Are you with...
 

On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 3:54:58 PM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 12:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/8/16 10:36 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e


Is Trump a racist?

Well, I guess if you subscribe to contemporary notions of "political
correctness" and, with the PC rules overruling any
other considerations, yes, he has to be defined as a racist.

However, there are other ways to interpret what he said (and says)
but one has to look outside of the rules of political correctness
to understand or even give consideration to them, something difficult
to do with most progressives and certainly in the liberal media.

For example, his apparent racism related to referring to the judge as
being of Mexican heritage may not be based in racism at all. The
Donald's "Trump University" is being sued. The original lead plaintiff
in the lawsuit requested and was granted removal from being a plaintiff
in the case. In normal court proceedings, that would be end end of the
lawsuit. But in this case the judge allowed the suit to continue under
conditions and rulings made uniquely by him.

Trump has already ****ed off many (or most) Mexicans by insisting that
he is going to build a wall for which Mexico will pay for. Trump's
comments about the judge could simply be related to the fact that the
judge, being of Mexican heritage, may be sympathetic to the those who
oppose a wall and, according to Trump, is exercising his sympathy's in a
manner that is not germane to the lawsuit. If so, his comments can't be
regarded as being "racist".

The media has whipped this whole thing up to where no other
interpretation can be considered. I fully expect Harry to reply
with a four-word post:

"Trump is a racist"


Several key leaders in the GOP have already pointed out Trump's racism.

Of course they have. It's the politically correct thing to do. The
ones that floor me are the ones who state that Trump is clearly a racist
however they will continue to support him in the general election. This
demonstrates clearly how f*&A%Ked up career politicians are and how bad
our political system has degenerated to.

"Racism" gets thrown around so much these days it's losing it's sting. Hell, Mexican isn't even a race. That's how screwed up our media and PC bull**** is.

Are you with...
 

On 6/8/16 3:54 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 12:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/8/16 10:36 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e


Is Trump a racist?

Well, I guess if you subscribe to contemporary notions of "political
correctness" and, with the PC rules overruling any
other considerations, yes, he has to be defined as a racist.

However, there are other ways to interpret what he said (and says)
but one has to look outside of the rules of political correctness
to understand or even give consideration to them, something difficult
to do with most progressives and certainly in the liberal media.

For example, his apparent racism related to referring to the judge as
being of Mexican heritage may not be based in racism at all. The
Donald's "Trump University" is being sued. The original lead plaintiff
in the lawsuit requested and was granted removal from being a plaintiff
in the case. In normal court proceedings, that would be end end of the
lawsuit. But in this case the judge allowed the suit to continue under
conditions and rulings made uniquely by him.

Trump has already ****ed off many (or most) Mexicans by insisting that
he is going to build a wall for which Mexico will pay for. Trump's
comments about the judge could simply be related to the fact that the
judge, being of Mexican heritage, may be sympathetic to the those who
oppose a wall and, according to Trump, is exercising his sympathy's in a
manner that is not germane to the lawsuit. If so, his comments can't be
regarded as being "racist".

The media has whipped this whole thing up to where no other
interpretation can be considered. I fully expect Harry to reply
with a four-word post:

"Trump is a racist"


Several key leaders in the GOP have already pointed out Trump's racism.

Of course they have. It's the politically correct thing to do. The
ones that floor me are the ones who state that Trump is clearly a racist
however they will continue to support him in the general election. This
demonstrates clearly how f*&A%Ked up career politicians are and how bad
our political system has degenerated to.



Trump's base voters and indeed many of the GOP base voters don't see
Trump's racist behavior as a detriment. They also are not offput by the
rest of Trump's hateful rhetoric.

Are you with...
 

On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 17:38:57 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/8/16 3:54 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 12:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/8/16 10:36 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e


Is Trump a racist?

Well, I guess if you subscribe to contemporary notions of "political
correctness" and, with the PC rules overruling any
other considerations, yes, he has to be defined as a racist.

However, there are other ways to interpret what he said (and says)
but one has to look outside of the rules of political correctness
to understand or even give consideration to them, something difficult
to do with most progressives and certainly in the liberal media.

For example, his apparent racism related to referring to the judge as
being of Mexican heritage may not be based in racism at all. The
Donald's "Trump University" is being sued. The original lead plaintiff
in the lawsuit requested and was granted removal from being a plaintiff
in the case. In normal court proceedings, that would be end end of the
lawsuit. But in this case the judge allowed the suit to continue under
conditions and rulings made uniquely by him.

Trump has already ****ed off many (or most) Mexicans by insisting that
he is going to build a wall for which Mexico will pay for. Trump's
comments about the judge could simply be related to the fact that the
judge, being of Mexican heritage, may be sympathetic to the those who
oppose a wall and, according to Trump, is exercising his sympathy's in a
manner that is not germane to the lawsuit. If so, his comments can't be
regarded as being "racist".

The media has whipped this whole thing up to where no other
interpretation can be considered. I fully expect Harry to reply
with a four-word post:

"Trump is a racist"


Several key leaders in the GOP have already pointed out Trump's racism.

Of course they have. It's the politically correct thing to do. The
ones that floor me are the ones who state that Trump is clearly a racist
however they will continue to support him in the general election. This
demonstrates clearly how f*&A%Ked up career politicians are and how bad
our political system has degenerated to.



Trump's base voters and indeed many of the GOP base voters don't see
Trump's racist behavior as a detriment. They also are not offput by the
rest of Trump's hateful rhetoric.

Is being against illegal immigration 'racism'? Is being against a Mexican/American judge's opinions
'racism'?

Are you with...
 

On 6/9/16 7:31 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 17:38:57 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/8/16 3:54 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 12:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/8/16 10:36 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e


Is Trump a racist?

Well, I guess if you subscribe to contemporary notions of "political
correctness" and, with the PC rules overruling any
other considerations, yes, he has to be defined as a racist.

However, there are other ways to interpret what he said (and says)
but one has to look outside of the rules of political correctness
to understand or even give consideration to them, something difficult
to do with most progressives and certainly in the liberal media.

For example, his apparent racism related to referring to the judge as
being of Mexican heritage may not be based in racism at all. The
Donald's "Trump University" is being sued. The original lead plaintiff
in the lawsuit requested and was granted removal from being a plaintiff
in the case. In normal court proceedings, that would be end end of the
lawsuit. But in this case the judge allowed the suit to continue under
conditions and rulings made uniquely by him.

Trump has already ****ed off many (or most) Mexicans by insisting that
he is going to build a wall for which Mexico will pay for. Trump's
comments about the judge could simply be related to the fact that the
judge, being of Mexican heritage, may be sympathetic to the those who
oppose a wall and, according to Trump, is exercising his sympathy's in a
manner that is not germane to the lawsuit. If so, his comments can't be
regarded as being "racist".

The media has whipped this whole thing up to where no other
interpretation can be considered. I fully expect Harry to reply
with a four-word post:

"Trump is a racist"


Several key leaders in the GOP have already pointed out Trump's racism.

Of course they have. It's the politically correct thing to do. The
ones that floor me are the ones who state that Trump is clearly a racist
however they will continue to support him in the general election. This
demonstrates clearly how f*&A%Ked up career politicians are and how bad
our political system has degenerated to.



Trump's base voters and indeed many of the GOP base voters don't see
Trump's racist behavior as a detriment. They also are not offput by the
rest of Trump's hateful rhetoric.

Is being against illegal immigration 'racism'? Is being against a Mexican/American judge's opinions
'racism'?



As I have long suspected, you have no understanding. First, the judge
Trump is insulting is not a Mexican American. He is American. Second,
Trump is whining about the judge's recent decision not on the merits of
that decision, per se, but on his belief that the judge cannot render an
impartial decision because of his Mexican heritage.

You really are an ignorant ****, and you prove it here frequently.

Are you with...
 

On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:35:51 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/9/16 7:31 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 17:38:57 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/8/16 3:54 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 12:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/8/16 10:36 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e


Is Trump a racist?

Well, I guess if you subscribe to contemporary notions of "political
correctness" and, with the PC rules overruling any
other considerations, yes, he has to be defined as a racist.

However, there are other ways to interpret what he said (and says)
but one has to look outside of the rules of political correctness
to understand or even give consideration to them, something difficult
to do with most progressives and certainly in the liberal media.

For example, his apparent racism related to referring to the judge as
being of Mexican heritage may not be based in racism at all. The
Donald's "Trump University" is being sued. The original lead plaintiff
in the lawsuit requested and was granted removal from being a plaintiff
in the case. In normal court proceedings, that would be end end of the
lawsuit. But in this case the judge allowed the suit to continue under
conditions and rulings made uniquely by him.

Trump has already ****ed off many (or most) Mexicans by insisting that
he is going to build a wall for which Mexico will pay for. Trump's
comments about the judge could simply be related to the fact that the
judge, being of Mexican heritage, may be sympathetic to the those who
oppose a wall and, according to Trump, is exercising his sympathy's in a
manner that is not germane to the lawsuit. If so, his comments can't be
regarded as being "racist".

The media has whipped this whole thing up to where no other
interpretation can be considered. I fully expect Harry to reply
with a four-word post:

"Trump is a racist"


Several key leaders in the GOP have already pointed out Trump's racism.

Of course they have. It's the politically correct thing to do. The
ones that floor me are the ones who state that Trump is clearly a racist
however they will continue to support him in the general election. This
demonstrates clearly how f*&A%Ked up career politicians are and how bad
our political system has degenerated to.



Trump's base voters and indeed many of the GOP base voters don't see
Trump's racist behavior as a detriment. They also are not offput by the
rest of Trump's hateful rhetoric.

Is being against illegal immigration 'racism'? Is being against a Mexican/American judge's opinions
'racism'?



As I have long suspected, you have no understanding. First, the judge
Trump is insulting is not a Mexican American. He is American. Second,
Trump is whining about the judge's recent decision not on the merits of
that decision, per se, but on his belief that the judge cannot render an
impartial decision because of his Mexican heritage.

You really are an ignorant ****, and you prove it here frequently.

You skipped the question. But, you called names to make up for it.

I suppose I shouldn't have said Mexican American but instead said, 'American with Mexican Heritage',
which is, of course, much different than being Mexican American.

Go re-read Luddite's post. He explained it just for you. Open those liberal f'ing eyes!

Are you with...
 

On 6/9/16 7:45 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:35:51 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/9/16 7:31 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 17:38:57 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/8/16 3:54 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 12:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/8/16 10:36 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e


Is Trump a racist?

Well, I guess if you subscribe to contemporary notions of "political
correctness" and, with the PC rules overruling any
other considerations, yes, he has to be defined as a racist.

However, there are other ways to interpret what he said (and says)
but one has to look outside of the rules of political correctness
to understand or even give consideration to them, something difficult
to do with most progressives and certainly in the liberal media.

For example, his apparent racism related to referring to the judge as
being of Mexican heritage may not be based in racism at all. The
Donald's "Trump University" is being sued. The original lead plaintiff
in the lawsuit requested and was granted removal from being a plaintiff
in the case. In normal court proceedings, that would be end end of the
lawsuit. But in this case the judge allowed the suit to continue under
conditions and rulings made uniquely by him.

Trump has already ****ed off many (or most) Mexicans by insisting that
he is going to build a wall for which Mexico will pay for. Trump's
comments about the judge could simply be related to the fact that the
judge, being of Mexican heritage, may be sympathetic to the those who
oppose a wall and, according to Trump, is exercising his sympathy's in a
manner that is not germane to the lawsuit. If so, his comments can't be
regarded as being "racist".

The media has whipped this whole thing up to where no other
interpretation can be considered. I fully expect Harry to reply
with a four-word post:

"Trump is a racist"


Several key leaders in the GOP have already pointed out Trump's racism.

Of course they have. It's the politically correct thing to do. The
ones that floor me are the ones who state that Trump is clearly a racist
however they will continue to support him in the general election. This
demonstrates clearly how f*&A%Ked up career politicians are and how bad
our political system has degenerated to.



Trump's base voters and indeed many of the GOP base voters don't see
Trump's racist behavior as a detriment. They also are not offput by the
rest of Trump's hateful rhetoric.

Is being against illegal immigration 'racism'? Is being against a Mexican/American judge's opinions
'racism'?



As I have long suspected, you have no understanding. First, the judge
Trump is insulting is not a Mexican American. He is American. Second,
Trump is whining about the judge's recent decision not on the merits of
that decision, per se, but on his belief that the judge cannot render an
impartial decision because of his Mexican heritage.

You really are an ignorant ****, and you prove it here frequently.

You skipped the question. But, you called names to make up for it.

I suppose I shouldn't have said Mexican American but instead said, 'American with Mexican Heritage',
which is, of course, much different than being Mexican American.

Go re-read Luddite's post. He explained it just for you. Open those liberal f'ing eyes!



Sorry, I don't "take direction" from dirtbags like you. Trump's comment
was racist, and he is being properly excoriated for it. Luddite simply
has decided to give Trump a pass.

Are you with...
 

On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 6:35:53 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 7:31 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 17:38:57 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/8/16 3:54 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 12:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/8/16 10:36 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e


Is Trump a racist?

Well, I guess if you subscribe to contemporary notions of "political
correctness" and, with the PC rules overruling any
other considerations, yes, he has to be defined as a racist.

However, there are other ways to interpret what he said (and says)
but one has to look outside of the rules of political correctness
to understand or even give consideration to them, something difficult
to do with most progressives and certainly in the liberal media.

For example, his apparent racism related to referring to the judge as
being of Mexican heritage may not be based in racism at all. The
Donald's "Trump University" is being sued. The original lead plaintiff
in the lawsuit requested and was granted removal from being a plaintiff
in the case. In normal court proceedings, that would be end end of the
lawsuit. But in this case the judge allowed the suit to continue under
conditions and rulings made uniquely by him.

Trump has already ****ed off many (or most) Mexicans by insisting that
he is going to build a wall for which Mexico will pay for. Trump's
comments about the judge could simply be related to the fact that the
judge, being of Mexican heritage, may be sympathetic to the those who
oppose a wall and, according to Trump, is exercising his sympathy's in a
manner that is not germane to the lawsuit. If so, his comments can't be
regarded as being "racist".

The media has whipped this whole thing up to where no other
interpretation can be considered. I fully expect Harry to reply
with a four-word post:

"Trump is a racist"


Several key leaders in the GOP have already pointed out Trump's racism.

Of course they have. It's the politically correct thing to do. The
ones that floor me are the ones who state that Trump is clearly a racist
however they will continue to support him in the general election. This
demonstrates clearly how f*&A%Ked up career politicians are and how bad
our political system has degenerated to.



Trump's base voters and indeed many of the GOP base voters don't see
Trump's racist behavior as a detriment. They also are not offput by the
rest of Trump's hateful rhetoric.

Is being against illegal immigration 'racism'? Is being against a Mexican/American judge's opinions
'racism'?



As I have long suspected, you have no understanding. First, the judge
Trump is insulting is not a Mexican American. He is American. Second,
Trump is whining about the judge's recent decision not on the merits of
that decision, per se, but on his belief that the judge cannot render an
impartial decision because of his Mexican heritage.

You really are an ignorant ****, and you prove it here frequently.

This is funny Harry, you bring up articles to make an attempt to get an argument going, then you chew out people that disagreed with you then you attempt to insulot their intelecct and then cuss them out.
Amazing. eh, not really

Are you with...
 

On 6/9/16 8:10 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 6:35:53 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 7:31 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 17:38:57 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/8/16 3:54 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 12:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/8/16 10:36 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e


Is Trump a racist?

Well, I guess if you subscribe to contemporary notions of "political
correctness" and, with the PC rules overruling any
other considerations, yes, he has to be defined as a racist.

However, there are other ways to interpret what he said (and says)
but one has to look outside of the rules of political correctness
to understand or even give consideration to them, something difficult
to do with most progressives and certainly in the liberal media.

For example, his apparent racism related to referring to the judge as
being of Mexican heritage may not be based in racism at all. The
Donald's "Trump University" is being sued. The original lead plaintiff
in the lawsuit requested and was granted removal from being a plaintiff
in the case. In normal court proceedings, that would be end end of the
lawsuit. But in this case the judge allowed the suit to continue under
conditions and rulings made uniquely by him.

Trump has already ****ed off many (or most) Mexicans by insisting that
he is going to build a wall for which Mexico will pay for. Trump's
comments about the judge could simply be related to the fact that the
judge, being of Mexican heritage, may be sympathetic to the those who
oppose a wall and, according to Trump, is exercising his sympathy's in a
manner that is not germane to the lawsuit. If so, his comments can't be
regarded as being "racist".

The media has whipped this whole thing up to where no other
interpretation can be considered. I fully expect Harry to reply
with a four-word post:

"Trump is a racist"


Several key leaders in the GOP have already pointed out Trump's racism.

Of course they have. It's the politically correct thing to do. The
ones that floor me are the ones who state that Trump is clearly a racist
however they will continue to support him in the general election. This
demonstrates clearly how f*&A%Ked up career politicians are and how bad
our political system has degenerated to.



Trump's base voters and indeed many of the GOP base voters don't see
Trump's racist behavior as a detriment. They also are not offput by the
rest of Trump's hateful rhetoric.

Is being against illegal immigration 'racism'? Is being against a Mexican/American judge's opinions
'racism'?



As I have long suspected, you have no understanding. First, the judge
Trump is insulting is not a Mexican American. He is American. Second,
Trump is whining about the judge's recent decision not on the merits of
that decision, per se, but on his belief that the judge cannot render an
impartial decision because of his Mexican heritage.

You really are an ignorant ****, and you prove it here frequently.

This is funny Harry, you bring up articles to make an attempt to get an argument going, then you chew out people that disagreed with you then you attempt to insulot their intelecct and then cuss them out.
Amazing. eh, not really


I am not interested in getting "an argument going" here. That may be
what you think, but it isn't my motivation.

Are you with...
 

On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 08:05:29 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/9/16 7:45 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:35:51 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/9/16 7:31 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 17:38:57 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/8/16 3:54 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 12:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/8/16 10:36 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e


Is Trump a racist?

Well, I guess if you subscribe to contemporary notions of "political
correctness" and, with the PC rules overruling any
other considerations, yes, he has to be defined as a racist.

However, there are other ways to interpret what he said (and says)
but one has to look outside of the rules of political correctness
to understand or even give consideration to them, something difficult
to do with most progressives and certainly in the liberal media.

For example, his apparent racism related to referring to the judge as
being of Mexican heritage may not be based in racism at all. The
Donald's "Trump University" is being sued. The original lead plaintiff
in the lawsuit requested and was granted removal from being a plaintiff
in the case. In normal court proceedings, that would be end end of the
lawsuit. But in this case the judge allowed the suit to continue under
conditions and rulings made uniquely by him.

Trump has already ****ed off many (or most) Mexicans by insisting that
he is going to build a wall for which Mexico will pay for. Trump's
comments about the judge could simply be related to the fact that the
judge, being of Mexican heritage, may be sympathetic to the those who
oppose a wall and, according to Trump, is exercising his sympathy's in a
manner that is not germane to the lawsuit. If so, his comments can't be
regarded as being "racist".

The media has whipped this whole thing up to where no other
interpretation can be considered. I fully expect Harry to reply
with a four-word post:

"Trump is a racist"


Several key leaders in the GOP have already pointed out Trump's racism.

Of course they have. It's the politically correct thing to do. The
ones that floor me are the ones who state that Trump is clearly a racist
however they will continue to support him in the general election. This
demonstrates clearly how f*&A%Ked up career politicians are and how bad
our political system has degenerated to.



Trump's base voters and indeed many of the GOP base voters don't see
Trump's racist behavior as a detriment. They also are not offput by the
rest of Trump's hateful rhetoric.

Is being against illegal immigration 'racism'? Is being against a Mexican/American judge's opinions
'racism'?



As I have long suspected, you have no understanding. First, the judge
Trump is insulting is not a Mexican American. He is American. Second,
Trump is whining about the judge's recent decision not on the merits of
that decision, per se, but on his belief that the judge cannot render an
impartial decision because of his Mexican heritage.

You really are an ignorant ****, and you prove it here frequently.

You skipped the question. But, you called names to make up for it.

I suppose I shouldn't have said Mexican American but instead said, 'American with Mexican Heritage',
which is, of course, much different than being Mexican American.

Go re-read Luddite's post. He explained it just for you. Open those liberal f'ing eyes!



Sorry, I don't "take direction" from dirtbags like you. Trump's comment
was racist, and he is being properly excoriated for it. Luddite simply
has decided to give Trump a pass.

No, Luddite stated some facts, which, of course, you turn away from.

Luddite doesn't like Trump any more than I do, but facts are facts.

Are you with...
 

7:16 AMKeyser Söze
On 6/9/16 8:10 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 6:35:53 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 7:31 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
- show quoted text -
I am not interested in getting "an argument going" here. That may be
what you think, but it isn't my motivation.
----

All right then, what IS your motivation ( besides the opertunity to belittle and insult others, of course)?