Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 11:15:47 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 11:09 AM, wrote: On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 07:45:59 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote: On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway. If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as if it really matters in your state. Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of discrimination? "Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians. I imagine if they had a sign that said they would not serve people with an NRA hat, that would be fine with you. Typically, anti-discrimination laws target discrimination over which an individual has no control, such as race, ethnicity, country of origin, gender preference and, usually but not always, religion (tends to be inherited socially from parents). Many people who deviate have control over their "gender preference". Remove the word preference, and you would be correct. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/6/16 11:38 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 11:15:47 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/6/16 11:09 AM, wrote: On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 07:45:59 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote: On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway. If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as if it really matters in your state. Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of discrimination? "Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians. I imagine if they had a sign that said they would not serve people with an NRA hat, that would be fine with you. Typically, anti-discrimination laws target discrimination over which an individual has no control, such as race, ethnicity, country of origin, gender preference and, usually but not always, religion (tends to be inherited socially from parents). Many people who deviate have control over their "gender preference". Remove the word preference, and you would be correct. Oh? Define "many" in terms of a percentage. Please. And from your personal knowledge and study. No cites, please, from right-wingers, fundamentalist preachers, et cetera, or groups that promote the right-wing agenda. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 11:42:38 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 11:38 AM, Its Me wrote: On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 11:15:47 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/6/16 11:09 AM, wrote: On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 07:45:59 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote: On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway. If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as if it really matters in your state. Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of discrimination? "Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians. I imagine if they had a sign that said they would not serve people with an NRA hat, that would be fine with you. Typically, anti-discrimination laws target discrimination over which an individual has no control, such as race, ethnicity, country of origin, gender preference and, usually but not always, religion (tends to be inherited socially from parents). Many people who deviate have control over their "gender preference". Remove the word preference, and you would be correct. Oh? Define "many" in terms of a percentage. Please. And from your personal knowledge and study. No cites, please, from right-wingers, fundamentalist preachers, et cetera, or groups that promote the right-wing agenda. Loogy! It *is* you! Sorry, but you're not in charge here, and I have no reason to educate you. But if you want some education, look up the word "preference". Please. ![]() |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/6/16 2:55 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 11:42:38 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/6/16 11:38 AM, Its Me wrote: On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 11:15:47 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/6/16 11:09 AM, wrote: On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 07:45:59 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote: On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway. If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as if it really matters in your state. Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of discrimination? "Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians. I imagine if they had a sign that said they would not serve people with an NRA hat, that would be fine with you. Typically, anti-discrimination laws target discrimination over which an individual has no control, such as race, ethnicity, country of origin, gender preference and, usually but not always, religion (tends to be inherited socially from parents). Many people who deviate have control over their "gender preference". Remove the word preference, and you would be correct. Oh? Define "many" in terms of a percentage. Please. And from your personal knowledge and study. No cites, please, from right-wingers, fundamentalist preachers, et cetera, or groups that promote the right-wing agenda. Loogy! It *is* you! Sorry, but you're not in charge here, and I have no reason to educate you. But if you want some education, look up the word "preference". Please. ![]() I had a feeling you were blowing that out your ass. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:15:45 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 11:09 AM, wrote: I imagine if they had a sign that said they would not serve people with an NRA hat, that would be fine with you. Typically, anti-discrimination laws target discrimination over which an individual has no control, such as race, ethnicity, country of origin, gender preference and, usually but not always, religion (tends to be inherited socially from parents). Political speech is constitutionally protected, public accommodation is not. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/6/16 11:45 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:15:45 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/6/16 11:09 AM, wrote: I imagine if they had a sign that said they would not serve people with an NRA hat, that would be fine with you. Typically, anti-discrimination laws target discrimination over which an individual has no control, such as race, ethnicity, country of origin, gender preference and, usually but not always, religion (tends to be inherited socially from parents). Political speech is constitutionally protected, public accommodation is not. Public accommodation is protected by the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the law that outlaws discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It ended unequal application of voter registration requirements and racial segregation in schools, at the workplace and by facilities that served the general public (known as "public accommodations"). It's the law that offends Libertarians because it interferes with their right to discriminate. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:54:33 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 11:45 AM, wrote: Political speech is constitutionally protected, public accommodation is not. Public accommodation is protected by the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the law that outlaws discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It ended unequal application of voter registration requirements and racial segregation in schools, at the workplace and by facilities that served the general public (known as "public accommodations"). You seemed to miss the "Constitutional" part. It's the law that offends Libertarians because it interferes with their right to discriminate. If it is a PRIVATE operation, why shouldn't you have the right to decide who can join? I personally find discrimination against people based on race religion or gender to be stupid but I am not sure it should be the law. I do find it interesting that you talk about the evils of discrimination but you are the first one to discriminate against christians. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/6/16 12:31 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:54:33 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/6/16 11:45 AM, wrote: Political speech is constitutionally protected, public accommodation is not. Public accommodation is protected by the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the law that outlaws discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It ended unequal application of voter registration requirements and racial segregation in schools, at the workplace and by facilities that served the general public (known as "public accommodations"). You seemed to miss the "Constitutional" part. It's the law that offends Libertarians because it interferes with their right to discriminate. If it is a PRIVATE operation, why shouldn't you have the right to decide who can join? I personally find discrimination against people based on race religion or gender to be stupid but I am not sure it should be the law. I do find it interesting that you talk about the evils of discrimination but you are the first one to discriminate against christians. Oh? How do *I* discriminate against christians? Please be specific. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:15:45 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 11:09 AM, wrote: On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 07:45:59 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote: On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway. If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as if it really matters in your state. Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of discrimination? "Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians. I imagine if they had a sign that said they would not serve people with an NRA hat, that would be fine with you. Typically, anti-discrimination laws target discrimination over which an individual has no control, such as race, ethnicity, country of origin, gender preference and, usually but not always, religion (tends to be inherited socially from parents). You should thank Got that liars are not usually targetted. You'd go hungry a lot. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Real Whore | General | |||
As the whore turns... | General | |||
Cannibals In The U.S. Congress, On Capital Hill! Meet George Bush, Jr., Bill And Hillary Clinton, Barrack Obama, Al Gore, And Capital Hill! | General | |||
What a Whore! | ASA | |||
Crack Whore | ASA |