On 3/15/16 3:44 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:02:52 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/15/16 2:48 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump
plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does.

Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that
do we?


Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh.

If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more
naive than we thought


You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to
hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your conspiracy
theory bull****.

I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no demonstrators?
The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a Bernie
rally and took over. What is happening now?

Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and cause
more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days the
yippie riots.


Breitbart has an opening for you.

That's your reply when you get backed against the wall?

More Krausescheiße, eh Krause?
--


Breitbart has openings...it's staff of conspiracy reporters seems to be
quitting. Thus, the opening. You probably could get a job there as men's
room porter.

Even more Krausescheiße, eh Krause?

You must feel rather ****ty when Greg trounces your ass, eh Krause?
--


I take it back...you were an Army puke who learned nothing useful and
therefore could not handle a job as a men's room porter.

On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:06:38 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


I take it back...you were an Army puke who learned nothing useful and
therefore could not handle a job as a men's room porter.

It is interesting that we can only call your responses "trump like".
(non-responsive and vicious)
I still believe that if trump was running as a democrat, insulting
republicans, he would be your guy.

On 3/15/16 5:38 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:06:38 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


I take it back...you were an Army puke who learned nothing useful and
therefore could not handle a job as a men's room porter.

It is interesting that we can only call your responses "trump like".
(non-responsive and vicious)
I still believe that if trump was running as a democrat, insulting
republicans, he would be your guy.



And you would be as wrong as you usually are.

As for Herring4Trump, he's demonstrated his racism any number of times.
**** him.

On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:44:40 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/15/16 5:38 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:06:38 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


I take it back...you were an Army puke who learned nothing useful and
therefore could not handle a job as a men's room porter.

It is interesting that we can only call your responses "trump like".
(non-responsive and vicious)
I still believe that if trump was running as a democrat, insulting
republicans, he would be your guy.



And you would be as wrong as you usually are.

As for Herring4Trump, he's demonstrated his racism any number of times.
**** him.

I don't think Greg mentioned me. But I can see you've used up about everything else
you had. Better fall back on name-calling.
--

Ban liars, tax cheats, idiots, audiophools, and narcissists...not guns!

On 3/16/16 1:38 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:44:40 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/15/16 5:38 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:06:38 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


I take it back...you were an Army puke who learned nothing useful and
therefore could not handle a job as a men's room porter.

It is interesting that we can only call your responses "trump like".
(non-responsive and vicious)
I still believe that if trump was running as a democrat, insulting
republicans, he would be your guy.



And you would be as wrong as you usually are.

As for Herring4Trump, he's demonstrated his racism any number of times.
**** him.

I don't think Greg mentioned me. But I can see you've used up about everything else
you had. Better fall back on name-calling.
--

It doesn't matter whether Greg mentions you, Johnny4Trump. He's not in
control of rec.boats, neither am I, and, most assuredly, neither are you?

Don't like it? Go **** a golf club.

On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:06:38 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/15/16 3:44 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:02:52 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/15/16 2:48 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump
plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does.

Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that
do we?


Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh.

If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more
naive than we thought


You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to
hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your conspiracy
theory bull****.

I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no demonstrators?
The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a Bernie
rally and took over. What is happening now?

Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and cause
more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days the
yippie riots.


Breitbart has an opening for you.

That's your reply when you get backed against the wall?

More Krausescheiße, eh Krause?
--


Breitbart has openings...it's staff of conspiracy reporters seems to be
quitting. Thus, the opening. You probably could get a job there as men's
room porter.

Even more Krausescheiße, eh Krause?

You must feel rather ****ty when Greg trounces your ass, eh Krause?
--


I take it back...you were an Army puke who learned nothing useful and
therefore could not handle a job as a men's room porter.

You chickened out again, Krause. Answer the question. Calling more names doesn't make
you look more of a man.
--

Ban liars, tax cheats, idiots, audiophools, and narcissists...not guns!

On 3/16/16 10:22 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:06:38 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/15/16 3:44 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:02:52 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/15/16 2:48 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump
plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does.

Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that
do we?


Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh.

If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more
naive than we thought


You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to
hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your conspiracy
theory bull****.

I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no demonstrators?
The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a Bernie
rally and took over. What is happening now?

Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and cause
more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days the
yippie riots.


Breitbart has an opening for you.

That's your reply when you get backed against the wall?

More Krausescheiße, eh Krause?
--


Breitbart has openings...it's staff of conspiracy reporters seems to be
quitting. Thus, the opening. You probably could get a job there as men's
room porter.

Even more Krausescheiße, eh Krause?

You must feel rather ****ty when Greg trounces your ass, eh Krause?
--


I take it back...you were an Army puke who learned nothing useful and
therefore could not handle a job as a men's room porter.

You chickened out again, Krause. Answer the question. Calling more names doesn't make
you look more of a man.
--


Chickened out? Because I wasn't dumb enough to join the Army? Heheheh.
Moron.

On 3/16/2016 10:26 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/16/16 10:22 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:06:38 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/15/16 3:44 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:02:52 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/15/16 2:48 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Söze

wrote:

Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your
boy Trump
plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their
crowd does.

Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't
know that
do we?


Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh.

If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you
are more
naive than we thought


You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to
hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your
conspiracy
theory bull****.

I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no
demonstrators?
The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a
Bernie
rally and took over. What is happening now?

Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and
cause
more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days
the
yippie riots.


Breitbart has an opening for you.

That's your reply when you get backed against the wall?

More Krausescheiße, eh Krause?
--


Breitbart has openings...it's staff of conspiracy reporters seems
to be
quitting. Thus, the opening. You probably could get a job there as
men's
room porter.

Even more Krausescheiße, eh Krause?

You must feel rather ****ty when Greg trounces your ass, eh Krause?
--


I take it back...you were an Army puke who learned nothing useful and
therefore could not handle a job as a men's room porter.

You chickened out again, Krause. Answer the question. Calling more
names doesn't make
you look more of a man.
--


Chickened out? Because I wasn't dumb enough to join the Army? Heheheh.
Moron.

You had other options to do your duty. You were too cowardly to take any
of those available to you. As your candidate would say,cackle cackle you
coward.

On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:55:30 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:


Chickened out? Because I wasn't dumb enough to join the Army? Heheheh.
Moron.

You had other options to do your duty. You were too cowardly to take any
of those available to you. As your candidate would say,cackle cackle you
coward.

He is of that hippie culture that said any service to your country was
for suckers. I agree there were plenty of other options. He could have
joined the Peace Corps or the Public Health Service and fulfilled his
military obligations.

On 3/16/16 12:06 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:55:30 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:


Chickened out? Because I wasn't dumb enough to join the Army? Heheheh.
Moron.

You had other options to do your duty. You were too cowardly to take any
of those available to you. As your candidate would say,cackle cackle you
coward.

He is of that hippie culture that said any service to your country was
for suckers. I agree there were plenty of other options. He could have
joined the Peace Corps or the Public Health Service and fulfilled his
military obligations.


You two have jumped the shark. There is nothing in the Constitution that
requires military or any other form of government service or duty, and
therefore there is no requirement, period. There was a Selective Service
requirement, and I complied completely with that. My "draft board" could
have called me up to report, but it didn't.

Some of you fellas "joined up" to avoid being drafted into the Army. My
guess is that FlaJim was socially promoted out of high school, and the
military was his only choice. His comments remind me of those of the few
high school dropouts I knew back in the day.

Your "hippie culture" remark is laughable. I worked within the system to
help pay for college, and I was part of "the system" immediately
afterwards with employment...hardly the choices of a "hippie."