| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
More from the pig
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:32:02 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 6/13/16 9:05 AM, wrote: On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 06:15:52 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: So, you felt empathy for Mrs. Clinton, eh? I only felt bad for the women Bill abused. Don't even bother to say he didn't. He copped a plea. Oh, I bemused by FlaJim's use of the word empathy. No reason to get into it further here. Yeah we do not want to remember what a slime ball Mr Clinton was. It takes away from his value as a prop in the campaign for Hillary to get the thinking woman's vote. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
More from the pig
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:57:03 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 6/13/16 10:52 AM, wrote: On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:32:02 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/13/16 9:05 AM, wrote: On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 06:15:52 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: So, you felt empathy for Mrs. Clinton, eh? I only felt bad for the women Bill abused. Don't even bother to say he didn't. He copped a plea. Oh, I bemused by FlaJim's use of the word empathy. No reason to get into it further here. Yeah we do not want to remember what a slime ball Mr Clinton was. It takes away from his value as a prop in the campaign for Hillary to get the thinking woman's vote. I'm sorry, but I cannot empathize with your political positions.  Oh, wait...*you* think thinking women should vote for the loonytarians...but after they read the loonytarian platform, they won't. It's a family thing. Why not? Are women more predisposed to wanting a bigger government that imposes more on their rights and takes more of their money? Do they want an interventionist government that sends their kids off to war or throws them in jail for having a joint in their sock? Do they want to keep paying ~$20,000 a year (per pupil) for government schools that do not actually educate their kids? Do they want another 4 years of a government that is the hand maiden of Wall Street and the bankers? Government will always be the tool of the people who can spend billions to (s)elect the leaders and the only way to blunt that is to reduce the size and power of government. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
More from the pig
On 6/13/16 12:45 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:57:03 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/13/16 10:52 AM, wrote: On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:32:02 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/13/16 9:05 AM, wrote: On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 06:15:52 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: So, you felt empathy for Mrs. Clinton, eh? I only felt bad for the women Bill abused. Don't even bother to say he didn't. He copped a plea. Oh, I bemused by FlaJim's use of the word empathy. No reason to get into it further here. Yeah we do not want to remember what a slime ball Mr Clinton was. It takes away from his value as a prop in the campaign for Hillary to get the thinking woman's vote. I'm sorry, but I cannot empathize with your political positions. Oh, wait...*you* think thinking women should vote for the loonytarians...but after they read the loonytarian platform, they won't. It's a family thing. Why not? Are women more predisposed to wanting a bigger government that imposes more on their rights and takes more of their money? Do they want an interventionist government that sends their kids off to war or throws them in jail for having a joint in their sock? Do they want to keep paying ~$20,000 a year (per pupil) for government schools that do not actually educate their kids? Do they want another 4 years of a government that is the hand maiden of Wall Street and the bankers? Government will always be the tool of the people who can spend billions to (s)elect the leaders and the only way to blunt that is to reduce the size and power of government. I've read the Loonytarian Platform. It's a document for a far-reaching abolition of government and the important services government provides, especially those without significant financial resources. No thanks. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
More from the pig
On 6/13/16 12:48 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/13/16 12:45 PM, wrote: On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:57:03 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/13/16 10:52 AM, wrote: On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:32:02 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/13/16 9:05 AM, wrote: On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 06:15:52 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: So, you felt empathy for Mrs. Clinton, eh? I only felt bad for the women Bill abused. Don't even bother to say he didn't. He copped a plea. Oh, I bemused by FlaJim's use of the word empathy. No reason to get into it further here. Yeah we do not want to remember what a slime ball Mr Clinton was. It takes away from his value as a prop in the campaign for Hillary to get the thinking woman's vote. I'm sorry, but I cannot empathize with your political positions. Oh, wait...*you* think thinking women should vote for the loonytarians...but after they read the loonytarian platform, they won't. It's a family thing. Why not? Are women more predisposed to wanting a bigger government that imposes more on their rights and takes more of their money? Do they want an interventionist government that sends their kids off to war or throws them in jail for having a joint in their sock? Do they want to keep paying ~$20,000 a year (per pupil) for government schools that do not actually educate their kids? Do they want another 4 years of a government that is the hand maiden of Wall Street and the bankers? Government will always be the tool of the people who can spend billions to (s)elect the leaders and the only way to blunt that is to reduce the size and power of government. I've read the Loonytarian Platform. It's a document for a far-reaching abolition of government and the important services government provides, especially those without significant financial resources. No thanks. ....PROVIDES to its citizens, especially those... |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
More from the pig
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 12:48:31 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 6/13/16 12:45 PM, wrote: Why not? Are women more predisposed to wanting a bigger government that imposes more on their rights and takes more of their money? Do they want an interventionist government that sends their kids off to war or throws them in jail for having a joint in their sock? Do they want to keep paying ~$20,000 a year (per pupil) for government schools that do not actually educate their kids? Do they want another 4 years of a government that is the hand maiden of Wall Street and the bankers? Government will always be the tool of the people who can spend billions to (s)elect the leaders and the only way to blunt that is to reduce the size and power of government. I've read the Loonytarian Platform. It's a document for a far-reaching abolition of government and the important services government provides, especially those without significant financial resources. No thanks. If we continue on our current path, the country will be bankrupt and those programs will all fail. Let Hillary or Bernie actually propose the taxes that are necessary to support the "give aways" they promise and let's see how far they get. It is certainly not going to be simply raising the taxes on 1% of the people and leaving everyone else unscathed. The Libertarians are the only ones proposing serious cuts in DoD and trying to get the entitlements under control. The democrats do not even want to tell us how much trouble we are in. They ignore things like, we are spending over 100% of revenue on entitlements and interest on the debt. Everything else is borrowed money or money the fed prints out of thin air. If the rest of the world was not in worse shape than us, we would be called on it but we are all just whistling through the grave yard. This can not continue and a world financial collapse is the only possible result if we do not get our financial house in order. Compared to this debt bubble, 2009 was a firecracker and we are looking at an A bomb. (maybe more literally than we want to admit). |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
