On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:28:21 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:

Not my fault that you stupidly provide personal information that should
be kept off line.

Since most of the stuff in your rant was online from public sources I
think the idea of "providing" information is moot.
Privacy is an obsolete idea these days when virtually everything
important about someone is freely available from government web sites
and all it takes is a snippet of information to get started. I know
that when I was looking into buying the house next door (tax deed sale
and a foreclosure), I ended up knowing a lot more about my neighbor
than I needed to know, simply by investigating the title on the house
and using the links at the court clerk's site from the strap number.

On 6/12/2016 12:39 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:28:21 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:

Not my fault that you stupidly provide personal information that should
be kept off line.

Since most of the stuff in your rant was online from public sources I
think the idea of "providing" information is moot.
Privacy is an obsolete idea these days when virtually everything
important about someone is freely available from government web sites
and all it takes is a snippet of information to get started. I know
that when I was looking into buying the house next door (tax deed sale
and a foreclosure), I ended up knowing a lot more about my neighbor
than I needed to know, simply by investigating the title on the house
and using the links at the court clerk's site from the strap number.


Karen's property records don't list Harry as a co owner.
I doubt you could find anything positive about Harry Krause on line.

On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:47:56 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:

Karen's property records don't list Harry as a co owner.
I doubt you could find anything positive about Harry Krause on line.

===

If Harry owned anything in his own name the IRS would be all over it.