On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:19:14 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Maybe we should put Palin on the 20. She is certainly the most
influential woman in the last 7 - 8 years.
People like Harry can't go a day without bringing her up.


Palin played a major role in turning the GOP into the party of
obstreperous teabaggin' dumb ****s, and I think it appropriate to give
her credit for her contributions.

So putting her on currency may not be a bad idea? After all what we
call money is just a love letter from the federal reserve,
representing nothing but the paper it is printed on and a promise that
someone will take it.
As of the other day, it was pointed out that the fed created $4.5
Trillion out of thin air to prop up the economy since 2008.
That accounts for 200% of the "growth" we have had in that period.
We printed 4.5 trillion, injected it into the economy and that only
showed up as 2.7 trillion on the bottom line. Typical government
operation. Lose half of your investment and call it a success.

You do make one good point. If the GOP had a luke warm candidate
running it would be easy to run against the last 8 years but they have
nothing going right now.

On 4/21/16 12:45 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:19:14 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Maybe we should put Palin on the 20. She is certainly the most
influential woman in the last 7 - 8 years.
People like Harry can't go a day without bringing her up.


Palin played a major role in turning the GOP into the party of
obstreperous teabaggin' dumb ****s, and I think it appropriate to give
her credit for her contributions.

So putting her on currency may not be a bad idea? After all what we
call money is just a love letter from the federal reserve,
representing nothing but the paper it is printed on and a promise that
someone will take it.
As of the other day, it was pointed out that the fed created $4.5
Trillion out of thin air to prop up the economy since 2008.
That accounts for 200% of the "growth" we have had in that period.
We printed 4.5 trillion, injected it into the economy and that only
showed up as 2.7 trillion on the bottom line. Typical government
operation. Lose half of your investment and call it a success.

You do make one good point. If the GOP had a luke warm candidate
running it would be easy to run against the last 8 years but they have
nothing going right now.


I wouldn't vote for him, but Mitt Romney sure is several rungs up the
evolutionary ladder from the three assholes still in the GOP POTUS
nomination race.

I'm really hoping Trump gets the nomination. He'll insult Hillary and
then she and her minions will eviscerate him, especially in debates
where his intellectual laziness and lack of knowledge will be readily
apparent.

"Your husband Bill was a skirt chaser..."

"Yeah, your third wife liked that about him when she agreed to pose
naked for him after their weekend in the NoTell Motel..."

Next.