On 3/20/16 1:24 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, March 20, 2016 at 12:17:14 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/20/16 1:09 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, March 20, 2016 at 7:27:03 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
from today's NYT:

Republican leaders adamantly opposed to Donald J. Trump's candidacy are
preparing a 100-day campaign to deny him the presidential nomination,
starting with an aggressive battle in Wisconsin's April 5 primary and
extending into the summer, with a delegate-by-delegate lobbying effort
that would cast Mr. Trump as a calamitous choice for the general election.

Recognizing that Mr. Trump has seized a formidable advantage in the
race, they say that an effort to block him would rely on an array of
desperation measures, the political equivalent of guerrilla fighting.

There is no longer room for error or delay, the anti-Trump forces say,
and without a flawlessly executed plan of attack, he could well become
unstoppable.

But should that effort falter, leading conservatives are prepared to
field an independent candidate in the general election, to defend
Republican principles and offer traditional conservatives an alternative
to Mr. Trump's hard-edged populism. They described their plans in
interviews after Mr. Trump's victories last Tuesday in Florida and three
other states.

- - -

Defend Republican principles..."I've got mine, so...**** you."

On a more serious note, this is still hilarious. If Trump gets the
nomination, the Repugnants lose and if the Repugnants keep Trump from
getting the nomination...the Repugnants lose.

LOL! That same article was posted by Fox News Harry. The source you love to hate!

http://nation.foxnews.com/2016/03/20...bid-stop-trump


D'uh. When you are in the news biz, and subscribe to news services, you
can pick up enterprise pieces and run them in your own outlet. Fox, of
course, has a love-hate relationship with Donald Aryan Trump.

Of course, the funny part is that if somebody in here posted the Fox article first, you'd be on them like ugly on an ape!


Right, because I wouldn't have noticed the byline:

By Alexander Burns and Jonathan Martin, NY Times

Mar 20Keyser Söze
- show quoted text -
Right, because I wouldn't have noticed the byline:

By Alexander Burns and Jonathan Martin, NY Times
......

Probably not. You would have seen the "Fox News" badge and shut it right down...

On 3/22/16 10:54 AM, Tim wrote:

Mar 20Keyser Söze
- show quoted text -
Right, because I wouldn't have noticed the byline:

By Alexander Burns and Jonathan Martin, NY Times
.....

Probably not. You would have seen the "Fox News" badge and shut it right down...


You're projecting.

11:11 AMKeyser Söze
- hide quoted text -
On 3/22/16 10:54 AM, Tim wrote:

Mar 20Keyser Söze
- show quoted text -
Right, because I wouldn't have noticed the byline:

By Alexander Burns and Jonathan Martin, NY Times
.....

Probably not. You would have seen the "Fox News" badge and shut it right down...


You're projecting.
.......

You noticed! Nothing you don't do. But good you caught it though...