| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 3/30/16 9:48 PM, Tim wrote:
On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 7:12:46 PM UTC-5, Alex wrote: I got a great deal in another charity auction. This is a stainless steel Ruger 22/45 Mark III Hunter made in 2007 from the Ruger factory collection. The bonus is that it has an Aimpoint Micro R-1 factory mounted. I think you got a great deal and have a great collection. A great collection of mostly non-collectibles... Ruger has made thousands, maybe tens of thousands of Mark III Hunters. I had one years ago, with a long barrel. It was as good as all the Mark III's, though I think the non 22/45 models handle better. I don't recall what I paid for the pistol when it was new, but it was about $300, maybe a little more, from a high volume dealer. A stock Mark III is a good shooter, but it could use some work to make it a better shooter, the kind of work Volquartsen does. A high end red dot is wasted on these pistols. Most of the Mark III's I see that have a red dot mounted go with the Bushnell TRS-25, which goes on sale frequently for $55 to $75. It's more than good enough for a stock Mark III. |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:06:38 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/30/16 9:48 PM, Tim wrote: On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 7:12:46 PM UTC-5, Alex wrote: I got a great deal in another charity auction. This is a stainless steel Ruger 22/45 Mark III Hunter made in 2007 from the Ruger factory collection. The bonus is that it has an Aimpoint Micro R-1 factory mounted. I think you got a great deal and have a great collection. A great collection of mostly non-collectibles... Ruger has made thousands, maybe tens of thousands of Mark III Hunters. I had one years ago, with a long barrel. It was as good as all the Mark III's, though I think the non 22/45 models handle better. I don't recall what I paid for the pistol when it was new, but it was about $300, maybe a little more, from a high volume dealer. A stock Mark III is a good shooter, but it could use some work to make it a better shooter, the kind of work Volquartsen does. A high end red dot is wasted on these pistols. Most of the Mark III's I see that have a red dot mounted go with the Bushnell TRS-25, which goes on sale frequently for $55 to $75. It's more than good enough for a stock Mark III. That's nice. I have a fender guitar that was produced by the hundreds of thousands, except mine is factory different. it's documented and it's #3 out of only 13 of it's kind in the world. It's worth about as much as my wifes new Honda CRV So... I can appreciate his collection of unused firearms, with documented factory owned (not for sale to the public) pieces. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 20:10:53 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:06:38 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/30/16 9:48 PM, Tim wrote: On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 7:12:46 PM UTC-5, Alex wrote: I got a great deal in another charity auction. This is a stainless steel Ruger 22/45 Mark III Hunter made in 2007 from the Ruger factory collection. The bonus is that it has an Aimpoint Micro R-1 factory mounted. I think you got a great deal and have a great collection. A great collection of mostly non-collectibles... Ruger has made thousands, maybe tens of thousands of Mark III Hunters. I had one years ago, with a long barrel. It was as good as all the Mark III's, though I think the non 22/45 models handle better. I don't recall what I paid for the pistol when it was new, but it was about $300, maybe a little more, from a high volume dealer. A stock Mark III is a good shooter, but it could use some work to make it a better shooter, the kind of work Volquartsen does. A high end red dot is wasted on these pistols. Most of the Mark III's I see that have a red dot mounted go with the Bushnell TRS-25, which goes on sale frequently for $55 to $75. It's more than good enough for a stock Mark III. That's nice. I have a fender guitar that was produced by the hundreds of thousands, except mine is factory different. it's documented and it's #3 out of only 13 of it's kind in the world. It's worth about as much as my wifes new Honda CRV So... I can appreciate his collection of unused firearms, with documented factory owned (not for sale to the public) pieces. === Harry is very proud of his collections also, collections of tax and loan delinquincy notices. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 05:40:55 -0400 (EDT), fire man wrote:
Wrote in message: On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 20:10:53 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:06:38 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/30/16 9:48 PM, Tim wrote: On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 7:12:46 PM UTC-5, Alex wrote: I got a great deal in another charity auction. This is a stainless steel Ruger 22/45 Mark III Hunter made in 2007 from the Ruger factory collection. The bonus is that it has an Aimpoint Micro R-1 factory mounted. I think you got a great deal and have a great collection. A great collection of mostly non-collectibles... Ruger has made thousands, maybe tens of thousands of Mark III Hunters. I had one years ago, with a long barrel. It was as good as all the Mark III's, though I think the non 22/45 models handle better. I don't recall what I paid for the pistol when it was new, but it was about $300, maybe a little more, from a high volume dealer. A stock Mark III is a good shooter, but it could use some work to make it a better shooter, the kind of work Volquartsen does. A high end red dot is wasted on these pistols. Most of the Mark III's I see that have a red dot mounted go with the Bushnell TRS-25, which goes on sale frequently for $55 to $75. It's more than good enough for a stock Mark III. That's nice. I have a fender guitar that was produced by the hundreds of thousands, except mine is factory different. it's documented and it's #3 out of only 13 of it's kind in the world. It's worth about as much as my wifes new Honda CRV So... I can appreciate his collection of unused firearms, with documented factory owned (not for sale to the public) pieces. === Harry is very proud of his collections also, collections of tax and loan delinquincy notices. He's definitely proud of his guns. Why? Anyone with modest resources can duplicate his collection easily. He has them all trigger modified to accommodate his arthritic trigger finger. As for his collection of bad debt, tax delinquencies, foreclosures, and bankruptcies, I have yet to see him make mention even once. And that is strange considering how he is so open about his and the little woman's affairs. Are you sure he's "very proud" of those dubious distinctions? Harry seldom mentions the truth about anything. -- Ban liars, tax cheats, juvenile name-callers, and narcissists...not guns! |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 3/30/16 11:10 PM, Tim wrote:
On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:06:38 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/30/16 9:48 PM, Tim wrote: On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 7:12:46 PM UTC-5, Alex wrote: I got a great deal in another charity auction. This is a stainless steel Ruger 22/45 Mark III Hunter made in 2007 from the Ruger factory collection. The bonus is that it has an Aimpoint Micro R-1 factory mounted. I think you got a great deal and have a great collection. A great collection of mostly non-collectibles... Ruger has made thousands, maybe tens of thousands of Mark III Hunters. I had one years ago, with a long barrel. It was as good as all the Mark III's, though I think the non 22/45 models handle better. I don't recall what I paid for the pistol when it was new, but it was about $300, maybe a little more, from a high volume dealer. A stock Mark III is a good shooter, but it could use some work to make it a better shooter, the kind of work Volquartsen does. A high end red dot is wasted on these pistols. Most of the Mark III's I see that have a red dot mounted go with the Bushnell TRS-25, which goes on sale frequently for $55 to $75. It's more than good enough for a stock Mark III. That's nice. I have a fender guitar that was produced by the hundreds of thousands, except mine is factory different. it's documented and it's #3 out of only 13 of it's kind in the world. It's worth about as much as my wifes new Honda CRV So... I can appreciate his collection of unused firearms, with documented factory owned (not for sale to the public) pieces. Admittedly, I don't read Alex's posts, and only see some of them second or third hand, but I don't recall anything that indicates the Mark III he bought was "factory different." Unless there is something unusual about it, it is just another mass produced .22LR pistol. As I stated, these are fine pistols, usually, but no more unusual or collectible than a Toyota sedan. I can't think of a valid reason why anyone would put a $500 red dot on a stock, production pistol other than there was one kicking around the shop. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 06:14:17 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/30/16 11:10 PM, Tim wrote: On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:06:38 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/30/16 9:48 PM, Tim wrote: On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 7:12:46 PM UTC-5, Alex wrote: I got a great deal in another charity auction. This is a stainless steel Ruger 22/45 Mark III Hunter made in 2007 from the Ruger factory collection. The bonus is that it has an Aimpoint Micro R-1 factory mounted. I think you got a great deal and have a great collection. A great collection of mostly non-collectibles... Ruger has made thousands, maybe tens of thousands of Mark III Hunters. I had one years ago, with a long barrel. It was as good as all the Mark III's, though I think the non 22/45 models handle better. I don't recall what I paid for the pistol when it was new, but it was about $300, maybe a little more, from a high volume dealer. A stock Mark III is a good shooter, but it could use some work to make it a better shooter, the kind of work Volquartsen does. A high end red dot is wasted on these pistols. Most of the Mark III's I see that have a red dot mounted go with the Bushnell TRS-25, which goes on sale frequently for $55 to $75. It's more than good enough for a stock Mark III. That's nice. I have a fender guitar that was produced by the hundreds of thousands, except mine is factory different. it's documented and it's #3 out of only 13 of it's kind in the world. It's worth about as much as my wifes new Honda CRV So... I can appreciate his collection of unused firearms, with documented factory owned (not for sale to the public) pieces. Admittedly, I don't read Alex's posts, ....more Krausesheiße! and only see some of them second or third hand, but I don't recall anything that indicates the Mark III he bought was "factory different." Unless there is something unusual about it, it is just another mass produced .22LR pistol. As I stated, these are fine pistols, usually, but no more unusual or collectible than a Toyota sedan. ***I can't think*** Probably the first bit of truth all day. of a valid reason why anyone would put a $500 red dot on a stock, production pistol other than there was one kicking around the shop. -- Ban liars, tax cheats, juvenile name-callers, and narcissists...not guns! |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thursday, March 31, 2016 at 5:14:19 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/30/16 11:10 PM, Tim wrote: On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:06:38 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/30/16 9:48 PM, Tim wrote: On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 7:12:46 PM UTC-5, Alex wrote: I got a great deal in another charity auction. This is a stainless steel Ruger 22/45 Mark III Hunter made in 2007 from the Ruger factory collection. The bonus is that it has an Aimpoint Micro R-1 factory mounted. I think you got a great deal and have a great collection. A great collection of mostly non-collectibles... Ruger has made thousands, maybe tens of thousands of Mark III Hunters. I had one years ago, with a long barrel. It was as good as all the Mark III's, though I think the non 22/45 models handle better. I don't recall what I paid for the pistol when it was new, but it was about $300, maybe a little more, from a high volume dealer. A stock Mark III is a good shooter, but it could use some work to make it a better shooter, the kind of work Volquartsen does. A high end red dot is wasted on these pistols. Most of the Mark III's I see that have a red dot mounted go with the Bushnell TRS-25, which goes on sale frequently for $55 to $75. It's more than good enough for a stock Mark III. That's nice. I have a fender guitar that was produced by the hundreds of thousands, except mine is factory different. it's documented and it's #3 out of only 13 of it's kind in the world. It's worth about as much as my wifes new Honda CRV So... I can appreciate his collection of unused firearms, with documented factory owned (not for sale to the public) pieces. Admittedly, I don't read Alex's posts, and only see some of them second or third hand, but I don't recall anything that indicates the Mark III he bought was "factory different." Unless there is something unusual about it, it is just another mass produced .22LR pistol. As I stated, these are fine pistols, usually, but no more unusual or collectible than a Toyota sedan. I can't think of a valid reason why anyone would put a $500 red dot on a stock, production pistol other than there was one kicking around the shop. OK, so. why all the criticizing? He has a hobby he enjoys. You criticize him for it. Herring likes to go out to parks in his trailer, and you criticize him for it. Wayne has a very nice boat and he is capable of piloting it to about any open body of water, and you criticize him for it. There was a guy named Dale (fishwisher) who had a hobby of fishing in various lakes for sturgeon. had a great boat and camper. He'd post stories here and you'd criticize him for it. What's the deal, Harry. It seems that it bothers you if someone here happens to enjoy a hobby. really |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 3/31/16 8:05 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, March 31, 2016 at 5:14:19 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/30/16 11:10 PM, Tim wrote: On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:06:38 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/30/16 9:48 PM, Tim wrote: On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 7:12:46 PM UTC-5, Alex wrote: I got a great deal in another charity auction. This is a stainless steel Ruger 22/45 Mark III Hunter made in 2007 from the Ruger factory collection. The bonus is that it has an Aimpoint Micro R-1 factory mounted. I think you got a great deal and have a great collection. A great collection of mostly non-collectibles... Ruger has made thousands, maybe tens of thousands of Mark III Hunters. I had one years ago, with a long barrel. It was as good as all the Mark III's, though I think the non 22/45 models handle better. I don't recall what I paid for the pistol when it was new, but it was about $300, maybe a little more, from a high volume dealer. A stock Mark III is a good shooter, but it could use some work to make it a better shooter, the kind of work Volquartsen does. A high end red dot is wasted on these pistols. Most of the Mark III's I see that have a red dot mounted go with the Bushnell TRS-25, which goes on sale frequently for $55 to $75. It's more than good enough for a stock Mark III. That's nice. I have a fender guitar that was produced by the hundreds of thousands, except mine is factory different. it's documented and it's #3 out of only 13 of it's kind in the world. It's worth about as much as my wifes new Honda CRV So... I can appreciate his collection of unused firearms, with documented factory owned (not for sale to the public) pieces. Admittedly, I don't read Alex's posts, and only see some of them second or third hand, but I don't recall anything that indicates the Mark III he bought was "factory different." Unless there is something unusual about it, it is just another mass produced .22LR pistol. As I stated, these are fine pistols, usually, but no more unusual or collectible than a Toyota sedan. I can't think of a valid reason why anyone would put a $500 red dot on a stock, production pistol other than there was one kicking around the shop. OK, so. why all the criticizing? He has a hobby he enjoys. You criticize him for it. Herring likes to go out to parks in his trailer, and you criticize him for it. Wayne has a very nice boat and he is capable of piloting it to about any open body of water, and you criticize him for it. There was a guy named Dale (fishwisher) who had a hobby of fishing in various lakes for sturgeon. had a great boat and camper. He'd post stories here and you'd criticize him for it. What's the deal, Harry. It seems that it bothers you if someone here happens to enjoy a hobby. really What Alex does, mostly, is take cheap shots here. Herring does the same, and is a racist. Wayne is a pompous asshole. It has to do with their persona, not their hobbies. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
7:15 AMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text - What Alex does, mostly, is take cheap shots here. Herring does the same, and is a racist. Wayne is a pompous asshole. It has to do with their persona, not their hobbies. ....... Honestly Harry, it seems that in here the only hobby you have is to criticize people who aren't democrats, agnostics, or atheists. |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 3/31/16 8:21 AM, Tim wrote:
7:15 AMKeyser Söze - show quoted text - What Alex does, mostly, is take cheap shots here. Herring does the same, and is a racist. Wayne is a pompous asshole. It has to do with their persona, not their hobbies. ...... Honestly Harry, it seems that in here the only hobby you have is to criticize people who aren't democrats, agnostics, or atheists. Actually, Tim, political party or religious beliefs or lack of same have nothing to do with it. I just don't like assholes, and assholishness is what Alex, Herring, W'hine and a few others here have in common. |