Jo Cox
 

On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:41:27 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

There are reports, as yet unconfirmed, that he used a "homemade gun" he
made from plans in a U.S.-based white nationalist publication or
website. Probably a Trump supporter, too.

He got off at least 3 rounds in rapid succession so that is a heluva
zip gun. If this is true it talks to the futility of gun control even
more than an illegally owned gun.



It was on a news report from Great Britain, still no secondary
confirmation.

There were lots of unconfirmed reports including that this was a
shotgun and that it was the size of a cucumber but multiple shots
seems to be confirmed. That is not a zip gun.

Jo Cox
 

On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:38:00 -0500, Califbill
wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:


The 2nd Amendment is no protection against "despot leaders."


Why?

Harry thinks the Air Force would nuke us I guess. It is clear that
they are not that effective against a civilian insurgency.
When have we ever won one of those?
Even in the last war we won (WWII) we defeated the standing armies but
we had to make concessions to the civilian population to chill them
out. (we let the japanese keep the emperor, engaging him to end any
insurgency and we let the germans keep all the property they stole
from the jews ... and more, chilling out the nazi supporters.)

Jo Cox
 

On 6/17/16 3:51 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:41:27 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

There are reports, as yet unconfirmed, that he used a "homemade gun" he
made from plans in a U.S.-based white nationalist publication or
website. Probably a Trump supporter, too.

He got off at least 3 rounds in rapid succession so that is a heluva
zip gun. If this is true it talks to the futility of gun control even
more than an illegally owned gun.



It was on a news report from Great Britain, still no secondary
confirmation.

There were lots of unconfirmed reports including that this was a
shotgun and that it was the size of a cucumber but multiple shots
seems to be confirmed. That is not a zip gun.



I haven't seen any reports that indicate it was a homemade single shot
"zip" gun as opposed to some sort of homemade multi-shot firearm.

Here's an article that doesn't shine a lot of light on the subject:

http://www.ammoland.com/2016/06/brit...#axzz4BZseoaD6

Jo Cox
 

wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:38:00 -0500, Califbill
wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:


The 2nd Amendment is no protection against "despot leaders."


Why?

Harry thinks the Air Force would nuke us I guess. It is clear that
they are not that effective against a civilian insurgency.
When have we ever won one of those?
Even in the last war we won (WWII) we defeated the standing armies but
we had to make concessions to the civilian population to chill them
out. (we let the japanese keep the emperor, engaging him to end any
insurgency and we let the germans keep all the property they stole
from the jews ... and more, chilling out the nazi supporters.)


Look at one gun precipitated. Sareavo (sp) last thing to kick off ww1.
Sirhan Sirhan, single biggest change in US politics. Killing Bobby, gave
us Carter and his giving us Islamoterrorists, and Reagan, etc. how many US
soldiers are going to follow an unconstitutional leadership?

Jo Cox
 

On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:03:15 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/17/16 3:51 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:41:27 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

There are reports, as yet unconfirmed, that he used a "homemade gun" he
made from plans in a U.S.-based white nationalist publication or
website. Probably a Trump supporter, too.

He got off at least 3 rounds in rapid succession so that is a heluva
zip gun. If this is true it talks to the futility of gun control even
more than an illegally owned gun.



It was on a news report from Great Britain, still no secondary
confirmation.

There were lots of unconfirmed reports including that this was a
shotgun and that it was the size of a cucumber but multiple shots
seems to be confirmed. That is not a zip gun.



I haven't seen any reports that indicate it was a homemade single shot
"zip" gun as opposed to some sort of homemade multi-shot firearm.

Here's an article that doesn't shine a lot of light on the subject:

http://www.ammoland.com/2016/06/brit...#axzz4BZseoaD6

There was nothing there we have not already heard. The "old WWI" thing
would have me thinking an old Webley. It is clear these people do not
know much about guns and I assume they think if it is not a Sig, Glock
or Beretta M9 like they see in the movies, it must be an antique.
Maybe they should see your stuff ;-)

Jo Cox
 

On 6/17/16 4:02 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:38:00 -0500, Califbill
wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:


The 2nd Amendment is no protection against "despot leaders."


Why?

Harry thinks the Air Force would nuke us I guess. It is clear that
they are not that effective against a civilian insurgency.
When have we ever won one of those?
Even in the last war we won (WWII) we defeated the standing armies but
we had to make concessions to the civilian population to chill them
out. (we let the japanese keep the emperor, engaging him to end any
insurgency and we let the germans keep all the property they stole
from the jews ... and more, chilling out the nazi supporters.)



You and the fellow over-the-top 2nd Amenders here couldn't defeat a Cub
Scout pack armed with Daisy BB guns.

Jo Cox
 

On 6/17/16 4:18 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:03:15 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/17/16 3:51 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:41:27 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

There are reports, as yet unconfirmed, that he used a "homemade gun" he
made from plans in a U.S.-based white nationalist publication or
website. Probably a Trump supporter, too.

He got off at least 3 rounds in rapid succession so that is a heluva
zip gun. If this is true it talks to the futility of gun control even
more than an illegally owned gun.



It was on a news report from Great Britain, still no secondary
confirmation.

There were lots of unconfirmed reports including that this was a
shotgun and that it was the size of a cucumber but multiple shots
seems to be confirmed. That is not a zip gun.



I haven't seen any reports that indicate it was a homemade single shot
"zip" gun as opposed to some sort of homemade multi-shot firearm.

Here's an article that doesn't shine a lot of light on the subject:

http://www.ammoland.com/2016/06/brit...#axzz4BZseoaD6

There was nothing there we have not already heard. The "old WWI" thing
would have me thinking an old Webley. It is clear these people do not
know much about guns and I assume they think if it is not a Sig, Glock
or Beretta M9 like they see in the movies, it must be an antique.
Maybe they should see your stuff ;-)



I keep my "junk" zipped up!

Hey, I have a semi-auto pistol, albeit only a .22LR. :)

Jo Cox
 

On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:13:27 -0500, Califbill
wrote:

Sirhan Sirhan, single biggest change in US politics. Killing Bobby, gave
us Carter and his giving us Islamoterrorists, and Reagan, etc. how many US
soldiers are going to follow an unconstitutional leadership?

I am not sure how you got to Carter from RFK.
Nixon was still going to beat Bobby, if he could have taken the
nomination away from Humphrey in the first place.
The scourge of the Kennedys was still with us for another 4 decades
with his drunken, murdering brother.

Jo Cox
 

On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:21:11 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/17/16 4:02 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:38:00 -0500, Califbill
wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:


The 2nd Amendment is no protection against "despot leaders."


Why?

Harry thinks the Air Force would nuke us I guess. It is clear that
they are not that effective against a civilian insurgency.
When have we ever won one of those?
Even in the last war we won (WWII) we defeated the standing armies but
we had to make concessions to the civilian population to chill them
out. (we let the japanese keep the emperor, engaging him to end any
insurgency and we let the germans keep all the property they stole
from the jews ... and more, chilling out the nazi supporters.)



You and the fellow over-the-top 2nd Amenders here couldn't defeat a Cub
Scout pack armed with Daisy BB guns.

Yeah, that is what King George said

Jo Cox
 

On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:23:42 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/17/16 4:18 PM, wrote:

Here's an article that doesn't shine a lot of light on the subject:

http://www.ammoland.com/2016/06/brit...#axzz4BZseoaD6

There was nothing there we have not already heard. The "old WWI" thing
would have me thinking an old Webley. It is clear these people do not
know much about guns and I assume they think if it is not a Sig, Glock
or Beretta M9 like they see in the movies, it must be an antique.
Maybe they should see your stuff ;-)



I keep my "junk" zipped up!

We weren't talking about "junk" but I will say that is unusual for a
democrat.


Hey, I have a semi-auto pistol, albeit only a .22LR. :)

You still have the Mini 14 too don't you? That is an assault weapon.
I was really thinking about your revolvers, LEs and bold action
"stuff".
With all of the churn, it is hard to remember what kind of guns flow
through your little dealership