Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
On 7/5/16 11:37 AM, justan wrote:
Wrote in message:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/

If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned.

The Clintons have always been corporate whores.
How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years?


Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing
sinister there, right?



Do you have specifics to offer aside from the drool running down your
chin onto your bib?


Seemed specific enough to me. You know how talented at making evidence
disappear those Clintoons are.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

On 7/5/16 12:08 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
On 7/5/16 11:37 AM, justan wrote:
Wrote in message:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/

If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned.

The Clintons have always been corporate whores.
How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years?


Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing
sinister there, right?



Do you have specifics to offer aside from the drool running down your
chin onto your bib?


Seemed specific enough to me. You know how talented at making evidence
disappear those Clintoons are.


Seems specific to you because you are a moron and you support, puke, Trump.

On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:08:13 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:

Seemed specific enough to me. You know how talented at making evidence
disappear those Clintoons are.
--
x

Considering how much the FBI did recover, perhaps they are not as
smart as we assumed. It appears they just formatted the drives but
they did not run a "wipe" program and the unused sectors were still
loaded with latent data.
They tried to hide their secrets but in the same "careless" manner
that they were using in the protection of our nations secrets