On 7/5/16 1:09 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:29:01 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

Gee I though Harry was saying that whole area was taken over by
erudite gentlemen farmers like himself.


We've got a guy around the corner who has a Trump sign in his front
yard. Always thought he was a bit strange.

I bet he feels the same about you. If he lived there for 20 or 30
years he remembers when that place was all "good old boys".
Now it is just another bedroom community of DC. The people who could
afford to get out of PG moved there. It is the same migration that has
been going on since the 50s. The difference is the parts of DC that
are gentrified, pushing the poor folks out to the beltway and the
folks who were there either jump over the doughnut and go to town or
they move farther out into tobacco country.


Nah, the guy in question is a newcomer. This county still votes
Repugnant for most but not all county and state offices, and for POTUS.
Not much evidence, though, of Tea Bagger presence. The real nuts,
forgive me, are the Loonytarians, who set up booths on occasion and hand
out insane-reading literature.

On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 13:29:12 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/5/16 1:09 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:29:01 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

Gee I though Harry was saying that whole area was taken over by
erudite gentlemen farmers like himself.


We've got a guy around the corner who has a Trump sign in his front
yard. Always thought he was a bit strange.

I bet he feels the same about you. If he lived there for 20 or 30
years he remembers when that place was all "good old boys".
Now it is just another bedroom community of DC. The people who could
afford to get out of PG moved there. It is the same migration that has
been going on since the 50s. The difference is the parts of DC that
are gentrified, pushing the poor folks out to the beltway and the
folks who were there either jump over the doughnut and go to town or
they move farther out into tobacco country.


Nah, the guy in question is a newcomer. This county still votes
Repugnant for most but not all county and state offices, and for POTUS.
Not much evidence, though, of Tea Bagger presence. The real nuts,
forgive me, are the Loonytarians, who set up booths on occasion and hand
out insane-reading literature.

I see plenty of silly **** from Dumbocrats. At least the Libertarians
are not burning cars and breaking store windows

On 7/5/16 1:53 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 13:29:12 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/5/16 1:09 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:29:01 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

Gee I though Harry was saying that whole area was taken over by
erudite gentlemen farmers like himself.


We've got a guy around the corner who has a Trump sign in his front
yard. Always thought he was a bit strange.

I bet he feels the same about you. If he lived there for 20 or 30
years he remembers when that place was all "good old boys".
Now it is just another bedroom community of DC. The people who could
afford to get out of PG moved there. It is the same migration that has
been going on since the 50s. The difference is the parts of DC that
are gentrified, pushing the poor folks out to the beltway and the
folks who were there either jump over the doughnut and go to town or
they move farther out into tobacco country.


Nah, the guy in question is a newcomer. This county still votes
Repugnant for most but not all county and state offices, and for POTUS.
Not much evidence, though, of Tea Bagger presence. The real nuts,
forgive me, are the Loonytarians, who set up booths on occasion and hand
out insane-reading literature.

I see plenty of silly **** from Dumbocrats. At least the Libertarians
are not burning cars and breaking store windows


I wouldn't bet on that.

On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 13:55:23 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

I see plenty of silly **** from Dumbocrats. At least the Libertarians
are not burning cars and breaking store windows


I wouldn't bet on that.

I know you wouldn't because you would lose. I can name dozens of riots
from democrat leaning groups like the occupy punks, urban punks and
even the disrupters at the trump rallies. You don't hear much of that
from Libertarians. They just sit at card tables and hand out pieces of
paper that **** you off. Most serious people don't take them that
seriously because we tolerate other views. It is the self proclaimed
"liberal" who is everything but. You live in a strictly defined big,
all powerful, government paradigm and anything outside of that is
"loony" to you. There is a name for that. It is Fascism.

On 7/5/16 4:22 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 13:55:23 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

I see plenty of silly **** from Dumbocrats. At least the Libertarians
are not burning cars and breaking store windows


I wouldn't bet on that.

I know you wouldn't because you would lose.

You don't hear much of that
from Libertarians.


You don't hear much of anything from libertarians. Hard to take them
seriously.

On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 16:27:34 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/5/16 4:22 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 13:55:23 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

I see plenty of silly **** from Dumbocrats. At least the Libertarians
are not burning cars and breaking store windows


I wouldn't bet on that.

I know you wouldn't because you would lose.

You don't hear much of that
from Libertarians.


You don't hear much of anything from libertarians. Hard to take them
seriously.

You don't hear much because the networks don't say much about them and
after 1996, the 2 major parties shut them out of the debates. Nobody
was prepared to answer Harry Browne's questions. These days the
"debates" are nothing but 2 candidates, reading lines from their stump
speech, no matter what the questions are.
The result is that, since then, we are getting the inbred *******
children of the GHWB administration. There are so many interlocking
relationships between both party's mainstream candidates that there is
not much space between them. Guns, abortion and most recently gays
seems to be the big things and I bet Hillary will run away from the
gay thing as much as she can in the general. She is certainly in the
pockets of the banksters and wall street as much as anyone (as was her
hubby). She is also a neocon, more like McCain than most other
democrats.

On 7/5/16 5:02 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 16:27:34 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/5/16 4:22 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 13:55:23 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

I see plenty of silly **** from Dumbocrats. At least the Libertarians
are not burning cars and breaking store windows


I wouldn't bet on that.

I know you wouldn't because you would lose.

You don't hear much of that
from Libertarians.


You don't hear much of anything from libertarians. Hard to take them
seriously.

You don't hear much because the networks don't say much about them and
after 1996, the 2 major parties shut them out of the debates.


My guess is that you don't hear much from the libertarians because they
sound like a "fringe" party, way out there.

12:54
- show quoted text -
I see plenty of silly **** from Dumbocrats. At least the Libertarians
are not burning cars and breaking store windows
......

I've never heard of a "radical" libertarian, have you?