On 3/16/2016 10:26 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/16/16 10:22 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:06:38 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/15/16 3:44 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:02:52 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/15/16 2:48 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Söze

wrote:

Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your
boy Trump
plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their
crowd does.

Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't
know that
do we?


Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh.

If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you
are more
naive than we thought


You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to
hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your
conspiracy
theory bull****.

I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no
demonstrators?
The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a
Bernie
rally and took over. What is happening now?

Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and
cause
more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days
the
yippie riots.


Breitbart has an opening for you.

That's your reply when you get backed against the wall?

More Krausescheiße, eh Krause?
--


Breitbart has openings...it's staff of conspiracy reporters seems
to be
quitting. Thus, the opening. You probably could get a job there as
men's
room porter.

Even more Krausescheiße, eh Krause?

You must feel rather ****ty when Greg trounces your ass, eh Krause?
--


I take it back...you were an Army puke who learned nothing useful and
therefore could not handle a job as a men's room porter.

You chickened out again, Krause. Answer the question. Calling more
names doesn't make
you look more of a man.
--


Chickened out? Because I wasn't dumb enough to join the Army? Heheheh.
Moron.

You had other options to do your duty. You were too cowardly to take any
of those available to you. As your candidate would say,cackle cackle you
coward.

On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:55:30 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:


Chickened out? Because I wasn't dumb enough to join the Army? Heheheh.
Moron.

You had other options to do your duty. You were too cowardly to take any
of those available to you. As your candidate would say,cackle cackle you
coward.

He is of that hippie culture that said any service to your country was
for suckers. I agree there were plenty of other options. He could have
joined the Peace Corps or the Public Health Service and fulfilled his
military obligations.

On 3/16/16 12:06 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:55:30 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:


Chickened out? Because I wasn't dumb enough to join the Army? Heheheh.
Moron.

You had other options to do your duty. You were too cowardly to take any
of those available to you. As your candidate would say,cackle cackle you
coward.

He is of that hippie culture that said any service to your country was
for suckers. I agree there were plenty of other options. He could have
joined the Peace Corps or the Public Health Service and fulfilled his
military obligations.


You two have jumped the shark. There is nothing in the Constitution that
requires military or any other form of government service or duty, and
therefore there is no requirement, period. There was a Selective Service
requirement, and I complied completely with that. My "draft board" could
have called me up to report, but it didn't.

Some of you fellas "joined up" to avoid being drafted into the Army. My
guess is that FlaJim was socially promoted out of high school, and the
military was his only choice. His comments remind me of those of the few
high school dropouts I knew back in the day.

Your "hippie culture" remark is laughable. I worked within the system to
help pay for college, and I was part of "the system" immediately
afterwards with employment...hardly the choices of a "hippie."

On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:39:23 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

There is nothing in the Constitution that
requires military or any other form of government service or duty, and
therefore there is no requirement, period.

There are plenty of social "obligations" that are not defined in the
constitution. It would have been easy for me to dodge the draft by
hiding in school. I had signed an "intent" letter with the CG when I
was 17 but those are really not binding.
It could be that I took JFKs words to heart "ask what you can do for
your country".

On 3/16/16 12:51 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:39:23 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

There is nothing in the Constitution that
requires military or any other form of government service or duty, and
therefore there is no requirement, period.

There are plenty of social "obligations" that are not defined in the
constitution. It would have been easy for me to dodge the draft by
hiding in school. I had signed an "intent" letter with the CG when I
was 17 but those are really not binding.
It could be that I took JFKs words to heart "ask what you can do for
your country".



I was cognizant of what was going on in SE Asia while I was in college
and immediately after, and felt a social obligation to speak out against
the horrors we were perpetrating there to prop up a brutal dictatorship.
I was working and obtaining a master's degree immediately after college,
and while working at The Star was offered a government position that
would have fulfilled a social obligation (agricultural assistance to
farmers) in Vietnam, but by the time I was trained and ready, the
position had been discontinued.

On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:58:34 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/16/16 12:51 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:39:23 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

There is nothing in the Constitution that
requires military or any other form of government service or duty, and
therefore there is no requirement, period.

There are plenty of social "obligations" that are not defined in the
constitution. It would have been easy for me to dodge the draft by
hiding in school. I had signed an "intent" letter with the CG when I
was 17 but those are really not binding.
It could be that I took JFKs words to heart "ask what you can do for
your country".



I was cognizant of what was going on in SE Asia while I was in college
and immediately after, and felt a social obligation to speak out against
the horrors we were perpetrating there to prop up a brutal dictatorship.
I was working and obtaining a master's degree immediately after college,
and while working at The Star was offered a government position that
would have fulfilled a social obligation (agricultural assistance to
farmers) in Vietnam, but by the time I was trained and ready, the
position had been discontinued.

Gosh, all that speaking out and you still volunteered to perform your 'Vietnam
service', if you can be believed, which you can't.

'Agricultural assistance to farmers'? You knew more than the farmers? Or were you
going to simply fertilize the Kansas wheat fields with your Krausescheiße?
--

Ban liars, tax cheats, idiots, audiophools, and narcissists...not guns!

On 3/16/16 2:03 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:58:34 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/16/16 12:51 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:39:23 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

There is nothing in the Constitution that
requires military or any other form of government service or duty, and
therefore there is no requirement, period.

There are plenty of social "obligations" that are not defined in the
constitution. It would have been easy for me to dodge the draft by
hiding in school. I had signed an "intent" letter with the CG when I
was 17 but those are really not binding.
It could be that I took JFKs words to heart "ask what you can do for
your country".



I was cognizant of what was going on in SE Asia while I was in college
and immediately after, and felt a social obligation to speak out against
the horrors we were perpetrating there to prop up a brutal dictatorship.
I was working and obtaining a master's degree immediately after college,
and while working at The Star was offered a government position that
would have fulfilled a social obligation (agricultural assistance to
farmers) in Vietnam, but by the time I was trained and ready, the
position had been discontinued.

Gosh, all that speaking out and you still volunteered to perform your 'Vietnam
service', if you can be believed, which you can't.

'Agricultural assistance to farmers'? You knew more than the farmers? Or were you
going to simply fertilize the Kansas wheat fields with your Krausescheiße?
--


As I have stated here several times, I was "recruited" to become a
federal employee and participate as a publicist to build support about
several agricultural "pacification programs" aimed at helping
small-scale farmers in Vietnam become more productive. Thus, while you
were blowing up villages, women, and children, I was involved in
programs to help better feed the populace and increase the meager income
of farmers.

See...even back then, you were a piece of ****.

On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:58:34 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/16/16 12:51 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:39:23 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

There is nothing in the Constitution that
requires military or any other form of government service or duty, and
therefore there is no requirement, period.

There are plenty of social "obligations" that are not defined in the
constitution. It would have been easy for me to dodge the draft by
hiding in school. I had signed an "intent" letter with the CG when I
was 17 but those are really not binding.
It could be that I took JFKs words to heart "ask what you can do for
your country".



I was cognizant of what was going on in SE Asia while I was in college
and immediately after, and felt a social obligation to speak out against
the horrors we were perpetrating there to prop up a brutal dictatorship.
I was working and obtaining a master's degree immediately after college,
and while working at The Star was offered a government position that
would have fulfilled a social obligation (agricultural assistance to
farmers) in Vietnam, but by the time I was trained and ready, the
position had been discontinued.

I had already enlisted before most people even knew where Vietnam was.
After all it was a place where LBJ had just said we would never send
"American boys". Dodging the draft was not really much of an issue
because few actually got drafted and if you did, the worst thing that
would happen is you would be sent to New Jersey.

On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:54:59 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:58:34 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/16/16 12:51 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:39:23 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

There is nothing in the Constitution that
requires military or any other form of government service or duty, and
therefore there is no requirement, period.

There are plenty of social "obligations" that are not defined in the
constitution. It would have been easy for me to dodge the draft by
hiding in school. I had signed an "intent" letter with the CG when I
was 17 but those are really not binding.
It could be that I took JFKs words to heart "ask what you can do for
your country".



I was cognizant of what was going on in SE Asia while I was in college
and immediately after, and felt a social obligation to speak out against
the horrors we were perpetrating there to prop up a brutal dictatorship.
I was working and obtaining a master's degree immediately after college,
and while working at The Star was offered a government position that
would have fulfilled a social obligation (agricultural assistance to
farmers) in Vietnam, but by the time I was trained and ready, the
position had been discontinued.

I had already enlisted before most people even knew where Vietnam was.
After all it was a place where LBJ had just said we would never send
"American boys". Dodging the draft was not really much of an issue
because few actually got drafted and if you did, the worst thing that
would happen is you would be sent to New Jersey.

When was this?
--

Ban liars, tax cheats, idiots, audiophools, and narcissists...not guns!

On 3/16/16 2:54 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:58:34 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/16/16 12:51 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:39:23 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

There is nothing in the Constitution that
requires military or any other form of government service or duty, and
therefore there is no requirement, period.

There are plenty of social "obligations" that are not defined in the
constitution. It would have been easy for me to dodge the draft by
hiding in school. I had signed an "intent" letter with the CG when I
was 17 but those are really not binding.
It could be that I took JFKs words to heart "ask what you can do for
your country".



I was cognizant of what was going on in SE Asia while I was in college
and immediately after, and felt a social obligation to speak out against
the horrors we were perpetrating there to prop up a brutal dictatorship.
I was working and obtaining a master's degree immediately after college,
and while working at The Star was offered a government position that
would have fulfilled a social obligation (agricultural assistance to
farmers) in Vietnam, but by the time I was trained and ready, the
position had been discontinued.

I had already enlisted before most people even knew where Vietnam was.
After all it was a place where LBJ had just said we would never send
"American boys". Dodging the draft was not really much of an issue
because few actually got drafted and if you did, the worst thing that
would happen is you would be sent to New Jersey.


I was in college full time and working full time until the late 1960s.