Brown shirts for all!
 

On 3/16/16 12:06 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:55:30 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:


Chickened out? Because I wasn't dumb enough to join the Army? Heheheh.
Moron.

You had other options to do your duty. You were too cowardly to take any
of those available to you. As your candidate would say,cackle cackle you
coward.

He is of that hippie culture that said any service to your country was
for suckers. I agree there were plenty of other options. He could have
joined the Peace Corps or the Public Health Service and fulfilled his
military obligations.


You two have jumped the shark. There is nothing in the Constitution that
requires military or any other form of government service or duty, and
therefore there is no requirement, period. There was a Selective Service
requirement, and I complied completely with that. My "draft board" could
have called me up to report, but it didn't.

Some of you fellas "joined up" to avoid being drafted into the Army. My
guess is that FlaJim was socially promoted out of high school, and the
military was his only choice. His comments remind me of those of the few
high school dropouts I knew back in the day.

Your "hippie culture" remark is laughable. I worked within the system to
help pay for college, and I was part of "the system" immediately
afterwards with employment...hardly the choices of a "hippie."

Brown shirts for all!
 

On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:39:23 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

There is nothing in the Constitution that
requires military or any other form of government service or duty, and
therefore there is no requirement, period.

There are plenty of social "obligations" that are not defined in the
constitution. It would have been easy for me to dodge the draft by
hiding in school. I had signed an "intent" letter with the CG when I
was 17 but those are really not binding.
It could be that I took JFKs words to heart "ask what you can do for
your country".

Brown shirts for all!
 

On 3/16/16 12:51 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:39:23 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

There is nothing in the Constitution that
requires military or any other form of government service or duty, and
therefore there is no requirement, period.

There are plenty of social "obligations" that are not defined in the
constitution. It would have been easy for me to dodge the draft by
hiding in school. I had signed an "intent" letter with the CG when I
was 17 but those are really not binding.
It could be that I took JFKs words to heart "ask what you can do for
your country".



I was cognizant of what was going on in SE Asia while I was in college
and immediately after, and felt a social obligation to speak out against
the horrors we were perpetrating there to prop up a brutal dictatorship.
I was working and obtaining a master's degree immediately after college,
and while working at The Star was offered a government position that
would have fulfilled a social obligation (agricultural assistance to
farmers) in Vietnam, but by the time I was trained and ready, the
position had been discontinued.

Brown shirts for all!
 

On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:44:40 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/15/16 5:38 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:06:38 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


I take it back...you were an Army puke who learned nothing useful and
therefore could not handle a job as a men's room porter.

It is interesting that we can only call your responses "trump like".
(non-responsive and vicious)
I still believe that if trump was running as a democrat, insulting
republicans, he would be your guy.



And you would be as wrong as you usually are.

As for Herring4Trump, he's demonstrated his racism any number of times.
**** him.

I don't think Greg mentioned me. But I can see you've used up about everything else
you had. Better fall back on name-calling.
--

Ban liars, tax cheats, idiots, audiophools, and narcissists...not guns!

Brown shirts for all!
 

On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:27:38 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/15/16 5:24 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:00:58 -0700 (PDT), Its Me
wrote:


You remember the story I linked about the "protester" that Hilly had bumped from her rally, don't you? The one with the scary postcard-sized sign?

Yup she sicced the secret service on him, like he was going to cause
some serious paper cuts with his ripped up sign.
Dallas BTW if you are keeping score. Maybe democrats are a little more
nervous there ;-)



Did she exhort the crowd to beat him up as Trump has done? Did she offer
to pay the legal bills for assaulting a demonstrator, as Trump has done?

No?

Didn't think so.


She's cheap.
--

Ban liars, tax cheats, idiots, audiophools, and narcissists...not guns!

Brown shirts for all!
 

On 3/16/16 1:38 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:44:40 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/15/16 5:38 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:06:38 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


I take it back...you were an Army puke who learned nothing useful and
therefore could not handle a job as a men's room porter.

It is interesting that we can only call your responses "trump like".
(non-responsive and vicious)
I still believe that if trump was running as a democrat, insulting
republicans, he would be your guy.



And you would be as wrong as you usually are.

As for Herring4Trump, he's demonstrated his racism any number of times.
**** him.

I don't think Greg mentioned me. But I can see you've used up about everything else
you had. Better fall back on name-calling.
--

It doesn't matter whether Greg mentions you, Johnny4Trump. He's not in
control of rec.boats, neither am I, and, most assuredly, neither are you?

Don't like it? Go **** a golf club.

Brown shirts for all!
 

On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:43:03 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/15/16 5:35 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:05:40 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 3:24 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump
plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does.

Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that
do we?


Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh.

If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more
naive than we thought


You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to
hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your conspiracy
theory bull****.

I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no demonstrators?
The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a Bernie
rally and took over. What is happening now?

Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and cause
more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days the
yippie riots.


Breitbart has an opening for you.

Brain fart

Are you really trying to tell us there are no protests at a Hillary
rally? If not then who are the disrupters?
If the GOP protesters are so non confrontive and non violent that it
is not even newsworthy, then I rest my case.


No, Breitbart has openings for conspiracy believers like you. You have
evidence "the networks" are choosing not to show demonstrations at
Hillary/Bernie rallies? You have evidence Bernie/Hillary are threatening
demonstrators and urging the crowds to take them out? That's what I am
commenting upon, not your conspiracies to hide the news or whatever the
point is you are not making.

If I believe you I am left to believe there are no protests at hillary
rallies and certainly no violent protests. Isn't that complimenting
the civility of the GOP protesters?

The reality is there have only been a handful of violent incidents at
trump rallies and in at least one, it was a black guy throwing a major
league punch at a trump guy.



The reality is, Trump has been urging those who attend his rallies to
beat up demonstrators and at least once he said he would pay the legal
bills. That's the reality of Donald the Fascist.

I haven't heard of Hillary or Bernie urging their crowds to beat up
demonstrators.

I am sure there are demonstrators at virtually all these events. It is
Trump and Trump alone so far who has been exhorting violence on the
demonstrators.

And that was the point.

Got it?


Site? Was he maybe telling supporters to beat up anyone who initiated an assault?

Or are you just continuing your spread of Krausescheiße?
--

Ban liars, tax cheats, idiots, audiophools, and narcissists...not guns!

Brown shirts for all!
 

On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:58:34 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/16/16 12:51 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:39:23 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

There is nothing in the Constitution that
requires military or any other form of government service or duty, and
therefore there is no requirement, period.

There are plenty of social "obligations" that are not defined in the
constitution. It would have been easy for me to dodge the draft by
hiding in school. I had signed an "intent" letter with the CG when I
was 17 but those are really not binding.
It could be that I took JFKs words to heart "ask what you can do for
your country".



I was cognizant of what was going on in SE Asia while I was in college
and immediately after, and felt a social obligation to speak out against
the horrors we were perpetrating there to prop up a brutal dictatorship.
I was working and obtaining a master's degree immediately after college,
and while working at The Star was offered a government position that
would have fulfilled a social obligation (agricultural assistance to
farmers) in Vietnam, but by the time I was trained and ready, the
position had been discontinued.

Gosh, all that speaking out and you still volunteered to perform your 'Vietnam
service', if you can be believed, which you can't.

'Agricultural assistance to farmers'? You knew more than the farmers? Or were you
going to simply fertilize the Kansas wheat fields with your Krausescheiße?
--

Ban liars, tax cheats, idiots, audiophools, and narcissists...not guns!

Brown shirts for all!
 

On 3/16/16 1:56 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:43:03 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/15/16 5:35 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:05:40 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 3:24 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump
plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does.

Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that
do we?


Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh.

If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more
naive than we thought


You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to
hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your conspiracy
theory bull****.

I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no demonstrators?
The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a Bernie
rally and took over. What is happening now?

Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and cause
more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days the
yippie riots.


Breitbart has an opening for you.

Brain fart

Are you really trying to tell us there are no protests at a Hillary
rally? If not then who are the disrupters?
If the GOP protesters are so non confrontive and non violent that it
is not even newsworthy, then I rest my case.


No, Breitbart has openings for conspiracy believers like you. You have
evidence "the networks" are choosing not to show demonstrations at
Hillary/Bernie rallies? You have evidence Bernie/Hillary are threatening
demonstrators and urging the crowds to take them out? That's what I am
commenting upon, not your conspiracies to hide the news or whatever the
point is you are not making.

If I believe you I am left to believe there are no protests at hillary
rallies and certainly no violent protests. Isn't that complimenting
the civility of the GOP protesters?

The reality is there have only been a handful of violent incidents at
trump rallies and in at least one, it was a black guy throwing a major
league punch at a trump guy.



The reality is, Trump has been urging those who attend his rallies to
beat up demonstrators and at least once he said he would pay the legal
bills. That's the reality of Donald the Fascist.

I haven't heard of Hillary or Bernie urging their crowds to beat up
demonstrators.

I am sure there are demonstrators at virtually all these events. It is
Trump and Trump alone so far who has been exhorting violence on the
demonstrators.

And that was the point.

Got it?


Site? Was he maybe telling supporters to beat up anyone who initiated an assault?

Or are you just continuing your spread of Krausescheiße?
--


It's been all over the news for days, even on Faux News.

It's not my fault if, as usual, you are misinformed and uninformed.
That's possibly why you'll be voting for Trump in the general, eh?

Brown shirts for all!
 

On 3/16/16 2:03 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:58:34 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/16/16 12:51 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:39:23 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

There is nothing in the Constitution that
requires military or any other form of government service or duty, and
therefore there is no requirement, period.

There are plenty of social "obligations" that are not defined in the
constitution. It would have been easy for me to dodge the draft by
hiding in school. I had signed an "intent" letter with the CG when I
was 17 but those are really not binding.
It could be that I took JFKs words to heart "ask what you can do for
your country".



I was cognizant of what was going on in SE Asia while I was in college
and immediately after, and felt a social obligation to speak out against
the horrors we were perpetrating there to prop up a brutal dictatorship.
I was working and obtaining a master's degree immediately after college,
and while working at The Star was offered a government position that
would have fulfilled a social obligation (agricultural assistance to
farmers) in Vietnam, but by the time I was trained and ready, the
position had been discontinued.

Gosh, all that speaking out and you still volunteered to perform your 'Vietnam
service', if you can be believed, which you can't.

'Agricultural assistance to farmers'? You knew more than the farmers? Or were you
going to simply fertilize the Kansas wheat fields with your Krausescheiße?
--


As I have stated here several times, I was "recruited" to become a
federal employee and participate as a publicist to build support about
several agricultural "pacification programs" aimed at helping
small-scale farmers in Vietnam become more productive. Thus, while you
were blowing up villages, women, and children, I was involved in
programs to help better feed the populace and increase the meager income
of farmers.

See...even back then, you were a piece of ****.