Are you with...
 

....this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e

Are you with...
 

On 6/8/2016 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e


Is Trump a racist?

Well, I guess if you subscribe to contemporary notions of "political
correctness" and, with the PC rules overruling any
other considerations, yes, he has to be defined as a racist.

However, there are other ways to interpret what he said (and says)
but one has to look outside of the rules of political correctness
to understand or even give consideration to them, something difficult
to do with most progressives and certainly in the liberal media.

For example, his apparent racism related to referring to the judge as
being of Mexican heritage may not be based in racism at all. The
Donald's "Trump University" is being sued. The original lead plaintiff
in the lawsuit requested and was granted removal from being a plaintiff
in the case. In normal court proceedings, that would be end end of the
lawsuit. But in this case the judge allowed the suit to continue under
conditions and rulings made uniquely by him.

Trump has already ****ed off many (or most) Mexicans by insisting that
he is going to build a wall for which Mexico will pay for. Trump's
comments about the judge could simply be related to the fact that the
judge, being of Mexican heritage, may be sympathetic to the those who
oppose a wall and, according to Trump, is exercising his sympathy's in a
manner that is not germane to the lawsuit. If so, his comments can't be
regarded as being "racist".

The media has whipped this whole thing up to where no other
interpretation can be considered. I fully expect Harry to reply
with a four-word post:

"Trump is a racist"

Are you with...
 

On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 10:36:03 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 6/8/2016 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e


Is Trump a racist?

Well, I guess if you subscribe to contemporary notions of "political
correctness" and, with the PC rules overruling any
other considerations, yes, he has to be defined as a racist.

However, there are other ways to interpret what he said (and says)
but one has to look outside of the rules of political correctness
to understand or even give consideration to them, something difficult
to do with most progressives and certainly in the liberal media.

For example, his apparent racism related to referring to the judge as
being of Mexican heritage may not be based in racism at all. The
Donald's "Trump University" is being sued. The original lead plaintiff
in the lawsuit requested and was granted removal from being a plaintiff
in the case. In normal court proceedings, that would be end end of the
lawsuit. But in this case the judge allowed the suit to continue under
conditions and rulings made uniquely by him.

Trump has already ****ed off many (or most) Mexicans by insisting that
he is going to build a wall for which Mexico will pay for. Trump's
comments about the judge could simply be related to the fact that the
judge, being of Mexican heritage, may be sympathetic to the those who
oppose a wall and, according to Trump, is exercising his sympathy's in a
manner that is not germane to the lawsuit. If so, his comments can't be
regarded as being "racist".

The media has whipped this whole thing up to where no other
interpretation can be considered. I fully expect Harry to reply
with a four-word post:

"Trump is a racist"

Trump was stupid to bring up this guy's distant heritage. He should
have simply attacked the decision on legal grounds or, better, let his
lawyer do it.

Are you with...
 

On 6/8/2016 10:46 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 10:36:03 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 6/8/2016 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e


Is Trump a racist?

Well, I guess if you subscribe to contemporary notions of "political
correctness" and, with the PC rules overruling any
other considerations, yes, he has to be defined as a racist.

However, there are other ways to interpret what he said (and says)
but one has to look outside of the rules of political correctness
to understand or even give consideration to them, something difficult
to do with most progressives and certainly in the liberal media.

For example, his apparent racism related to referring to the judge as
being of Mexican heritage may not be based in racism at all. The
Donald's "Trump University" is being sued. The original lead plaintiff
in the lawsuit requested and was granted removal from being a plaintiff
in the case. In normal court proceedings, that would be end end of the
lawsuit. But in this case the judge allowed the suit to continue under
conditions and rulings made uniquely by him.

Trump has already ****ed off many (or most) Mexicans by insisting that
he is going to build a wall for which Mexico will pay for. Trump's
comments about the judge could simply be related to the fact that the
judge, being of Mexican heritage, may be sympathetic to the those who
oppose a wall and, according to Trump, is exercising his sympathy's in a
manner that is not germane to the lawsuit. If so, his comments can't be
regarded as being "racist".

The media has whipped this whole thing up to where no other
interpretation can be considered. I fully expect Harry to reply
with a four-word post:

"Trump is a racist"

Trump was stupid to bring up this guy's distant heritage. He should
have simply attacked the decision on legal grounds or, better, let his
lawyer do it.


I agree. Trump is demonstrating daily that he is not a career
politician nor a lawyer. Hillary is going to cream him in the general.

Are you with...
 

In article ,
says...

On 6/8/2016 10:46 AM, wrote:

Trump was stupid to bring up this guy's distant heritage. He should
have simply attacked the decision on legal grounds or, better, let his
lawyer do it.


I agree. Trump is demonstrating daily that he is not a career
politician nor a lawyer. Hillary is going to cream him in the general.

You can't cure stupid, and you can't buy smarts.

Are you with...
 

On 6/8/16 10:36 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e


Is Trump a racist?

Well, I guess if you subscribe to contemporary notions of "political
correctness" and, with the PC rules overruling any
other considerations, yes, he has to be defined as a racist.

However, there are other ways to interpret what he said (and says)
but one has to look outside of the rules of political correctness
to understand or even give consideration to them, something difficult
to do with most progressives and certainly in the liberal media.

For example, his apparent racism related to referring to the judge as
being of Mexican heritage may not be based in racism at all. The
Donald's "Trump University" is being sued. The original lead plaintiff
in the lawsuit requested and was granted removal from being a plaintiff
in the case. In normal court proceedings, that would be end end of the
lawsuit. But in this case the judge allowed the suit to continue under
conditions and rulings made uniquely by him.

Trump has already ****ed off many (or most) Mexicans by insisting that
he is going to build a wall for which Mexico will pay for. Trump's
comments about the judge could simply be related to the fact that the
judge, being of Mexican heritage, may be sympathetic to the those who
oppose a wall and, according to Trump, is exercising his sympathy's in a
manner that is not germane to the lawsuit. If so, his comments can't be
regarded as being "racist".

The media has whipped this whole thing up to where no other
interpretation can be considered. I fully expect Harry to reply
with a four-word post:

"Trump is a racist"


Several key leaders in the GOP have already pointed out Trump's racism.

Are you with...
 

On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 12:02:52 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

Several key leaders in the GOP have already pointed out Trump's racism.

The scary thing in this election might be how many racists there are
in the country. If they had put the civil rights act up to a national
vote it would not have passed in 1964. The question might be, will it
pass now?

Gary looks better to me every day. He is the one least likely to be
indicted by November.

Are you with...
 

On 6/8/16 1:49 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 12:02:52 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

Several key leaders in the GOP have already pointed out Trump's racism.

The scary thing in this election might be how many racists there are
in the country. If they had put the civil rights act up to a national
vote it would not have passed in 1964. The question might be, will it
pass now?

Gary looks better to me every day. He is the one least likely to be
indicted by November.


And unelected.

Are you with...
 

On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 14:37:53 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/8/16 1:49 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 12:02:52 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

Several key leaders in the GOP have already pointed out Trump's racism.

The scary thing in this election might be how many racists there are
in the country. If they had put the civil rights act up to a national
vote it would not have passed in 1964. The question might be, will it
pass now?

Gary looks better to me every day. He is the one least likely to be
indicted by November.


And unelected.

There is polling right now as reported on Charlie Rose that has
Johnson up in the double digits instead of the normal 1% (assuming it
is Trumpy and Dumpy)
There are a lot of democrats who hate Hillary and plenty of
republicans who can't hold their nose tight enough to vote for the
Donald. They will either stay home or cast a protest vote. That might
be a Bernie write in or a 3d party candidate.
I doubt past is prolog this year unless it is 1824. This is a totally
unprecedented election.
I would say 1968 but the GOP does not have Nixon. Hillary is more
disliked than Humphrey. It would be funny is Trump got Wallace
numbers. That is the racist vote. (5 1/2 states in the EC)

Are you with...
 

On 6/8/2016 12:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/8/16 10:36 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e


Is Trump a racist?

Well, I guess if you subscribe to contemporary notions of "political
correctness" and, with the PC rules overruling any
other considerations, yes, he has to be defined as a racist.

However, there are other ways to interpret what he said (and says)
but one has to look outside of the rules of political correctness
to understand or even give consideration to them, something difficult
to do with most progressives and certainly in the liberal media.

For example, his apparent racism related to referring to the judge as
being of Mexican heritage may not be based in racism at all. The
Donald's "Trump University" is being sued. The original lead plaintiff
in the lawsuit requested and was granted removal from being a plaintiff
in the case. In normal court proceedings, that would be end end of the
lawsuit. But in this case the judge allowed the suit to continue under
conditions and rulings made uniquely by him.

Trump has already ****ed off many (or most) Mexicans by insisting that
he is going to build a wall for which Mexico will pay for. Trump's
comments about the judge could simply be related to the fact that the
judge, being of Mexican heritage, may be sympathetic to the those who
oppose a wall and, according to Trump, is exercising his sympathy's in a
manner that is not germane to the lawsuit. If so, his comments can't be
regarded as being "racist".

The media has whipped this whole thing up to where no other
interpretation can be considered. I fully expect Harry to reply
with a four-word post:

"Trump is a racist"


Several key leaders in the GOP have already pointed out Trump's racism.

Of course they have. It's the politically correct thing to do. The
ones that floor me are the ones who state that Trump is clearly a racist
however they will continue to support him in the general election. This
demonstrates clearly how f*&A%Ked up career politicians are and how bad
our political system has degenerated to.

Are you with...
 

On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 3:54:58 PM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 12:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/8/16 10:36 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e


Is Trump a racist?

Well, I guess if you subscribe to contemporary notions of "political
correctness" and, with the PC rules overruling any
other considerations, yes, he has to be defined as a racist.

However, there are other ways to interpret what he said (and says)
but one has to look outside of the rules of political correctness
to understand or even give consideration to them, something difficult
to do with most progressives and certainly in the liberal media.

For example, his apparent racism related to referring to the judge as
being of Mexican heritage may not be based in racism at all. The
Donald's "Trump University" is being sued. The original lead plaintiff
in the lawsuit requested and was granted removal from being a plaintiff
in the case. In normal court proceedings, that would be end end of the
lawsuit. But in this case the judge allowed the suit to continue under
conditions and rulings made uniquely by him.

Trump has already ****ed off many (or most) Mexicans by insisting that
he is going to build a wall for which Mexico will pay for. Trump's
comments about the judge could simply be related to the fact that the
judge, being of Mexican heritage, may be sympathetic to the those who
oppose a wall and, according to Trump, is exercising his sympathy's in a
manner that is not germane to the lawsuit. If so, his comments can't be
regarded as being "racist".

The media has whipped this whole thing up to where no other
interpretation can be considered. I fully expect Harry to reply
with a four-word post:

"Trump is a racist"


Several key leaders in the GOP have already pointed out Trump's racism.

Of course they have. It's the politically correct thing to do. The
ones that floor me are the ones who state that Trump is clearly a racist
however they will continue to support him in the general election. This
demonstrates clearly how f*&A%Ked up career politicians are and how bad
our political system has degenerated to.

"Racism" gets thrown around so much these days it's losing it's sting. Hell, Mexican isn't even a race. That's how screwed up our media and PC bull**** is.

Are you with...
 

On 6/8/16 3:54 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 12:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/8/16 10:36 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e


Is Trump a racist?

Well, I guess if you subscribe to contemporary notions of "political
correctness" and, with the PC rules overruling any
other considerations, yes, he has to be defined as a racist.

However, there are other ways to interpret what he said (and says)
but one has to look outside of the rules of political correctness
to understand or even give consideration to them, something difficult
to do with most progressives and certainly in the liberal media.

For example, his apparent racism related to referring to the judge as
being of Mexican heritage may not be based in racism at all. The
Donald's "Trump University" is being sued. The original lead plaintiff
in the lawsuit requested and was granted removal from being a plaintiff
in the case. In normal court proceedings, that would be end end of the
lawsuit. But in this case the judge allowed the suit to continue under
conditions and rulings made uniquely by him.

Trump has already ****ed off many (or most) Mexicans by insisting that
he is going to build a wall for which Mexico will pay for. Trump's
comments about the judge could simply be related to the fact that the
judge, being of Mexican heritage, may be sympathetic to the those who
oppose a wall and, according to Trump, is exercising his sympathy's in a
manner that is not germane to the lawsuit. If so, his comments can't be
regarded as being "racist".

The media has whipped this whole thing up to where no other
interpretation can be considered. I fully expect Harry to reply
with a four-word post:

"Trump is a racist"


Several key leaders in the GOP have already pointed out Trump's racism.

Of course they have. It's the politically correct thing to do. The
ones that floor me are the ones who state that Trump is clearly a racist
however they will continue to support him in the general election. This
demonstrates clearly how f*&A%Ked up career politicians are and how bad
our political system has degenerated to.



Trump's base voters and indeed many of the GOP base voters don't see
Trump's racist behavior as a detriment. They also are not offput by the
rest of Trump's hateful rhetoric.

Are you with...
 

On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 17:38:57 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/8/16 3:54 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 12:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/8/16 10:36 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e


Is Trump a racist?

Well, I guess if you subscribe to contemporary notions of "political
correctness" and, with the PC rules overruling any
other considerations, yes, he has to be defined as a racist.

However, there are other ways to interpret what he said (and says)
but one has to look outside of the rules of political correctness
to understand or even give consideration to them, something difficult
to do with most progressives and certainly in the liberal media.

For example, his apparent racism related to referring to the judge as
being of Mexican heritage may not be based in racism at all. The
Donald's "Trump University" is being sued. The original lead plaintiff
in the lawsuit requested and was granted removal from being a plaintiff
in the case. In normal court proceedings, that would be end end of the
lawsuit. But in this case the judge allowed the suit to continue under
conditions and rulings made uniquely by him.

Trump has already ****ed off many (or most) Mexicans by insisting that
he is going to build a wall for which Mexico will pay for. Trump's
comments about the judge could simply be related to the fact that the
judge, being of Mexican heritage, may be sympathetic to the those who
oppose a wall and, according to Trump, is exercising his sympathy's in a
manner that is not germane to the lawsuit. If so, his comments can't be
regarded as being "racist".

The media has whipped this whole thing up to where no other
interpretation can be considered. I fully expect Harry to reply
with a four-word post:

"Trump is a racist"


Several key leaders in the GOP have already pointed out Trump's racism.

Of course they have. It's the politically correct thing to do. The
ones that floor me are the ones who state that Trump is clearly a racist
however they will continue to support him in the general election. This
demonstrates clearly how f*&A%Ked up career politicians are and how bad
our political system has degenerated to.



Trump's base voters and indeed many of the GOP base voters don't see
Trump's racist behavior as a detriment. They also are not offput by the
rest of Trump's hateful rhetoric.

Is being against illegal immigration 'racism'? Is being against a Mexican/American judge's opinions
'racism'?

Are you with...
 

On 6/9/16 7:31 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 17:38:57 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/8/16 3:54 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 12:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/8/16 10:36 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e


Is Trump a racist?

Well, I guess if you subscribe to contemporary notions of "political
correctness" and, with the PC rules overruling any
other considerations, yes, he has to be defined as a racist.

However, there are other ways to interpret what he said (and says)
but one has to look outside of the rules of political correctness
to understand or even give consideration to them, something difficult
to do with most progressives and certainly in the liberal media.

For example, his apparent racism related to referring to the judge as
being of Mexican heritage may not be based in racism at all. The
Donald's "Trump University" is being sued. The original lead plaintiff
in the lawsuit requested and was granted removal from being a plaintiff
in the case. In normal court proceedings, that would be end end of the
lawsuit. But in this case the judge allowed the suit to continue under
conditions and rulings made uniquely by him.

Trump has already ****ed off many (or most) Mexicans by insisting that
he is going to build a wall for which Mexico will pay for. Trump's
comments about the judge could simply be related to the fact that the
judge, being of Mexican heritage, may be sympathetic to the those who
oppose a wall and, according to Trump, is exercising his sympathy's in a
manner that is not germane to the lawsuit. If so, his comments can't be
regarded as being "racist".

The media has whipped this whole thing up to where no other
interpretation can be considered. I fully expect Harry to reply
with a four-word post:

"Trump is a racist"


Several key leaders in the GOP have already pointed out Trump's racism.

Of course they have. It's the politically correct thing to do. The
ones that floor me are the ones who state that Trump is clearly a racist
however they will continue to support him in the general election. This
demonstrates clearly how f*&A%Ked up career politicians are and how bad
our political system has degenerated to.



Trump's base voters and indeed many of the GOP base voters don't see
Trump's racist behavior as a detriment. They also are not offput by the
rest of Trump's hateful rhetoric.

Is being against illegal immigration 'racism'? Is being against a Mexican/American judge's opinions
'racism'?



As I have long suspected, you have no understanding. First, the judge
Trump is insulting is not a Mexican American. He is American. Second,
Trump is whining about the judge's recent decision not on the merits of
that decision, per se, but on his belief that the judge cannot render an
impartial decision because of his Mexican heritage.

You really are an ignorant ****, and you prove it here frequently.

Are you with...
 

On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:35:51 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/9/16 7:31 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 17:38:57 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/8/16 3:54 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 12:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/8/16 10:36 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e


Is Trump a racist?

Well, I guess if you subscribe to contemporary notions of "political
correctness" and, with the PC rules overruling any
other considerations, yes, he has to be defined as a racist.

However, there are other ways to interpret what he said (and says)
but one has to look outside of the rules of political correctness
to understand or even give consideration to them, something difficult
to do with most progressives and certainly in the liberal media.

For example, his apparent racism related to referring to the judge as
being of Mexican heritage may not be based in racism at all. The
Donald's "Trump University" is being sued. The original lead plaintiff
in the lawsuit requested and was granted removal from being a plaintiff
in the case. In normal court proceedings, that would be end end of the
lawsuit. But in this case the judge allowed the suit to continue under
conditions and rulings made uniquely by him.

Trump has already ****ed off many (or most) Mexicans by insisting that
he is going to build a wall for which Mexico will pay for. Trump's
comments about the judge could simply be related to the fact that the
judge, being of Mexican heritage, may be sympathetic to the those who
oppose a wall and, according to Trump, is exercising his sympathy's in a
manner that is not germane to the lawsuit. If so, his comments can't be
regarded as being "racist".

The media has whipped this whole thing up to where no other
interpretation can be considered. I fully expect Harry to reply
with a four-word post:

"Trump is a racist"


Several key leaders in the GOP have already pointed out Trump's racism.

Of course they have. It's the politically correct thing to do. The
ones that floor me are the ones who state that Trump is clearly a racist
however they will continue to support him in the general election. This
demonstrates clearly how f*&A%Ked up career politicians are and how bad
our political system has degenerated to.



Trump's base voters and indeed many of the GOP base voters don't see
Trump's racist behavior as a detriment. They also are not offput by the
rest of Trump's hateful rhetoric.

Is being against illegal immigration 'racism'? Is being against a Mexican/American judge's opinions
'racism'?



As I have long suspected, you have no understanding. First, the judge
Trump is insulting is not a Mexican American. He is American. Second,
Trump is whining about the judge's recent decision not on the merits of
that decision, per se, but on his belief that the judge cannot render an
impartial decision because of his Mexican heritage.

You really are an ignorant ****, and you prove it here frequently.

You skipped the question. But, you called names to make up for it.

I suppose I shouldn't have said Mexican American but instead said, 'American with Mexican Heritage',
which is, of course, much different than being Mexican American.

Go re-read Luddite's post. He explained it just for you. Open those liberal f'ing eyes!

Are you with...
 

On 6/9/16 7:45 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:35:51 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/9/16 7:31 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 17:38:57 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/8/16 3:54 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 12:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/8/16 10:36 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e


Is Trump a racist?

Well, I guess if you subscribe to contemporary notions of "political
correctness" and, with the PC rules overruling any
other considerations, yes, he has to be defined as a racist.

However, there are other ways to interpret what he said (and says)
but one has to look outside of the rules of political correctness
to understand or even give consideration to them, something difficult
to do with most progressives and certainly in the liberal media.

For example, his apparent racism related to referring to the judge as
being of Mexican heritage may not be based in racism at all. The
Donald's "Trump University" is being sued. The original lead plaintiff
in the lawsuit requested and was granted removal from being a plaintiff
in the case. In normal court proceedings, that would be end end of the
lawsuit. But in this case the judge allowed the suit to continue under
conditions and rulings made uniquely by him.

Trump has already ****ed off many (or most) Mexicans by insisting that
he is going to build a wall for which Mexico will pay for. Trump's
comments about the judge could simply be related to the fact that the
judge, being of Mexican heritage, may be sympathetic to the those who
oppose a wall and, according to Trump, is exercising his sympathy's in a
manner that is not germane to the lawsuit. If so, his comments can't be
regarded as being "racist".

The media has whipped this whole thing up to where no other
interpretation can be considered. I fully expect Harry to reply
with a four-word post:

"Trump is a racist"


Several key leaders in the GOP have already pointed out Trump's racism.

Of course they have. It's the politically correct thing to do. The
ones that floor me are the ones who state that Trump is clearly a racist
however they will continue to support him in the general election. This
demonstrates clearly how f*&A%Ked up career politicians are and how bad
our political system has degenerated to.



Trump's base voters and indeed many of the GOP base voters don't see
Trump's racist behavior as a detriment. They also are not offput by the
rest of Trump's hateful rhetoric.

Is being against illegal immigration 'racism'? Is being against a Mexican/American judge's opinions
'racism'?



As I have long suspected, you have no understanding. First, the judge
Trump is insulting is not a Mexican American. He is American. Second,
Trump is whining about the judge's recent decision not on the merits of
that decision, per se, but on his belief that the judge cannot render an
impartial decision because of his Mexican heritage.

You really are an ignorant ****, and you prove it here frequently.

You skipped the question. But, you called names to make up for it.

I suppose I shouldn't have said Mexican American but instead said, 'American with Mexican Heritage',
which is, of course, much different than being Mexican American.

Go re-read Luddite's post. He explained it just for you. Open those liberal f'ing eyes!



Sorry, I don't "take direction" from dirtbags like you. Trump's comment
was racist, and he is being properly excoriated for it. Luddite simply
has decided to give Trump a pass.

Are you with...
 

On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 6:35:53 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 7:31 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 17:38:57 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/8/16 3:54 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 12:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/8/16 10:36 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e


Is Trump a racist?

Well, I guess if you subscribe to contemporary notions of "political
correctness" and, with the PC rules overruling any
other considerations, yes, he has to be defined as a racist.

However, there are other ways to interpret what he said (and says)
but one has to look outside of the rules of political correctness
to understand or even give consideration to them, something difficult
to do with most progressives and certainly in the liberal media.

For example, his apparent racism related to referring to the judge as
being of Mexican heritage may not be based in racism at all. The
Donald's "Trump University" is being sued. The original lead plaintiff
in the lawsuit requested and was granted removal from being a plaintiff
in the case. In normal court proceedings, that would be end end of the
lawsuit. But in this case the judge allowed the suit to continue under
conditions and rulings made uniquely by him.

Trump has already ****ed off many (or most) Mexicans by insisting that
he is going to build a wall for which Mexico will pay for. Trump's
comments about the judge could simply be related to the fact that the
judge, being of Mexican heritage, may be sympathetic to the those who
oppose a wall and, according to Trump, is exercising his sympathy's in a
manner that is not germane to the lawsuit. If so, his comments can't be
regarded as being "racist".

The media has whipped this whole thing up to where no other
interpretation can be considered. I fully expect Harry to reply
with a four-word post:

"Trump is a racist"


Several key leaders in the GOP have already pointed out Trump's racism.

Of course they have. It's the politically correct thing to do. The
ones that floor me are the ones who state that Trump is clearly a racist
however they will continue to support him in the general election. This
demonstrates clearly how f*&A%Ked up career politicians are and how bad
our political system has degenerated to.



Trump's base voters and indeed many of the GOP base voters don't see
Trump's racist behavior as a detriment. They also are not offput by the
rest of Trump's hateful rhetoric.

Is being against illegal immigration 'racism'? Is being against a Mexican/American judge's opinions
'racism'?



As I have long suspected, you have no understanding. First, the judge
Trump is insulting is not a Mexican American. He is American. Second,
Trump is whining about the judge's recent decision not on the merits of
that decision, per se, but on his belief that the judge cannot render an
impartial decision because of his Mexican heritage.

You really are an ignorant ****, and you prove it here frequently.

This is funny Harry, you bring up articles to make an attempt to get an argument going, then you chew out people that disagreed with you then you attempt to insulot their intelecct and then cuss them out.
Amazing. eh, not really

Are you with...
 

On 6/9/16 8:10 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 6:35:53 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 7:31 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 17:38:57 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/8/16 3:54 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 12:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/8/16 10:36 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e


Is Trump a racist?

Well, I guess if you subscribe to contemporary notions of "political
correctness" and, with the PC rules overruling any
other considerations, yes, he has to be defined as a racist.

However, there are other ways to interpret what he said (and says)
but one has to look outside of the rules of political correctness
to understand or even give consideration to them, something difficult
to do with most progressives and certainly in the liberal media.

For example, his apparent racism related to referring to the judge as
being of Mexican heritage may not be based in racism at all. The
Donald's "Trump University" is being sued. The original lead plaintiff
in the lawsuit requested and was granted removal from being a plaintiff
in the case. In normal court proceedings, that would be end end of the
lawsuit. But in this case the judge allowed the suit to continue under
conditions and rulings made uniquely by him.

Trump has already ****ed off many (or most) Mexicans by insisting that
he is going to build a wall for which Mexico will pay for. Trump's
comments about the judge could simply be related to the fact that the
judge, being of Mexican heritage, may be sympathetic to the those who
oppose a wall and, according to Trump, is exercising his sympathy's in a
manner that is not germane to the lawsuit. If so, his comments can't be
regarded as being "racist".

The media has whipped this whole thing up to where no other
interpretation can be considered. I fully expect Harry to reply
with a four-word post:

"Trump is a racist"


Several key leaders in the GOP have already pointed out Trump's racism.

Of course they have. It's the politically correct thing to do. The
ones that floor me are the ones who state that Trump is clearly a racist
however they will continue to support him in the general election. This
demonstrates clearly how f*&A%Ked up career politicians are and how bad
our political system has degenerated to.



Trump's base voters and indeed many of the GOP base voters don't see
Trump's racist behavior as a detriment. They also are not offput by the
rest of Trump's hateful rhetoric.

Is being against illegal immigration 'racism'? Is being against a Mexican/American judge's opinions
'racism'?



As I have long suspected, you have no understanding. First, the judge
Trump is insulting is not a Mexican American. He is American. Second,
Trump is whining about the judge's recent decision not on the merits of
that decision, per se, but on his belief that the judge cannot render an
impartial decision because of his Mexican heritage.

You really are an ignorant ****, and you prove it here frequently.

This is funny Harry, you bring up articles to make an attempt to get an argument going, then you chew out people that disagreed with you then you attempt to insulot their intelecct and then cuss them out.
Amazing. eh, not really


I am not interested in getting "an argument going" here. That may be
what you think, but it isn't my motivation.

Are you with...
 

On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 08:05:29 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/9/16 7:45 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:35:51 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/9/16 7:31 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 17:38:57 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/8/16 3:54 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 12:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/8/16 10:36 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e


Is Trump a racist?

Well, I guess if you subscribe to contemporary notions of "political
correctness" and, with the PC rules overruling any
other considerations, yes, he has to be defined as a racist.

However, there are other ways to interpret what he said (and says)
but one has to look outside of the rules of political correctness
to understand or even give consideration to them, something difficult
to do with most progressives and certainly in the liberal media.

For example, his apparent racism related to referring to the judge as
being of Mexican heritage may not be based in racism at all. The
Donald's "Trump University" is being sued. The original lead plaintiff
in the lawsuit requested and was granted removal from being a plaintiff
in the case. In normal court proceedings, that would be end end of the
lawsuit. But in this case the judge allowed the suit to continue under
conditions and rulings made uniquely by him.

Trump has already ****ed off many (or most) Mexicans by insisting that
he is going to build a wall for which Mexico will pay for. Trump's
comments about the judge could simply be related to the fact that the
judge, being of Mexican heritage, may be sympathetic to the those who
oppose a wall and, according to Trump, is exercising his sympathy's in a
manner that is not germane to the lawsuit. If so, his comments can't be
regarded as being "racist".

The media has whipped this whole thing up to where no other
interpretation can be considered. I fully expect Harry to reply
with a four-word post:

"Trump is a racist"


Several key leaders in the GOP have already pointed out Trump's racism.

Of course they have. It's the politically correct thing to do. The
ones that floor me are the ones who state that Trump is clearly a racist
however they will continue to support him in the general election. This
demonstrates clearly how f*&A%Ked up career politicians are and how bad
our political system has degenerated to.



Trump's base voters and indeed many of the GOP base voters don't see
Trump's racist behavior as a detriment. They also are not offput by the
rest of Trump's hateful rhetoric.

Is being against illegal immigration 'racism'? Is being against a Mexican/American judge's opinions
'racism'?



As I have long suspected, you have no understanding. First, the judge
Trump is insulting is not a Mexican American. He is American. Second,
Trump is whining about the judge's recent decision not on the merits of
that decision, per se, but on his belief that the judge cannot render an
impartial decision because of his Mexican heritage.

You really are an ignorant ****, and you prove it here frequently.

You skipped the question. But, you called names to make up for it.

I suppose I shouldn't have said Mexican American but instead said, 'American with Mexican Heritage',
which is, of course, much different than being Mexican American.

Go re-read Luddite's post. He explained it just for you. Open those liberal f'ing eyes!



Sorry, I don't "take direction" from dirtbags like you. Trump's comment
was racist, and he is being properly excoriated for it. Luddite simply
has decided to give Trump a pass.

No, Luddite stated some facts, which, of course, you turn away from.

Luddite doesn't like Trump any more than I do, but facts are facts.

Are you with...
 

7:16 AMKeyser Söze
On 6/9/16 8:10 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 6:35:53 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 7:31 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
- show quoted text -
I am not interested in getting "an argument going" here. That may be
what you think, but it isn't my motivation.
----

All right then, what IS your motivation ( besides the opertunity to belittle and insult others, of course)?

Are you with...
 

On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 06:10:08 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:


7:16 AMKeyser Söze
On 6/9/16 8:10 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 6:35:53 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 7:31 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
- show quoted text -
I am not interested in getting "an argument going" here. That may be
what you think, but it isn't my motivation.
----

All right then, what IS your motivation ( besides the opertunity to belittle and insult others, of course)?

Other than John and Don ****ing on each other's leg, it was actually
pleasant here while Harry was gone,. We had real boat discussions
going on.

Are you with...
 

10:03
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 06:10:08 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
- show quoted text -
Other than John and Don ****ing on each other's leg, it was actually
pleasant here while Harry was gone,. We had real boat discussions
going on.
---

Hey, I remember that. It wasn't that long ago either!

Are you with...
 

On 6/9/16 11:03 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 06:10:08 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:


7:16 AMKeyser Söze
On 6/9/16 8:10 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 6:35:53 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 7:31 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
- show quoted text -
I am not interested in getting "an argument going" here. That may be
what you think, but it isn't my motivation.
----

All right then, what IS your motivation ( besides the opertunity to belittle and insult others, of course)?

Other than John and Don ****ing on each other's leg, it was actually
pleasant here while Harry was gone,. We had real boat discussions
going on.



Well, if you say so.

Are you with...
 

On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 11:03:26 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 06:10:08 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:


7:16 AMKeyser Söze
On 6/9/16 8:10 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 6:35:53 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 7:31 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
- show quoted text -
I am not interested in getting "an argument going" here. That may be
what you think, but it isn't my motivation.
----

All right then, what IS your motivation ( besides the opertunity to belittle and insult others, of course)?

Other than John and Don ****ing on each other's leg, it was actually
pleasant here while Harry was gone,. We had real boat discussions
going on.

Well, you have to admit we've put up with our fair share of you ****ing down Harry's leg!

Are you with...
 

On 6/9/2016 8:10 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 6:35:53 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 7:31 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 17:38:57 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/8/16 3:54 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 12:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/8/16 10:36 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e


Is Trump a racist?

Well, I guess if you subscribe to contemporary notions of "political
correctness" and, with the PC rules overruling any
other considerations, yes, he has to be defined as a racist.

However, there are other ways to interpret what he said (and says)
but one has to look outside of the rules of political correctness
to understand or even give consideration to them, something difficult
to do with most progressives and certainly in the liberal media.

For example, his apparent racism related to referring to the judge as
being of Mexican heritage may not be based in racism at all. The
Donald's "Trump University" is being sued. The original lead plaintiff
in the lawsuit requested and was granted removal from being a plaintiff
in the case. In normal court proceedings, that would be end end of the
lawsuit. But in this case the judge allowed the suit to continue under
conditions and rulings made uniquely by him.

Trump has already ****ed off many (or most) Mexicans by insisting that
he is going to build a wall for which Mexico will pay for. Trump's
comments about the judge could simply be related to the fact that the
judge, being of Mexican heritage, may be sympathetic to the those who
oppose a wall and, according to Trump, is exercising his sympathy's in a
manner that is not germane to the lawsuit. If so, his comments can't be
regarded as being "racist".

The media has whipped this whole thing up to where no other
interpretation can be considered. I fully expect Harry to reply
with a four-word post:

"Trump is a racist"


Several key leaders in the GOP have already pointed out Trump's racism.

Of course they have. It's the politically correct thing to do. The
ones that floor me are the ones who state that Trump is clearly a racist
however they will continue to support him in the general election. This
demonstrates clearly how f*&A%Ked up career politicians are and how bad
our political system has degenerated to.



Trump's base voters and indeed many of the GOP base voters don't see
Trump's racist behavior as a detriment. They also are not offput by the
rest of Trump's hateful rhetoric.

Is being against illegal immigration 'racism'? Is being against a Mexican/American judge's opinions
'racism'?



As I have long suspected, you have no understanding. First, the judge
Trump is insulting is not a Mexican American. He is American. Second,
Trump is whining about the judge's recent decision not on the merits of
that decision, per se, but on his belief that the judge cannot render an
impartial decision because of his Mexican heritage.

You really are an ignorant ****, and you prove it here frequently.

This is funny Harry, you bring up articles to make an attempt to get an argument going, then you chew out people that disagreed with you then you attempt to insulot their intelecct and then cuss them out.
Amazing. eh, not really


The lazy slug has nothing better to do with his time. The DR DR should
assign him some chores to keep him busy while she's at work.

Are you with...
 

On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 12:12:58 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 11:03:26 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 06:10:08 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:


7:16 AMKeyser Söze
On 6/9/16 8:10 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 6:35:53 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 7:31 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
- show quoted text -
I am not interested in getting "an argument going" here. That may be
what you think, but it isn't my motivation.
----

All right then, what IS your motivation ( besides the opertunity to belittle and insult others, of course)?

Other than John and Don ****ing on each other's leg, it was actually
pleasant here while Harry was gone,. We had real boat discussions
going on.

Well, you have to admit we've put up with our fair share of you ****ing down Harry's leg!

I don't think it was personal and I do try a modicum of restraint.

Are you with...
 

On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 13:10:29 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 12:12:58 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 11:03:26 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 06:10:08 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:


7:16 AMKeyser Söze
On 6/9/16 8:10 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 6:35:53 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 7:31 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
- show quoted text -
I am not interested in getting "an argument going" here. That may be
what you think, but it isn't my motivation.
----

All right then, what IS your motivation ( besides the opertunity to belittle and insult others, of course)?

Other than John and Don ****ing on each other's leg, it was actually
pleasant here while Harry was gone,. We had real boat discussions
going on.

Well, you have to admit we've put up with our fair share of you ****ing down Harry's leg!

I don't think it was personal and I do try a modicum of restraint.

Well, I disagree, but I will admit that the personal stuff was all true!

Are you with...
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 8:10 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 6:35:53 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 7:31 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 17:38:57 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/8/16 3:54 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 12:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/8/16 10:36 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/8/2016 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...this guy?

http://tinyurl.com/zwyhe3e


Is Trump a racist?

Well, I guess if you subscribe to contemporary notions of
"political
correctness" and, with the PC rules overruling any
other considerations, yes, he has to be defined as a racist.

However, there are other ways to interpret what he said (and says)
but one has to look outside of the rules of political correctness
to understand or even give consideration to them, something
difficult
to do with most progressives and certainly in the liberal media.

For example, his apparent racism related to referring to the
judge as
being of Mexican heritage may not be based in racism at all. The
Donald's "Trump University" is being sued. The original lead
plaintiff
in the lawsuit requested and was granted removal from being a
plaintiff
in the case. In normal court proceedings, that would be end
end of the
lawsuit. But in this case the judge allowed the suit to
continue under
conditions and rulings made uniquely by him.

Trump has already ****ed off many (or most) Mexicans by
insisting that
he is going to build a wall for which Mexico will pay for.
Trump's
comments about the judge could simply be related to the fact
that the
judge, being of Mexican heritage, may be sympathetic to the
those who
oppose a wall and, according to Trump, is exercising his
sympathy's in a
manner that is not germane to the lawsuit. If so, his comments
can't be
regarded as being "racist".

The media has whipped this whole thing up to where no other
interpretation can be considered. I fully expect Harry to reply
with a four-word post:

"Trump is a racist"


Several key leaders in the GOP have already pointed out Trump's
racism.

Of course they have. It's the politically correct thing to do. The
ones that floor me are the ones who state that Trump is clearly a
racist
however they will continue to support him in the general
election. This
demonstrates clearly how f*&A%Ked up career politicians are and
how bad
our political system has degenerated to.



Trump's base voters and indeed many of the GOP base voters don't see
Trump's racist behavior as a detriment. They also are not offput
by the
rest of Trump's hateful rhetoric.

Is being against illegal immigration 'racism'? Is being against a
Mexican/American judge's opinions
'racism'?



As I have long suspected, you have no understanding. First, the judge
Trump is insulting is not a Mexican American. He is American. Second,
Trump is whining about the judge's recent decision not on the merits of
that decision, per se, but on his belief that the judge cannot
render an
impartial decision because of his Mexican heritage.

You really are an ignorant ****, and you prove it here frequently.

This is funny Harry, you bring up articles to make an attempt to get
an argument going, then you chew out people that disagreed with you
then you attempt to insulot their intelecct and then cuss them out.
Amazing. eh, not really


I am not interested in getting "an argument going" here. That may be
what you think, but it isn't my motivation.

Sure.