On 2/29/2016 10:17 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 9:10:44 AM UTC-6, wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:53:38 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

Sort of flies in the face of claims that they only want "reasonable"
gun laws.
What makes a Kimber any worse than any other .45 pistol?


They either don't pass the MA safety tests, meet the AG requirements or
Kimber refuses to submit any to the state for compliance testing.

===

My guess is the latter. Kimber can already sell everything they make
so why waste production assets on stupid states with stupid rules.

I was thinking the same thing. Kimber has high sales volume and I can't see them making a 'special' model to satisfy an angry state's resterictions just to sell a few.



Good thing I am not a "gun nut", huh? :-)

On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 9:20:00 AM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/29/2016 10:17 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 9:10:44 AM UTC-6, wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:53:38 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

Sort of flies in the face of claims that they only want "reasonable"
gun laws.
What makes a Kimber any worse than any other .45 pistol?


They either don't pass the MA safety tests, meet the AG requirements or
Kimber refuses to submit any to the state for compliance testing.

===

My guess is the latter. Kimber can already sell everything they make
so why waste production assets on stupid states with stupid rules.

I was thinking the same thing. Kimber has high sales volume and I can't see them making a 'special' model to satisfy an angry state's resterictions just to sell a few.



Good thing I am not a "gun nut", huh? :-)

Yes Richard, that's wise. You should leave the gun nutting up to us professionals. LOL

On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 04:14:10 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 9:20:00 AM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/29/2016 10:17 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 9:10:44 AM UTC-6, wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:53:38 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

Sort of flies in the face of claims that they only want "reasonable"
gun laws.
What makes a Kimber any worse than any other .45 pistol?


They either don't pass the MA safety tests, meet the AG requirements or
Kimber refuses to submit any to the state for compliance testing.

===

My guess is the latter. Kimber can already sell everything they make
so why waste production assets on stupid states with stupid rules.

I was thinking the same thing. Kimber has high sales volume and I can't see them making a 'special' model to satisfy an angry state's resterictions just to sell a few.



Good thing I am not a "gun nut", huh? :-)

Yes Richard, that's wise. You should leave the gun nutting up to us professionals. LOL

Ah, I wondered why your cards show: "Tim Schnautz, PGN"

Professional Gun Nut. Now I know.
--

Ban liars, tax cheats, idiots, audiophools, and narcissists...not guns!