On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:00:07 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Uh, that's not a stock 10/22. Shooter changed the stock, the barrel, and
probably the receiver.

The receiver is the part with the serial number on it. Duh

I am also not sure much but the stock was changed and that is common
with 10/22s. They are sort of like ARs. You buy the part with the
serial number and make whatever kind of gun you want.
The 10/22 may be the best selling .22 out there over the 50 years it
has been around.

On 6/16/16 6:56 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:00:07 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Uh, that's not a stock 10/22. Shooter changed the stock, the barrel, and
probably the receiver.

The receiver is the part with the serial number on it. Duh

I am also not sure much but the stock was changed and that is common
with 10/22s. They are sort of like ARs. You buy the part with the
serial number and make whatever kind of gun you want.
The 10/22 may be the best selling .22 out there over the 50 years it
has been around.


There are several suppliers of "third party receivers" for the 10/22.
They get shipped to an FFL. Here's one:

http://tinyurl.com/z3ymk7s

I'm not disputing the success of the 10/22, but to make it as accurate
as a CZ 455 or 452, you have to spend several times the original cost of
the rifle.

On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 19:06:35 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/16/16 6:56 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:00:07 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Uh, that's not a stock 10/22. Shooter changed the stock, the barrel, and
probably the receiver.

The receiver is the part with the serial number on it. Duh

I am also not sure much but the stock was changed and that is common
with 10/22s. They are sort of like ARs. You buy the part with the
serial number and make whatever kind of gun you want.
The 10/22 may be the best selling .22 out there over the 50 years it
has been around.


There are several suppliers of "third party receivers" for the 10/22.
They get shipped to an FFL. Here's one:

http://tinyurl.com/z3ymk7s

That is a new gun. Why bother to even start with a 10/22 if you are
just going to throw away the serialized part?


I'm not disputing the success of the 10/22, but to make it as accurate
as a CZ 455 or 452, you have to spend several times the original cost of
the rifle.

Most people would rather have a magazine fed semi auto if they are not
shooting some kind of competition or fantasizing about it..

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ex8dSp_DJQA

Ok. Box stock 10/22 with a 3x Bushnel


Hits at 500 yd.

On 6/16/16 7:39 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 19:06:35 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/16/16 6:56 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:00:07 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Uh, that's not a stock 10/22. Shooter changed the stock, the barrel, and
probably the receiver.

The receiver is the part with the serial number on it. Duh

I am also not sure much but the stock was changed and that is common
with 10/22s. They are sort of like ARs. You buy the part with the
serial number and make whatever kind of gun you want.
The 10/22 may be the best selling .22 out there over the 50 years it
has been around.


There are several suppliers of "third party receivers" for the 10/22.
They get shipped to an FFL. Here's one:

http://tinyurl.com/z3ymk7s

That is a new gun. Why bother to even start with a 10/22 if you are
just going to throw away the serialized part?


I'm not disputing the success of the 10/22, but to make it as accurate
as a CZ 455 or 452, you have to spend several times the original cost of
the rifle.

Most people would rather have a magazine fed semi auto if they are not
shooting some kind of competition or fantasizing about it..



It's a hobby. I had a nice mag-fed semi-auto 22LR rifle a few years ago.
I sold it. It, too, was more accurate out of the box than any of the
10/22's. My CZ .22 is bolt action, with magazines. I like cycling the bolt.

Keyser Söze wrote:
Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/15/16 8:16 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/15/16 8:02 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/14/16 8:06 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:34:46 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

You left your keys in the refrigerator. Again.
What the **** are you doing in John's fridge?
Looking for pie?

Naw...the fridge is on a web cam.

That's stupid. Did you just giggle or "LOL" when you typed that dumb
remark?
Stupid? I'm not the one who paid $1100 for a $200 rifle.
I'll pay you $400 each for any you can get. Find 100 and I'll happily
write that check for $40,000. Best investment you can make since you
have a source for them at half the price.

The 10/22 is a $200 or $200 and change rifle. There's nothing rare
about it, even the "commemorative" model you bought, which is just a
dressed up 10/22.



Great deal for you then. Put up or shut up. Go get them.


I already have a .22lr rifle, a CZ, that easily outshoots a 10/22.


Good for you! And it's nothing special, not a limited edition, and a
depreciating asset. My last 10/22 is worth far more and won't lose value.

Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 20:41:12 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/15/16 8:16 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/15/16 8:02 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/14/16 8:06 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:34:46 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

You left your keys in the refrigerator. Again.
What the **** are you doing in John's fridge?
Looking for pie?

Naw...the fridge is on a web cam.

That's stupid. Did you just giggle or "LOL" when you typed that dumb
remark?
Stupid? I'm not the one who paid $1100 for a $200 rifle.
I'll pay you $400 each for any you can get. Find 100 and I'll happily
write that check for $40,000. Best investment you can make since you
have a source for them at half the price.

The 10/22 is a $200 or $200 and change rifle. There's nothing rare
about it, even the "commemorative" model you bought, which is just a
dressed up 10/22.



Great deal for you then. Put up or shut up. Go get them.


I already have a .22lr rifle, a CZ, that easily outshoots a 10/22.
Can you get the model he bought for $200 or not? You made the comment, now put up or shut up.

Notice how you change the subject. Got caught again, eh?

Deflection is his MO. It's all the old man has.

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/16/16 7:53 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 20:41:12 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/15/16 8:16 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/15/16 8:02 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/14/16 8:06 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:34:46 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

You left your keys in the refrigerator. Again.
What the **** are you doing in John's fridge?
Looking for pie?


Naw...the fridge is on a web cam.


That's stupid. Did you just giggle or "LOL" when you typed
that dumb
remark?

Stupid? I'm not the one who paid $1100 for a $200 rifle.

I'll pay you $400 each for any you can get. Find 100 and I'll
happily
write that check for $40,000. Best investment you can make since
you
have a source for them at half the price.


The 10/22 is a $200 or $200 and change rifle. There's nothing rare
about it, even the "commemorative" model you bought, which is just a
dressed up 10/22.




Great deal for you then. Put up or shut up. Go get them.



I already have a .22lr rifle, a CZ, that easily outshoots a 10/22.

Can you get the model he bought for $200 or not? You made the
comment, now put up or shut up.

Notice how you change the subject. Got caught again, eh?



I have no interest in an "old" new 10/22 or a "new" new 10/22 rifle. I
already have a .22 rifle that shoots better.

You said I overpaid for a $200 rifle and I offered to double your money
on any and all you could buy for $200 and sell to me for $400. Then you
STFU and ran. No surprise there.

Keyser Söze wrote:
wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:17:49 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:32:43 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


I have no interest in an "old" new 10/22 or a "new" new 10/22 rifle. I
already have a .22 rifle that shoots better.
I might take that bet, using my 60+ year old Remington pump.
I paid $20 for it.

What bet?
That you CZ wonder gun ain't all that.

Wonder gun? Where did you get that? It is a stock CZ 455 and it is more
accurate than a stock 10/22. This is it:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DP3kwJADWd0


A bolt action vs a semi-auto is never a fair comparison. You should
know that.

On 6/16/16 7:39 PM, Tim wrote:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ex8dSp_DJQA

Ok. Box stock 10/22 with a 3x Bushnel


Hits at 500 yd.



Show me the vid of the stock 10/22 shooting a 1/2" group at 100 yards,
something the CZ's can do.