?? -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ Mobsters sometimes use a 22 during hits. You'd probably know why better than I. I -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
The NRA is...
On 7/10/16 5:38 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Sze Wrote in message: wrote: On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 14:01:43 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: Well, then, perhaps the lesson is that "open carry" is great for intimidating shoppers but not so much for taking care of bad guys, especially when there are cops present. I do not disagree. If this guy is shooting at heavily armed cops, I doubt a few untrained yahoos are going to scare him much. Of course if one of them was a trained shootist like you with a rifle that shoots well within a MOA, he might guess wrong. ;-) Right, except I am not dumb enough to open carry downtown anywhere. Besides the only MOA rifle I have is a mere .22. ?? -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ Mobsters sometimes use a 22 during hits. You'd probably know why better than I. I I used to wonder if you were as stupid as most of your posts here read. I don't wonder anymore about that. Do you know the difference between a ..22LR rifle and a .22LR pistol? It is mind-boggling to reflect upon the fact that you were judged intellectually capable of being in the U.S. Navy. |
The NRA is...
On Sunday, July 10, 2016 at 4:47:02 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/10/16 5:38 PM, justan wrote: Keyser Söze Wrote in message: wrote: On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 14:01:43 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Well, then, perhaps the lesson is that "open carry" is great for intimidating shoppers but not so much for taking care of bad guys, especially when there are cops present. I do not disagree. If this guy is shooting at heavily armed cops, I doubt a few untrained yahoos are going to scare him much. Of course if one of them was a trained shootist like you with a rifle that shoots well within a MOA, he might guess wrong. ;-) Right, except I am not dumb enough to open carry downtown anywhere. Besides the only MOA rifle I have is a mere .22. ?? -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ Mobsters sometimes use a 22 during hits. You'd probably know why better than I. I I used to wonder if you were as stupid as most of your posts here read. I don't wonder anymore about that. Do you know the difference between a .22LR rifle and a .22LR pistol? It is mind-boggling to reflect upon the fact that you were judged intellectually capable of being in the U.S. Navy. Harry, read it again before you start thrashing out in such an aimless fashion. You didn't take the time to notice that his comment had nothing to do with the implement, but the people who used that selected 22 caliber. |
The NRA is...
On 7/10/16 5:59 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, July 10, 2016 at 4:47:02 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/10/16 5:38 PM, justan wrote: Keyser Söze Wrote in message: wrote: On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 14:01:43 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Well, then, perhaps the lesson is that "open carry" is great for intimidating shoppers but not so much for taking care of bad guys, especially when there are cops present. I do not disagree. If this guy is shooting at heavily armed cops, I doubt a few untrained yahoos are going to scare him much. Of course if one of them was a trained shootist like you with a rifle that shoots well within a MOA, he might guess wrong. ;-) Right, except I am not dumb enough to open carry downtown anywhere. Besides the only MOA rifle I have is a mere .22. ?? -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ Mobsters sometimes use a 22 during hits. You'd probably know why better than I. I I used to wonder if you were as stupid as most of your posts here read. I don't wonder anymore about that. Do you know the difference between a .22LR rifle and a .22LR pistol? It is mind-boggling to reflect upon the fact that you were judged intellectually capable of being in the U.S. Navy. Harry, read it again before you start thrashing out in such an aimless fashion. You didn't take the time to notice that his comment had nothing to do with the implement, but the people who used that selected 22 caliber. I always get a giggle over how you righties rush to aid your compadres, no matter how stupid they are. Why would Justan Stupido bring up "Mobsters sometimes use a 22 during hits," if the reference I offered was to a .22LR rifle. BTW, none of the "mobsters" I sorta knew used a .22LR firearm for hits. Most of them carried a .38 "snubbie." |
The NRA is...
On 7/10/2016 12:39 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/10/16 11:32 AM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: The NRA is full of ****. The Dallas shooter was a good guy with a gun until he wasn’t. The guns and ammo were legally purchased. There were at least 20 “open carry” guys present when the shooting started, and they all ran from the scene. The victims were heavily armed and highly trained. So much for the concept that there’s a benefit to “carrying” in an open venue. Oh, and did I miss the NRA’s comment on the death of the guy in Minnesota who apparently was legally carrying and shot to death by the cops? Or does the NRA only care about white folks who carry? Another dumb post by a racist and loser. Bilious, it is fashionable these days for white guys to accuse others of "racism" when the latter point out the racism or possible racism of whites or white-dominated groups. But that doesn't make the charge true. It is simply a way for white guys to try to "transfer" their racism onto those who accuse them of it. The NRA and other nutcase groups frequently state that "if only more people carried firearms...blah blah blah." Well, in Dallas there were plenty of "civilians" open carrying firearms, and they all ran when the shooting started. And where is the comment from the NRA on the guy who apparently was legally carrying and was shot by a cop? If the 2nd Amendment is suppose to allow you to arm yourself so you can protect yourself from an "overreaching" government, well, it doesn't seem to work, does it? I wouldn't attempt a shootout with a guy with a high velocity, military type rifle using my carry pistol. Would you? |
The NRA is...
On 7/10/16 6:23 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/10/2016 12:39 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/10/16 11:32 AM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: The NRA is full of ****. The Dallas shooter was a good guy with a gun until he wasn’t. The guns and ammo were legally purchased. There were at least 20 “open carry” guys present when the shooting started, and they all ran from the scene. The victims were heavily armed and highly trained. So much for the concept that there’s a benefit to “carrying” in an open venue. Oh, and did I miss the NRA’s comment on the death of the guy in Minnesota who apparently was legally carrying and shot to death by the cops? Or does the NRA only care about white folks who carry? Another dumb post by a racist and loser. Bilious, it is fashionable these days for white guys to accuse others of "racism" when the latter point out the racism or possible racism of whites or white-dominated groups. But that doesn't make the charge true. It is simply a way for white guys to try to "transfer" their racism onto those who accuse them of it. The NRA and other nutcase groups frequently state that "if only more people carried firearms...blah blah blah." Well, in Dallas there were plenty of "civilians" open carrying firearms, and they all ran when the shooting started. And where is the comment from the NRA on the guy who apparently was legally carrying and was shot by a cop? If the 2nd Amendment is suppose to allow you to arm yourself so you can protect yourself from an "overreaching" government, well, it doesn't seem to work, does it? I wouldn't attempt a shootout with a guy with a high velocity, military type rifle using my carry pistol. Would you? News photos and reports showed some of the open carry morons carrying semi-auto rifles. But that's not the point. The point is that the NRA and other gun nutzies claim a "good citizen" carrying would stop a bad guy shooting. That didn't happen in Dallas, and it typically doesn't happen. A carry firearm might help you defend yourself, if you can get to it in time and if you can shoot and if you get a shot. It's hardly a weapon to shut down a crazy dude or a terrorist or terrorists who have you outgunned and who don't care about their personal safety. What the NRA promotes in carry to protect others is mostly a canard. |
The NRA is...
"Ialways get a giggle over how you righties rush to aid your compadres, " I always get a giggle out of you putting me on a category of *you righties* You're amazing Harry. |
The NRA is...
On 7/10/16 6:50 PM, Tim wrote:
"Ialways get a giggle over how you righties rush to aid your compadres, " I always get a giggle out of you putting me on a category of *you righties* You're amazing Harry. I don't see you as a leftie or a centrist. |
The NRA is...
Keyser Sze Wrote in message:
On 7/10/16 5:59 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, July 10, 2016 at 4:47:02 PM UTC-5, Keyser Sze wrote: On 7/10/16 5:38 PM, justan wrote: Keyser Sze Wrote in message: wrote: On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 14:01:43 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: Well, then, perhaps the lesson is that "open carry" is great for intimidating shoppers but not so much for taking care of bad guys, especially when there are cops present. I do not disagree. If this guy is shooting at heavily armed cops, I doubt a few untrained yahoos are going to scare him much. Of course if one of them was a trained shootist like you with a rifle that shoots well within a MOA, he might guess wrong. ;-) Right, except I am not dumb enough to open carry downtown anywhere. Besides the only MOA rifle I have is a mere .22. ?? -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ Mobsters sometimes use a 22 during hits. You'd probably know why better than I. I I used to wonder if you were as stupid as most of your posts here read. I don't wonder anymore about that. Do you know the difference between a .22LR rifle and a .22LR pistol? It is mind-boggling to reflect upon the fact that you were judged intellectually capable of being in the U.S. Navy. Harry, read it again before you start thrashing out in such an aimless fashion. You didn't take the time to notice that his comment had nothing to do with the implement, but the people who used that selected 22 caliber. I always get a giggle over how you righties rush to aid your compadres, no matter how stupid they are. Why would Justan Stupido bring up "Mobsters sometimes use a 22 during hits," if the reference I offered was to a .22LR rifle. BTW, none of the "mobsters" I sorta knew used a .22LR firearm for hits. Most of them carried a .38 "snubbie." Gosh Harry . You sure do know your mobster stuff. Explain about the 22 business I seem to be in the dark about. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
The NRA is...
Tim Wrote in message:
"Ialways get a giggle over how you righties rush to aid your compadres, " I always get a giggle out of you putting me on a category of *you righties* You're amazing Harry. Isn't he though. :-) -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
The NRA is...
Keyser Sze Wrote in message:
On 7/10/16 6:50 PM, Tim wrote: "Ialways get a giggle over how you righties rush to aid your compadres, " I always get a giggle out of you putting me on a category of *you righties* You're amazing Harry. I don't see you as a leftie or a centrist. Quit trying to pigeon hole people. You are miserably inept at it. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
The NRA is...
Justine giggles...
"Gosh Harry . You sure do know your mobster stuff. Explain about *the 22 business I seem to be in the dark about." Harry would have to jamb an anti aircraft type searchlight up your butt to even start to enlightened you. |
The NRA is...
True North Wrote in message:
Justine giggles... "Gosh Harry . You sure do know your mobster stuff. Explain about the 22 business I seem to be in the dark about." Harry would have to jamb an anti aircraft type searchlight up your butt to even start to enlightened you. Is that how you two but thales communicate with each other? -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
The NRA is...
On Sunday, July 10, 2016 at 6:42:13 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/10/16 6:50 PM, Tim wrote: "Ialways get a giggle over how you righties rush to aid your compadres, " I always get a giggle out of you putting me on a category of *you righties* You're amazing Harry. I don't see you as a leftie or a centrist. You need to open your eyes, Anything thats not you or further leftist leaning is a 'rightie' Some of us just want fairness. Sure Trump is a billionaire stooge and Hillary is a down an out reckless liar. If I vote at all this cycle Harry, it's be my conscience, not some political party Simon says game that you're involved with, and thats something I don't think you can, or at least, will ever be able to comprehend. |
The NRA is...
On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 18:09:47 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: BTW, none of the "mobsters" I sorta knew used a .22LR firearm for hits. Most of them carried a .38 "snubbie." You don't watch enough "Law and Order" ;-) |
The NRA is...
On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 18:32:20 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: News photos and reports showed some of the open carry morons carrying semi-auto rifles. But that's not the point. The point is that the NRA and other gun nutzies claim a "good citizen" carrying would stop a bad guy shooting. That didn't happen in Dallas, and it typically doesn't happen. A carry firearm might help you defend yourself, if you can get to it in time and if you can shoot and if you get a shot. It's hardly a weapon to shut down a crazy dude or a terrorist or terrorists who have you outgunned and who don't care about their personal safety. What the NRA promotes in carry to protect others is mostly a canard. I agree with you to a certain point but the reality is, if a civilian had fired a shot, 20 cops would have returned fire, even if he hit the bad guy in the eye. Walking around downtown with a long gun is stupid and the only way a handgun would be useful is if you were close to the shooter. |
The NRA is...
On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 14:47:40 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: Besides the only MOA rifle I have is a mere .22. ? That ranch rifle is not that accurate huh? Should have kept the H-bar I guess. My M1A was supposed to shoot inside 1 MOA when Springfield sold it to me but I was never good enough over iron to prove it. I played with one of those GI scope mounts but I am not convinced it works that well. |
The NRA is...
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/10/16 11:32 AM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: The NRA is full of ****. The Dallas shooter was a good guy with a gun until he wasn’t. The guns and ammo were legally purchased. There were at least 20 “open carry” guys present when the shooting started, and they all ran from the scene. The victims were heavily armed and highly trained. So much for the concept that there’s a benefit to “carrying” in an open venue. Oh, and did I miss the NRA’s comment on the death of the guy in Minnesota who apparently was legally carrying and shot to death by the cops? Or does the NRA only care about white folks who carry? Another dumb post by a racist and loser. Bilious, it is fashionable these days for white guys to accuse others of "racism" when the latter point out the racism or possible racism of whites or white-dominated groups. But that doesn't make the charge true. It is simply a way for white guys to try to "transfer" their racism onto those who accuse them of it. The NRA and other nutcase groups frequently state that "if only more people carried firearms...blah blah blah." Well, in Dallas there were plenty of "civilians" open carrying firearms, and they all ran when the shooting started. And where is the comment from the NRA on the guy who apparently was legally carrying and was shot by a cop? If the 2nd Amendment is suppose to allow you to arm yourself so you can protect yourself from an "overreaching" government, well, it doesn't seem to work, does it? The first paragraph pretty much describes your calling most posters racist. Seeing the amount of asset forfeiture and shootings by police, we seem to have an overreaching government. |
The NRA is...
On 7/10/16 11:48 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/10/16 11:32 AM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: The NRA is full of ****. The Dallas shooter was a good guy with a gun until he wasn’t. The guns and ammo were legally purchased. There were at least 20 “open carry” guys present when the shooting started, and they all ran from the scene. The victims were heavily armed and highly trained. So much for the concept that there’s a benefit to “carrying” in an open venue. Oh, and did I miss the NRA’s comment on the death of the guy in Minnesota who apparently was legally carrying and shot to death by the cops? Or does the NRA only care about white folks who carry? Another dumb post by a racist and loser. Bilious, it is fashionable these days for white guys to accuse others of "racism" when the latter point out the racism or possible racism of whites or white-dominated groups. But that doesn't make the charge true. It is simply a way for white guys to try to "transfer" their racism onto those who accuse them of it. The NRA and other nutcase groups frequently state that "if only more people carried firearms...blah blah blah." Well, in Dallas there were plenty of "civilians" open carrying firearms, and they all ran when the shooting started. And where is the comment from the NRA on the guy who apparently was legally carrying and was shot by a cop? If the 2nd Amendment is suppose to allow you to arm yourself so you can protect yourself from an "overreaching" government, well, it doesn't seem to work, does it? The first paragraph pretty much describes your calling most posters racist. Seeing the amount of asset forfeiture and shootings by police, we seem to have an overreaching government. Indeed, you and others transfer your racism onto others, as I pointed out. |
The NRA is...
On 7/10/16 8:51 PM, justan wrote:
True North Wrote in message: Justine giggles... "Gosh Harry . You sure do know your mobster stuff. Explain about the 22 business I seem to be in the dark about." Harry would have to jamb an anti aircraft type searchlight up your butt to even start to enlightened you. Is that how you two but thales communicate with each other? "But Thales" Is that some sort of farmyard animal you prefer for "intimate relations"? |
The NRA is...
On 7/10/16 9:08 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, July 10, 2016 at 6:42:13 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/10/16 6:50 PM, Tim wrote: "Ialways get a giggle over how you righties rush to aid your compadres, " I always get a giggle out of you putting me on a category of *you righties* You're amazing Harry. I don't see you as a leftie or a centrist. You need to open your eyes, Anything thats not you or further leftist leaning is a 'rightie' Some of us just want fairness. What do you mean by "fairness"? |
The NRA is...
|
The NRA is...
Keyser Sze Wrote in message:
On 7/10/16 8:51 PM, justan wrote: True North Wrote in message: Justine giggles... "Gosh Harry . You sure do know your mobster stuff. Explain about the 22 business I seem to be in the dark about." Harry would have to jamb an anti aircraft type searchlight up your butt to even start to enlightened you. Is that how you two but thales communicate with each other? "But Thales" Is that some sort of farmyard animal you prefer for "intimate relations"? I have no idea what it is. I've been trying without success to turn off this predictor thingy -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
The NRA is...
On 7/11/16 8:22 AM, justan wrote:
Keyser Sze Wrote in message: On 7/10/16 8:51 PM, justan wrote: True North Wrote in message: Justine giggles... "Gosh Harry . You sure do know your mobster stuff. Explain about the 22 business I seem to be in the dark about." Harry would have to jamb an anti aircraft type searchlight up your butt to even start to enlightened you. Is that how you two but thales communicate with each other? "But Thales" Is that some sort of farmyard animal you prefer for "intimate relations"? I have no idea what it is. I've been trying without success to turn off this predictor thingy If it is a tablet: Step 1. Drag down from the top of the screen twice if you have Lollipop to bring up the quick settings. Then tap the cog icon to open the settings menu. On other phones/devices, it might be a slightly different route to settings, but you can always check the app tray for the Settings app and pin it to your home screen if you want a really quick way to change settings. Step 2. Scroll down to Language & input and tap on it. Under the sub-heading Keyboard & input methods you will see which keyboard you are currently using and - not so obviously - the settings for it beneath that: the menu item states the name of the keyboard and the language. Step 3. Tap on the name of the keyboard - in this case Google Keyboard and you will see all the available settings. To turn off predictive text, tap Text correction and then at the bottom of the next screen, turn off "Next-word suggestions". Another option in the Text correction menu is your Personal dictionary. You can add words to this, and it's useful if Android tends to auto-correct someone's name or another word you use regularly. When you add a word, you can also enter a shortcut to type that word - that's invaluable when you have long or complex words. |
The NRA is...
On 7/10/2016 6:50 PM, Tim wrote:
"Ialways get a giggle over how you righties rush to aid your compadres, " I always get a giggle out of you putting me on a category of *you righties* You're amazing Harry. He's not amazing. He's tiresome. |
The NRA is...
7:33 AMMr. Luddite
On 7/10/2016 6:50 PM, Tim wrote: "Ialways get a giggle over how you righties rush to aid your compadres, " I always get a giggle out of you putting me on a category of *you righties* You're amazing Harry. He's not amazing. He's tiresome. ..... I'm finding that out. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:33 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com