11:03 AMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
D'uh. That's not a preference poll.
.....

To you, if it said Trump on it then it would be.

Face it Harry, she ain't doing to great at the moment..

11:06 AMKeyser Söze
On 7/8/16 8:13 AM, Tim wrote:
On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 7:02:05 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
- show quoted text -
Of course not, but I'm not an elected representative in Congress
conducting a never-ending witch hunt, like Gowdy.
.....

"Never ending witch hunt?" What do you mean? We already know who and what she is. Lol!

11:05 AMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
I'm sorry, but what crimes has Mrs. Clinton been charged with or
convicted of? Answer: none. Your boy Trump is a lot closer to the bar of
criminal justice.
....

"My boy Trump". Hardly. Where on earth do you come up with that presumptive crap anyhow?

On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 1:08:33 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:

On 7/8/16 12:34 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 12:05:20 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


I'm sorry, but what crimes has Mrs. Clinton been charged with or
convicted of? Answer: none. Your boy Trump is a lot closer to the bar of
criminal justice.

They reran the whole hearing last night. I watched Comey explain his
position. The thing that was consistent was that he stood by his
assessment that Hillary was "extremely careless" with national secrets
and that someone in her position should know better about what she was
sending and receiving.
When asked about presumptive penalties he stayed with "administrative
sanctions" and when questioned about them he said that included loss
of security clearance and being fired or moved to a position that does
not involve sensitive information.
OK by me.
If they want to make her secretary of HSS or Education, I am fine with
it but president is not a good fit for a careless person, whether that
is Hillary or Trump.

It was interesting to hear what the democrat members were saying. They
either tried to pivot to the police shootings or said some variation
of "what difference does it make"?

He did answer the direct question "did you ever think this was a witch
hunt" by saying no. He also said the only reason he took this up was
because of a direct request by the IG. The FBI does not respond to
things they see on TV.



I'm sorry...what crimes did Mrs. Clinton been charged with or convicted of?

None yet.
If there was one (that has not been investigated according to Comey),
it is perjury and obstruction of justice. Terms very familiar to the
Clintons. That was what got Bill impeached.
I am satisfied that she is not qualified to be president simply
because she is extremely careless and negligent.

Besides, one does not have to be charged with a crime and convicted to be a criminal. Hillary is a criminal. No sane, thinking person in this world believes she didn't know what she was doing with that email server, before it came to light and after.

Hillary is a criminal.

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 02:27:59 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

Couldn't lay a glove on him.
"No evidence warranting prosecution."
And he wouldn't even go so far as to say Hilary couldn't join the FBI due
to previous "careless" handling of classified material.
Not that makes any difference, seeing that Hilary doesn't want that job.
Pretty much trashed the Republican calls for prosecution, and gave the
house a schooling on the law.
Of course the Hilary witch-hunt will continue, because that's what
Republicans do.
Now, the question is to vote for Hilary, or Trump.
It's a no-brainer, but that's assuming a brain is present.
Well, I'm throwing down my cards.
Hilary 2016!

Did you ever think your cards would come down any other way?


Sure. It might have been Bernie. Certainly not Trump.
Now I know the alternative to Trump. Hilary Rodham Clinton.

I do believe you were not listening to Comey's testimony and only saw
what MSNBC cherry picked out of the hearings.

I watched the entire hearing. CSPAN. But MSNBC had the entire hearing,
as did CNN.
Comey refused to engage the Republicans in whether HRC would be hired by
the FBI - as if that could happen.
He also refused to to talk about Condi Rice and Colin Powell since he
wasn't charged with investigating them. Lucky for them.
Powell used his AOL account for SoS business, and said so.
Condi Rice - we'll never know. It's probably all been deleted.
BTW, it's now 2016. Congress's is still using private accounts to
conduct gov business.
As I said above, Comey's decision was not to prosecute.
In case you weren't paying attention, he explained it thoroughly.

On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 13:12:16 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

As I said above, Comey's decision was not to prosecute.
In case you weren't paying attention, he explained it thoroughly.

I listened and I also noticed that he consistently said she was
careless and negligent in the way she handled data. He pointed out the
normal administrative sanctions would involve limiting or eliminating
any future access to confidential information. Last time I looked
Powell and Rice were not running for president. I doubt either of them
will ever see any confidential data again either.

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/8/16 12:34 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 12:05:20 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


I'm sorry, but what crimes has Mrs. Clinton been charged with or
convicted of? Answer: none. Your boy Trump is a lot closer to the bar of
criminal justice.

They reran the whole hearing last night. I watched Comey explain his
position. The thing that was consistent was that he stood by his
assessment that Hillary was "extremely careless" with national secrets
and that someone in her position should know better about what she was
sending and receiving.
When asked about presumptive penalties he stayed with "administrative
sanctions" and when questioned about them he said that included loss
of security clearance and being fired or moved to a position that does
not involve sensitive information.
OK by me.
If they want to make her secretary of HSS or Education, I am fine with
it but president is not a good fit for a careless person, whether that
is Hillary or Trump.

It was interesting to hear what the democrat members were saying. They
either tried to pivot to the police shootings or said some variation
of "what difference does it make"?

He did answer the direct question "did you ever think this was a witch
hunt" by saying no. He also said the only reason he took this up was
because of a direct request by the IG. The FBI does not respond to
things they see on TV.



I'm sorry...what crimes did Mrs. Clinton been charged with or convicted of?




What crime did they Al Capone on?

Califbill Wrote in message:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/8/16 12:34 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 12:05:20 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


I'm sorry, but what crimes has Mrs. Clinton been charged with or
convicted of? Answer: none. Your boy Trump is a lot closer to the bar of
criminal justice.

They reran the whole hearing last night. I watched Comey explain his
position. The thing that was consistent was that he stood by his
assessment that Hillary was "extremely careless" with national secrets
and that someone in her position should know better about what she was
sending and receiving.
When asked about presumptive penalties he stayed with "administrative
sanctions" and when questioned about them he said that included loss
of security clearance and being fired or moved to a position that does
not involve sensitive information.
OK by me.
If they want to make her secretary of HSS or Education, I am fine with
it but president is not a good fit for a careless person, whether that
is Hillary or Trump.

It was interesting to hear what the democrat members were saying. They
either tried to pivot to the police shootings or said some variation
of "what difference does it make"?

He did answer the direct question "did you ever think this was a witch
hunt" by saying no. He also said the only reason he took this up was
because of a direct request by the IG. The FBI does not respond to
things they see on TV.



I'm sorry...what crimes did Mrs. Clinton been charged with or convicted of?




What crime did they Al Capone on?



Tax evasion. So why didn't Harry get similar treatment? Fair is fair.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

Tim Wrote in message:
11:05 AMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
I'm sorry, but what crimes has Mrs. Clinton been charged with or
convicted of? Answer: none. Your boy Trump is a lot closer to the bar of
criminal justice.
...

"My boy Trump". Hardly. Where on earth do you come up with that presumptive crap anyhow?


He's full of it.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
On 7/8/16 7:55 AM, Tim wrote:
On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 2:28:12 AM UTC-5, Boating All Out wrote:
Couldn't lay a glove on him.
"No evidence warranting prosecution."
And he wouldn't even go so far as to say Hilary couldn't join the FBI due
to previous "careless" handling of classified material.
Not that makes any difference, seeing that Hilary doesn't want that job.
Pretty much trashed the Republican calls for prosecution, and gave the
house a schooling on the law.
Of course the Hilary witch-hunt will continue, because that's what
Republicans do.
Now, the question is to vote for Hilary, or Trump.
It's a no-brainer, but that's assuming a brain is present.
Well, I'm throwing down my cards.
Hilary 2016!

She might need your help. Look at "latest polls"

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/...vorable-rating


D'uh. That's not a preference poll.


For Gods sake Krause. Can't you read. He didn't say it was. You
have a point? Didn't think so.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/