Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 16:17:43 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: A case of paranoia there. Pretty common among gun nuts. Do you carry a spare tire in your car? Is that paranoia too? How many flat tires/blow-outs have you had in your driving life? Since the steel belted radial tire? A couple. Considering I was driving 50,000 miles a year, it was a very rare to almost non-existent event in the last 45 years, yet I still carried a spare, a jack and a decent lug wrench. I guess I was paranoid about that too. The EPA says that every extra 100 pounds you add to a car reduces efficiency 1-2% so it is safe to say the 50 pounds or so you have with the "doughnut" tire, jack and such costs you about 1% so it is not unreasonable to say you wasted 25 gallons of gas a year, just on your paranoia. (assuming the tire and jack were free) At a certain point my $350 Ruger and a few boxes of ammo are a bargain. ;-) |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/23/16 8:09 AM, justan wrote:
Keyser Söze Wrote in message: On 6/22/16 11:06 PM, wrote: On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 16:17:43 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: A case of paranoia there. Pretty common among gun nuts. Do you carry a spare tire in your car? Is that paranoia too? How many flat tires/blow-outs have you had in your driving life? Since the steel belted radial tire? A couple. Considering I was driving 50,000 miles a year, it was a very rare to almost non-existent event in the last 45 years, yet I still carried a spare, a jack and a decent lug wrench. I guess I was paranoid about that too. The EPA says that every extra 100 pounds you add to a car reduces efficiency 1-2% so it is safe to say the 50 pounds or so you have with the "doughnut" tire, jack and such costs you about 1% so it is not unreasonable to say you wasted 25 gallons of gas a year, just on your paranoia. (assuming the tire and jack were free) At a certain point my $350 Ruger and a few boxes of ammo are a bargain. ;-) That's the whole point. You carry a spare tire because you need to, because you've had a couple of flats or blowouts over the years. It isn't paranoia to carry a spare and a jack. How many times have you *had* to use a firearm to defend yourself over the same period of time? Tell us about the times you were sitting down to lunch with your associates and out of nowhere other mobsters opened fire on them. We're you packing heat at the time? If not why not? Didn't that happen on more than one occasion? There were no such times. Once, in Central America, I was with a group of associates who were pushing for land reform when some members of the national army opened fire on several of our group who were sitting at an adjacent table. The attackers weren't mobsters, unless you think military officers are mobsters. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/23/16 8:09 AM, justan wrote: Keyser Söze Wrote in message: On 6/22/16 11:06 PM, wrote: On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 16:17:43 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: A case of paranoia there. Pretty common among gun nuts. Do you carry a spare tire in your car? Is that paranoia too? How many flat tires/blow-outs have you had in your driving life? Since the steel belted radial tire? A couple. Considering I was driving 50,000 miles a year, it was a very rare to almost non-existent event in the last 45 years, yet I still carried a spare, a jack and a decent lug wrench. I guess I was paranoid about that too. The EPA says that every extra 100 pounds you add to a car reduces efficiency 1-2% so it is safe to say the 50 pounds or so you have with the "doughnut" tire, jack and such costs you about 1% so it is not unreasonable to say you wasted 25 gallons of gas a year, just on your paranoia. (assuming the tire and jack were free) At a certain point my $350 Ruger and a few boxes of ammo are a bargain. ;-) That's the whole point. You carry a spare tire because you need to, because you've had a couple of flats or blowouts over the years. It isn't paranoia to carry a spare and a jack. How many times have you *had* to use a firearm to defend yourself over the same period of time? Tell us about the times you were sitting down to lunch with your associates and out of nowhere other mobsters opened fire on them. We're you packing heat at the time? If not why not? Didn't that happen on more than one occasion? There were no such times. Once, in Central America, I was with a group of associates who were pushing for land reform when some members of the national army opened fire on several of our group who were sitting at an adjacent table. The attackers weren't mobsters, unless you think military officers are mobsters. Was that with Brian Williams or Hillary Clinton? |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/23/16 9:49 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 06:29:33 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/22/16 11:06 PM, wrote: On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 16:17:43 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: A case of paranoia there. Pretty common among gun nuts. Do you carry a spare tire in your car? Is that paranoia too? How many flat tires/blow-outs have you had in your driving life? Since the steel belted radial tire? A couple. Considering I was driving 50,000 miles a year, it was a very rare to almost non-existent event in the last 45 years, yet I still carried a spare, a jack and a decent lug wrench. I guess I was paranoid about that too. The EPA says that every extra 100 pounds you add to a car reduces efficiency 1-2% so it is safe to say the 50 pounds or so you have with the "doughnut" tire, jack and such costs you about 1% so it is not unreasonable to say you wasted 25 gallons of gas a year, just on your paranoia. (assuming the tire and jack were free) At a certain point my $350 Ruger and a few boxes of ammo are a bargain. ;-) That's the whole point. You carry a spare tire because you need to, because you've had a couple of flats or blowouts over the years. It isn't paranoia to carry a spare and a jack. How many times have you *had* to use a firearm to defend yourself over the same period of time? A couple. Oh, well. Go for it. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
On 6/23/16 9:49 AM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 06:29:33 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/22/16 11:06 PM, wrote: On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 16:17:43 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: A case of paranoia there. Pretty common among gun nuts. Do you carry a spare tire in your car? Is that paranoia too? How many flat tires/blow-outs have you had in your driving life? Since the steel belted radial tire? A couple. Considering I was driving 50,000 miles a year, it was a very rare to almost non-existent event in the last 45 years, yet I still carried a spare, a jack and a decent lug wrench. I guess I was paranoid about that too. The EPA says that every extra 100 pounds you add to a car reduces efficiency 1-2% so it is safe to say the 50 pounds or so you have with the "doughnut" tire, jack and such costs you about 1% so it is not unreasonable to say you wasted 25 gallons of gas a year, just on your paranoia. (assuming the tire and jack were free) At a certain point my $350 Ruger and a few boxes of ammo are a bargain. ;-) That's the whole point. You carry a spare tire because you need to, because you've had a couple of flats or blowouts over the years. It isn't paranoia to carry a spare and a jack. How many times have you *had* to use a firearm to defend yourself over the same period of time? A couple. Oh, well. Go for it. the Apparently he did, and he' still here to talk about it. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:25:25 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 6/23/16 9:49 AM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 06:29:33 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: How many times have you *had* to use a firearm to defend yourself over the same period of time? A couple. Oh, well. Go for it. You seem to be fairly well armed and you have made no secret of the fact that you would use deadly force if it was necessary so you do not really have a stand here. BAO trusts the police to respond before anything bad can happen to him. I hope he is right but they usually just show up in time to take a report and, maybe, call the coroner. The number of these crimes that are actually closed is frighteningly small. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/23/16 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:25:25 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/23/16 9:49 AM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 06:29:33 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: How many times have you *had* to use a firearm to defend yourself over the same period of time? A couple. Oh, well. Go for it. You seem to be fairly well armed and you have made no secret of the fact that you would use deadly force if it was necessary so you do not really have a stand here. BAO trusts the police to respond before anything bad can happen to him. I hope he is right but they usually just show up in time to take a report and, maybe, call the coroner. The number of these crimes that are actually closed is frighteningly small. Ahh, but my primary purpose in having a few firearms is to participate in target shooting. At one point, there were two morons here who threatened physical violence, so I "gunned up" and got a carry permit, but those morons -the crazy guy from the Pacific Rim who lived in Canada and nutball Scotty from Connecticut- seem to have disappeared. If we had a home invasion here and we somehow weren't warned by the security system, I probably could get to a sidearm or shotgun in time to defend us. If thugs trip the property lights at night or the perimeter alarms, there's no question I'd have time to grab a firearm. I certainly wouldn't hesitate to fire into the center of body mass of a home invader. My "trusty" S&W revolver would do the job, and I wouldn't need more than six rounds. ![]() |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Carnival Victory | Tall Ship Photos | |||
What's with Wilderness/Victory? | General | |||
Victory Tugs | General | |||
No Victory For Bush | ASA |