12:54
- show quoted text -
I see plenty of silly **** from Dumbocrats. At least the Libertarians
are not burning cars and breaking store windows
......

I've never heard of a "radical" libertarian, have you?

On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 16:27:34 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/5/16 4:22 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 13:55:23 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

I see plenty of silly **** from Dumbocrats. At least the Libertarians
are not burning cars and breaking store windows


I wouldn't bet on that.

I know you wouldn't because you would lose.

You don't hear much of that
from Libertarians.


You don't hear much of anything from libertarians. Hard to take them
seriously.

You don't hear much because the networks don't say much about them and
after 1996, the 2 major parties shut them out of the debates. Nobody
was prepared to answer Harry Browne's questions. These days the
"debates" are nothing but 2 candidates, reading lines from their stump
speech, no matter what the questions are.
The result is that, since then, we are getting the inbred *******
children of the GHWB administration. There are so many interlocking
relationships between both party's mainstream candidates that there is
not much space between them. Guns, abortion and most recently gays
seems to be the big things and I bet Hillary will run away from the
gay thing as much as she can in the general. She is certainly in the
pockets of the banksters and wall street as much as anyone (as was her
hubby). She is also a neocon, more like McCain than most other
democrats.

On 7/5/16 5:02 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 16:27:34 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/5/16 4:22 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 13:55:23 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

I see plenty of silly **** from Dumbocrats. At least the Libertarians
are not burning cars and breaking store windows


I wouldn't bet on that.

I know you wouldn't because you would lose.

You don't hear much of that
from Libertarians.


You don't hear much of anything from libertarians. Hard to take them
seriously.

You don't hear much because the networks don't say much about them and
after 1996, the 2 major parties shut them out of the debates.


My guess is that you don't hear much from the libertarians because they
sound like a "fringe" party, way out there.

On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:24:04 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/5/16 5:02 PM, wrote:

You don't hear much because the networks don't say much about them and
after 1996, the 2 major parties shut them out of the debates.


My guess is that you don't hear much from the libertarians because they
sound like a "fringe" party, way out there.

If they were so fringe, why did Harry Browne scare them so badly, they
shut him out of the debates after that? Of course some of it was Perot
too. He also asked questions about the economy that they were not
prepared to answer. They just want to read talking points from their
stump speech without any real questions.
BTW did you see the Stossel report on the elections? I know you would
not normally watch Stossel or Fox but it was a pretty good show. He
had Beckel and Rollins talking about how campaigns are really run.
They dissected various campaigns from Nixon on. They talk about how
the campaign keeps the candidate on message and how the whole thing is
more about image than substance. It was actually taped around 2012 so
Trump is not in it. It is worth a look if for nothing else, Beckel and
Rollins.