| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Jo Cox
The Brits just lost an MP ... shot. I thought they didn't have any
guns there. |
Jo Cox
|
Jo Cox
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
On 6/17/16 1:00 AM, wrote: The Brits just lost an MP ... shot. I thought they didn't have any guns there. D'oh. Better, compare the murder by gun rate per 1000 between our two countries. Start a new thread if that's what you want to talk about, asshole.I suppose you like O'bumma's plan to take guns away from the innocent to protect the guilty. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Jo Cox
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 06:25:19 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 6/17/16 1:00 AM, wrote: The Brits just lost an MP ... shot. I thought they didn't have any guns there. D'oh. Better, compare the murder by gun rate per 1000 between our two countries. Tell that to the dead MP's family |
Jo Cox
|
Jo Cox
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/17/16 1:00 AM, wrote: The Brits just lost an MP ... shot. I thought they didn't have any guns there. There are reports, as yet unconfirmed, that he used a "homemade gun" he made from plans in a U.S.-based white nationalist publication or website. Probably a Trump supporter, too. You need to do a little more research. England has a gun problem. Lots of the guns were reactivated weapons, from the days when the Brit's could own anything. Some are starter pistols that have been made usable. Biggest problem in England is ammo. Sort of like the state of California has tried. So lots of the ammo is reloads. 100 years ago, the English could still own any weapon, including machine guns. That was right guaranteed by a statute from Parliament when the people were worried about despot rulers. Unfortunately it was a statute and not a Magna Carta type law. So a later Parliament changed the law. At least we have the 2nd amendment to protect us from despot rulers. And the 2nd can not be changed by Congress. Seems as if the SCOTUS has been allowed tho. The 2nd is not about hunting weapons, it is about politics! Especially bad politics. You say we can not defeat an army. How many of the military would oppose the people? Russia stationed soldiers far from their homes, and in different countries, so they would not have to choose between their neighbors and the government. With islamoterrism on the rise, we may need more lenient gun laws to protect ourselves from those who ignore laws anyway. |
Jo Cox
On 6/17/16 1:14 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/17/16 1:00 AM, wrote: The Brits just lost an MP ... shot. I thought they didn't have any guns there. There are reports, as yet unconfirmed, that he used a "homemade gun" he made from plans in a U.S.-based white nationalist publication or website. Probably a Trump supporter, too. You need to do a little more research. England has a gun problem. Lots of the guns were reactivated weapons, from the days when the Brit's could own anything. Some are starter pistols that have been made usable. Biggest problem in England is ammo. Sort of like the state of California has tried. So lots of the ammo is reloads. 100 years ago, the English could still own any weapon, including machine guns. That was right guaranteed by a statute from Parliament when the people were worried about despot rulers. Unfortunately it was a statute and not a Magna Carta type law. So a later Parliament changed the law. At least we have the 2nd amendment to protect us from despot rulers. And the 2nd can not be changed by Congress. Seems as if the SCOTUS has been allowed tho. The 2nd is not about hunting weapons, it is about politics! Especially bad politics. You say we can not defeat an army. How many of the military would oppose the people? Russia stationed soldiers far from their homes, and in different countries, so they would not have to choose between their neighbors and the government. With islamoterrism on the rise, we may need more lenient gun laws to protect ourselves from those who ignore laws anyway. The 2nd Amendment is no protection against "despot leaders." |
Jo Cox
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:43:22 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 6/17/16 1:00 AM, wrote: The Brits just lost an MP ... shot. I thought they didn't have any guns there. There are reports, as yet unconfirmed, that he used a "homemade gun" he made from plans in a U.S.-based white nationalist publication or website. Probably a Trump supporter, too. He got off at least 3 rounds in rapid succession so that is a heluva zip gun. If this is true it talks to the futility of gun control even more than an illegally owned gun. |
Jo Cox
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/17/16 1:14 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/17/16 1:00 AM, wrote: The Brits just lost an MP ... shot. I thought they didn't have any guns there. There are reports, as yet unconfirmed, that he used a "homemade gun" he made from plans in a U.S.-based white nationalist publication or website. Probably a Trump supporter, too. You need to do a little more research. England has a gun problem. Lots of the guns were reactivated weapons, from the days when the Brit's could own anything. Some are starter pistols that have been made usable. Biggest problem in England is ammo. Sort of like the state of California has tried. So lots of the ammo is reloads. 100 years ago, the English could still own any weapon, including machine guns. That was right guaranteed by a statute from Parliament when the people were worried about despot rulers. Unfortunately it was a statute and not a Magna Carta type law. So a later Parliament changed the law. At least we have the 2nd amendment to protect us from despot rulers. And the 2nd can not be changed by Congress. Seems as if the SCOTUS has been allowed tho. The 2nd is not about hunting weapons, it is about politics! Especially bad politics. You say we can not defeat an army. How many of the military would oppose the people? Russia stationed soldiers far from their homes, and in different countries, so they would not have to choose between their neighbors and the government. With islamoterrism on the rise, we may need more lenient gun laws to protect ourselves from those who ignore laws anyway. The 2nd Amendment is no protection against "despot leaders." Why? |
Jo Cox
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:41:27 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: There are reports, as yet unconfirmed, that he used a "homemade gun" he made from plans in a U.S.-based white nationalist publication or website. Probably a Trump supporter, too. He got off at least 3 rounds in rapid succession so that is a heluva zip gun. If this is true it talks to the futility of gun control even more than an illegally owned gun. It was on a news report from Great Britain, still no secondary confirmation. There were lots of unconfirmed reports including that this was a shotgun and that it was the size of a cucumber but multiple shots seems to be confirmed. That is not a zip gun. |
Jo Cox
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:38:00 -0500, Califbill
wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: The 2nd Amendment is no protection against "despot leaders." Why? Harry thinks the Air Force would nuke us I guess. It is clear that they are not that effective against a civilian insurgency. When have we ever won one of those? Even in the last war we won (WWII) we defeated the standing armies but we had to make concessions to the civilian population to chill them out. (we let the japanese keep the emperor, engaging him to end any insurgency and we let the germans keep all the property they stole from the jews ... and more, chilling out the nazi supporters.) |
Jo Cox
On 6/17/16 3:51 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:41:27 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: There are reports, as yet unconfirmed, that he used a "homemade gun" he made from plans in a U.S.-based white nationalist publication or website. Probably a Trump supporter, too. He got off at least 3 rounds in rapid succession so that is a heluva zip gun. If this is true it talks to the futility of gun control even more than an illegally owned gun. It was on a news report from Great Britain, still no secondary confirmation. There were lots of unconfirmed reports including that this was a shotgun and that it was the size of a cucumber but multiple shots seems to be confirmed. That is not a zip gun. I haven't seen any reports that indicate it was a homemade single shot "zip" gun as opposed to some sort of homemade multi-shot firearm. Here's an article that doesn't shine a lot of light on the subject: http://www.ammoland.com/2016/06/brit...#axzz4BZseoaD6 |
Jo Cox
wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:38:00 -0500, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: The 2nd Amendment is no protection against "despot leaders." Why? Harry thinks the Air Force would nuke us I guess. It is clear that they are not that effective against a civilian insurgency. When have we ever won one of those? Even in the last war we won (WWII) we defeated the standing armies but we had to make concessions to the civilian population to chill them out. (we let the japanese keep the emperor, engaging him to end any insurgency and we let the germans keep all the property they stole from the jews ... and more, chilling out the nazi supporters.) Look at one gun precipitated. Sareavo (sp) last thing to kick off ww1. Sirhan Sirhan, single biggest change in US politics. Killing Bobby, gave us Carter and his giving us Islamoterrorists, and Reagan, etc. how many US soldiers are going to follow an unconstitutional leadership? |
Jo Cox
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:03:15 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 6/17/16 3:51 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:41:27 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: There are reports, as yet unconfirmed, that he used a "homemade gun" he made from plans in a U.S.-based white nationalist publication or website. Probably a Trump supporter, too. He got off at least 3 rounds in rapid succession so that is a heluva zip gun. If this is true it talks to the futility of gun control even more than an illegally owned gun. It was on a news report from Great Britain, still no secondary confirmation. There were lots of unconfirmed reports including that this was a shotgun and that it was the size of a cucumber but multiple shots seems to be confirmed. That is not a zip gun. I haven't seen any reports that indicate it was a homemade single shot "zip" gun as opposed to some sort of homemade multi-shot firearm. Here's an article that doesn't shine a lot of light on the subject: http://www.ammoland.com/2016/06/brit...#axzz4BZseoaD6 There was nothing there we have not already heard. The "old WWI" thing would have me thinking an old Webley. It is clear these people do not know much about guns and I assume they think if it is not a Sig, Glock or Beretta M9 like they see in the movies, it must be an antique. Maybe they should see your stuff ;-) |
Jo Cox
|
Jo Cox
On 6/17/16 4:18 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:03:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/17/16 3:51 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:41:27 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: There are reports, as yet unconfirmed, that he used a "homemade gun" he made from plans in a U.S.-based white nationalist publication or website. Probably a Trump supporter, too. He got off at least 3 rounds in rapid succession so that is a heluva zip gun. If this is true it talks to the futility of gun control even more than an illegally owned gun. It was on a news report from Great Britain, still no secondary confirmation. There were lots of unconfirmed reports including that this was a shotgun and that it was the size of a cucumber but multiple shots seems to be confirmed. That is not a zip gun. I haven't seen any reports that indicate it was a homemade single shot "zip" gun as opposed to some sort of homemade multi-shot firearm. Here's an article that doesn't shine a lot of light on the subject: http://www.ammoland.com/2016/06/brit...#axzz4BZseoaD6 There was nothing there we have not already heard. The "old WWI" thing would have me thinking an old Webley. It is clear these people do not know much about guns and I assume they think if it is not a Sig, Glock or Beretta M9 like they see in the movies, it must be an antique. Maybe they should see your stuff ;-) I keep my "junk" zipped up! Hey, I have a semi-auto pistol, albeit only a .22LR. :) |
Jo Cox
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:13:27 -0500, Califbill
wrote: Sirhan Sirhan, single biggest change in US politics. Killing Bobby, gave us Carter and his giving us Islamoterrorists, and Reagan, etc. how many US soldiers are going to follow an unconstitutional leadership? I am not sure how you got to Carter from RFK. Nixon was still going to beat Bobby, if he could have taken the nomination away from Humphrey in the first place. The scourge of the Kennedys was still with us for another 4 decades with his drunken, murdering brother. |
Jo Cox
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:21:11 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 6/17/16 4:02 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:38:00 -0500, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: The 2nd Amendment is no protection against "despot leaders." Why? Harry thinks the Air Force would nuke us I guess. It is clear that they are not that effective against a civilian insurgency. When have we ever won one of those? Even in the last war we won (WWII) we defeated the standing armies but we had to make concessions to the civilian population to chill them out. (we let the japanese keep the emperor, engaging him to end any insurgency and we let the germans keep all the property they stole from the jews ... and more, chilling out the nazi supporters.) You and the fellow over-the-top 2nd Amenders here couldn't defeat a Cub Scout pack armed with Daisy BB guns. Yeah, that is what King George said |
Jo Cox
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:23:42 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 6/17/16 4:18 PM, wrote: Here's an article that doesn't shine a lot of light on the subject: http://www.ammoland.com/2016/06/brit...#axzz4BZseoaD6 There was nothing there we have not already heard. The "old WWI" thing would have me thinking an old Webley. It is clear these people do not know much about guns and I assume they think if it is not a Sig, Glock or Beretta M9 like they see in the movies, it must be an antique. Maybe they should see your stuff ;-) I keep my "junk" zipped up! We weren't talking about "junk" but I will say that is unusual for a democrat. Hey, I have a semi-auto pistol, albeit only a .22LR. :) You still have the Mini 14 too don't you? That is an assault weapon. I was really thinking about your revolvers, LEs and bold action "stuff". With all of the churn, it is hard to remember what kind of guns flow through your little dealership |
Jo Cox
On 6/17/16 4:38 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:23:42 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/17/16 4:18 PM, wrote: Here's an article that doesn't shine a lot of light on the subject: http://www.ammoland.com/2016/06/brit...#axzz4BZseoaD6 There was nothing there we have not already heard. The "old WWI" thing would have me thinking an old Webley. It is clear these people do not know much about guns and I assume they think if it is not a Sig, Glock or Beretta M9 like they see in the movies, it must be an antique. Maybe they should see your stuff ;-) I keep my "junk" zipped up! We weren't talking about "junk" but I will say that is unusual for a democrat. Hey, I have a semi-auto pistol, albeit only a .22LR. :) You still have the Mini 14 too don't you? That is an assault weapon. I was really thinking about your revolvers, LEs and bold action "stuff". With all of the churn, it is hard to remember what kind of guns flow through your little dealership I picked up a really nice walnut stock for the mini-14 but haven't gotten around to putting it on... Saw a mini-14 at the range a few weeks ago that got the owner kicked out...apparently he figured out some way to "bump fire" it and the range officer said, "Go home." Semi-auto "defense" pistols are for guys who can't shoot straight! :) |
Jo Cox
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
On 6/17/16 4:38 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:23:42 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/17/16 4:18 PM, wrote: Here's an article that doesn't shine a lot of light on the subject: http://www.ammoland.com/2016/06/brit...#axzz4BZseoaD6 There was nothing there we have not already heard. The "old WWI" thing would have me thinking an old Webley. It is clear these people do not know much about guns and I assume they think if it is not a Sig, Glock or Beretta M9 like they see in the movies, it must be an antique. Maybe they should see your stuff ;-) I keep my "junk" zipped up! We weren't talking about "junk" but I will say that is unusual for a democrat. Hey, I have a semi-auto pistol, albeit only a .22LR. :) You still have the Mini 14 too don't you? That is an assault weapon. I was really thinking about your revolvers, LEs and bold action "stuff". With all of the churn, it is hard to remember what kind of guns flow through your little dealership I picked up a really nice walnut stock for the mini-14 but haven't gotten around to putting it on... Saw a mini-14 at the range a few weeks ago that got the owner kicked out...apparently he figured out some way to "bump fire" it and the range officer said, "Go home." Semi-auto "defense" pistols are for guys who can't shoot straight! :) That's probably why cops wear them. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Jo Cox
On 6/17/16 5:38 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Söze Wrote in message: On 6/17/16 4:38 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:23:42 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/17/16 4:18 PM, wrote: Here's an article that doesn't shine a lot of light on the subject: http://www.ammoland.com/2016/06/brit...#axzz4BZseoaD6 There was nothing there we have not already heard. The "old WWI" thing would have me thinking an old Webley. It is clear these people do not know much about guns and I assume they think if it is not a Sig, Glock or Beretta M9 like they see in the movies, it must be an antique. Maybe they should see your stuff ;-) I keep my "junk" zipped up! We weren't talking about "junk" but I will say that is unusual for a democrat. Hey, I have a semi-auto pistol, albeit only a .22LR. :) You still have the Mini 14 too don't you? That is an assault weapon. I was really thinking about your revolvers, LEs and bold action "stuff". With all of the churn, it is hard to remember what kind of guns flow through your little dealership I picked up a really nice walnut stock for the mini-14 but haven't gotten around to putting it on... Saw a mini-14 at the range a few weeks ago that got the owner kicked out...apparently he figured out some way to "bump fire" it and the range officer said, "Go home." Semi-auto "defense" pistols are for guys who can't shoot straight! :) That's probably why cops wear them. How's that Daisy Red Ryder of yours? https://www.amazon.com/Daisy-Outdoor.../dp/B001IB4SBM |
Jo Cox
wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:13:27 -0500, Califbill wrote: Sirhan Sirhan, single biggest change in US politics. Killing Bobby, gave us Carter and his giving us Islamoterrorists, and Reagan, etc. how many US soldiers are going to follow an unconstitutional leadership? I am not sure how you got to Carter from RFK. Nixon was still going to beat Bobby, if he could have taken the nomination away from Humphrey in the first place. The scourge of the Kennedys was still with us for another 4 decades with his drunken, murdering brother. Rfk was leading more than Hillary. |
Jo Cox
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:47:04 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 6/17/16 4:38 PM, wrote: You still have the Mini 14 too don't you? That is an assault weapon. I was really thinking about your revolvers, LEs and bold action "stuff". With all of the churn, it is hard to remember what kind of guns flow through your little dealership I picked up a really nice walnut stock for the mini-14 but haven't gotten around to putting it on... Saw a mini-14 at the range a few weeks ago that got the owner kicked out...apparently he figured out some way to "bump fire" it and the range officer said, "Go home." My range kicks you out for "rapid fire" too but they seem to tolerate a disciplined double tap. Semi-auto "defense" pistols are for guys who can't shoot straight! :) Say that to millions of soldiers who were defended by a 1911. |
Jo Cox
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 17:38:20 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:
Semi-auto "defense" pistols are for guys who can't shoot straight! :) That's probably why cops wear them. Far too true. Cops hit a lower percentage than the spray and pray Vietnam guys. |
Jo Cox
On 6/17/16 8:36 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:47:04 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/17/16 4:38 PM, wrote: You still have the Mini 14 too don't you? That is an assault weapon. I was really thinking about your revolvers, LEs and bold action "stuff". With all of the churn, it is hard to remember what kind of guns flow through your little dealership I picked up a really nice walnut stock for the mini-14 but haven't gotten around to putting it on... Saw a mini-14 at the range a few weeks ago that got the owner kicked out...apparently he figured out some way to "bump fire" it and the range officer said, "Go home." My range kicks you out for "rapid fire" too but they seem to tolerate a disciplined double tap. Semi-auto "defense" pistols are for guys who can't shoot straight! :) Say that to millions of soldiers who were defended by a 1911. Spraying bullets is easier than making each shot count. :) |
Jo Cox
|
Jo Cox
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:54:35 -0500, Califbill
wrote: us Carter and his giving us Islamoterrorists, and Reagan, etc. how many US soldiers are going to follow an unconstitutional leadership? I am not sure how you got to Carter from RFK. Nixon was still going to beat Bobby, if he could have taken the nomination away from Humphrey in the first place. The scourge of the Kennedys was still with us for another 4 decades with his drunken, murdering brother. Rfk was leading more than Hillary. In a race where the democrats won 14 states. |
Jo Cox
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 21:01:29 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote: On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 20:36:56 -0400, wrote: Saw a mini-14 at the range a few weeks ago that got the owner kicked out...apparently he figured out some way to "bump fire" it and the range officer said, "Go home." My range kicks you out for "rapid fire" too but they seem to tolerate a disciplined double tap. === My club has banned "bump firing" also. It gets the range neighbors on edge if they think they are hearing guns on full auto and bump firing comes pretty close. They have a couple rapid fire days a month up at Cecil so the class III guys can spend money. |
Jo Cox
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/17/16 4:38 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:23:42 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/17/16 4:18 PM, wrote: Here's an article that doesn't shine a lot of light on the subject: http://www.ammoland.com/2016/06/brit...#axzz4BZseoaD6 There was nothing there we have not already heard. The "old WWI" thing would have me thinking an old Webley. It is clear these people do not know much about guns and I assume they think if it is not a Sig, Glock or Beretta M9 like they see in the movies, it must be an antique. Maybe they should see your stuff ;-) I keep my "junk" zipped up! We weren't talking about "junk" but I will say that is unusual for a democrat. Hey, I have a semi-auto pistol, albeit only a .22LR. :) You still have the Mini 14 too don't you? That is an assault weapon. I was really thinking about your revolvers, LEs and bold action "stuff". With all of the churn, it is hard to remember what kind of guns flow through your little dealership I picked up a really nice walnut stock for the mini-14 but haven't gotten around to putting it on... Saw a mini-14 at the range a few weeks ago that got the owner kicked out...apparently he figured out some way to "bump fire" it and the range officer said, "Go home." Semi-auto "defense" pistols are for guys who can't shoot straight! :) The Mini-14 you "saw" was a pistol? Tell me when I can buy one! |
Jo Cox
On Friday, June 17, 2016 at 8:46:34 PM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/17/16 8:36 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:47:04 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/17/16 4:38 PM, wrote: You still have the Mini 14 too don't you? That is an assault weapon. I was really thinking about your revolvers, LEs and bold action "stuff". With all of the churn, it is hard to remember what kind of guns flow through your little dealership I picked up a really nice walnut stock for the mini-14 but haven't gotten around to putting it on... Saw a mini-14 at the range a few weeks ago that got the owner kicked out...apparently he figured out some way to "bump fire" it and the range officer said, "Go home." My range kicks you out for "rapid fire" too but they seem to tolerate a disciplined double tap. Semi-auto "defense" pistols are for guys who can't shoot straight! :) Say that to millions of soldiers who were defended by a 1911. Spraying bullets is easier than making each shot count. :) A decent shooter can make each semi-auto shot count. :) |
Jo Cox
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 20:46:32 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: Semi-auto "defense" pistols are for guys who can't shoot straight! :) Say that to millions of soldiers who were defended by a 1911. Spraying bullets is easier than making each shot count. :) When the chief was teaching me how to shoot a 1911, I only got one round at a time. He was teaching me that exact thing. Make each one count. |
Jo Cox
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
On 6/17/16 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:43:22 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/17/16 1:00 AM, wrote: The Brits just lost an MP ... shot. I thought they didn't have any guns there. There are reports, as yet unconfirmed, that he used a "homemade gun" he made from plans in a U.S.-based white nationalist publication or website. Probably a Trump supporter, too. He got off at least 3 rounds in rapid succession so that is a heluva zip gun. If this is true it talks to the futility of gun control even more than an illegally owned gun. It was on a news report from Great Britain, still no secondary confirmation. Been sighting in the red dot on my new .22LR pistol. The point of aim is...at least three clicks lower than it was on my Ruger Mark III, though the pistols are approximately the same size and shape, and have a similar mounting rail. I guessed maybe one click up or down...wrong. :) Who would guess that your guess that moving a scope from gun to gun shouldn't require substantial resighting? It never ceases to amaze me how inept you are on so many levels. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Jo Cox
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
On 6/17/16 4:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:03:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/17/16 3:51 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:41:27 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: There are reports, as yet unconfirmed, that he used a "homemade gun" he made from plans in a U.S.-based white nationalist publication or website. Probably a Trump supporter, too. He got off at least 3 rounds in rapid succession so that is a heluva zip gun. If this is true it talks to the futility of gun control even more than an illegally owned gun. It was on a news report from Great Britain, still no secondary confirmation. There were lots of unconfirmed reports including that this was a shotgun and that it was the size of a cucumber but multiple shots seems to be confirmed. That is not a zip gun. I haven't seen any reports that indicate it was a homemade single shot "zip" gun as opposed to some sort of homemade multi-shot firearm. Here's an article that doesn't shine a lot of light on the subject: http://www.ammoland.com/2016/06/brit...#axzz4BZseoaD6 There was nothing there we have not already heard. The "old WWI" thing would have me thinking an old Webley. It is clear these people do not know much about guns and I assume they think if it is not a Sig, Glock or Beretta M9 like they see in the movies, it must be an antique. Maybe they should see your stuff ;-) I keep my "junk" zipped up! Hey, I have a semi-auto pistol, albeit only a .22LR. :) Learned a lesson from your first cousin Ray Harry Krause the perv, eh? -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Jo Cox
Wayne.B Wrote in message:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 20:36:56 -0400, wrote: Saw a mini-14 at the range a few weeks ago that got the owner kicked out...apparently he figured out some way to "bump fire" it and the range officer said, "Go home." My range kicks you out for "rapid fire" too but they seem to tolerate a disciplined double tap. === My club has banned "bump firing" also. It gets the range neighbors on edge if they think they are hearing guns on full auto and bump firing comes pretty close. What exactly is bump firing? It sounds like what Harry was trying to accomplish by making his triggers overly sensitive. Premature ejackulation, if you will. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Jo Cox
On 6/18/16 6:16 AM, justan wrote:
Wayne.B Wrote in message: On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 20:36:56 -0400, wrote: Saw a mini-14 at the range a few weeks ago that got the owner kicked out...apparently he figured out some way to "bump fire" it and the range officer said, "Go home." My range kicks you out for "rapid fire" too but they seem to tolerate a disciplined double tap. === My club has banned "bump firing" also. It gets the range neighbors on edge if they think they are hearing guns on full auto and bump firing comes pretty close. What exactly is bump firing? It sounds like what Harry was trying to accomplish by making his triggers overly sensitive. Premature ejackulation, if you will. I'll bet that when you could ejaculate, it was always premature. If you want to know about bump firing, you can google it or see plenty of examples on youtube. Oh, and I never customize the triggers on my firearms to make them "overly sensitive." |
Jo Cox
On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 06:16:04 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:
Wayne.B Wrote in message: On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 20:36:56 -0400, wrote: Saw a mini-14 at the range a few weeks ago that got the owner kicked out...apparently he figured out some way to "bump fire" it and the range officer said, "Go home." My range kicks you out for "rapid fire" too but they seem to tolerate a disciplined double tap. === My club has banned "bump firing" also. It gets the range neighbors on edge if they think they are hearing guns on full auto and bump firing comes pretty close. What exactly is bump firing? It sounds like what Harry was trying to accomplish by making his triggers overly sensitive. Premature ejackulation, if you will. === https://www.bumpfiresystems.com/ |
Jo Cox
Keyser Söze
- show quoted text - "I'll bet that when you could ejaculate, it was always premature. If you want to know about bump firing, you can google it or see plenty of examples on youtube. Oh, and I never customize the triggers on my firearms to make them "overly sensitive."" Oh my....that Stinky fellow is inept on so many levels! |
Jo Cox
justan wrote:
Keyser Söze Wrote in message: On 6/17/16 1:18 PM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:43:22 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/17/16 1:00 AM, wrote: The Brits just lost an MP ... shot. I thought they didn't have any guns there. There are reports, as yet unconfirmed, that he used a "homemade gun" he made from plans in a U.S.-based white nationalist publication or website. Probably a Trump supporter, too. He got off at least 3 rounds in rapid succession so that is a heluva zip gun. If this is true it talks to the futility of gun control even more than an illegally owned gun. It was on a news report from Great Britain, still no secondary confirmation. Been sighting in the red dot on my new .22LR pistol. The point of aim is...at least three clicks lower than it was on my Ruger Mark III, though the pistols are approximately the same size and shape, and have a similar mounting rail. I guessed maybe one click up or down...wrong. :) Who would guess that your guess that moving a scope from gun to gun shouldn't require substantial resighting? It never ceases to amaze me how inept you are on so many levels. What gets me, is I understand a Reddot is to help you get on target fast, not the same as a scope. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:45 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com