On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:05:40 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 3:24 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump
plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does.

Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that
do we?


Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh.

If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more
naive than we thought


You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to
hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your conspiracy
theory bull****.

I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no demonstrators?
The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a Bernie
rally and took over. What is happening now?

Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and cause
more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days the
yippie riots.


Breitbart has an opening for you.

Brain fart

Are you really trying to tell us there are no protests at a Hillary
rally? If not then who are the disrupters?
If the GOP protesters are so non confrontive and non violent that it
is not even newsworthy, then I rest my case.


No, Breitbart has openings for conspiracy believers like you. You have
evidence "the networks" are choosing not to show demonstrations at
Hillary/Bernie rallies? You have evidence Bernie/Hillary are threatening
demonstrators and urging the crowds to take them out? That's what I am
commenting upon, not your conspiracies to hide the news or whatever the
point is you are not making.

If I believe you I am left to believe there are no protests at hillary
rallies and certainly no violent protests. Isn't that complimenting
the civility of the GOP protesters?

The reality is there have only been a handful of violent incidents at
trump rallies and in at least one, it was a black guy throwing a major
league punch at a trump guy.

On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:06:38 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


I take it back...you were an Army puke who learned nothing useful and
therefore could not handle a job as a men's room porter.

It is interesting that we can only call your responses "trump like".
(non-responsive and vicious)
I still believe that if trump was running as a democrat, insulting
republicans, he would be your guy.

On 3/15/16 5:35 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:05:40 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 3:24 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump
plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does.

Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that
do we?


Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh.

If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more
naive than we thought


You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to
hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your conspiracy
theory bull****.

I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no demonstrators?
The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a Bernie
rally and took over. What is happening now?

Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and cause
more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days the
yippie riots.


Breitbart has an opening for you.

Brain fart

Are you really trying to tell us there are no protests at a Hillary
rally? If not then who are the disrupters?
If the GOP protesters are so non confrontive and non violent that it
is not even newsworthy, then I rest my case.


No, Breitbart has openings for conspiracy believers like you. You have
evidence "the networks" are choosing not to show demonstrations at
Hillary/Bernie rallies? You have evidence Bernie/Hillary are threatening
demonstrators and urging the crowds to take them out? That's what I am
commenting upon, not your conspiracies to hide the news or whatever the
point is you are not making.

If I believe you I am left to believe there are no protests at hillary
rallies and certainly no violent protests. Isn't that complimenting
the civility of the GOP protesters?

The reality is there have only been a handful of violent incidents at
trump rallies and in at least one, it was a black guy throwing a major
league punch at a trump guy.



The reality is, Trump has been urging those who attend his rallies to
beat up demonstrators and at least once he said he would pay the legal
bills. That's the reality of Donald the Fascist.

I haven't heard of Hillary or Bernie urging their crowds to beat up
demonstrators.

I am sure there are demonstrators at virtually all these events. It is
Trump and Trump alone so far who has been exhorting violence on the
demonstrators.

And that was the point.

Got it?

On 3/15/16 5:38 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:06:38 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


I take it back...you were an Army puke who learned nothing useful and
therefore could not handle a job as a men's room porter.

It is interesting that we can only call your responses "trump like".
(non-responsive and vicious)
I still believe that if trump was running as a democrat, insulting
republicans, he would be your guy.



And you would be as wrong as you usually are.

As for Herring4Trump, he's demonstrated his racism any number of times.
**** him.

wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:47:46 -0400 (EDT), fire man
wrote:


Yawn. Your points are as blunt as a pencil eraser. Do you really
think folks regard you as a serious thinker?

Harry has the same problem as the TV networks. Trump was just a joke
to them and they all built him up to pump up their ratings. Now that
he actually looks viable they are scared ****less.
Harry thought it would be a hoot for hillary to run against him, now
it may not be so funny.
No matter who wins, I expect 4 more years of totally disfunctional
government.


I'm conflicted. I have no doubt Hillary will win the general, but I fret
for the country when the other major party has Trump or maybe Cruz as its
FRONTRUNNER.
Maybe Hillary will cross party lines and pick kasich as her running mate.
That'll just bury the GOP and leave the carcass for the evangelicals to
form a Jesus party.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 20:48:03 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:47:46 -0400 (EDT), fire man
wrote:


Yawn. Your points are as blunt as a pencil eraser. Do you really
think folks regard you as a serious thinker?

Harry has the same problem as the TV networks. Trump was just a joke
to them and they all built him up to pump up their ratings. Now that
he actually looks viable they are scared ****less.
Harry thought it would be a hoot for hillary to run against him, now
it may not be so funny.
No matter who wins, I expect 4 more years of totally disfunctional
government.


I'm conflicted. I have no doubt Hillary will win the general, but I fret
for the country when the other major party has Trump or maybe Cruz as its
FRONTRUNNER.
Maybe Hillary will cross party lines and pick kasich as her running mate.
That'll just bury the GOP and leave the carcass for the evangelicals to
form a Jesus party.

This is going to be a tough summer. The talking heads are saying Trump
probably will not have enough delegates for a slam dunk at the
convention and they are already speculating about what rule changes
they will make to bury him. I am not sure who will come out on top or
who will win in November but I am sure America will be the loser.
I see 4 more years of a divided country and gridlock.

There is more than a small chance that we will be in recession again
by 2017, never really recovered from the last one.

My gas price prediction is looking more accurate every day. Even
without an incident in the middle east, prices are going back up.

On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:06:38 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/15/16 3:44 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:02:52 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/15/16 2:48 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump
plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does.

Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that
do we?


Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh.

If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more
naive than we thought


You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to
hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your conspiracy
theory bull****.

I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no demonstrators?
The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a Bernie
rally and took over. What is happening now?

Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and cause
more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days the
yippie riots.


Breitbart has an opening for you.

That's your reply when you get backed against the wall?

More Krausescheiße, eh Krause?
--


Breitbart has openings...it's staff of conspiracy reporters seems to be
quitting. Thus, the opening. You probably could get a job there as men's
room porter.

Even more Krausescheiße, eh Krause?

You must feel rather ****ty when Greg trounces your ass, eh Krause?
--


I take it back...you were an Army puke who learned nothing useful and
therefore could not handle a job as a men's room porter.

You chickened out again, Krause. Answer the question. Calling more names doesn't make
you look more of a man.
--

Ban liars, tax cheats, idiots, audiophools, and narcissists...not guns!

On 3/16/16 10:22 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:06:38 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/15/16 3:44 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:02:52 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/15/16 2:48 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump
plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does.

Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that
do we?


Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh.

If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more
naive than we thought


You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to
hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your conspiracy
theory bull****.

I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no demonstrators?
The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a Bernie
rally and took over. What is happening now?

Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and cause
more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days the
yippie riots.


Breitbart has an opening for you.

That's your reply when you get backed against the wall?

More Krausescheiße, eh Krause?
--


Breitbart has openings...it's staff of conspiracy reporters seems to be
quitting. Thus, the opening. You probably could get a job there as men's
room porter.

Even more Krausescheiße, eh Krause?

You must feel rather ****ty when Greg trounces your ass, eh Krause?
--


I take it back...you were an Army puke who learned nothing useful and
therefore could not handle a job as a men's room porter.

You chickened out again, Krause. Answer the question. Calling more names doesn't make
you look more of a man.
--


Chickened out? Because I wasn't dumb enough to join the Army? Heheheh.
Moron.

On 3/16/2016 10:26 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/16/16 10:22 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:06:38 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/15/16 3:44 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:02:52 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/15/16 2:48 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Söze

wrote:

Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your
boy Trump
plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their
crowd does.

Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't
know that
do we?


Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh.

If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you
are more
naive than we thought


You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to
hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your
conspiracy
theory bull****.

I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no
demonstrators?
The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a
Bernie
rally and took over. What is happening now?

Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and
cause
more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days
the
yippie riots.


Breitbart has an opening for you.

That's your reply when you get backed against the wall?

More Krausescheiße, eh Krause?
--


Breitbart has openings...it's staff of conspiracy reporters seems
to be
quitting. Thus, the opening. You probably could get a job there as
men's
room porter.

Even more Krausescheiße, eh Krause?

You must feel rather ****ty when Greg trounces your ass, eh Krause?
--


I take it back...you were an Army puke who learned nothing useful and
therefore could not handle a job as a men's room porter.

You chickened out again, Krause. Answer the question. Calling more
names doesn't make
you look more of a man.
--


Chickened out? Because I wasn't dumb enough to join the Army? Heheheh.
Moron.

You had other options to do your duty. You were too cowardly to take any
of those available to you. As your candidate would say,cackle cackle you
coward.

On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:55:30 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:


Chickened out? Because I wasn't dumb enough to join the Army? Heheheh.
Moron.

You had other options to do your duty. You were too cowardly to take any
of those available to you. As your candidate would say,cackle cackle you
coward.

He is of that hippie culture that said any service to your country was
for suckers. I agree there were plenty of other options. He could have
joined the Peace Corps or the Public Health Service and fulfilled his
military obligations.