The vast majority of boycotts and shaming campaigns that get big enough
to be heard about state-wide or nationally are usually liberals
protesting a conservative organization. And Liberals are generally more
aggressive in their protests.
Example: A Christian Conservative might disapprove of homosexuals. But
the vast majority of those that do are have a mindset of "What you do
with your body is your own business... Just don't flaunt it in my
face." Whereas the majority of liberals have a mindset of "You WILL
approve of homosexuals, you will donate to homosexual causes, and you
will say that Bruce Jenner makes a beautiful woman. If you don't, we
will drive you out of business."
Speaking generically, of course, There are extremist wackos on both
sides, but there are far more liberal wackos than conservative wackos.
I don't know any liberals who want everyone to "approve" of homosexuals,
or donate to homosexual causes, or think Jennier is a beautiful woman.
Who are know are liberals who want gays, transexuals, et cetera, to be
treated in terms of civil rights and access, like everyone else.
Then why do they go out of their way to punish those who don't approve?
As for "access," that's a ridiculous argument. The whole bathroom
debate is just stupid and illustrates my point. Men who live and dress
as women have been using women's restrooms for years, and NOBODY has
cared for the past 20 years. What's changed is now those groups insist
that everybody KNOWS and APPROVES of using those bathrooms.
No tow job...
Threaded Mode
