| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Attention, John Herring
On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 06:35:10 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:
Alex Wrote in message: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/17/16 7:43 AM, justan wrote: Wrote in message: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:46:37 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:21:04 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/16/16 12:10 PM, wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:06:33 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/16/16 11:52 AM, Tim wrote: 2) if you're meaning the CZ is a more accurate rifle than the 10/22 then you should reconsider. Why? The stock CZs under discussion are more accurate than the 10/22s. The issue is whether the shooter is more accurate than the gun. That's Tim's issue. Some firearms are inherently more accurate than others. You should have watched the little video I referenced.using ope About a minute into the ad, I didn't care anymore. opeThe caption says it shoots inside a 1/2 MOA but most shooters can't accomplish 10 times that without a rest and a scope. The guy was using a rest and a scope. I doubt a 10/22 could match that at 100 yards no matter what. So what? Most people do not sit at a bench with a scoped rifle trying to shoot tight groups all day, particularly with a 22 rf. Most folks would be happy if they hit what they are shooting at. There might be some advantage to hitting the target at different points. I'm happy that I can shoot offhand and hit a target the size of your belly button at 20-25 yards. You are exaggerating, I'm sure. Do ya think? I think he pokes holes in the target with a pencil, photographs same, and posts it to get pats on the back. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Attention, John Herring
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 16:59:11 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote: On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 06:35:10 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote: Alex Wrote in message: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/17/16 7:43 AM, justan wrote: Wrote in message: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:46:37 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:21:04 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/16/16 12:10 PM, wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:06:33 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/16/16 11:52 AM, Tim wrote: 2) if you're meaning the CZ is a more accurate rifle than the 10/22 then you should reconsider. Why? The stock CZs under discussion are more accurate than the 10/22s. The issue is whether the shooter is more accurate than the gun. That's Tim's issue. Some firearms are inherently more accurate than others. You should have watched the little video I referenced.using ope About a minute into the ad, I didn't care anymore. opeThe caption says it shoots inside a 1/2 MOA but most shooters can't accomplish 10 times that without a rest and a scope. The guy was using a rest and a scope. I doubt a 10/22 could match that at 100 yards no matter what. So what? Most people do not sit at a bench with a scoped rifle trying to shoot tight groups all day, particularly with a 22 rf. Most folks would be happy if they hit what they are shooting at. There might be some advantage to hitting the target at different points. I'm happy that I can shoot offhand and hit a target the size of your belly button at 20-25 yards. You are exaggerating, I'm sure. Do ya think? I think he pokes holes in the target with a pencil, photographs same, and posts it to get pats on the back. === I have no doubt he could hit a target that size. The question is how many rounds would he need to fire, and whether or not he'd need to reload before succeeding. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| John Herring | General | |||
| I just got off the phone with John Herring | General | |||
| Where's John Herring? | General | |||
| John Herring is a.... | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
