On 6/16/16 7:39 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 19:06:35 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/16/16 6:56 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:00:07 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Uh, that's not a stock 10/22. Shooter changed the stock, the barrel, and
probably the receiver.

The receiver is the part with the serial number on it. Duh

I am also not sure much but the stock was changed and that is common
with 10/22s. They are sort of like ARs. You buy the part with the
serial number and make whatever kind of gun you want.
The 10/22 may be the best selling .22 out there over the 50 years it
has been around.


There are several suppliers of "third party receivers" for the 10/22.
They get shipped to an FFL. Here's one:

http://tinyurl.com/z3ymk7s

That is a new gun. Why bother to even start with a 10/22 if you are
just going to throw away the serialized part?


I'm not disputing the success of the 10/22, but to make it as accurate
as a CZ 455 or 452, you have to spend several times the original cost of
the rifle.

Most people would rather have a magazine fed semi auto if they are not
shooting some kind of competition or fantasizing about it..



It's a hobby. I had a nice mag-fed semi-auto 22LR rifle a few years ago.
I sold it. It, too, was more accurate out of the box than any of the
10/22's. My CZ .22 is bolt action, with magazines. I like cycling the bolt.